Friday, July 24, 2026

On CRA Before FDIC and OCC Even Move the Asset Size Line Banks Are Already Gaming the System

FEDERAL COURTHOUSE, July 22 –  Sources this week say the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC are preparing to raise the asset threshold for full Community Reinvestment Act compliance from $1.6 billion to as much as $10 billion — potentially moving hundreds of banks out of "large bank" status and the full lending and investment scrutiny that comes with it.

Fair Finance Watch has commented on bank mergers spanning nearly this entire range this year. Laid side by side, they show something reporting on a single proposed number can't: banks are not clustered at either extreme. They are spread across the whole spectrum the rulemaking would redraw, and at least one sits precisely where a rule change would newly exempt it from scrutiny it faces today. 

   First, it must be noted that the current leadership of the FDIC and OCC are already gutting CRA. The FDIC dispensed with public notice of branch applications, the very basis of CRA. See, Sept 10, 2025, American Banker, BankThink: "The FDIC is taking the 'community' out of CRA enforcement," by Matthew R. Lee, here.  The OCC has allowed crypto firms into bank, and not answer on how fintechs evade CRA.

Now, to particularly banks, and their gaming of the system: Bank of Nova Scotia's pending application to acquire MapleMark Bank, a Dallas commercial bank with roughly $1 billion in assets — already below today's $1.6 billion threshold. Coastal Bend Bancshares' acquisition of The First National Bank in Port Lavaca creates a combined institution just over $1 billion, also below the current line; FFW's comments documented NOW account minimums rising 50 percent, Money Market minimums rising 150 percent, Education IRAs eliminated, and trust services subject to discontinuation in a rural Gulf Coast county with few alternatives. Facing that record, Coastal Bend's counsel cited the Federal Reserve's own April 21, 2026 supervisory memo citing "Miki" Bowman and signed by Division of Supervision and Regulation Director Randall Guynn, previously the banking industry's own longtime outside counsel, for the proposition that existing CRA ratings could substitute for a full convenience-and-needs review.

FFW found and read the memo. (It may have been publicized to banks, but wasn't to the public).  It does not mention CRA, or convenience and needs, at all. FFW's subsequent FOIA request confirmed no Board guidance connecting the two exists anywhere in Federal Reserve records. 

Just under the current line: Grasshopper Bank, at approximately $1.59 billion, target of Enova International, the publicly traded parent of high-cost lenders CashNetUSA and NetCredit. FFW has separately challenged the Federal Reserve in federal court after the Board redacted even its own questions to Enova; fifteen state attorneys general have told the Board the deal "seeks to evade Congress and circumvent state limits on high-cost or usurious lending," citing Enova's plan to relocate Grasshopper's charter from New York, which caps interest rates, to Utah, which does not.

 Squarely in the middle, and the clearest illustration of what a higher threshold would actually do: CBS Banc-Corp's move on TAG Bancshares, parent of Citizens Bank & Trust of Trenton, Georgia, by CB&S Bank of Russellville, Alabama, creating a combined institution of approximately $3.0 billion. Under today's $1.6 billion threshold, this bank undergoes full CRA review. Under a $10 billion threshold, it would not — and FFW's 2024 HMDA analysis of CB&S Bank's existing lending shows exactly what that review currently catches. In Tennessee, CB&S made 182 mortgage loans to white applicants against 30 denials, and only six loans to African American applicants against nine denials — CB&S denied more Black applicants in Tennessee that year than it approved. In Alabama, the bank made 394 loans to white applicants against 75 denials, versus 17 loans to African American applicants against 14 denials. In Mississippi, 106 loans to white applicants against 19 denials, versus 21 loans to African American applicants against 16 denials. A bank with documented, current, multi-state lending disparities, comfortably clear of the line that subjects it to scrutiny today, comfortably short of the line that would end it.

 Higher still, and just over the number under discussion: Stock Yards Bancorp's acquisition of Field & Main Bancorp of Henderson, Kentucky, creating a combined institution of approximately $10.4 billion — four hundred million dollars over the reported $10 billion threshold. Where the final number lands will determine whether a bank this size continues to face the scrutiny it faces today or not. 

Further up: BancFirst Corporation's pending acquisition of SpiritBank, where FFW's comment documented a live, current disparity: a 2025 HMDA record of one loan to an African American applicant against five to white applicants in the Tulsa assessment area, and a CRA evaluation showing zero small business loans originated in low-income census tracts.

 And then two transactions, at very different scales, that converge on the same state. Home Bancshares' Centennial Bank, at approximately $23 billion, sits well clear of any threshold the rulemaking would touch: full CRA review was never in question for a bank this size, threshold change or not.

But FFW's 2024 HMDA analysis shows exactly what that review is meant to catch, and Centennial is now trying to expand into new territory anyway. In Arkansas, Centennial made 870 mortgage loans to white applicants against 242 denials, versus 64 loans to African American applicants against 48 denials — and FFW's analysis found Centennial's lending to Black Arkansans has fallen for years, from 113 loans in 2020 to just 64 in 2024. In Florida, 406 loans to white applicants against 146 denials, versus 23 loans to African American applicants against 27 denials, Centennial denied more Black applicants in Florida that year than it approved. In Alabama, 20 loans to white applicants against 11 denials, versus a single loan to an African American applicant. In Texas, 477 loans to white applicants against 151 denials, versus 14 loans to African American applicants against 12 denials.  Centennial now wants to expand into Tennessee, the same state where CB&S Bank, described above, already shows the sharpest lending disparity of any bank in this year's comment file.

FFW filed in opposition to Centennial's Tennessee expansion and requested a hearing, arguing that a bank whose lending to Black applicants has been shrinking for four years, and denies Black applicants more often than it approves them in at least one state already, should not be permitted to bring that pattern into a new one. Two banks, two very different asset sizes, one shared destination, and — on FFW's own numbers — the same disparate pattern waiting for them there.  Columbia Financial's acquisition of Northfield Bancorp, closed July 20 at $18.0 billion in pro forma assets, and OceanFirst Financial's acquisition of Flushing Financial, closed earlier this year at roughly $23.5 billion, round out the well-clear-of-any-threshold group — both remain subject to full CRA review under either the current $1.6 billion line or the reported $10 billion one. 

One more exits the statute by a different door entirely: The Hicksville Bank, a $227 million community bank in Ohio, is being acquired not by another bank but by Interra Credit Union — an institution the Community Reinvestment Act does not reach at all, regardless of size, because CRA applies to banks, not credit unions. 

Put together, these Fair Finance Watch's 2026 files  amounts to a natural experiment in what an asset threshold actually does. Real bank mergers this year sit on both sides of nearly every plausible place regulators could draw the line — from $227 million exiting by charter conversion, through $1 billion, $1.6 billion, $3 billion, $10.4 billion, up to $23.5 billion, comfortably clear of any number under discussion.

Somewhere in that middle band sits a $3 billion Alabama-Georgia bank merger that would keep its current oversight today and lose it tomorrow, on the strength of nothing but where a number lands — while a $23 billion bank whose own lending to Black Arkansans has been quietly shrinking for years tries to bring the same pattern into a state where a smaller bank, soon to be exempted, has already gotten there first. We'll have more on all this. Watch this site.   

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here