Showing posts with label Paul Seger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Seger. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

To UN Human Rights Council Candidates, Inner City Press Asks of Sri Lanka, Free Press & Covered-Up Child Rapes in CAR



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 15 -- When countries running for seats on the UN Human Rights Council appeared in the ECOSOC Chamber to take questions on July 15, it was a staffer from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights who moderated. Inner City Press ran to the room to asked questions; not called on, it tweeted this question: on OHCHR cover-up of child rapes in the Central African Republic, what's the HRC oversight role?

   When that question was read out, Switzerland's Ambassador Paul Seger said the issue had injured the reputation of the UN and OHCHR and that the Human Rights Council might have to take it up, once Ban Ki-moon's “independent” panel issues its report, due in mid-September. Slovenia and Georgia also responded.

  In the interim, Inner City Press ran to the ECOSOC Chamber a second time, from the Security Council stakeout, and asked about the the delay in the report on Sri Lanka, due in March, to September, and about freedom of the press, specifically but not only in South Korea. Video here.

   Seger said the UN was not at its best on Sri Lanka; South Korea argued that press freedom is only abridged for national security. (One wonders.)  Georgia also responded on press freedoms; Inner City Press was thus glad to have asked the question for the Free UN Coalition for Access, FUNCA.

  The exercise on July 15 was on balance a good one, and leads one to wonder again why at least this, if not direct debate, is not possible or even required in the race for the next Secretary General. We'll have more on this.



 
  

Friday, May 15, 2015

Exclusive: On Burundi, UN Is Asked Why Ban Ki-moon Has Been So Slow in Closed Door Meeting by Tanzania; Of EU, US & Contingent Owned Equipment Funds


By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive
UNITED NATIONS, May 15 -- When the UN Peacebuilding Configuration on Burundi held a closed meeting on May 15, Burundi's ambassador began by saying that almost all of the coup plotters have been arrested.
   Minutes later, Inner City Press is exclusively informed, Tanzania's Ambassador asked the UN's head of Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman why the UN and Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had been so slow to condemn the coup.
   Inner City Press put the question to Ban's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq at the UN's public noon briefing on May 15, to give the UN a change to publicly explain. 
  But as on a scandal about Ban and his nephew being reported on here by Inner City Press and media in Vietnam and South Korea, where Ban Ki-moon is headed, Haq response was essentially that the UN is good, that is does not need to explain (in the case of Ban's nephew) or should be presumed to be always deeply engaged and deeply concerned. Some simply don't believe that.
   While Haq at the May 15 noon briefing said that Ban, who has yet to speak with Nkurunziza, spoke with Kenya's President Kenyatta, Inner City Press is informed that in the closed Peacebuilding Configuration meeting it was said that Ban called Rwanda's Paul Kagame as well. If so, why didn't Haq say that? (Click here for another exclusive story about Ban's office not disclosing Ban's call with US John Kerry about Yemen).
  Much of the Peacebuilding Configuration meeting involved indirect criticism of the European Union for getting “too involved” in Burundi's constitution, followed by a proposal that the Configuration should issue a statement on Burundi. 
 The US, Inner City Press is informed, expressed opposition or skepticism of the latter; a draft should still be circulated by the configuration chair, Swiss Ambassador Paul Seger, but it can be blocked by one member.
  France, Inner City Press is informed -- that Mission responds to but does not answer its questions -- said that the Security Council spoke and that those (mere) Elements to the Press remain as valid today as the day before.
  The EU for its part said it is in discussions with the African Union about a human rights mission to Burundi. After the meeting, some expressed doubt to Inner City Press this will ever happen; at the noon briefing Inner City Press asked Haq if the UN would participate and was told that the UN has other more mediate focus right now.
  While Haq did not deliver the UN's best defense, in fairness Inner City Press will: it could say it was waiting for the East African Community and African Union to speak first, which the US - which quickly condemned the coup, even after criticism the possible third term - and EU don't have to consider, as much.
  Feltman was asked if the US has better intelligence than the UN (he should know, having been with the US State Department). Of course, Feltman is said to have replied, the US has intelligence that works and the UN does not.
   Some in the meeting, including Brazil, said that uncoordinated statements can enflame. In this case, Inner City Press or the Free UN Coalition for Access would say it is good to have a configuration, so to speak, other than the Security Council which can speak. Watch this site.
Footnotes: as Inner City Press tweeted, the US pulled out non-essential personnel (Haq wouldn't confirm UN actions), and also the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights said Pierre-Claver Mbonimpa has gone into hiding, under death threats.
As Inner City Press reported yesterday, along with theresponse it got on Burundi from the International Monetary Fund, it has been exclusively informed of some $9 million in UN Peacekeeping “Contingent Owned Equipment” funds about which doubts are being raised. We'll have more on this.

 
  

Monday, May 11, 2015

Amid Burundi Crackdown, Questions From Some at UN, US Travel Warning Says More Grenades, But "Usually Not Directed Against Foreigners"


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 11, with video -- Amid protests and crackdown after Pierre Nkurunziza was nominated to run for a third term as President in seeming violation of the Arusha Peace Accord, on May 11 the UN Peacebuilding Configuration for Burundi met and sought answers from Burundi's minister by video.
  Asking questions were Swiss Permanent Representative Paul Seger and his counterparts from Belgium and Tanzania, Ambassador Manongi, as well as the UK's Deputy Permanent Representative Peter Wilson. France, the penholder on Burundi in the UN Security Council, did not send its Permanent Representative Francois Delattre nor his Deputy Alexis Lamek.
  Questions were raised about the armed youth wing, the crackdown on media, the outward flows of refugees. The responses were generally dismissive -- Wilson wondered aloud at the disparity between the Minister's denials on the youth wing and all other available information -- and on press freedom, troubling. Media is political, the minister said, justifying the crackdown.
 But what will come next? Later on May 11, the US issued a travel warning on Burundi saying among other things that "Armed groups operate in Burundi... Exchanges of gunfire and grenade attacks have increased but are usually not directed at foreigners." It's that kind of thinking that the ruling party seems to be counting on. Watch this site.
Inner City Press on May 8 asked Tanzanian President Kikwete what his country and the East African Community are trying to do. Video here.
 Kikwete, at the UN for a press conference about the High Level Panel on Global Response to Health Crises, told Inner City Press to ask him about Burundi after the press conference. Inner City Press did, specifically if the EAC will be opining on if a third term would violate the Arusha Agreements or pose regional threats.
  "Be patient," was Kikwete's response, saying that the foreign ministers who visited Burundi will report back on May 13. We will cover that at that time.

  During the press conference, Kikwete dealt with aplomb when UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq called him the "former president" of Tanzania. There were a number of "formers" (and "futures") on the panel, but Kikwete is current.
   Moments after Kikwete's and the panel's press conference, the UN Security Council issued "elements to the press" which "called upon all parties to refrain from violence and to prioritize Burundi’s peace and stability through the current political dialogue and also to achieve their needs through legal and peaceful means. They stressed the need to hold a credible, transparent, inclusive and peaceful electoral process."
 Inner City Press asked the Security Council's president for May  Raimonda Murmokaite of Lithuania how the third term was discussed in the Council's closed meeting. She replied that individual members did express their views on the third term but it was not really the essence of the discussion.  We'll have more on this.
  Inner City Press has asked the UN about Burundi, most recently on May 4 and 5 and now May 6, below. Now it's said the UN's Said Djinnit will belatedly brief the Security Council on May 7 - we'll be there.
  On May 6, Inner City Press asked the UN, " I don't know if you have an update on Burundi?"
  Moments later, beyond an if-asked, a statement was handed to UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq, who answered Inner City Press with this:
"Regarding Burundi, after a plenary session yesterday, Burundian stakeholders continued the political dialogue.  Our Special Envoy for the Great Lakes region, Said Djinnit, is facilitating work in smaller committees.  The objective of the dialogue remains to seek common grounds for creating conditions for the holding of peaceful, inclusive, and credible elections in Burundi.  Meanwhile, we welcome the arrival in Bujumbura of the foreign ministers of the East African community, and we look forward to working closely with the region on this."
  The UN is relentlessly upbeat - and marginalized. Watch this site.
 On May 4, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric:
Inner City Press: On Burundi, I want to know if you have any statement on the violence in the capital in which at least two people have been killed today protesting the third-term run of the President?

Spokesman Dujurric:  Sure, we continue to follow the events in Burundi with great concern and deplore the loss of lives and injuries as well as the destruction of property that we've seen.  We reiterate our calls to all the parties to reject violence, exercise maximum restraint, and avoid using inflammatory language, as well as to take the necessary appeasement measures to create conditions for dialogue.  In this regard, the UN mission on the ground, MENUB, has been encouraging all stakeholders to seize the opportunities of the dialogue that is organized by the Ministry of Interior with the support of the UN on 5 and 6 May.  That is tomorrow and Wednesday.  And we trust that stakeholders will see and build on this dialogue as an opportunity to defuse tensions and seek common grounds for creating conditions for the holding of peaceful, inclusive, and credible elections in Burundi.
 Later on May 4, Ban Ki-moon met with Uganda's Yoweri Museveni, but no UN read-out was issued. On May 5, Inner City Press asked for this, and about the judge who fled the country amid death threats. Video here.

 
  

Monday, July 22, 2013

Burundi Notes Belgium Had No Government For a Year, UN UNreformed


By Matthew Russell Lee
 UNITED NATIONS, July 22 -- The Security Council tables were turned on Monday morning, when the Ambassador of Burundi began his speech with the fact that former colonial powerhouse Belgium was without a government for more than a year.
  He then mocked those to whom "good government is so dear," citing a proverb from another colonialist, France: "An empty stomach has no ears."
  On the other end of the spectrum, after the chair of the UN Peacebuilding configuration Paul Seger of Switzerland spoke in the open meeting, he like Burundi was not allowed into the Security Council's consultation.
  These exclusions are one of the reforms proposed by the new ACT grouping, and the Small Five before it. Seger stopped and told Inner City Press that, along with lines of another saying about Mohamed and the mountain, he had invited Security Council members to consult with him on Friday, and they did. But at what level?
  Seger was in Burundi from June 24 to 28, and among other things as regards the International Monetary Fund said, "both the Burundian authorities and the donors consider the socio-economic situation to be difficult, although the two sides do not necessarily have the same interpretation of the causes of this fragility. The recent mission by the International Monetary Fund summed up the main challenges well. I strongly encourage the government to follow its recommendations."
  There were four then one then no media in front of the Security Council -- the Conference Building wi-fi seems not to work, beyond the lack of the media worktable that existed in front of the Security Council before and during the Capital Master Plan renovation. To return to Seger's speech, while the IMF tends to try to make things easier for journalists to cover it, the opposite may be the trend at the UN. The Free UN Coalition for Access has asked why. Watch this site.

 
  

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Ten Swiss Years in UN Spin HRC & Sanctions Reforms, Going Big in Small Five

 

By Matthew Russell Lee, Review

UNITED NATIONS, September 4 -- Switzerland joined the UN ten years ago, and its UN Mission website presents it as an unmitigated success. But closer examination finds that some of its claimed impacted, on and of the UN, are more ambiguous than presented.

Switzerland makes much of the Geneva-based Human Rights Council. But just this month, Sudan's candidacy for the HRC while its president has been indicted for genocide by the ICC has drawn fire. Word has been, for Sudan to drop out, it will get a quiet commitment for lighter treatment by the HRC.

Last week on August 30, Inner City Press asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's Associate Spokesman Farhan Haq about the efficacy of any challenge to the Secretariat to Sudan's candidacy:

Inner City Press: there's a letter that was sent to Patricia O’Brien about Sudan’s candidacy for the Human Rights Council. It’s been publicly announced; I don’t know if the UN has received it. And also, does the Secretariat have any role in ruling on the eligibility of countries to run in elections for the Human Rights Council?

Associate Spokesperson Farhan Haq: Well, certainly, Member States can request our expertise, our legal expertise, on points of order if they choose to do so. In this case, though, the question of membership in the Human Rights Council is up to the Member States, as it properly is, and we will leave it in their hands how to handle this issue.

Now, amid claims by some it vindicates the HRC, Sudan is backing out. But in exchange for what? Sudan's National Congress Party's secretary of organizations Adil Awad on September 2 said he now expects Sudan to be relieved of monitoring by a special rapporteur...

On the positive side, Switzerland's (increasingly leadership, and lonely) role in the so-called Small Five for reform of the Security Council's working methods stands out.

Their draft resolution was withdrawn, but Ambassador Seger seems committed to press forward, bringing a legal approach too rare in the UN. Seger insists, correctly, on more participation in the Security Council as head of a Peacebuilding Commission configuration. Seger's predecessor Peter Maurer now heads the ICRC and is headed to Syia.

On the other hand it was unfortunate that Nicolas Michel, while serving at the UN's top lawyer, also accepted Swiss payments for his housing, in violation of the UN charter and rules, as exposed by Inner City Press.

And Joseph Deiss, while he was PGA, was only halting in disclosing who paid for his housing and travel. For a PGA, it is legal to take from one's country. But Deiss appeared to deny it, when Inner City Press first raised it.

The ombudsperson of the Al Qaeda Sanctions committee was something of a good reform. But recently, for example, the reform proved illusory. A person removed from the Al Qaeda list, businessman Jim'ale, was then just put on the Somalia / Eritrea sanctions list.
Switzerland is in the position to critique and even reform these things. We'll be watching.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

UN Reform Withdrawn by Swiss After Letter of Ban's Lawyer, Who Won't Speak

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 16 -- Less than three hours after he withdrew the Small Five draft resolution on Security Council working methods, Swiss Ambassador Seger told Inner City Press that the letter by UN Legal Adviser Patricia O'Brien that led to the withdrawal was "wrong," but that the President of the General Assembly had let it be known that he would express support for the letter.

  In his withdrawal speech, both as prepared and delivered, Seger criticized "legal arguments according to which our resolution should be submitted to a qualified majority of all member States under resolution 53/30 which we find, with all due respect, utterly wrong and biased."

  Inner City Press obtained the O'Brien letter and exclusively published it May 15; Seger on May 16 referred to it being leaked to the press. But it should have been public.

  At Wednesday's noon briefing, Inner City Press asked the spokesman for Secretary General Ban Ki-moon if Ban agrees with his lawyer's ruling. The spokesman, Martin Nesirky, said that since the resolution was withdrawn there was no reason to answer. 
 
  Inner City Press asked again that Patricia O'Brien hold a press availability to answer questions, now that she had issued a legal opinion not only to Ban but all 193 member states. Nesirky said such a briefing is "unlikely," for the reason he previously said. But now O'Brien has impacted a major UN reform issue: is there no accountability?

  Ban Ki-moon talks about transparency, but O'Brien never takes press questions. Ban's more recent hire, top Peacekeeper Herve Ladsous, never answers questions, unlike for example Kofi Annan's top Peacekeeper Jean-Marie Guehenno.

  Ban talks about reform, but blocks it. Here his top lawyer rules for a two-third General Assembly vote for a reform he disfavors, when for his half-baked "Change Management" Ban wanted to proceed without any GA vote at all, until the Group of 77 slapped him down. Some reformer.

  Ban main reform has been the five year mobility rule, now renamed the "rotation" rule. Inner City Press asked on Wednesday if it applies to Patricia O'Brien and later this arrived:

Subject: Patricia O'Brien
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com

Regarding Patricia O'Brien, her term started in 2008. Please see below:

6 August 2008 Secretary-General SG/A/1147 BIO/4002

SECRETARY-GENERAL APPOINTS PATRICIA O’BRIEN OF IRELAND AS UNDER-SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR LEGAL AFFAIRS AND UNITED NATIONS LEGAL COUNSEL

United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has appointed Patricia O’Brien of Ireland as Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs and United Nations Legal Counsel. Ms. O'Brien, the first woman in this position in the history of the United Nations, will replace Nicolas Michel.

  Note that Michel, whatever other issues, at least held press conferences. So, O'Brien until August 8, 2013? And now Q&A or accountability until then? Watch this site.

Footnote: Ambassador Seger recounted how after he briefed the Security Council as head of the Burundi Peacebuilding Configuration he was not allowed into consultations.

  Inner City Press suggested, ask for an Arria formula meeting, like was held on Guinea Bissau. There, Brazil's Ambassador who heads the PBC on Guinea Bissau pressed to get admitted. It shouldn't be required every time, fine -- but if it is, why not press?

Saturday, September 17, 2011

If Palestine Wins UN Observer State Status, Joining ICC to Refer Israel Would Go Through Ban Ki-moon, No Presser in 3 Months

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, September 6 -- What's at stake if Palestine in the UN General Assembly seeks enhanced Observer State status? One thing is Palestine's possible membership in the International Criminal Court and the ability to refer to the ICC alleged crimes committed by Israel in Gaza and the West Bank.

The legal adviser of a large European state highlighted this to Inner City Press, predicting that once the Palestinians won Observer State status with 130 or so votes, they would file a request to become party to the ICC's Rome Statute with UN Security General's top lawyer, Patricia O'Brien.

It was said that while O'Brien might want otherwise, ICC membership for "States" is straightforward even if they are not members of the UN, as Switzerland until recently was not.

Inner City Press on September 6 asked Switzerland's Permanent Representative to the UN Paul Seger if Palestine would be able to join the ICC if granted Observer State status.

Seger replied with a series of questions: "Does that automatically then allow Palestine to become a member of an international treaty? Each treaty has its own conditions and prerogatives for joining such an instrument. It is up to the member states of each international instrument to decide whether or not the conidtions are met to become a party of that treaty."

Seger turned and asked a Swiss mission staffer, "In case of ICC, who is the depository?"

The Swiss staffer replied, "The Secretary General."

Seger concluded, "So it will be the S-G who will determine whether or not Palestine is qualified to join that."

Ban Ki-moon has not held a sit-down question and answer session with the press at UN headquarters for some time -- despite a commitment to do them at least monthly, the last one appears to be a full three months ago, on June 6.

When Ban held a stakeout upon gaining a second term, his spokesman went out of his way to call on the UN's own radio station for a softball question. In stakeout's since, he and his team have excluded obvious tough questions.

Ban's top lawyer Patricia O'Brien has denied several requests to come and give a briefing. It is not in substance a hypothetical question: what will Ban's UN do? Watch this site.