Showing posts with label Frank La Rue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Frank La Rue. Show all posts

Thursday, December 12, 2013

France Says Its "Journalist Protection" Event at UN on Dec 13 is Off the Record" and Can't be Reported On


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 12 -- The French-sponsored meeting about protection of journalists held December 13 in the UN will, ironically, be "off the record" and not for recording.

After that, Inner City Press on the day of Council bilateral meetings asked the French delegation if the December 13 session would be open, though an "Arria formula" meeting.

"It's an open Arria," was the response.

At the next day's press conference, at which Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access planned to ask about this "open Arria," French Ambassador Gerard Araud preemptively announced that all the journalists were invited to the session.
  An invitation went out -- to some -- listing among participants not only Araud but also
Mrs Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO,
Mr David Rohde, Investigative journalist for Thomson Reuters,
Mr Christophe Deloire, Director General of Reporters Without Borders,
Mr Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression,
Mrs Anne-Marie Capomaccio, Head of Office of Radio France Internationale in Washington.
  But now, it turns out, journalists are invited -- but cannot report on it. Araud's spokesman Frederic Jung sent this e-mail the night before the event:
"We have been advised that due to the specific format of this meeting, discussions will be held =off the record=, with no microphones or cameras."
  So France's event about "protection of journalists" will be "off the record, with no microphones or cameras." As they say... incroyable. Watch this site.

 
  

Monday, June 10, 2013

Through UN PRISM, Snowden UNprotected as Whistleblower, Of Ban's Host Country, CFR's Haass & Negroponte


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, June 10 -- Attacks on whistleblower Edward Snowden have begun, some expected and some not. Monday at the Council on Foreign Relations, former US Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte said he hopes Snowden "will be punished." Dog bites man.
But the head of CFR, Richard Haass, said that Snowden isnot even a whistleblower, based on a definition and argument that what he has exposed is not illegal. Man bites dog?
  This a narrow definition of whistleblower whose use by the United Nations Inner City Press has previously covered. Given a lack of legal protections in the UN whistleblowers approaching Inner City Press usually need total anonymity. UN peacekeepers, for example, are afforded no protections at all by the UN.
  In the case of the whistleblower for and about the UN Development Program in North Korea, UNDP argued that he was no whistleblower at all. While after a long fight he was awarded damages, it was for a violation of his due process rights, NOT for the obvious retaliation.
  More recently, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has appealed, apparently automatically, the award of damages to whistleblower James Wasserstrom -- an award lower than Wasserstrom's own legal costs.
  At the June 10 UN noon briefing, Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson Martin Nesirky, in the context of the US National Security Agency PRISM case, if the UN views Snowden as a whistleblower, compared to its treatment of the North Korea case, and for an update on thereport on UN whistleblower protections commissioned by Ban from a Canadian jurist.
  Nesirky said the update will be provided when ready; he did not squarely answer the Snowden as whistleblower or any PRISM question, even though through PRISM as well as Verizon Wireless and the FISA court, UN officials have also been monitored.
  Would that violate the US' Host Country agreement with the UN? That is a question. But would this UN say anything?
  At the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, a civil society statement was being circulated on Monday, to
"express strong concern over recent revelations of surveillance of internet and telephone communications of US and non-US nationals by the government of the USA and the fact that US authorities makes the results of that surveillance available to other governments such as the UK... These revelations suggest a blatant and systematic disregard for human rights as articulated in Articles 17 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), as well as Articles 12 and 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights... But during this session the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression, Mr. Frank La Rue, reported (A/HRC/23/40) worrying new trends in state surveillance of communications with serious implications for the exercise of the human rights to privacy and to freedom of opinion and expression."

  Civil society might speak - but will the UN? Haass will be speaking on Monday evening at the International Peace Institute, across from the UN. Watch this site.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

As Sri Lanka Cracked Down on Press, UN Said Nothing, Now Congratulates Itself

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
www.innercitypress.com/unesco1srilanka050109.html

UNITED NATIONS, May 1 -- While the plights in Sri Lanka of civilians and non-governmental organization seeking to serve them were confined Thursday night to a informal closed door meeting in the UN basement, Friday the lack of free press access in the country was a matter of heated debate in the river-view Delegates' Dining Room. UNESCO, which has otherwise said little about Sri Lanka's crackdown on the press, gave an award to slain newspaper editor Lasantha Wickrematunge. His widow delivered a blistering critique of Mahinda Rajapaksa's barring of reporters from Northern Sri Lanka, and the killing of 16 media professionals since November 2005.

Surreally, two UN officials then praised themselves for the UN's offer of training to journalists in such countries as Iraq. Staffan de Mistura, the UN's envoy in Baghdad, condemned the reporter who threw his shoes at George W. Bush. Inner City Press asked him and his follow UN panelist Frank La Rue, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression to explain what UN Country Teams are supposed to be doing, given Sri Lanka Resident Coordinator Neil Buhne's silence while staff were arrested and detained, journalists barred and killed.

Moderator Barbara Crossette, formerly of the New York Times and now a consultant to UNA-USA, said, "let's make the questions go beyond Sri Lanka" into "what the UN does proactively." Mr. de Mistura said, "without going into Sri Lanka in particular," that the UN in Iraq had "complicity" with the local media in a "campaign of constructive embarrassment" in furtherance of fast elections. This of source was a foreign policy goal of the United States, in a way that criticism of Sri Lanka's crackdown on the press and UN staff does not appear to be.

Frank La Rue, despite being the UN system's expert on press freedom, said "I'm not going to comment on what County Offices have not done, I'm not involved in that work." Who is, then?

Inner City Press, after asking its questions, had urged that time be made for a response from the Sri Lankan government's representative at the event, First Secretary Muditha Halliyadde. Mrs. Halliyadde has been present at each press stakeout in the basement, as her Ambassador Palihakkara has spoken. Friday she joked with Inner City Press, your writing is good if one sided, you make us work until two or three in the morning. Her response, however, was no laughing matter.

Mrs. Halliyadde said that no one is being detained in the IDP camps, it's just that they can't return were terrorists are. But the conflict zone is now less than ten square kilometers. She said that press has access to the conflict zone, and cited a broadcast by Al Jazeera. Inner City Press saw that report, in which Al Jazeera English correspondent David Chater was given access by the Sri Lankan Navy to cruise along the shore of the conflict zone. Seemingly in exchange for the access, the interviews he conducted said very little about the government's shelling or detention practices.

Mrs. Halliyadde said that "Ambassador Nambiar and Sir John Holmes" have visited Sri Lanka and everything is essentially going well. Mr. La Rue countered that he had been barred from the country. But why hadn't he said this before?

The event ended with another question being directed to the representative of Sri Lanka, but the UNESCO moderator essentially ignoring it. The World Press Freedom Day event was over, the baby frisse salad, Moroccan chicken with tomato confit and cheese cake with apricot puree had been eaten, and the UN went on to congratulate itself further. Write nicely about me, Mrs. Halliyadde asked. About her, perhaps. But detentions and shelling by the government, and silence by the UN, is hard to praise. Watch this site.

On March 18, Inner City Press on Wednesday asked Nicholas Burnett, Assistant Director-General for Education at UNESCO, why his agency, while condemn crackdowns on the press in the Philippines and elsewhere has said nothing about the newspaper editors locked up during the current conflict, and journalists previously killed. Mr. Burnett said, I can get you an answer. Video here, from Minute 18:36. Three hours later his spokesperson asked Inner City Press to email the questions, which was done:

As I asked at the briefing earlier today, what has UNESCO had to say about the recent imprisonment of two journalists in Sri Lanka, on which RSF is requesting UN action

This is a specific request, also, for comment on 1) the killing of a journalist described at http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=30312

and 2) on the comments which the Sri Lankan President’s brother, Defense Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa made about Vithyatharan in an interview for ... Australia's Special Broadcasting Service (SBS). “He is involved in the recent air attack and I am telling you if you try to give cover-up for that person you have blood in your hands,” Rajapaksa said. “And if someone says he is arrested because he is in media, that person also has blood on his hands.”

Forty two days later, UNESCO has not answered the questions.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/unesco1srilanka050109.html