Showing posts with label Jean-Jacques Graisse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jean-Jacques Graisse. Show all posts

Friday, April 5, 2013

At UN, Before Staff Walkout, Audio Shows Ban's War on Labor, No Confidence



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 5 -- How dysfunctional the UN's relations with its staff have become under Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was shown Friday by staff's walkout of a meeting with Ban's departing chief of the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management, Jean-Jacques Graisse.
  Inner City Press staked out the meeting, held in Conference Room 7 in the UN's North Lawn building, and published a story about it as the meeting broke up.
In the three hours since, Inner City Press has been provided with an audio recording of the meeting, and runs the 16 minutes question and answer session, here.
  As if in a dark comedy about layoffs and austerity, an official of the Office of Human Resources Management tells a 21 year UN veteran, I understand you are upset, but you need to market yourself.
Another participant reminds Graisse and his Assistant Secretary General Franz Baumann off the UN Staff Union wide vote of “no confidence” in Ban Ki-moon, and says it extends to those officials present.
They are mocked for earning $200,000 but still claiming they need housing subsidy, while 59 or 100 jobs are slated to be cut.
  Graisse is accused of mis-stating a UN dispute tribunal ruling on 19 posts. Graisse said only nine were in the Inspira computer system, 10 were “in the pipeline.”
The name of Ban's chief of staff Susana Malcorra, who many say got her former colleague Graisse the job as she has moved in so many others, is cited.
Who is running the show at the UN, while for example it conducted a raid on Inner City Press' office on March 18, as the president of its UN Censorship Alliance, Pamela Falk of CBS, took photographs? 
  Immediately after Ban's spokesperson was contacted by an outside journalist about the raid, photographs of Inner City Press' desk and bookshelf were leaked to BuzzFeed.com by an anonymous e-mail account “Concerned UN Reporter.”Who is behind this?
  Ban Ki-moon, typically, can been away all week, in San Marino, Andorra and Monaco. Now with a flourish he's confirmed he will stay away to meet President Barack Obama on April 11. 
  Could an elected politician act this way, leaving chaos at home, no confidence? No. But this is the UN. Watch this site.

After Staff Union “No Confidence” in Ban, Walk-Out of Meeting with Graisse



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 5 -- Is it any wonder that the UN can't mediate in the Middle East, Congo or Koreas, if it can't even speak to its own staff?
  After the UN Staff Union voted “no confidence” in Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, his outgoing head of the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management Jean-Jacques Graisse has been trying to meet with the Publishing Section.
  From the third sub-basement they had complained, with evidence, that the UN intended to eliminate their jobs. Then when Hurricane Sandy hit, the UN took advantage. Now this.
  After that Unit, Unit 5, said again, “no confidence,” Graisse on April 4 sent this out:
Date: 04/04/2013 04:18PM
Subject: On behalf of Acting Head of DGACM Mr Graisse - to all staff of the Publishing Section
Dear Colleagues:
Earlier this week, I invited the DGACM staff representatives and the President of the New York Staff Union to meet with DGACM management tomorrow, Friday, 5 April to discuss the matters related to the Publishing Section. Regrettably, the representatives of Unit 5 (Publishing Section), declined my invitation, and, as a consequence, so did the other DGACM staff representatives.
Therefore, I invite you to a general staff meeting tomorrow at 3 p.m. in room NLB-7. All DGACM staff representatives, President of the New York Staff Union as well as officials of the Department of Management are hereby also invited.
I look forward to seeing you tomorrow.
Jean-Jacques Graisse
  Inner City Press went and staked-out the meeting. Some from Unit 5 went in, but there was tension in the air. 
  While they were inside, Inner City Press covered the beginning of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions with a European-heavy group of big wigs in from the UN's mission in Cote d'Ivoire. We hope to have more on that.
Suddenly the Unit 5 crew came out. We walked out, they told Inner City Press. “No confidence.” And so it goes at the UN.
Footnote: If Ban's spokesperson's office hadn't hit the new low of refusing to even take questions, perhaps this interim report could have had more.

After Staff No Confidence in Ban, Graisse Can't Get a Meeting, Gettu in Wings



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 4 -- Fifty days after the UN Staff Union voted “no confidence” in Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Ban's outgoing chief of the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management Jean-Jacques Graisse can't even get a meeting with his staff.
  On March 28, Graisse wrote to Staff Union leaders as well as Ban officials Susana Malcorra, Catherine Pollard and Franz Baumann, asking for an “emergency” meeting on April 3. He said it concerned the “force majeure” event of Hurricane Sandy, which allowed the UN to move on plans to kill off publishing jobs.
  On April 2, Graisse's office asked, “May we propose to meet for an emergency DGACM staff-management consultation on Friday, 5th April, from 10 to 12 in the morning, in room S-1517, to discuss the current temporary situation resulting from the impact of storm Sandy with regards to the Publishing Section staff? Our invitation to President of the Staff Union to participate in the meeting if she finds it acceptable and useful remains open.”
After some back and forth, he was told that some in the Union, due to the no confidence vote of January 24, would decline to meet with him. And this turned out to be true:
As stated previously we intend to abide by the vote of no confidence taken by the EGM of the staff. It will be up to the staff to mandate us to meet with the management.
Just to remind all of our fellow DGACM we initiated a dialogue with Mr. Graisse when he first came subsequent to that meeting and the subsequent meeting that included Mr. Baumann, we went back and forth on the issue of the meeting record being falsified and our position being misrepresented. Despite repeated attempts to have this corrected by them and their refusal, this matter is now before MEU. The illegal actions by Mr. Baumann to restructure the Publishing Section without mandate and the pretext of a vague plan in an Annex of a budget proposal was the subject of tribunal orders of Suspension of Action and Interim Relief. To remind you, the Tribunal in Order No. 77 (NY/2013) of 27 March 2013 "order[ed] the Respondent to suspend the implementation of the decision to conduct a recruitment exercise via Inspira, or by any other means whatsoever, for 19 new posts in the Publishing Section, DGACM, for a period of 60 days from the date of this Order or pending a final determination of the substantive merits of the application, if sooner, or until such further Order as may be deemed appropriate by the Tribunal".
It is our position that DGACM has continually acted without regard to any mandates, rules, or staff rights. Let us not waste anymore time meeting with a management in which the staff has no confidence and continue to show bad faith to us. In calling for the meeting, Mr. Graisse stated that "[t]he urgency is dictated by the fact that a number of PS staff currently have no meaningful work assignments - a situation unacceptable to them as well to the management and Member States." This is not a cause for staff-management consultation, but an indictment of the incompetency and failure of the management of DGACM.
The DGACM management must show that it is sincere in establishing proper relations or willing to mend their ways and work to rebuilding trust and the confidence of the staff. Regrettably, I don't see this happening with the DGACM management of Mr. Graisse, Mr. Baumann, Mr. Olafsson, Ms. Chiulli, Mr. Nanadoe and Mr. Shpiniov.
And there you have it. But will it be different with Graisse replaced by Gettu? There's talk of businesses in Addis. Meanwhile Ban himself has been in San Marina, Andorra and Monaco. 
  Ban USG for Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous openly refuses to answer Press questions about spreading cholera and rapes by the UN's partners. 
 Ban's Department of Public Information raided the Press' office, while the president of the UN's Censorship Alliance Pam Falk of CBS took photos. Now DPI won't even give the names of those allowed by it to enter. So it goes at the UN. Watch this site.

Friday, March 15, 2013

Exclusive: After Hurricane Sandy, UN Staff Left With Wet Rotting Paper, Dust Masks, No Haz-Mat Suits, They Say



By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive

UNITED NATIONS, March 14 -- In the aftermath of Super Storm Sandy, UN staff were left “co-located” with wet and rotting paper, then made to work with dust masks while outside clean up crew members had full hazardous material gear.

  This, Inner City Press was told in real-time just after the storm. But it was finally raised to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon chief of staff Susana Malcorra, who passed the issues for response to the chief of Management, Yukio Takasu.

  Earlier today, Takasu gave the UN Secretariat's spin. Inner City Press has exclusively obtained and now published it:

From: USG Yukio Takasu
To: Barbara Tavora-Jainchill [Staff Union]
Cc: Catherine Pollard [OHRC], Jean-Jacques Graisse [DGACM], Kevin Kennedy [DSS], Dmitri Dovgopoly, Susana Malcorra [CdC]/NY/UNO@UNHQ
Date: 14/03/2013
Subject: Re: UN Staff working in potentially hazardous parts of the compound post Sandy

Dear Barbara,

1. Reference is made to the letter dated 20 February 2013 from the Chair of the United Nations Staff Relief Committee for the victims of hurricane Sandy in the City of New York and the Tri-state communities to you, which you shared with us by email on 21 February 2013.

2. I am pleased to provide the following clarifications to concerns raised in the letter:

3. The letter states that:

a. UN staff indicate that they were asked to perform cleanup and maintenance duties without proper protective gear and/or health and safety guidance, although black water and increasing mold spores were evident.”

Comments: On 2 and 16 November 2012, advice was communicated to departmental Executive Officers by the Director of Facilities and Commercial Services Division (FCSD), in conjunction with Medical Services Division (MSD), informing them of planning for temporary relocation of staff and clean-up activities, and providing instructions on the means of protection required for staff who needed to enter into any flood-affected area. This included use of eye protection, gloves and N95 masks as advised by MSD. This advice was further communicated by supervisors of the various departments to their respective staff.

b. Some staff also noticed that contractors, performing similar duties alongside staff, were wearing full protective hazmat gear and equipment.

Comments: As per normal practice, contractors from the professional cleaning company initially wore full protection gear; within a few days, however, it was clear that this was not required and they no longer wore this gear. It is emphasised that the level of protection recommended for our staff, i.e. N95 masks and gloves, was adequate for the risk.

c. One FMS supervisor finally held a first information meeting on 19 November. It was at that time that those staff were given one disposable face mask.

Comments: As noted above, the Director of FCSD communicated with departmental Executive Officers as early as 2 November 2012, which was repeated on 16 November 2012. This information was further communicated to their staff by DSS, DGACM, DPI and DM supervisors. .

d. Furthermore, it has been pointed out that wet and mold-laden paper and other material made hazardous by the storm had been co-located with staff. This persisted for several months until its recent removal.

Comments: One of the main concerns during the cleanup was disposal of damaged material. Early disposal of wet items was essential. While some of these items had to be retained pending validation for insurance purposes, specific areas were identified for storing these items so that drying was maximised, and the impact on clean areas and exposure of staff was limited.

e. Some staff continue to work in areas with moldy vents/shafts that have not been assessed or cleaned since Sandy.

Comments: The 3B area has been independently assessed as having clean air with spore counts well below limits required by local host country law, as communicated to departmental focal points on 21 December 2012 and confirmed again as recently as 27 February 2013. We have no knowledge of moldy vents or shafts, and if the Staff Union has evidence of specific locations where this might be the case we would appreciate FMS being informed.

f. While many staff members of FMS visited the Medical Service immediately after the storm, other have also visited private doctors because they are already experiencing some health problems. Because of the potential for future problems, it is important to ensure that information regarding UN staff tasked with working in affected areas be properly documented. We have learned from other environmental disasters (nature or man-made), which resulted in the release of environmental toxins, adverse health effects may not manifest for months and sometimes years.

Comments: A total of fourteen (14) staff members approached the Medical Service in the aftermath of Sandy to seek advice. One FMS staff was provided restriction not to work in 3B. MSD has also confirmed that if staff entered the 3B areas, without the benefit of the protective equipment (gloves and masks), it does not automatically mean that they will have a problem. Most bacteria, molds and chemicals cause immediate problems, not problems that occur months or years later. Notwithstanding the above, MSD will be sending individual emails to those staff who are known to have been in the 3B area either for clean up or to retrieve their personal items, providing them this information and inviting them to visit the Medical Service should they have any concerns. A separate communication will also be posted on iseek for the general information of all staff.

5. Please rest assured that the safety of our staff is of primary importance to us, and we will continue to take the necessary steps to ensure that this is not compromised.

Yukio Takasu

   Is this acceptable? Ban has asked to meet with Staff Union officials next week. Some are refusing to go. Those who do, will they seek public retraction of the claim that New York UN staff are selfish? Will they address and rebut the above? Watch this site.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

UN Audit Slams UMOJA As Corporate Friends Hired, Pension Fund PWC Too



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, August 23 -- The UN's much-delayed Enterprise Resource Planning systems upgrade "UMOJA" has been plagued by nepotism and the hiring of friends from its inception.


   Now, ostensibly to solve the problem, Ernesto Baca has been brought in, previously of the World Food Program and before that Telecom Argentina. 

  Strikingly, this is the same trajectory as Ban Ki-moon's current chief of staff Susana Malcorra. Perhaps those she is bringing in, like Mr. Graisse at the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management, are competent. 

 But what about the process? Weeks ago Inner City Press wrote and asked the UN if Ms. Malcorra recused herself from the process that brought in Graisse, so far without answer. How about Mr. Baca?

   Today's system is more and more shot through with these corporate conflicts of interest. At the UN Joint Staff Pension Fund, we find that former PriceWaterhouseCoopers consultant is now Chief Financial Officer at Pension Fund. What are the restrictions on such hiring from consultants?

   Meanwhile there a hole in the Pension Fund, which defenders call merely "actuarial." But the hole is big; now, retirement age is to be raised to 65 in 2014. How is accountable for under-performing the market? Who is accountable at the UN?

   In the interim, Inner City Press has obtained and is putting online the Board of Auditors report on UMOJA, here, including under-estimate of cost and lack of transparency. 

  A well placed source exclusive tells Inner City Press of UMOJA, "there was no software because the UN could not sign a contract with SAP. Later, the scope was drastically reduced. Bottom line is that the staffing table is bloated with D1 and P5s. Including posts seconded from other offices, there are 11 D1s and over 15 P5s for a staffing table of less than 100 people."

The UMOJA web site has a list of "Official Documents" -- but this audit is not among them. So here it is, for transparency. Watch this site.

From UN, South Koreans Choi & Kang To Go, Eyes on DGACM, Opaque

From UN, South Koreans Choi & Kang To Go, Eyes on DGACM, Opaque  

By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive 

UNITED NATIONS, August 23, updated -- Citing the five year mobility rule of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, Ban's fellow South Korea Choi Soon-hong is set to leave his Chief Information Technology Officer post at the UN. They are taking resumes for his replacement until September 17.    Sources tell Inner City Press Choi asked for a six month extension but was offered only three; he has decided to leave. Inner City Press asked about this at Thursday's noon briefing.    Meanwhile in Geneva another native of South Korea, deputy High Commission for Human Rights Kyung-wha Kang, is also set to go. On this, resumes are being accepted until October 15.    And so insiders tell Inner City Press, there must be a South Korea Under Secretary General in the works, since two Assistant Secretaries General are leaving.    

There is only one high profile USG post left at UN Headquarters, the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management post currently held by a Belgian "acting" director Jean-Jacques Graisse who, as first reported by Inner City Press, was the one who brought Ban's current chief of staff Susana Malcorra into the World Food Program.   Graisse's UN "Biographical Note" states that "Mr. Graisse’s most recent position was as Senior Deputy Executive Director responsible for the World Food Program’s (WFP) multibillion-dollar emergency, development and logistics operations around the world."    Unstated but significant is that after Graisse took over in January 2004 as "Senior Deputy Executive Director (Operations Department)," in July 2004 he brought into WFP as Deputy Executive Director (Administration) Susana Malcorra.    He was named as "acting" head of DGACM rather than the position going on an interim basis to Franz Baumann. Other ascribed this to staff complaints against Baumann and austerity; others to the fact that Baumann is a candidate for this USG post.    But given recent moves, the sources say, watch for a South Korean native to get this post, combined with the Protocol post, a triple play or even clean sweep. Another asked, perhaps connected, all this to upgrade Kim Won-soo to USG?  

  For DGACM, resumes are accepted through September 10.     Inner City Press weeks ago asked the UN to state if Malcorra recused herself from the process by which Graise was put in at DGACM. So far, no answer.

 Watch this site.

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Amid Saudi Syria Snafu, "Acting" DGACM Chief's Malcorra Links Raised

Amid Saudi Syria Snafu, "Acting" DGACM Chief's Malcorra Links Raised  

By Matthew Russell Lee, Follow up on Exclusive  

UNITED NATIONS, August 2 -- With a cloud thrown over the UN General Assembly vote on Saudi Arabia's Syria resolution by a notice linking to a version of the resolution Saudi Arabia told member states had been superseded, Inner City Press asked four UN spokespeople who was responsible.    Two and a half hours before the scheduled vote, there was still no answer. Now it is time.  

  Back on July 13, 2012, the UN announced that Secretary General Ban Ki-moon had named "Jean-Jacques Graisse of Belgium as Acting Head, Department of General Assembly and Conference Management."     His UN "Biographical Note" states that "Mr. Graisse’s most recent position was as Senior Deputy Executive Director responsible for the World Food Program’s (WFP) multibillion-dollar emergency, development and logistics operations around the world."  

  Unstated but significant is that after Graisse took over in January 2004 as "Senior Deputy Executive Director (Operations Department)," in July 2004 he brought into WFP as Deputy Executive Director (Administration) Susana Malcorra.    Malcorra is now Ban Ki-moon's chief of staff, still very much involved in the Department of Field Support she used to run, and now, staff have exclusively told Inner City Press, "involved" in DGACM. 

   They point also to moves with the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Matters, which we will address in coming days.  But it raises the question: why did Ban (and Malcorra) name only an "Acting" head of DGACM, the Secretariat's largest Department, and why THIS particular acting chief?    Other sources say that Ban wanted to keep on in the post the Egyptian Muhammad Shaaban Shaaban, despite a troubling UN court system finding against his management practices. "Reformers" wanted Shaaban out; the compromise was to appoint only an "acting" head and apparently Malcorra got to choose, they say. Was there recusal?    Others point out that the appointment of an outside "acting" head of DGACM is strange, since in the normal course Assistant Secretary General Franz Baumann would have been named Officer in Charge. 

    But Baumann's management moves have left a trail of staff complaints. And so an acting head, and this one. And now, this GA problem. 

Watch this site