Showing posts with label house of cards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label house of cards. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Amid Talk of Palestine Drafts, Of House of Cards & Rights of Reply


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 21 -- The UN Security Council's quarterly open debate on the Middle East and Palestine ended with right of reply statements by Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia (whose Deputy Permanent Representative slammed both Israel and Syria).
 In the opening statements, the State of Palestine's Deputy Permanent Observer Feda Abdelhady Nasser included in her speech a reiteration of the PLO's neutrality in Syria. Israel's Ron Prosor, among many citations, brought up Frank Underwood of Netflix' House of Cards.
  Jordan's Nasser Judeh, shifting into English, replied to Prosor about "all the TV shows you watch." Then among Security Council member states, both France and New Zealand spoke of draft resolutions to set parameters and get talks re-started.
  Some wondered how the US Administration's interest in the P5+1 talks might impact its position on such a resolution. On that, we'll have more.
 Back on April 6 amid news that ISIS has taken over most of the UN's Yarmouk camp for Palestinian refugees in Syria, the UN Security Council scheduled an urgent meeting on April 6 at 11:30 am, to get a briefing by video from Pierre Krähenbühl, the Commissioner General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, UNRWA.
   Inner City Press arrived early, and saw going into the Council the UN's head of Political Affairs, Jeffrey Feltman. The State of Palestine's Permanent Observer to the UN Riyad Mansour spoke outside the Security Council, saying “we are concerned about the safety and well-being of our people,  About 2000 were able to run to safety away from the camp on their own. We hope that the Security Council will adopt a position to secure a safety passage through UN agencies to save and protect the 16,000 now in the refugee camp and we hope that all countries will help in securing this objective of safety passage, security passage and for the refugees to be safe.”
  Inner City Press asked Mansour whether he expects a Security Council resolution on the question of Palestine this month. He answered -- video here -- always ready, but that the key is the political will to implement such a resolution. He said that the independence of Palestine would eliminate sixty to seventy percent of extremist recruitment in the Middle East.
  Later, Inner City Press asked UNRWA's Krähenbühl if UNRWA is in contact with ISIS (no) and who he thinks might influence them. His reply -- video here -- cited the “broad spectrum” including of religious leaders. 
 Inner City Press asked where the displaced refugees have gone. He said there are an additional 44,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, not all from Yarmouk. Overall, he said that of 560,000 Palestinians in Syria before, now 460 to 470,000 remain, with half of them having been displaced.
  The Security Council agreed to what's called “Elements to the Press,” which the Council's president for April Dina Kawar of Jordan read out; here's the hard copy, which Inner City Press tweeted in real time:
"The members of the Security Council expressed deep concern regarding the grave situation in the Yarmouk refugee camp in Syria.
The members condemned in the strongest terms the grave crimes committed by Daesh and Jabhet al Nusra against 18,000 civilians in the camp and emphasized the need that such crimes do not go unpunished.
The members called for the protection of civilians in the camp, for ensuring humanitarian access to the area including by providing life-saving assistance, and ensure safe passage and evacuation of the civilians.
The members welcomed UNRWA's efforts in protecting and assisting Palestinian refugees and the need for providing UNRWA with the necessary resources to carry out its mandate in Syria, provide providing the necessary life-saving assistance and evacuate civilians.
 The members reminded all parties of their obligations to work toward the safety, security and protections of the civilians in the camp.
The members called on all parties to immediately implement the relevant Security Council resolutions including SCRs 2139, 2165 and 2191 and in line with the international humanitarian law.
The members recalled SCR 2139 which inter alia calls upon all parties to lift the siege of populated areas, demands all parties allow delivery of humanitarian access and enable rapid, safe and unhindered evacuation of civilians.
The members will look into further measures that can be taken to help in providing the necessary protection and assistance."


 
  

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

French Mission on Twitter Answers 1 of 4 Questions, Gao Report Up to UNSG, Silence on Haiti, Sale of UN Posts, Approval of Hillary Clinton's UNSC Stakeout


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, March 11 -- When the French Mission to the UN solicited questions on Twitter for its spokesman and political coordinator, Inner City Press submitted four questions, one of them days in advance to increase the odds of it being answered.
 In fairness, one of the four questions was responded to: Inner City Press asked (as it has before) "Will the report on MINUSMA shooting at demonstrators in Gao, Mali, go to UNSC and be made public? If not, why not?"
 To this the French Mission to the UN replied, "Gao report was commissioned by UNSG. He will examine it and decide on the next steps #FrPrez."
 Inner City Press asked a follow up -- "Is France concerned to see & act on report?" -- but this has yet to be answered. The analogy might be to report(s) on Darfur, which the Security Council does see and discuss, at least under other Presidencies.
  Not discussed or answered is the UN Peacekeeping mission in Haiti introducing cholera to the island and the ongoing impunity and lack of accountability to victims. Inner City Press asked the French mission about it, without answer.
 A newer arising issue was whether as the UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric answered earlier on March 11 the French Mission OK-ed the use of the Security Council televised stakeout for a 20 minute appearance on March 10 by Hillary Clinton to answer hand-picked questions about her privatized emails. Video here. This question was not answered either.
  Another questioner asked or opined about Saudi Arabia funding Islamic State or Daesh -- no answer, even more expected than usual given Suadi Arabia's recall of its Ambassador to Sweden for talking about its human rights record.
  Of the two questions about the UN mission MONUSCO not moving to neutralize the Hutu FDLR militia the French mission answered one, by a favored correspondent; a more funny response was proffered to a question about Claire Underwood on House of Cards, Season 3 (No spoiler alert.)
 A question about Mexico went unanswered; a question whether the French-led mission to Burundi this week will look inot the Cibitoke massacre went unanswered -- for now. Watch this site.
On Gao, after UN Peacekeeping shot protesters in Northern Mali, the UN commissioned a report which it said will be finished by the end of March. But will it be made public, or even be submitted to the UN Security Council which formed the Mali mission?
  Inner City Press on March 4 tried to ask the Security Council president for March, Francois Delattre of France, about the Gao report. Video here. But Delattre replied, for the second time in two days, "I have to run." Vine here.
 On March 5 Inner City Press asked UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric if the report will go to the Security Council. Dujarric replied "in some form" and that the findings would be made public. Video here.
 So later on March 5, along with a question about a briefing about African Union cooperation which UN official Taye Brook Zerihoun told Inner City Press he had given in the Council, Inner City Press asked Delattre about the Gao report: will the Council get, or request to get, the report? 
  Delattre this time didn't run but rather answered. He answered only the Africa Union question, video here. It's appreciated but leave the question open: what is going to happen with the report, with the incident and accountability? 
  Tellingly, perhaps, the French Mission transcription of Delattre's press encounter included Inner City Press' African Union but not its Gao report question, compare video to transcript. We'll have more on this.
The UN Security Council speaks in at least four different ways: resolutions, Presidential Statements, Press Statements and the weakest form of action, "Elements to the Press."
  When French Ambassador Francois Delattre came to the UN Security Council stakeout on March 4 as Council president he read out "Elements to the Press about Mali. 
  Inner City Press twice asked, Question on Mali? But Delattre for the second time in two days said, "I have to run" and declined to answer.Video here and embedded below.
   Now the UN peacekeeping mission in Mali, MINUSMA, has publicly mis-characterized the Elements to the Press that Delattre read out as a Press Statement or "Declaration a la Presse," including in a tweet at-naming the French Mission to the UN, which offered no correction. It was also e-mailed out (which should be similarly corrected) and put here on the MINUSMA Facebook page.
Update of March 6 - after this report, MINUSMA changed its Facebook page to say "Elements to the Press" - but left its tweet and email announcement uncorrected. Ban Ki-moon also issued a statement urging Coordination to sign.)
   Perhaps France, and ultimate MINUSMA boss Herve Ladsous, the fourth Frenchman in a row atop UN Peacekeeping, would have preferred the stronger form, Press Statement, to Elements to the Press. But the are different, and it is the job of a Security Council president to make sure the two are not mistaken or mis-represented, particularly not by a UN mission.
  Maybe if Delattre has deigned to take the question(s) about Mali, alongside the three hand-picked questions he did take about Libya, it would have been more difficult to mis-describe the Elements to the Press he read out as a formal Press Statement.
  So will this be fixed? Or will the running continue? Watch this site.

  Here is what Delattre read, and questions he refused to answer.
"We heard a briefing by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Mali, Mr Mongi Hamdi, who gave us an update on the Algiers peace talks and the Agreement on Peace and Security in Mali initialed on 1 March 2015... We encourage the armed groups of the coordination to initial the agreement."
  Inner City Press asked, what about the MNLA not signing? But Delattre said, for the second time in two days, "I have to run" -- then proceeded to stand to the side of the stakeout, decidedly NOT running. 
Update: French mission spokesperson Thierry Caboche has replied that the "Press Elements agreed by UNSC on Mali encourage Coordination groups, including MNLA, to initial Algiers agreement."
 It's appreciated, and added here in full - but since the Elements to the Press in the first paragraph cites that "Agreement on Peace and Security in Mali initialed on 1 March 2015 by representatives of the Malian Government, one of the coalition of armed groups Platform' and all members of the international mediation team" then never names the MNLA, the Mali question should have been taken and answered, alongside fully three questions on Libya.
    Inner City Press also asked about the UN's "independent" report into UN Peacekeepers shooting at protesters (who were angry about the UN using attack helicopters, but that's another story).
  Delattre did not answer about this report, which one would think like the report on the Tabit rapes in Darfur also covered by UN Peacekeeping through its UNAMID mission, would go to the Security Council.
  On February 26, two days before Delattre took over as Security Council President, the UN announced that "the high-level team mandated by the Secretary-General of the United Nations to conduct an inquiry into the violent protests that took place in Gao, Mali, on 27 January is concluding an eight-day visit to Mali.
    “During this visit, the team met with the Malian national authorities, the authorities of the region of Gao, the national police and the civil protection service in Gao, representatives of MINUSMA, local leaders from the Cadre de Concertation des Notables de Gao, the associations who organized the protests on 27 January, authorities from the hospitals that received the victims, opposition parties, and several other interlocutors who could help shed light on the events. The team also spoke to the protestors who were injured during these events, and visited the bereaved families, to whom they expressed condolences.
  The team was "composed of three independent experts with extensive international experience: Bacre Waly Ndiaye (Senegal), Mark Kroeker (US) and Ralph Zacklin (UK)."
     Back on January 29, the UN said that Secretary General Ban Ki-moon  “deplores the incidents that took place on 27 January during a demonstration in front of the MINUSMA base in Gao town in the north of Mali. He is saddened by the violence that surrounded the demonstration and the reported death of at least 3 protesters and the injury of several others.”
   “The inquiry team will now travel to New York to present its preliminary report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. It will present its final report by the end of March 2015,” the UN on Thursday said.