Showing posts with label BBG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BBG. Show all posts

Thursday, February 25, 2016

While ICP Fights for Free Press, Pile-On By UNCA: Reuters, AFP, US US Broadcasting Board of Governors, DPA



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 24 -- After Inner City Press was summarily ejected from the UN, which it has covered for ten years, on February 19, the ostensibly deciding official Cristina Gallach told no less than Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jose Ramos Horta that Inner City Press would still be able to cover the UN.

What she didn't say was that Inner City Press' ability to cover the unfolding UN corruption scandal in which she has played a role would be curtailed under the proposed arrangement - by design. Inner City Press is opposin this.

 But the UN Correspondents Association, at least its 15 Executive Committee members, issued a February 22 statement in context fully supporting the throwing of Inner City Press into the street, the seizure of passport, the Banning, all of it. We wonder if these scribes' employers know about this.

  For now we reiterate the obvious: the UN Press Briefing Room is presumptively open to all press. If Spokesman Dujarric, or DPI's Gallach, wants to lend it to their friends, at least provide a notice so journalists hungry for news don't get excluded and get nothing.

 Now there are not only pro-development pieces, like here - there's also false but illustrative pices like this one, from Mococco, raised to Gallach and higher. What now?

  After BuzzFeed ran an article about the underlying (pretextual) "incident," UNCA proffered a statement, of which BuzzFeed added two lines. Inner City Press hereby publishes in full the statement of the UNCA Executive Committee, attributable to each member and their media, and a critique as annotations, in bold:

"Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2016

STATEMENT: FOR THE RECORD

On the evening of Friday, 29 January, 2016, U.N. accredited blogger Matthew Lee of Inner City Press disrupted the Annual General Meeting of the United Nations Correspondents Association (UNCA).

Mr. Lee concealed himself in an interpreter booth in the room S-237 ahead of the meeting.

FALSE: Inner City Press waved at people from the booth, which it entred both not to be disruptive and because, unlike the UN Press Briefing Room after the UN's $2 billion Capital Master Plan renovation, has electical outlets.

UNCA President Giampaolo Pioli made clear at the start of the meeting that it was a closed meeting for UNCA members only.

NOTE: Pioli has no authority to thrown any journalist out of the UN Press Briefing Room.

There are more than 200 UNCA members and the association represents almost 100 percent of the resident correspondents at United Nations headquarters. Mr. Lee is not a member of UNCA.

Note: Inner City Press quit UNCA finding it and Pioli to be corrupt; the UN allows this UNCA to set rules for other journalists, illegitimately.

Mr. Lee began videotaping the meeting without UNCA’s knowledge.

Note: it was a Periscope live-stream: perhaps this technology is not in "UNCA's knowledge."

Once he was discovered doing so there was justified concern over his presence

Note: Why? Because UNCA took money from indicted Frank Lorenzo and Ng Lap Seng's South South News, and openly discusses selling UN office space?

 and UNCA respectfully asked Mr. Lee to leave, but he refused.

Note: did "respectfully" include Pioli and another UNCA insider quoted in BuzzFeed calling Inner City Press mentally ill? Is that "civil" as Ms Gallach says is required? Will Pioli lose his office?

UNCA contacted the U.N. Department of Safety and Security, the Media Accreditation Liaison Unit (MALU) and the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

UNCA suspended the meeting. U.N. Secretary-General spokesman Stephane Dujarric, deputy U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq, acting MALU chief Tal Mekel, a U.N. Security officer and journalists implored Mr. Lee to leave.

Note: Inner City Press said clearly, if and when UN DSS says it's a closed meeting, it would leave. Which it did.

After much resistance, Mr. Lee finally agreed. The UNCA meeting had been disrupted for more than 30 minutes. Despite being told it was a closed meeting, Mr. Lee still posted the video on his blog.

Note: this is dinosaur talk: Inner City Press has already live-streamed on Periscope. And the "video" UNCA members from Voice of America and AFP filmed -- wasn't it a closed meeting? -- was give to the authorities. This is UNCA: working for the Man. FUNCA livestreams for the people. Which is journalism in 2016?

UNCA stands for press freedom and vehemently defends rights of journalists at the UN and around the world. UNCA is committed to journalism ethics and expects journalists to act professionally."

B.S. -- UNCA under Pioli has tried again to get Inner City Press thorwn out for its acts of journalism.

The U.N. Correspondents Association Executive Committee"

So, all members are responsible. We'll have more on this.

  When on February 19 Inner City Press was being told it had to leave the UN on two hours notice, UN Security told it darkly they had “seen the video” of January 29 in the UN Press Briefing Room.

Inner City Press assumed that meant UN Security video, and asked in an article why a supposedly “closed” meeting would be filmed.

Then when BuzzFeed ran an article about the UN's ouster of Inner City Press, unnamed UNCA scribes showed the reporter video, focusing on Inner City Press sitting in the back row (that was after Dujarric and particularly his deputy Haq tried to made being in the interpreters booth the problem, not being in a non-closed closed meeting in the UN Press Briefing Room).

 So these “journalists” -- Margaret Besheer of Voice of America and Carole Landry of AFP among them -- in fact shot video in order to turn it over to the authorities.

Is that journalism?

On February 19 when eight UN Security guards pushed Inner City Press out the gate onto First Avenue, VOA' Margaret Besheer was there waiting, along with Sherwin of SABC. How did they know to be there, then?

So beyond providing video to the authorities, do these journalists “coordinate” with the authorities?

Is this journalism? Are these journalists?

  Gallach also has not said that the complainant against Inner City Press, Giampaolo Pioli's UNCA, is also involved in the Frank Lorenzo and Ng Lap Seng scandal, as well as other financial irregularities.

  South South News of Ng and Lorenzo, both now under indictment, gave money to UNCA and Ng was given by UNCA a photo op with Ban Ki-moon.

  Gallach in her short tenure at the UN already hobhobbed with Lorenzo at his South South Awards, as reported by Inner City Press - but Gallach did not recuse herself from issuing a ruling to throw Inner City Press out of the UN.

  Gallach and this conflict of interest was not mentioned, yet, in theFebruary 22 BuzzFeed piece, here - despite being the signer of the ouster order without even having sought or allowed Inner City Press side of the story.

 That piece said the UNCA, rather than explain why it sought to get the Press thrown out, would be putting out a statement later. Well here it is: "UNCA President Giampaolo Pioli made clear at the start of the meeting that it was a closed meeting for UNCA members only."

 This is a laughable. It is not for Giampaolo Pioli, more of a landlord than a journalist, to declare any event in the UN Press Briefing Room to be "closed."

 As Inner City Press said on January 29, and before that when with Dujarric also involved Francois Hollande tried to close the UN Press Briefing Room to all but the French traveling press, the UN Press Briefing Room is presumptively open to all journalists. On January 29, there was no notice in the UN Journal of a closed meeting, nor any sign on the door.

 So essentially, Cristina Gallach is ousting Inner City Press because it didn't obey an order by Giampaolo Pioli.

  But the two are united: Pioli's UNCA took Lorenzo's and Ng's South South News' money; Gallach was with Lorenzo at the South South Awards.

  When Pioli told Inner City Press to get out of the UN Press Briefing Room, and Inner City Press on principle and to follow the UNCA - Lorenzo story refused, Gallach plotted three weeks then threw Inner City Press out of the UN.

  It is too dangerous, apparently, to have a bloggest "spewing" - the words of UNCA's Masood Haider - when the scope and implications of the Ng Lorenzo scandal are still not known. These go to the very top of the UN - thus, no one up there has held Gallach to account for an "investigation" that omitted the defendant, and for not recusing herself.

  This must all be investigated, and will be. Inner City Press should not have to accept dramatically reduced access, especially at this time. And those who tried this gambit must face new scrutiny.

  When Inner City Press came to the UN on the morning of Monday February 22, with another journalist there to sign Inner City Press in as a guest, UN Security said, “You are Banned from the UN.”  Audio here.

  Inner City Press left the UN pass office, and set up shop in the Isaiah plowshares park across from the UN. Several Permanent Representatives, at least two Under Secretaries General (the same rank as Gallach) and many staff came to express outrage at the UN's censorship.

 But in the UN Press Briefing Room, which was "lent" to the UN Correspondents (or Corruption) Association back on January 29, the reaction was different.

 In an embarrassing colloquy, long time UNCA board member Masood Haider asked Spokesman Dujarric about "the blogger Matthew Lee" who has been "spewing on the Internet reports whether false or not."Vine hereVideo hereUN transcript here.


On February 19 Inner City Press asked to get its passport and most important files but was pushed out onto First Avenue by UN Security Deputy Chief Michael McNulty without either. That's not seized? That's OK?

And the extortionate offer - no access unless with much reduced rights - is entirely disproportionate to the non-existent "crimes," which was to seek to cover an event in this same UN Press Briefing Room, by UNCA which took money from indicted Ng Lap Seng's and Frank Lorenzo's South South News then gave Ng Lap Seng a photo op with Ban Ki-moon.

  UNCA President Giampaolo was there, leaving first from the February 22 Press-less press conference; another UNCA board member slapped Dujarric on the back. Great job!

  Bloggers are, of course, hacked to death in Bangladesh, a country on whose free press record USG Gallach never even replied to a detailed email from the Free UN Coalition for Access, for protection for a Bangladeshi journalist then in the UN. Spewing indeed.

 Dujarric took the opportunity to deny that the UN had seized Inner City Press' files -- the reality is, when Inner City Press asked on February 19 to take the most important of them, and its passport, it was denied by UN Security. On February 22, UN Security said Inner City Press is Banned from all UN premises.

  Dujarric said, as if it's ok, that Inner City Press is being "offered" much reduced access, for four months. But Inner City Press did nothing wrong, and the "investigation" by Gallach which led to its ouster did not involve a single conversation with or reaching out to Inner City Press.

  Any reduced access to loss of office space -- which Masood Haider, who hardly writes articles, has, and UNCA President Giampaolo Pioli has, a private office, while writing about Morgan Freeman -- is unfair and is to cast a chill of freedom of the press. No staged colloquy can hide that. We'll have more on this.

  Later, after being told to leave even the UN Pass office, a UN Under Secretary General told Inner City Press Gallach had told other USGs that Inner City Press was in fact in the building - that AFTER Inner City Press was told by UN Security, twice, that it is banned from all UN premises and was told to leave the UN Pass office.

 Ban Ki-moon's Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, who'd also told those who questioned him that Inner City Press could end and cover “his” briefing on Monday.

  False. UN Security then said, you cannot wait in the pass office, you are banned from all UN premises. Trying to cover the UN Security Council meeting on Syria from the Isaiah plowshares park across from the UN, various Ambassadors came to say they were appalled. But Gallach's office has told then, nothing will be done.

  This is disgusting censorship by an increasingly corrupt UN.

As Inner City Press at the UN pursues unfolding stories of corruption, peacekeepers committing rapes in the Central African Republic, UN inaction in Burundi, South Sudan and Yemen, on February 19 with two hours notice UN Under Secretary General Cristina Gallach ordered Inner City Press to be ousted. Letter here.

   On the evening of February 19, UN Security Deputy Chief Michael McNulty, who refused to provide his name (audio), pushed Inner City Press out onto First Avenue (audio), having cut off its Periscope video livestream (video) and not allowed it to get its files, coat or passport from its longtime shared office. Gallach wants the office back, to retaliate and so the UN Correspondents Association can, in essence, sell the UN space just as it sells access to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

  On February 20, Inner City Press posed four questions to Dujarric and his deputy Farhan Haq, with a copy to Gallach --which 24 hours later have not been answered or even acknowledged (while both Dujarric and Gallach were wildly spinning to those who contacted them, includingNobel Laureate Jose Ramos Horta, see here, who was told there was no problem taking over Inner City Press' office and undermining its ability to report, edit videos, conduct interviews. There is a big problem. Here are the questions:

"Please state the status and condition of all of my papers and property in my office, Room S-303A, including investigative papers, communications from sources including whistleblowers and my passport and when I will have the access to them that I was denied on February 19 and since.

Please state when the Resident Correspondent UN pass I have had for years, but which was torn off my neck on Feb 19, will be returned, in connection with 1, above, and the UNSC meeting(s) and UN Noon Briefing on Monday February 22.

Please state and explain the role of the Office of the Spokesperson of the Secretary General in the deprivations in 1 and 2, above.

Finally, for now, please state the Secretary-General's position on UN Security Deputy McNulty on February 19 threatening twice to have me “handed over to NYPD” (including the concomitant acceptance by the UN of the NYPD's jurisdiction), of UN Security officers grabbing my phone which was live-broadcasting Periscope video at the UN Security Council stakeout and turning it off.

I have other questions but these are most pressing, for immediate answer."

  And as yet, 42 hours later, no answer. Watch this site.

  While Inner City Press was writing up a UN Security Council meeting on Syria that went into the evening, and Periscope broadcasting, UN Security guards walked up, grabbed Inner City Press' laptop, blocked its Periscope camera and turned off the livestream. Video here.

  Then eight UN Security officers led by Deputy Chief McNulty tore off Inner City Press' UN ID badge and carted off Inner City Press' laptop and camera, returning these by throwing them on the sidewalk of First Avenue. Audio here.

 They did not allow Inner City Press to get coat or sweater, or the files in its office. No provision was made for this.

  The ejection letter was signed by the Under Secretary General for Public Information Cristina Galach of Spain but ultimately Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is in charge. Ban and his chief of staff Edmond Mulet and Deputy SG Jan Eliasson were all written to with details as this took place.

  USG Gallach's office, Darrin Farrant in charge, merely "took note" of questions about and criticism of the lack of due process. Gallach did not respond to email, even from Nobel Peace Prize winner Jose Ramos-Horta, here.

  When Inner City Press was thrown out onto First Avenue, standing waiting, laughing and filming, was Voice of America's Margaret Besheer and another board member of the UN Correspondents Association, whose president Giampaoli Pioli told Inner City Press if it didn't remove a (truthful) article about his screening of a war crimes denial film for a tenant of his, Sri Lanka's then ambassador Palitha Kohona, he would get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN.

  But who is running this asylum? Ban Ki-moon, his spokesman also involved Stephane Dujarric (who threw Inner City Press out of the UN Press Briefing Room on January 29, also trying to turn off ICP's Periscoping phone), and, some surmise, some who don't like Inner City Press' questions. We'll have more on this.

  The pretext was Inner City Press three weeks earlier seeking to cover a meeting in the UN Press Briefing Room by an organization which has taken money from now indicted Ng Lap Seng and Frank Lorenzo's South SOuth News, then gave Ng Lap Seng a photo op with Ban.

(As Inner City Press reported, Gallach attended the South South Awards with Frank Lorenzo, photo here, just before his indictment.  She should have been recused from any decision-making on this.)

  UN Security demanded ICP's pass - and later tore it off.

Friday, December 26, 2014

As US Broadcasting Board of Governors Slams Censorship in Baku, Its Voice of America Tried to Get Press Out of UN, Ignores FOIA



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, December 26 -- As the US Broadcasting Board of Governors complains of censorship in Azerbaijan, the Free UN Coalition for Access agrees that media should not be raided.

  But what about BBG's Voice of America having tried to get Inner City Press thrown out of covering the UN? Here is the letter VOA's Steve Redisch sent to the UN, asking for the "review" of Inner City Press' accreditation; this was supported by VOA's David Ensor.  Will this belatedly be addressed at BBG's next board meeting on February 18, particularly by new, not yet implicated Board members Karen Kornbluh, Michael Kempner and Leon Aron?

  Reuters, which joined in VOA's campaign, here, and whose UN bureau chief then moved to censor his own "for the record" anti-Press complaint to the UN from Googe's Search by calling it copyrighted, click here for that, reports:

"Nenad Pejic, editor-in-chief and co-CEO of RFE/RL called the raid a 'flagrant violation of every international commitment and standard Azerbaijan has pledged to uphold. The order comes from the top as retaliation for our reporting and as a thuggish effort to silence RFE/RL."

  Thuggish? How about trying to get the Press thrown out of the UN, and doing nothing when its office was raided, and when UN official Herve Ladsous later physically blocked Inner City Press from filming, Vine here
    Inner City Press documented Voice of America's anti-Press campaign, and the involvement of the UN offices of Reuters and Agence France Presse, among others, by Freedom of Information Act requests to BBG. But after it began reporting on these documents, BBG began denying all appeals, and FOIA office Andrew Krog began automatically denying the Press' FOIA requests.
   Back on August 13, US Congress proposals to confirm Voice of America as propaganda were the elephant in the Broadcasting Board of Governors meeting, but barely mentioned. 
   Instead, BBG board members were regaled with more than an hour of self-promotional videos, for example about how RFE/RL evades censorship. 
 This ignored that Voice of America's David Ensor and Steve Redisch tried to censor the investigative Press at the UN (click here), and its Freedom of Information Act office now routinely denies all Press requests, about funding in Afghanistan and other topics. Learning from some countries they cover?
  RFE/RL's Nanad Pejic spoke of Ukraine as if all attacks on the media were under what he called the "former government." But what of current blocking of websites and attacks on journalists?
   A staffer calling in to the meeting bragged of partnering with the station owned by "the richest Ukrainian" and of embedding with Kyiv's army and its paramilitaries. She described the siege and lack of water in Lugansk as a humanitarian crisis. But is that how they report it?
  NSC's Ben Rhodes was to call into the board meeting, but couldn't until 12:15 pm. So the BBG public meeting was adjourned - meaning Rhodes' briefing would not be public?
 A documentary about Armenians in Syria was shown -- with no mention of the armed opposition's or terrorist group's attacks on Armenians in Kessab. BBG is already propaganda.
   This was belatedly covered by the New York Times last month, but the Times ignored the role of VOA and its Broadcasting Board of Governors as censors, trying for example to get the investigative Press thrown out of the UN.
  The Times covered the House of Representatives bill which Inner City Press panned in April, focusing on a split between the union and some who work at VOA.  
   Alongside the draft US law to further make "clear that the Voice of America mission is to support U.S. public diplomacy efforts," there are still claims that VOA currently is more independent than this.
   At the United Nations, this has hardly been the case. On April 15, 2014, France's now-gone Ambassador to the UNGerard Araud told a reporter for what's called Shi'ite media, "You are not a journalist, you are an agent." But VOA's questions are no less directed.
 Significantly, Voice of America not only at the UN but from its Washington headquarters, in a formal complaint submitted to the current UN spokesman by editor Steve Redisch with the approval of supervisor David Ensor, asked the UN to "review the accreditation" of the investigative Press, click here for that.
  In e-mails subsequently obtained by Inner City Press under the Freedom of Information Act, the VOA bureau chief sought and said she had obtained support for censorship from the United Nations Correspondents Association and the bureau chiefs of Agence France Presseand Reutersherehere and then here (censorship under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act).
  Back on January 8, with Voice of America's Broadcasting Board of Governors still not having addressed censorship bids by VOA which it oversees, President Obama nominated to the BBG Michael W. Kempner, a founder of New Jersey's ConnectOne Bancorp and a bundler of campaign contributions.
   We asked and ask again, why does the US government need a propaganda network, and why turn it loose inside the US? And why would its BBG, after first granting Freedom of Information Act access and fee waivers then try to reverse all this after the documents released proved embarrassing?
  After that, BBG's FOIA Officer Andrew Krog suspended processing in the October 2013 government "funding lapse;" then Appeals Access Committee chair Marie Lennon denied access to any documents about taxpayer funded BBG programming in Sudan and Afghanistan (see below.)
  In the three days that followed, mail poured in providing yet more detailed accounts of BBG and Voice of America incompetence and assaults on the principles they supposedly uphold. 
  The union that represents workers there, AFGE Local 1812, has written that
poor morale was made markedly worse by a decision in 2010 to re-appoint the present newsroom director [Sonja Pace]. A correspondent since the 1980’s, she had been reassigned from the position of news chief more than a decade earlier. Fast forward to 2010: An audio recording of an open meeting in VOA’s newsroom shows that strong protests against the reappointment of the former news director were dismissed by VOA's Executive Editor [Steve Redisch] a former CNN employee. In the recording, the Executive Editor rejected staff concerns, saying 'you’re responsible for your own morale.' Though he has known of the morale crisis in VOA’s Central News Division created by the 2010 decision, current VOA director David Ensor has allowed this situation to continue.”
  Inner City Press in 2012 had its own experience of these three individuals. VOA's Executive Editor Steve Redisch wrote to the UN asking that Inner City Press' accreditation be “reviewed.”
  The only communication Inner City Press had received from VOA or BBG in Washington prior to this was from Sonja Pace, that “regarding VOA’s Charter and Code, we absolutely stand by those mandates and guidelines, without exception.”
  Apparently Voice of America's principles don't include the First Amendment. Subsequent inquiring under the Freedom of Information Act found David Ensor involved in the decision to try to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN. Ensor served the US State Department in Afghanistan and perhaps re-formed his view of press freedom there.
  In mid 2013, the Obama administration nominated former Afghanistan envoy Ryan Crocker to join the thenhalf-empty Broadcasting Board of Governors, along with John Kerry, while claiming that the output under the BBG is entirely independent from the US government. This is not credible.
  The Colombia Journalism Review, with its own conflicts, has made this point, and BBG has belatedly responded. Will any of this finally bring accountability? Watch this site.
  

Thursday, July 3, 2014

As NYT "Discovers" That Voice of America Is Propaganda, Broadcasting Board of Governors' Censorship Role FOIA-ed


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 3 -- Voice of America as propaganda has belatedly been covered by the New York Times, but ignoring the role of VOA and its Broadcasting Board of Governors as censors, trying for example to get the investigative Press thrown out of the UN.

  The Times covers the House of Representative bill which Inner City Press panned in April, focusing on a split between the union and some who work at VOA.  

   Alongside the draft US law to further make "clear that the Voice of America mission is to support U.S. public diplomacy efforts," there are still claims that VOA currently is more independent than this.

   At the United Nations, this has hardly been the case. Recently France's outgoing Ambassador to the UN Gerard Araud told a reporter for what's called Shi'ite media, "You are not a journalist, you are an agent." But VOA's questions are no less directed.

 Significantly, Voice of America not only at the UN but from its Washington headquarters, in a formal complaint submitted to the current UN spokesman by editor Steve Redisch with the approval of supervisor David Ensor, asked the UN to "review the accreditation" of the investigative Press, click here for that.
  In e-mails subsequently obtained by Inner City Press under the Freedom of Information Act, the VOA bureau chief sought and said she had obtained support for censorship from the United Nations Correspondents Association and the bureau chiefs of Agence France Presse and Reutershere,here and then here (censorship under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act).
  Back on January 8, with Voice of America's Broadcasting Board of Governors still not having addressed censorship bids by VOA which it oversees, President Obama nominated to the BBG Michael W. Kempner, a founder of New Jersey's ConnectOne Bancorp and a bundler of campaign contributions.
   We asked and ask again, why does the US government need a propaganda network, and why turn it loose inside the US? And why would its BBG, after first granting Freedom of Information Act access and fee waivers then try to reverse all this after the documents released proved embarrassing?
  After that, BBG's FOIA Officer Andrew Krog suspended processing in the October 2013 government "funding lapse;" then Appeals Access Committee chair Marie Lennon denied access to any documents about taxpayer funded BBG programming in Sudan and Afghanistan (see below.)
  In the three days that followed, mail poured in providing yet more detailed accounts of BBG and Voice of America incompetence and assaults on the principles they supposedly uphold. 
  The union that represents workers there, AFGE Local 1812, has written that
poor morale was made markedly worse by a decision in 2010 to re-appoint the present newsroom director [Sonja Pace]. A correspondent since the 1980’s, she had been reassigned from the position of news chief more than a decade earlier. Fast forward to 2010: An audio recording of an open meeting in VOA’s newsroom shows that strong protests against the reappointment of the former news director were dismissed by VOA's Executive Editor [Steve Redisch] a former CNN employee. In the recording, the Executive Editor rejected staff concerns, saying 'you’re responsible for your own morale.' Though he has known of the morale crisis in VOA’s Central News Division created by the 2010 decision, current VOA director David Ensor has allowed this situation to continue.”
  Inner City Press in 2012 had its own experience of these three individuals. VOA's Executive Editor Steve Redisch wrote to the UN asking that Inner City Press' accreditation be “reviewed.”
  The only communication Inner City Press had received from VOA or BBG in Washington prior to this was from Sonja Pace, that “regarding VOA’s Charter and Code, we absolutely stand by those mandates and guidelines, without exception.”
  Apparently Voice of America's principles don't include the First Amendment. Subsequent inquiring under the Freedom of Information Act found David Ensor involved in the decision to try to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN. Ensor served the US State Department in Afghanistan and perhaps re-formed his view of press freedom there.
  In mid 2013, the Obama administration nominated former Afghanistan envoy Ryan Crocker to join the then half-empty Broadcasting Board of Governors, along with John Kerry, while claiming that the output under the BBG is entirely independent from the US government. This is not credible.
  The Colombia Journalism Review, with its own conflicts, has made this point, and BBG has belatedly responded. Will any of this finally bring accountability? Watch this site.
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014

On Syria, Inner City Press Asks Ambassador Ja'afari of US-Made BGM-71TOW Missiles, UNSC Press Elements Without Geneva III


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 17 -- Homs in Syria was the topic when the UN Security Council met at 5:30 pm on April 17. France called the meeting but most who left called it a failure.
 What was agreed to were vague "elements to the press" about supporting envoy Lakhdar Brahimi's call for local ceasefire talks in Homs.  
  Inner City Press asked April's Council president Joy Ogwu of Nigeria why no reference to wider "Geneva 3" talks was included. It is not in there, she indicated. Video here.
  Then Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja'fari came to speak. Inner City Press asked him about US-made BGM-71 TOW missiles now in Syria, of the group Harakat Hazm. They are with Al Nusra, Ja'afari said.
  Inner City Press asked on what basis Ja'afari said the US approved their transfer to Syria, if they could have come through Turkey. Ja'afari said there is no way they could come in without approval from Washington. Video here.
  Ja'afari was asked by Voice of America, on whose Broadcast Board of Governor's US Secretary of State John Kerry serves, why Syria doesn't use Russia or China to get a meeting about Kassab. Ja'afari responded to the question; he did not say as France Ambassador Gerard Araud did on April 15 to Al Mayadeen, "You are not a journalist, you are an agent."
 
  By Araud's logic, is not Voice of America an agent? Is not France 24, also called on by Ja'afari? Ah, freedom of the press. Here is what the Free UN Coalition for Access has done so far.
   When outgoing French Ambassador Araud scheduled a press conference on human rights for April 15, he began to receive many questions, here, about blocking human rights monitoring in Western Sahara. 
  It is a policy Araud is particularly associated with, since Javier Barden quoted him calling Morocco France's "mistress." Araud spoke of suing, but hasn't.
   But when during the April 15 press conference, in which Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access were not called on, Araud was asked about France having killed people in Algeria, Araud told the questioner, You are not a journalist, you are an agent. Video here.
  The French run press conference gave the first question to Al Arabiya, for UNCA (now known as the UN's Censorship Alliance), then France 24.  By Araud's spokesperson Frederic Jung, a  Voice of America affiliate was given a question. 
  Syria "Caesar" report panelist David Crane was asked who funded it and answered on camera merely that he was paid. (The photographs, Inner City Press noted and notes, are extremely troubling - all the more reason that taking Qatar's funding and denouncing the only critical question were unwise.)
  Afterward, Inner City Press asked Crane to confirm the payment was from Qatar. He confirmed it. Inner City Press asked, did you seek any other, less compromised funding? The answer was no. In fact, Crane said he gave his recommendations to the Syrian National Council. Afterward Inner City Press asked him if he meant the Turkey based group headed by Ahmed Al Jarba, and Crane said yes, than added, "The resistance" writ large.
     When Qatar sponsored an event at the UN in New York on March 21 featuring the Syrian Coalition headed by Ahmad al Jarba, a group calling its the Syrian Grassroots Movement held protests seeking to oust Jarba.
   By March 22, the group stated that some 40,000 people in 58 cities inside Syria had participated in demonstrations to get Jarba out of his post, saying "it is time to put an end to political corruption."
  Back in September 2013, France sponsored an event in the UN and called Jarba the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people. French Ambassador Gerard Araud was the first questioning at Qatar's March 21 Syrian Coalition event. What is France's position now? Who chooses the leaders?
  Likewise, back in July 2013 and earlier this month, the Jarba-led Syrian Coalition held faux "UN" events in the clubhouse Ban Ki-moon's Secretariat gives to the largely Gulf and Western UN Correspondents Association. How does that now appear, in light of the anti-Jarba protests?
   Qatar's March 21 event was not listed in the UN Journal nor in the UN Media Alert. It was not on the UN's publicly available webcast.
  Select media outlets were there, when Inner City Press came in at the end to ask a question: Al Jazeera on the podium in Qatar's event, Al Arabiya like a Saudi diplomat -- not the Permanent Representative -- in the audience along with Al Hayat, even Al Hurra, on whose Broadcasting Board of Governors US Secretary of State John Kerry serves.
   The new Free UN Coalition for Access is against faux UN events, in the clubhouse the Secretariat gives to what's become its UN Censorship Alliance or elsewhere.
   On March 21 Inner City Press put these questions, also on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Access, to the UN's top two spokespeople:
"there is an event in Conference Room 4 right now, sponsored by Qatar, which is no listed in today's UN Journal, nor is it on UN Webcast http://webtv.un.org/ but it appears to be being filmed. Please explain the legal status of this meeting, if there are any sponsored beyond Qatar, how it was publicized and if any request to have it webcast was made. Thanks, on deadline."
  But no answer was provided. Inner City Press ran to the event and from the back of a three quarters empty Conference Room 4 asked why the event was so stealth: not in the UN Journal, not webcast.
  The Permanent Representative of Qatar answered, saying it was a "special event" to which Qatar had invited (some) member states and groups, and (some) media. There is a UN Media Alert, but this event was not put in it.
  Perhaps it was publicized by the Gulf & Western United Nations Correspondents Association, which has twice hosted faux "UN" events by the Syrian National Coalition or Syrian Coalition. (In both cases, the Free UN Coalition for Access suggested that the SNC hold its events in the UN briefing room, accessible to all journalists.)
  Since French Ambassador Gerard Araud, the first questioner flanked by representatives of Saudi Arabia and of Turkey which earlier in the day banned Twitter, has spoken about "fakes" and others about accountability, Inner City Press asked if the groups Al Nusra and ISIS, and those who fund them such as private individuals in Qatar alluded to at the US State Department briefing earlier in the day, could or would be held accountable.
  The SNC representative emphasized what he called links between the Assad regime and ISIS, saying it was too easy to blame the Gulf countries.
Question: you have concerns about the withdrawal of the ambassadors. Do you also have concerns about the reasons that these countries said that they withdrew their ambassadors from Qatar? In other words, do you – if you have concerns about the withdrawal of the ambassadors, do you also have concerns about Qatar’s behavior, which – alleged behavior, let’s say – which led to these countries withdrawing their ambassadors?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I know one of the issues that has been mentioned is the issue of private donations to extremists – and that’s something that some have mentioned – operating in Syria and elsewhere. It remains an important priority in our high-level discussions, and one that we also certainly raise with all states in the region, including Qatar, including the Government of Kuwait, wherever we have concerns.
After Inner City Press asked about the sponsorship of the event, a one-page "Joint Statement by the Co-Organizers" was passed out, listing among the co-organizers France, the UK, US, Belgium, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Inner City Press tweeted it. 
   Even 24 hours later, the UN's top two spokespeople had not answered the simple questions put to them, above. Watch this site.

 
  

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Voice of America? Obama Nominates Banker & Bundler Kempner for Broadcasting Board of Governors, Censorship UNaddressed



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, January 8 -- With the US Broadcasting Board of Governors still not having addressed censorship bids by the Voice of America it oversees, President Obama today nominated to the BBG Michael W. Kempner, a founder of New Jersey's ConnectOne Bancorp and a bundler of campaign contributions.

   We ask again, why does the US government need a propaganda network, and why turn it loose inside the US? And why would its BBG, after first granting Freedom of Information Act access and fee waivers then try to reverse all this after the documents released proved embarrassing?
  After that, BBG's FOIA Officer Andrew Krog suspended processing in the October 2013 government "funding lapse;" then Appeals Access Committee chair Marie Lennon denied access to any documents about taxpayer funded BBG programming in Sudan and Afghanistan (see below.)
  In the three days that followed, mail poured in providing yet more detailed accounts of BBG and Voice of America incompetence and assaults on the principles they supposedly uphold. 
  The union that represents workers there, AFGE Local 1812, has written that
poor morale was made markedly worse by a decision in 2010 to re-appoint the present newsroom director [Sonja Pace]. A correspondent since the 1980’s, she had been reassigned from the position of news chief more than a decade earlier. Fast forward to 2010: An audio recording of an open meeting in VOA’s newsroom shows that strong protests against the reappointment of the former news director were dismissed by VOA's Executive Editor [Steve Redisch] a former CNN employee. In the recording, the Executive Editor rejected staff concerns, saying 'you’re responsible for your own morale.' Though he has known of the morale crisis in VOA’s Central News Division created by the 2010 decision, current VOA director David Ensor has allowed this situation to continue.”
  Inner City Press in 2012 had its own experience of these three individuals. VOA's Executive Editor Steve Redisch wrote to the UN asking that Inner City Press' accreditation be “reviewed.”
  The only communication Inner City Press had received from VOA or BBG in Washington prior to this was from Sonja Pace, that “regarding VOA’s Charter and Code, we absolutely stand by those mandates and guidelines, without exception.”
  Apparently Voice of America's principles don't include the First Amendment. Subsequent inquiring under the Freedom of Information Act found David Ensor involved in the decision to try to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN. Ensor served the US State Department in Afghanistan and perhaps re-formed his view of press freedom there.
  In mid 2013, the Obama administration nominated former Afghanistan envoy Ryan Crocker to join the then half-empty Broadcasting Board of Governors, along with John Kerry, while claiming that the output under the BBG is entirely independent from the US government. This is not credible.
  The Colombia Journalism Review, with its own conflicts, has made this point, and BBG has belatedly responded. Will any of this finally bring accountability? Watch this site.
  

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

US Answer on Rwanda & M23 in DR Congo Was to Stearns of Voice of America, State Media, Censor at UN


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, July 24 -- When US State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki was asked at Tuesday briefing to denounce Rwanda for supporting the M23 rebels, few reported on who asked the question.
  It was Scott Stearns of Voice of America, a government broadcaster on whose Broadcasting Board of Governor's Psaki's boss Secretary of State John Kerry sits.
  So the US asked itself a staged question, for the second day in a row, and Psaki pulled out her binder and read a prepared answer. Stearn had asked the same question, without yet being able to cite HRW, on July 22: video here, from Minute 52:16.
  Then, Psaki had promised to get back with an answer. Inner City Press asked US Mission to the UN spokespeople about the VOA question -- as well as about the Congolese Army's 391st Battalion, which after US training has engaged in mass rape and corpses desecrationsee USUN answer here.
  But it appears that Psaki held back the answer a full 24 hours, delivering it after Stearn re-posed the question by citing HRW's study (but not the correction HRW had that morning appended to it.)
  Voice of America, contrary to its recent lobbying, is state media. Inner City Press has filed and received US Freedom of Information Act responses about VOA, showing among other things that its editor Steve Redisch last year asked the UN to "review" the accreditation of Inner City Press. 
  The documents show VOA saying it had the support in this of ReutersAgence France Presse and others on the board of the United Nations Correspondents Association, headed this year by Pamela Falk of CBS.
In full disclosure, Inner City Press has further FOIA requesting pending for documents to which BBG repeatedly denies access.
  VOA and its affilates, which include Radio Marti, Al Hurra and others, have this month been celebrating a legal change allowing them to broadcast what many consider propaganda inside the US, and not only outside of it.
  Without getting here into that debate, the spectacle of state media Voice of America two days in a row asking the US State Department canned questions about the DRC, as curtain raisers to a UN Security Council to chaired Thursday by John Kerry, who is on VOA's governing board, casts a new light. As stated yesterday, this is a machine. 
Footnote: Voice of American and BBG argue for broadcasting propaganda inside the US by claiming there is a clamor for their content. If it's any measure, VOA's State Department "correspondent" Scott Stearns has 46 followers on Twitter; its UN correspondent has during all this been most occupied with the birth of the UK royal baby. 
  How will VOA "cover" the July 25 DRC meeting of the UN Security Council which "editor" John Kerry will be chairing? Will VOA, for example, ask about the US' training of the 391st Battalion (on which HRW was also silent, as on theUN's failed Human Rights Due Diligence Policy under Herve Ladsous) -- and if so, in a similarly canned fashion? Watch this site.