On US Torture Report, UN Tells ICP Ban Ki-moon Has No Comment, Do UN Security Council Members?

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 9 -- After the much anticipated US torture report was released, and US Senator Diane Feinstein had spoken on the Senate floor on the morning of December 9, at the day's UN noon briefing in New York Inner City Press asked UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric for a comment from Ban Ki-moon, which was expected.

But Dujarric said that there was no comment, that the UN was following it. Video here, and embedded below. There was no comment on, for example, a torture victim being chained naked to a cement floor and dying of hypothermia.

This silence from Ban Ki-moon continued throughout December 9, even as he issued read-outs with the Saudi oil minister, for example.

The UN Security Council churned on -- UN Peacekeeping chief refused to answer a simple Inner City Press question as he left the Council, here -- even with some of the countries which hosted “black sites” for torture members of the Council.

An Amnesty International representative said that countries that are members of the International Criminal Court, which hosted such sites, could be acted against by the Court. UN expert Ben Emmerson chimed in, calling for prosecutions:

“the summary of the Feinstein report which was released this afternoon confirms what the international community has long believed - that there was a clear policy orchestrated at a high level within the Bush administration, which allowed to commit systematic crimes and gross violations of international human rights law.. The identities of the perpetrators, and many other details, have been redacted in the published summary report but are known to the Select Committee and to those who provided the Committee with information on the program... Torture is a crime of universal jurisdiction. The perpetrators may be prosecuted by any other country they may travel to. However, the primary responsibility for bringing them to justice rests with the US Department of Justice and the Attorney General.”

But still, from Ban Ki-moon, silence. Watch this site.

   

Yemen Eclipsed by Weapons Seizure & Iran Sanctions Committee, No Drones

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 7 – Yemen has been cited as one of the Security Council's successes, about which it remains very concerned. 

   But Thursday's sixty-day briefing by UN envoy Jamal Benomar attracted interest mostly due to the allegation that weapons seized by the government came from Iran.

  Outside the closed door meeting, Western diplomats primed the pump speaking about a request from Yemen's Hadi government to “the relevant sanctions committee” to investigate the weapons – that would be, the Iran sanctions committee.

  Thus primed, when Benomar came out to the stakeout, after he vaguely referred to spoilers – which would seem to refer to Ali Saleh – he was asked by a wire service much concerned about Iran if the arms shipment from Iran (“allegedly” from Iran, it was quickly pointed out) was indicative of the spoilers he referred to.

  Benomar answered, never naming the committee to which the complaint was directed. But it is the Resolution 1737 Committee, the Iran Sanctions committee.

  Non-western diplomats who had been in the meeting told Inner City Press that the weapons and Iran was a part, but not the majority, of the discussion. But the Iran angle was being pushed and promoted outside.

   Inner City Press asked Benomar about the promised but delayed Transitional Justice law. He said the UN would like to see discussion of a new law, that comports with international standards. Would that remove immunity from Ali Saleh?

 During the Security Council's trip they were told by Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman and others that Saleh must be removed from politics.

   Benomar complained how little of the $8 billion pledged to Yemen has come through. He did not directly mention it, but there have been protesters in front of the Council of Ministers office, amid calls for a new uprising, surrounded by the Fourth Armored Brigade.

   As the session broke up, Inner City Press asked UK Permanent Representative Mark Lyall Grant if the weapons allegedly from Iran took the focus away from the Yemen transition issues. 

  Lyall Grant told Inner City Press that while there is a move for a press statement on the weapons issues – Inner City Press understands that China on Thursday said it had to check with Beijing – there is also a move for a Presidential Statement on the Yemen issues.

   But will the weapons allegedly from Iran dominate some coverage? We will bet, yes.

   While the Council met behind closed doors about Yemen, in the Senate in Washington prospective CIA director John Brennan was questioned about torture, Benghazi, leaks and especially drones. 

  Protesters unfurled signs; chair Diane Feinstein excused the killing of American citizens by drones since those targeted were “not upstanding.” (“Not anymore,” remarked one wag.)

  UN special rapporteur Ben Emmerson was reported to "endorse" Brennan as US CIA chief - strange, for a UN affiliated person.

   Inner City Press at the UNTV stakeout tried to ask Benomar a question about drones, about the US drone base in Saudi Arabia. But there were more Iran questions to be fielded, a whole machinery to be fed.

  If even the Western members of the Security Council acknowledge that the weapons allegedly from Iran was only a small part of Thursday's discussion, why it is pitched, accepted and promoted as the main story?

Sanctions footnotes: On another sanctions front, after the meeting the Permanent Representative of Eritrea knocked on the door to get into the Security Council. He told Inner City Press it was to deliver a letter to the chair of his (and Somalia's) sanctions committee.

  There's talk of removing the arms embargo on Somalia. But will the Council do it? Watch this site.