Showing posts with label sarkozy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sarkozy. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

With UK's Andrew Lansley for UN Aid Chief Called Appalling, Herve Ladsous' Story, Dumped on UN Peacekeeping


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, November 26 -- Minutes after the UN announced the departure of Humanitarian Affairs chief Baroness Valerie Amos, Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq if the vacancy will be advertised for candidates from all countries, or if it is set aside for Amos' United Kingdom.

  While Haq insisted that the position is "open to people from any region," transcript below, the disposition of the top jobs in UN Peacekeeping (four Frenchmen in a row) and Political Affairs (two consecutive Americans) indicates otherwise.

  Now from the UK comes word that Prime Minister David Cameron is tapping the man he in July "sacked as Health Secretary and Leader of the House: Andrew Lansley" and "has reportedly refused to come up with two alternative candidates, as requested by the UN Secretary General."

  While the UN refuses to be transparent about this "please submit three candidates" form of limited competition for positions already designated by nationality, it is what happened with UN Peacekeeping, multiple sources have told Inner City Press.

  But even this is often waived. It is UNclear if when B. Lynn Pascoe left as head of the UN Department of Political Affairs, the US put forward anyone beyond Jeffrey Feltman, who has the job.

  For Peacekeeping, as Inner City Press exclusively reported in July 2011, when Alain Le Roy left France put forward three candidates and Ban Ki-moon selected Jerome Bonnafont, then France's ambassador to India.

  After Bonnafont started bragging about having the job, and Inner City Press reported such boast based on sourcing in India and closer, Team Ban decided that Bonnafont was not the team player they were looking for.

  But then president Nicolas Sarkozy, angered, refused to put forward another trio of candidates, instead "dumping" on the UN Herve Ladsous, who had been rejected by Kofi Annan during a previous one-of-three process. Ban Ki-moon accepted these damaged goods, and Ladsous has gone on to cover up rapes by the Congolese Army and now in Darfur, and to openly refuse to answer Press questions,video compilation here, UK New Statesman coverage here.

  How would Lansley be? And how is the UN in such decay? Even for the Secretary General position there was some limited competition

 At a much smaller but not unrelated level, the in-house United Nations Correspondents Association is set to "elect" as president, with no competition, a rarely present Italian scribe Giampaolo Pioli, who tried to censor Press articles about Sri Lanka in his previous tenure, click here for that. Also under Pioli, UNCA was used to try to censor, or censure, Inner City Press' reporting about how Ladsous was foisted on the UN, here.

  One reason the UN is in such decay is that few questions are asked, and even fewer are answered, at the UN. Here's the UN's transcript of what Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq on November 26:

Inner City Press: on the Under-Secretary-General position for OCHA, Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, could describe what the process for recruitment will be in the context that many people say that at least the top three jobs are pretty much assigned by country, for Humanitarian Affairs that was John Holmes and then Amos; the US had [B. Lynn] Pascoe, now Mr. Feltman; that France has had peacekeeping four times in a row.  Is this job going to be put in The Economist?  Are you seeking candidates from any Member State that chooses to step forward, or is it essentially designated for the United Kingdom?

Deputy Spokesman Haq:  The idea that there are spots that are designated is more a popular myth than reality.  As you know, many of the positions that have been said to be earmarked for this or that country have not over time proven to be that way.  There was an idea that Political Affairs was reserved for someone from the United Kingdom.  It hasn’t been that way for quite some time.  There’s been talk of how different agencies are headed by Americans or other nationalities, for example, UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), and over time you see that hasn’t held true.  That’s the case with this position, as well.  We’re seeking applicants from every area.

Inner City Press:  Will it be like in The Economist?  Is there going to be some public process to seek candidates?

Deputy Spokesman Haq:  We are seeking candidates.  We don’t talk so much about the appointment process as it’s in procedure, but certainly it’s open to people from any region.


  We'll stay on this.
  There have been rumblings, noted by Inner City Press, of DPA chief Jeffrey Feltman leaving -- and of the US perhaps trading Political Affairs for Peacekeeping. But that theory seems to have been that US State Department Number Three Wendy Sherman would move up to William Burns' deputy spot, opening her position for the return of Feltman.

  Now that the Obama administration has put Tony Blinken into the State Department Deputy post, as one insider told ICP, “Feltman stays at the UN.”

Even without any double switch, Ladsous is under fire atop DPKO, not only for refusal to answer questions, back to rapes in Minova in DR Congo, but now in Tabit in Darfur as well. 

 Haq, like lead UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric on November 26, would not when Inner City Press asked confirm receipt of a letter, critical of Ladsous' DPKO, from Darfuri groups, here
 Outgoing UN Security Council president Gary Quinlan of Australia not only confirmed receipt of the letter - he circulated it to the other Council members. A press officer of UK mission to the UN told Inner City Press, "I can confirm that we received the letter indirectly." We'll have more on this, and on Amos' work while at the UN, and perhaps reason(s) for leaving, including as, like Lansley, may related to UK politics.
  We might also suggest, if the UN under Ban is to remain so captured by Permanent Members of the Security Council, a more deserving British candidate, in connection with the April 2015 arrival of Matthew Rycroft atop the UK Mission to the UN.
  On November 25, it was Quinlan and not Amos who took question after Amos' briefing on Syria. How much will Amos speak, publicly, before her departure at the end of March? Much, is the hope and goal of the Free UN Coalition for Access. Watch this site.

 
  

Thursday, May 2, 2013

On Syria, Ban's UNscheduled P5 Meeting, Sellstrom on May 3, Popova Evidence?



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 2 -- On Syria, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon met with the Permanent Five members of the Security Council at 10:45 am. 
  But even after noon, the meeting was not on Ban's online public schedule. So Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesperson Martin Nesirky about it. From the UN's transcript:
Spokesperson Nesirky: the Secretary-General invited the ambassadors of the permanent five members of the Security Council to an informal meeting this morning, for discussions on Syria. They discussed possible diplomatic moves to end the crisis. He briefed them on the latest developments relating to the chemical weapons investigation mission. And they also discussed the ever-worsening humanitarian situation inside Syria and the neighboring countries and international efforts to alleviate it. Okay, yes?
Inner City Press: it might seem kind of procedural to you, but I am looking at the appointments of the Secretary-General’s page, and I don’t see that meeting. I understand it may have come up quickly, but is this the type of meeting that normally would be listed? I have been trying and understand what gets listed and what doesn’t get listed.
Spokesperson Nesirky: The first part of your layered question has the answer in it.
Inner City Press: Meaning what? That it came up quickly?
Spokesperson Nesirky: Correct. Next question?
  But the meeting wasn't even put on Ban's online schedule an hour and a half after the meeting took place. Last week, Inner City Press asked Nesirky about Ban meeting former French president (and current investment adviser to Qatar) Nicholas Sarkozy.
  Nesirky didn't answer Inner City Press, but gave the answer to Agence France Presse: Ban met Sarkozy at Ban's UN-provided residence. It was never put on Ban's schedule -- despite Sarkozy's connection with Qatar, which is to say, on Syria.
  Now on May 3, Ban is publicly scheduled to meet his chemical weapons prober Ake Sellstrom at 12:30 pm. Will Sellstrom have considered any of the evidence of Anastasia Popova by then? On May 1 Inner City Press asked Nesirky:
Inner City Press: yesterday, the Russians hosted a Russian State journalist that had been in Syria for some eight months, Anastasia Popova. Among other things, she said that she was in Khan al-Assal just after the attack and interviewed people. So, she said that she is offering this evidence. She said that the Pinheiro panel didn’t want to speak with her, saying that they would only speak first-hand to refugees, but I am wondering whether it is the Secretary-General’s understanding that his probe, if it can’t get into the country, or while it can’t get into the country, is this the type of evidence that they would be willing to take a look at?
Spokesperson Nesirky: The mission is looking at many different kinds of material that is available. And if this journalist, Ms. Papova, has information that she thinks is useful, then she should seek to contact the team. I am sure that she could do that through the Russian Mission. I am sure that that would be feasible. Whether it turns out to be admissible evidence or not is another matter, but there is no reason not to at least make the offer.
Watch this site.

Scoop Update II: After ICP Asks of Sale of Internship AT UN, UN Spins It's Not a UN Internship; Who's RFK "Winner" Aygul?



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 2 -- Yesterday morning Inner City Press published an expose that an internship at the UN was and is being sold, online, for more than $20,000. Then at theMay 1 UN noon briefing, Inner City Press asked the UN to justify that
Inner City Press: people should pay $22,000 to work in the UN, it’s for the UN NGO Committee on Human Rights, for six weeks. They are auctioning it off openly to benefit something called the RFK Young Leaders Foundation. It says, you’ll learn how the UN really works.... I have written an article about it... I am wondering if the UN is comfortable with positions inside the building being sold for money online.
Spokesperson Nesirky: I’ll have to look into that; I am not aware of that particular unusual story, Matthew. [Video here, at 13:42]
  Nearly eight hours later after some others jumped on that story if only on Twitter, some far away giving credit or hat tips and some closer at hand troublingly not, the UN sent Inner City Press this answer:
Subject: Re: Your question today
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:53 PM
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Internships at the United Nations are not for sale and cannot be put up for auction. We are trying to find out the details of how this came about and have contacted 'charitybuzz.com'
Inner City Press immediately published this answer, in a second story noting that it had asked the RFK Center's Sierra Ewert:
"I am a journalist who covers the UN; this morning I wrote a story, then asked the UN a question, about the RFK Center's RFK Young Leaders role in the auctioning off of a "UN internship" for over $20,000 on CharityBuzz.com. I want to ask you, on deadline, what the RFK Center's knowledge of, involvement in, and position on this auctioning off of an internship at the UN is. Please respond ASAP."
  The RFK Center has yet to respond; some have come to its defense, or to the defense of Bruce Knotts. But is that the point?  Inner City Press put in other requests for comment.
   For what it's worth, the bidding started at $500 then got into a contest between "m.alam" and "Aygul," with the latter the interim (Young?) leader at $22,000.
  The UN, after publication of Inner City Press' second story, sent a "further to" clarification:
"Further to the earlier email, just to add that we do not believe that the internship in question is a UN internship. As mentioned, we are trying to establish the details of this case and have contacted 'charitybuzz.com.'"
  It was at this point, using precisely this "further to" language from Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson's office, that another slowly came to the story. How did it happen? 
 What was the role of the spokesperson's office, which just last week didn't answer Inner City Press' April 25 noon briefing question about Ban meeting with former French president (and now investment adviser for Qatar) Nicolas Sarkozy -- then gave the answer to Agence France Presse? There is a growing pattern of this.
  The auctioned internship story has hit a nerve given the parallel debate about the ethics of unpaid internships; some have become aware of it through that world, and that's good. But in the smaller world of those who cover the UN, there are troubling developments on which we have also put in questions. In the UN fUN-house it is "World Press Freedom Day;" one would expect answers. Watch this site.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Syria Says UN's Ban Got Pressured April 4-5, Calls GA Draft War Declaration



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 30 -- When Syria Permanent Representative Bashar Ja'afari held a press conference Tuesday morning, it went over an hour. 
  He took questions, unlike Ban Ki-moon the day before, including from stations like Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera, and Voice of America which is run by the US State Department.
  After those, Inner City Press asked Ja'afari what he thought Secretary General Ban Ki-moon did between April 4, when Ja'afari said he had a deal with the UN's Angela Kane to inspect in Khan al Asal near Aleppo, and April 5 when Ban "went back on the deal."
  Ja'afari mused that either Ban got calls or MADE calls, and then went back on the deal. He called on the UN Secretariat to not be "part of this campaign against Syria."
  While Ban didn't take any question on April 29 -- and when the Free UN Coalition for Access complained, the UN's Stephane Dujarric said press "presence is not mandatory" -- one still wants to know what Ban did between April 4 and April 5. 
  Isn't that the purpose of a "public schedule" of the type Ban puts, or purports to put, online? (He did not list his April 26 "private" meeting with Sarkozy.)
First clue: as Inner City Press asked Ja'afari who'd said Ban was in The Hague, Ban was in fact in Madrid for this "Chief Executives Board" meeting.
  Inner City Press also asked Ja'afari about the pending UN General Assembly draft resolution, the fouth revision of which Inner City Press obtained and exclusively published earlier on Tuesday.
You are right there is a Rev 4, Ja'afari said, adding his prediction that they will have to go to a "Rev 10," because it is a declaration of war. He called Qatar, the first sponsor or drafter, a puppet, and said the goal is a follow up resolution to take Syria's UN seat and give it to the external, extremist opposition.
After more than an hour, Ja'afari stopped. Some said he'd started stronger or more logically than he finished with quotes from Winston Churchill about using chemical weapons on "uncivilized tribes" in Iraq, French nuclear tests in Algeria, Italian chemical weapons use in Libya. What about Guantanamo? Watch this site.

Friday, April 26, 2013

On Madagascar, UN Is Asked of Bans on Lalao Ravalomanana, Says Nothing






By Matthew Russell Lee


UNITED NATIONS, April 26 -- The UN had said it cared about Madagascar, but as with so many things it was not true, or there was no follow through.

On April 26 at noon, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky:

Inner City Press: About Lalao Ravalomanana, the wife of the Marc Ravalomanana, she returned to the country in March, apparently she was asked to commit to the Government of [Andry] Rajoelina that she wouldn’t make any political statements as a condition of returning and visiting her ailing mother. Now, she is announcing that she is going to run for President, so a lot of people saying, since the UN has had some involvement in this, what did the UN think of this condition on her return, and do they believe that she has an absolute right to make political statements and to run for office? What’s their position on this growing crisis as some call it?

Spokesperson Nesirky: I’ll check. I don’t think we have any immediate position on that, but I’ll certainly check for you, Matthew.

  But seven hours later there was no response. It's not that the Department of Political Affairs wasn't working -- as Inner City Press reported, DPA met with the Western European and Other Group, which then met with Qatar about its Syria resolution. (Spoiler alert: WEOG sources tell Inner City Press they demanded changes to an Operative Paragraph.) 

  But no response on Madagascar from DPA or Ban's office.

  Back in May 2012, the UN was partnering with Rajoelina's Ministry of Communication to celebrate World Press Freedom Day in Madagascar. On this same day Reporters without Borders directly criticized the Minister of Communication for threatening to shut down Radio Free FMand for his part in the detention of 2 Free FM journalists.
  Then after evidence of abuse including gang rape and the burning of twenty-some villages in southern Madagascar emerged, the transitional prime minister -- whose place Rajoelina now reportedly seeks to take until he runs again in 2018 -- said an investigation would be launched. But has it?
  Sources tell Inner City Press that Rajoelina's agenda may be to seek Ban's support to change the order of elections to have legislative elections happen on May 8 rather than presidential elections. 
  Now that Rajoelina has given in to pressure and declared himself out of the running for president, there is publicspeculation that he wants to set up a stand-in to run for president in 2013 with Rajoelina as Prime Minister, then Rajoelina runs for president in 2018. Rajoelina has already declared his candidacy for 2018.
   France has publicly stated that it may support a candidate in Madagascar’s upcoming presidential election ("si nous encourageons une candidature, ce sera aussi discrètement que possible"). 
  Perhaps as part of this support, the new French ambassador recently declared that ousted-president Ravalomanana should not be allowed to return to his country before the election. 
  So France favors forced exile counter to Article 20 of the SADC roadmap for a way out of the crisis which states that Ravalomanana should be allowed to return to his country unconditionally. Vive la France. Regardez cette site.

After Ban Ki-moon Spokesperson Nesirky Won't Tell ICP of Sarkozy Meeting, He Tells AFP, Calls It "Private"






By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, April 26 -- How secret and selective has the UN become? On April 25, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner City Press: it is reported that former President Nicolas Sarkozy will meet with Ban Ki-moon today. This was something said by his entourage... I looked at his schedule; it’s not there. Are we missing something or are they misinformed that Mr. Sarkozy will be meeting with Ban Ki-moon?
Spokesperson Nesirky: I will check for you, I am not aware of anything happening today. I will check for you.
Then Inner City Press heard nothing back from Nesirky. Ban Ki-moon's schedule for April 26, when it was put online, did not mention any meeting with Sarkozy.
But at noon on April 26, Nesirky told Agence France Presse that yes, Ban would be meeting with Sarkozy.
Inner City Press asked why it was not listed on Ban's schedule, and why it was not told, since it asked the question 24 hours before.
Nesirky's response was that the meeting is “private” -- how many “private” political meeting does Ban Ki-moon have? 

  Sarkozy's team say the meeting will "evoke the principal international subjects." That's private? Sarkozy is now involved in investing money for Qatar - which has its own principle international subjects...

Then Nesirky said that since Inner City Press had asked about April 25, it was fine not to answer and say the meeting would be April 26. Is that fine? The Free UN Coalition for Access says no. Watch this site.

Thursday, April 4, 2013

On Mali at Columbia, Nameless Discussion of Colonialism & Other Big Issues Under Outdate Chatham House Rules Superseded by Social Media



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 2 -- On Mali there was an event at Columbia University Tuesday night, advertised as “free and open to the public, but please register by writing.” So Inner City Press did, identifying itself as the Press, listing its office at the UN.
  Columbia's Stephen Wertheim, the last name you'll see in this piece, wrote back, “You are now registered for the talk, which starts at 7:30 pm. We look forward to seeing you there.”
  After that, notice of the event was further publicized on the website of the Free UN Coalition for Access, as still is another event at the UN this Thursday.
  After a final story about the day's Arms Trade Treaty vote in the UN General Assembly, Inner City Press arrived at the event. There were twenty to twenty five people, of all ages -- and all nameless here.
  After a lengthy speech and two social media missives, as the question and answer began, the moderator suddenly said -- and we'll paraphrase and not quote here -- that he should have said so from the beginning, this would be under Chatham House rules, you can use the idea but no quote.
  And so what were the ideas?
That the media focuses too much on the military offensive, which one participant called the kinetic aspect.
That there is a lot of corruption even in the south of Mali.
That the Malian military commits human rights violations, and that the UN does not have the resources to have a crew of human rights observers ready to go there.
That the UN will soon name a Special Representative of the Secretary General.
That the Malian press is reporting rumors of relations of Nicolas Sarkozy and the MNLA. (Inner City Press has been more focused on Sarkozy's hardly concealed try out to help invest Qatar's money, with his contacts in the center-right government in Spain.)
That the Security Council implicitly endorsed the French approach.
Inner City Press, which is surely free to report its own questions but apparently not the answers, asked if the envisioned “parallel force” would be under UN control; if coup leader Amadou Sanogo will continue to play a role in the Malian military, and how the fast action to defend Bamako differed from the decision to let Bagui in the Central African Republic fall.
  There was a response to each question, but how to report the answers under the spirit of the Chatham House rules inot clear. 
 As Inner City Press left it was told, despite the language of the invitation and its RSVP as the Press, that it is somehow understood that events in the university are under Chatham House rules.
  No, that is not automatically understood. People give on the record speeches at universities. In fact, since students have Facebook pages and blogs and, yes, Twitter accounts, it is entirely unclear what restriction on a class or seminar would look like, or how they could work.
  Nevertheless, Inner City Press has complied with the belatedly announced Chatham House rules. Who is served? The Security Council hears Wednesday on Mali. Watch this site.
Footnote: the UN office that Inner City Press listed on its RSVP has, as we've noted, been raided by the UN and others on March 18. We'll have more on this.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

On Libya, UK Concerned By Isolation Law, Zeidan's Link With Sarkozy, Qatar Sovereign Wealth Fund?



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 14 -- After the UN Security Council relaxed its arms embargo on Libya, even as the spread of weapons from Libya continues to reverberate from Mali to Syria, UK Permanent Representative Mark Lyall Grant came out to take questions.

  Inner City Press asked Lyall Grant what it has already posed, without yet response, to his new “#DigitalDiplomacy"(and as noted by another from way down in ChileWest Ham) twitter account: what the UK's position on the draft Isolation Law.” From the UK Mission's transcript:

Inner City Press: What does the UK think of the proposed Political Isolation Law in Libya and there’s been attacks on the media for reporting on it. Do you think it’s a good idea going forward to bar anyone that had a position in the Gaddafi government from future government service?

Mark Lyall Grant: Obviously that is an issue that we’re watching very closely. It is for the National General Congress to decide what legislation they adopt for the future political dispensation in Libya, but from our point of view, it is very important that this should be an inclusive process, and yes there should be accountability for past crimes, particularly those committed under the Gaddafi regime. But at the same time it is very important that all groups are included in the political dispensation of Libya, so it is fair to say that we do have some concerns about the Isolation Law, in as much of the text that we have seen of it.

Alright, then. Also at the Security Council on Thursday was Libyan Prime Minister Ali Zeidan. On Tuesday he was in DC for a private lunch “co-hosted by the Business Council for International Understanding.” The invitation said he “is credited as having played a key role in persuading French President Nicolas Sarkozy to support the anti-Gaddafi forces.”

Now Sarkozy is said to be offered a $500 million hedge fund to run, by Qatar's Sovereign Wealth Fund. One wag asks: is Sarko bullish on jihad? Watch this site.

Monday, December 24, 2012

UN Peacekeeping's Ladsous Fiddles As Copter Burns, Offers Photos Only to Western Wires, Hurts DPKO



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 23 -- The UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations is headed by a former spokesman for the French ministry of foreign affairs, but its professionalism, transparency and credibility have plummeted in the second half of 2012 under Herve Ladsous.

  Most recently on December 21, minutes after the Security Council issued a press statement condemning the shooting down of a DPKO helicopter by South Sudan, killing four Russian crew members, DPKO's spokesman Andre-Michel Essoungou e-mailed out "an interactive timeline to look back at the milestones of 2012. We’d be grateful if you could have a look."

  Three days earlier at the direction of Herve Ladsous, Essoungou seized the boom microphone at the UN Television stakeout, to prevent questions to Ladsous about mass rapes by DPKO's partners in the Congolese Army, and Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's supposed Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. Video here.

  This was called outrageous by many in the UN, including in the Security Council, but despite complaints the UN has yet to act.

  The problem is that no one dares tell Ladsous to do his job, since the post belongs to France and outgoing French president Nicolas Sarkozy dumped Ladsous into the job as a last minute replacement for Jerome Bonnafont, after Ladsous had been rejected by previous Secretary General Kofi Annan.

  Ladsous openly favors the French, including also giving advance notice and questions to Agence France-Presse, on one of the boards of which Ladsous used to serve. Under Ladsous, DPKO despite its use of South Asian peacekeepers and Russian pilots has become fixated on Western wire services.

  Consider this UNPeacekeeping tweet, of photographs of Wau in South Sudan:

RT "@UNPeacekeeping: Photos: Protecting civilians in #Wau #SouthSudan http://ow.ly/geR6i For use in publication @washingtonpost @afp @ap @reuters @bw"

  Even if this doesn't mean what to some it seemed like -- that Ladsous' DPKO was offering photos only to these five Western media including AFP -- the choice of these five shows the bias and non-UN thinking of Ladsous' DPKO. So did Ladsous taking two of the five listed above into the hallway on November 27, to avoid questions about the Congolese Army rapes in Minova, video here.

   Substantively, Ladsous' refusal to answer Press questions since late May, when he sought take advantage of anti-Press moves that has begun in September 2011 by AFP, ironically about coverage of Ladsous being the last minute replacement for Bonnafont, has hurt the Ban Ki-moon administration, for example leaving Ban's Human Rights Due Diligence Policy unexplained and not credible.

   But who would replace Bonnafont? The way the UN works, one thinks it could only be the French. Watch this site.