Showing posts with label jean-marie guehenno. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jean-marie guehenno. Show all posts

Thursday, July 9, 2015

After Herve Ladsous Spoonfeeds Scribes on South Sudan, FUNCA Asks UN Why, And If CAR Rapes Panel Has Spoken With Ladsous


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, July 9 -- While refusing to answer questions about any protection of civilians in South Sudan, or about his role in covering up French soldiers' rape of children in the Central African Republic, the reclusive head of UN Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous on July 8 spoon-fed a "small group of reporters" his views on South Sudan. On July 9, Inner City Press for the Free UN Coalition for Access asked the UN about it,video here.
  Ladsous did not speak at the UNTV stakeout, as his also French predecessors Alain Le Roy and Jean-Marie Guehenno did; he refused to answer Inner City Press about any steps to protect civilians at Malakal, nor if Ban Ki-moon's Panel on the CAR rapes has spoken to him yet.
  Instead, hours after Ladsous scurried from the Security Council to the elevator without answering, ever-pliant US Voice of America and Reuters channeled his quotes to a "small group of reporters." This is how propaganda works, and how rapes like in Bangui and Tabit in Dafur and Minova in DRC before it are covered up.
  And so on July 9, Inner City Press for FUNCA asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, video here:

Inner City Press: on press freedom.  The Sri Lankan President, [Maithripala] Sirisena, some of whose moves have been praised by the Secretary-General, has decided to reinstitute something called the Sri Lankan Press Council that has the power to put journalists in jail for their reporting, only for speech or writing.  And I wanted to know, since groups are condemning this, does the Secretary-General have any view on that?

Spokesman Dujarric:  We'll take… we'll take a look.  Obviously, the Secretary-General [would] urge any country to ensure that laws are there to support press freedom and not impede them.  I'll take a look at the specific case.

Inner City Press:  Possibly on that same front, this is a factual question.  Yesterday there was a consultation… closed-door consultation about South Sudan.  And afterwards, Mr. [Hervé] Ladsous didn't speak at the stakeout, declined questions on the stairway.  But afterwards, there were at least two stories saying he told a small group of reporters that he was requesting an arms embargo on the Government or all sides on South Sudan.  I wanted to know, one, is that the UN position?  Two, where and how did Secretary-General… Under-Secretary-General Ladsous who's… he's a public official.  Like, is this really his position?  Why didn't he go to the stakeout or say…

Spokesman:  I think… [cross talk] Yes, he is, indeed, a public official.  UN officials give interviews left, right and centre.

Inner City Press:  Was this filmed?  A transcript?  Is there some way…

Spokesman:  Matthew, I understand.  There's no… you know, we don't provide transcripts of interviews that journalists do, just as we don't provide transcripts of interviews the Secretary-General does with individual journalists or group of journalists.  What I can tell you that obviously the… you know, the issue of… I mean, I think we've seen in South Sudan the toll that it's taken on civilians since this started more than a year ago, and that if the flow of weapons and equipment is not stemmed, civilians will continue to die in large numbers.  I think the Secretary-General, the UN, feels that it's time to end the supply of weapons and military equipment to all parties on the conflict.  Now, obviously, the decision of an embargo is up to the [Security Council], but it is clearly our position that we feel that continued flow of weapons to all members should stop.

Inner City Press:  Since his two predecessors at DPKO (Department of Peacekeeping Operations) used to do these kind of announcements at a stakeout--

Spokesman:  Listen, I think… [cross talk] I think there are…

Inner City Press:  To have that news.

Spokesman:  There are different modes of communicating.  Mr. Ladsous has done numerous stakeouts.

Inner City Press:  When was the last one?

Spokesman:  You can check, but he often does a stakeout, or other senior DPKO officials do a stakeout.  Senior UN officials are all free to use different methods to communicate and we’re also available daily here to answer those questions.

Inner City Press:  One final question.  Has the panel on the Central African Republic sexual abuse issues spoken to Mr. Ladsous yet, and can you describe the status of the panel's work?

Spokesman:  No, the panel will begin its work very shortly.  Who they will speak to, when they will speak, I don't know.  I don't want to know.  It's up to them to do their work independently.  And it will be then… they will then make… report back to the Secretary-General.  The Secretary-General has clearly said that that report will be made public.  And we can see who they've spoken to.

Thank you. [Video here.]
  Ladsous recently had Ban Ki-moon's guards eject Inner City Press from an open meeting. The old UN Correspondents Association, corrupted by AFP and Reuters and VOA into being now the UN's Censorship Alliance, said not a word about it, while the new Free UN Coalition for Access asked the UN, and posted a flier. 
  Ladsous is destroying not only UN Peacekeeping -- do a News search, it's mostly about sexual abuse -- but also other sections of the UN world. And the scribes just keep channeling. Watch this site.
  The UN Security Council on July 1 imposed sanctions including a travel ban on six South Sudan individuals, for only one of which the UN has a passport number listed. Travel ban on non-travelers?

  Hours later, UN Secretary General issued a statement condemning an attack on the UN's Protection of Civilians site in Malakal, specifically asking for an investigation from Riek Machar and Johnson Olony.
  But on July 8, after UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous briefed the Security Council behind closed doors about South Sudan, and Inner City Press asked him about Malakal when he came out of the Council, Ladsous refused to answer. Periscope video here for now. (He also refused to answer if the Central African Republic sexual abuse investigation panel has spoken with him yet.)
 So when the Security Council's president for July Gerard van Bohemen of New Zealand came to the stakeout, Inner City Press asked him if Malakal and how the UN can better protect civilians was discussed. He answered that this was not discussed in the consultation; neither was Riek Machar's public comments that fighting will continue as long as Salva Kiir, whose term expires on July 8, remains in power. Periscope video here, for now.
Inner City Press Q: On South Sudan, as to UNMIS, was there a discussion of the incident in Malakal where an IDP was killed? And, Riek Machar has said he’ll keep fighting as long as Salva Kiir stays in power, and that Salva Kiir's term expires today, July 8. Did this come up?

A: Neither of those specific situations have been discussed today.

  How could neither of this -- the Machar comments and especially the killing at Malakal and how the UN could do better -- have been raised by or to Ladsous? We'll be seeking more on this - and on the CAR sexual abuse panel. Watch this site.
 Of the UNSC sancctions, one of those now sanctioned, without a listed passport, is Peter Gadet, regarding whom Inner City Press has previously asked the US State Department, here. The individual WITH the passport is Marial Chanuong Yol Mangok, Passport no.: R00005943, South Sudan. Here's the full list, from US Ambassador Samantha Power's July 1 statement:
"Today, the Security Council took strong action in support of a peaceful end to the conflict in South Sudan by sanctioning six South Sudanese individuals for fueling the ongoing conflict and contributing to the devastating humanitarian crisis in their country.

Major-General Marial Chanuong Yol Mangok; Lieutenant-General Gabriel Jok Riak;  Major-General Santino Deng Wol; Major-General Simon Gatwech Dual; Major-General James Koang Chuol; and Major-General Peter Gadet will now be subject to a global travel ban and asset freeze for their contributions to a conflict that has  left more than 6.5 million people in need of humanitarian assistance and forced more than 2 million from their homes."
  Back on May 20, six days after the UN's envoy to South Sudan Ellen Loj spoke to the Security Council and to the Press at the Council stakeout on May 14, on the evening of May 20 the US State Department issued a statement about violence in South Sudan:
"The United States condemns the intensified fighting and violence in Unity, Upper Nile, and Jonglei states in South Sudan by the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, the armed opposition, and forces led by General Johnson Olony that have led to massive new developments and had a devastating effect on civilians.  We call on all armed groups to immediately halt offensive actions taken in contravention of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement.
Violations of international humanitarian norms, including the outright targeting of civilians already vulnerable to greater harm, especially women and children, and grave human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law by all sides are unacceptable.  The international community will hold those who perpetrate such abuses and violations to account.  We call on all sides to silence the guns immediately, permit the UN Mission in South Sudan to investigate the sites of all alleged human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, and allow all humanitarian workers immediate, free and unobstructed access to conflicted-affected communities regardless of their locations.
The human, social, and economic costs of this war have been devastating and the long-suffering people of South Sudan will also bear the brunt of the potential long-term consequences of this escalating fighting.  Any damage to South Sudan’s oil infrastructure is an additional life-long wound to the people and jeopardizes South Sudan’s development and rebuilding.  These resources belong to all South Sudanese people and the needs of the nation should be prioritized over the violent intentions of a few.
We will continue to work for a better future for all South Sudanese citizens and condemn those that intentionally jeopardize their collective future."
    Inner City Press on May 15 asked Loj about the UN Mission in South Sudan base in Bentiu, and more generally about proposals to lift UN immunity, called Code Blue, in the wake of the alleged rape of children in Central African Republic by French "peacekeepers" in the Sangaris force, allegedly covered up by French UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous.   (While the Security Council, on which France has one of five permanent veto-wielding seats, has taken no action on this issue, the General Assembly's Fifth (Budget) Committee has summoned Ban Ki-moon's chief of staff to a close door meeting, as Inner City Press first reported.)
  The Council's statement mentions for example the UNMISS camp at Bentiu, but none of the issues raised to and by Loj at her May 14 stakeout and May 15 press conference. Video here.
  Loj acknowledged that the new Bentiu camp she had referred to the day prior was not yet ready, and that SPLA intelligence are sometimes in front of the existing camp. She again noted camp residents, not only in Bentiu but also in Juba, cutting the wires of the fence. Afterward, her and one of Ladsous' spokespeople said that journalists are free to visit the Bentui camp (although Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access have heard differently; we hope to have more on this.)

  Here is the Security Council's May 17 press statement:

The following Security Council press statement was issued today by Council President Raimonda Murmokaité (Lithuania):

On 14 May, the members of the Security Council were briefed by Special Representative of the Secretary-General Ellen Margrethe Løj on the situation in South Sudan.

The members of the Security Council expressed condemnation at the renewed and ongoing large-scale violence in Unity State caused by the recent Government of South Sudan offensive and resulting in the displacement of more than 100,000 civilians and the suspension of nearly all activity and delivery of aid to populations in the affected areas, over 300,000 civilians, by humanitarian agencies and organizations.  The members of the Security Council further expressed their condemnation of the large-scale attack initiated on 15 May by the SPLM/A (in Opposition) on the town of Malakal, in Upper Nile State. 

The members of the Security Council underlined their grave concern that as a result of violence and increased insecurity since the beginning of the conflict, more than 50,000 internally displaced persons have sought shelter and assistance at the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) camp in Bentiu, and an additional nearly 25,000 at the UNMISS camp in Malakal, only further magnifying a dire humanitarian crisis.

The members of the Security Council condemned in the strongest terms the repeated violations of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement accepted and signed by the Republic of South Sudan and the SPLM/A (in Opposition) on 23 January 2014, and underscored that there is no military solution to this conflict that has now lasted more than 17 months.  

The members of the Security Council called upon all parties to engage meaningfully in the peace process so as to bring about a political solution to the crisis and an end to the conflict.  They acknowledged the IGAD-led peace process and urged renewed regional and international efforts to swiftly implement a common plan and to table a reasonable and comprehensive solution to end the crisis in South Sudan.  In this context, they reiterated their willingness to impose sanctions against those who threaten the peace, security, or stability of South Sudan as established in resolution 2206 (2015), and noted the 24 March 2015 African Union Peace and Security Council Communiqué on South Sudan and the 12 May 2015 African Union Commission Chairperson’s Statement on South Sudan in this regard.

The members of the Security Council reiterated their full support for UNMISS peacekeepers and for the vital mandate they are performing under very difficult conditions, including to protect civilians in South Sudan.  They demanded that all parties end intimidation and harassment against UNMISS and humanitarian personnel, cease ongoing restrictions on freedom of movement, and allow UNMISS to fully implement its mandate.  They further demanded full adherence to the Status of Forces Agreement and permission for the deployment of essential assets and enablers currently being blocked by the Government of South Sudan.  The members of the Security Council underscored the importance of close cooperation and communication between UNMISS and the Government in addressing these issues.

The members of the Security Council condemned, and reiterated their demand for an immediate end to, all human rights violations and abuses and violations of international humanitarian law.  They reiterated that those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law and violations and abuses of human rights must be held accountable and that the Government of South Sudan bears the primary responsibility to protect civilians within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction, including from potential crimes against humanity and war crimes.

The Security Council renewed its calls for the parties to the conflict to allow and facilitate the full, safe and unhindered access of humanitarian personnel, equipment and supplies to all those in need and timely delivery of humanitarian assistance in accordance with relevant provisions of international law and United Nations guiding principles of humanitarian assistance.

 Loj said that as a former diplomat she did not favor any blanket lifting of immunity. She said she has taken sexual abuse seriously, then said she is strict about curfew. One was left wondering how the UN will reform itself, if it ever will.  Let's see how you write this up, Loj genially said. Well here it is.

May 14 Video here.

 Loosely transcribed by Inner City Press (video here), Loj replied on May 14
"Let me say what UNMIS has undertaken in collaboration with IOM [the International Organization for Migration]. Primarily the project is primarily financed by the Dutch government. It’s actually a new site for the camp, on higher ground and with better drainage, because the Bentiu camp was totally flooded during the last rainy season. That work is being undertaken as of this week. We are hoping to get it finished…

As far as the fence, the problem with the fence is not that UNMIS is not putting up the fence. It’s that even if the fence were there, the problem with the fence is that the IDPs themselves cross the fence  in order to sneak out...

Yes, we have had troubles with the SPLA,  right outside the gates, and we have tried to solve it...We are doing our utmost to ensure that nobody enters the camp with weapons. We are doing regular searches in all camps … for alcohol and illegal substances…"
  She then said that UNMISS installed lights, but people break them. There was more to ask, including from great reporters on the bround. Inner City Press asked for another question but was told no, to ask on May 15. Watch this site.
After the May 14 stakeout, Loj told a story about UN staff in Liberia telling her all about Inner City Press, which after time she associated with her time on the UN Security Council. She has seen the UN from that position and now two countries.

 
  

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

As UN's Ladsous Spoonfeeds Scribes on South Sudan, They Ask and He Gives No Answers on His Rape Cover Ups in CAR, Darfur & DRC, Corruption


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, July 8 -- While refusing to answer questions about any protection of civilians in South Sudan, or about his role in covering up French soldiers' rape of children in the Central African Republic, the reclusive head of UN Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous on July 8 spoon-fed a "small group of reporters" his views on South Sudan.
  Ladsous did not speak at the UNTV stakeout, as his also French predecessors Alain Le Roy and Jean-Marie Guehenno did; he refused to answer Inner City Press about any steps to protect civilians at Malakal, nor if Ban Ki-moon's Panel on the CAR rapes has spoken to him yet.
  Instead, hours after Ladsous scurried from the Security Council to the elevator without answering, ever-pliant US Voice of America channeled his quotes to a "small group of reporters." But Reuters had already channeled Ladsous at the Council stakeout, asking about his (non-public) call. This is how propaganda works, and how rapes like in Bangui and Tabit in Dafur and Minova in DRC before it are covered up.
  Ladsous recently had Ban Ki-moon's guards eject Inner City Press from an open meeting. The old UN Correspondents Association, corrupted by AFP and Reuters and VOA into being now the UN's Censorship Alliance, said not a word about it, while the new Free UN Coalition for Access asked the UN, and posted a flier. 
  Ladsous is destroying not only UN Peacekeeping -- do a News search, it's mostly about sexual abuse -- but also other sections of the UN world. And the scribes just keep channeling. Watch this site.
  The UN Security Council on July 1 imposed sanctions including a travel ban on six South Sudan individuals, for only one of which the UN has a passport number listed. Travel ban on non-travelers?

  Hours later, UN Secretary General issued a statement condemning an attack on the UN's Protection of Civilians site in Malakal, specifically asking for an investigation from Riek Machar and Johnson Olony.
  But on July 8, after UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous briefed the Security Council behind closed doors about South Sudan, and Inner City Press asked him about Malakal when he came out of the Council, Ladsous refused to answer. Periscope video here for now. (He also refused to answer if the Central African Republic sexual abuse investigation panel has spoken with him yet.)
 So when the Security Council's president for July Gerard van Bohemen of New Zealand came to the stakeout, Inner City Press asked him if Malakal and how the UN can better protect civilians was discussed. He answered that this was not discussed in the consultation; neither was Riek Machar's public comments that fighting will continue as long as Salva Kiir, whose term expires on July 8, remains in power. Periscope video here, for now.
Inner City Press Q: On South Sudan, as to UNMIS, was there a discussion of the incident in Malakal where an IDP was killed? And, Riek Machar has said he’ll keep fighting as long as Salva Kiir stays in power, and that Salva Kiir's term expires today, July 8. Did this come up?

A: Neither of those specific situations have been discussed today.

  How could neither of this -- the Machar comments and especially the killing at Malakal and how the UN could do better -- have been raised by or to Ladsous? We'll be seeking more on this - and on the CAR sexual abuse panel. Watch this site.
 Of the UNSC sancctions, one of those now sanctioned, without a listed passport, is Peter Gadet, regarding whom Inner City Press has previously asked the US State Department, here. The individual WITH the passport is Marial Chanuong Yol Mangok, Passport no.: R00005943, South Sudan. Here's the full list, from US Ambassador Samantha Power's July 1 statement:
"Today, the Security Council took strong action in support of a peaceful end to the conflict in South Sudan by sanctioning six South Sudanese individuals for fueling the ongoing conflict and contributing to the devastating humanitarian crisis in their country.

Major-General Marial Chanuong Yol Mangok; Lieutenant-General Gabriel Jok Riak;  Major-General Santino Deng Wol; Major-General Simon Gatwech Dual; Major-General James Koang Chuol; and Major-General Peter Gadet will now be subject to a global travel ban and asset freeze for their contributions to a conflict that has  left more than 6.5 million people in need of humanitarian assistance and forced more than 2 million from their homes."
  Back on May 20, six days after the UN's envoy to South Sudan Ellen Loj spoke to the Security Council and to the Press at the Council stakeout on May 14, on the evening of May 20 the US State Department issued a statement about violence in South Sudan:
"The United States condemns the intensified fighting and violence in Unity, Upper Nile, and Jonglei states in South Sudan by the Sudan People’s Liberation Army, the armed opposition, and forces led by General Johnson Olony that have led to massive new developments and had a devastating effect on civilians.  We call on all armed groups to immediately halt offensive actions taken in contravention of the January 2014 Cessation of Hostilities Agreement.
Violations of international humanitarian norms, including the outright targeting of civilians already vulnerable to greater harm, especially women and children, and grave human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law by all sides are unacceptable.  The international community will hold those who perpetrate such abuses and violations to account.  We call on all sides to silence the guns immediately, permit the UN Mission in South Sudan to investigate the sites of all alleged human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law, and allow all humanitarian workers immediate, free and unobstructed access to conflicted-affected communities regardless of their locations.
The human, social, and economic costs of this war have been devastating and the long-suffering people of South Sudan will also bear the brunt of the potential long-term consequences of this escalating fighting.  Any damage to South Sudan’s oil infrastructure is an additional life-long wound to the people and jeopardizes South Sudan’s development and rebuilding.  These resources belong to all South Sudanese people and the needs of the nation should be prioritized over the violent intentions of a few.
We will continue to work for a better future for all South Sudanese citizens and condemn those that intentionally jeopardize their collective future."
    Inner City Press on May 15 asked Loj about the UN Mission in South Sudan base in Bentiu, and more generally about proposals to lift UN immunity, called Code Blue, in the wake of the alleged rape of children in Central African Republic by French "peacekeepers" in the Sangaris force, allegedly covered up by French UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous.   (While the Security Council, on which France has one of five permanent veto-wielding seats, has taken no action on this issue, the General Assembly's Fifth (Budget) Committee has summoned Ban Ki-moon's chief of staff to a close door meeting, as Inner City Press first reported.)
  The Council's statement mentions for example the UNMISS camp at Bentiu, but none of the issues raised to and by Loj at her May 14 stakeout and May 15 press conference. Video here.
  Loj acknowledged that the new Bentiu camp she had referred to the day prior was not yet ready, and that SPLA intelligence are sometimes in front of the existing camp. She again noted camp residents, not only in Bentiu but also in Juba, cutting the wires of the fence. Afterward, her and one of Ladsous' spokespeople said that journalists are free to visit the Bentui camp (although Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access have heard differently; we hope to have more on this.)

  Here is the Security Council's May 17 press statement:

The following Security Council press statement was issued today by Council President Raimonda Murmokaité (Lithuania):

On 14 May, the members of the Security Council were briefed by Special Representative of the Secretary-General Ellen Margrethe Løj on the situation in South Sudan.

The members of the Security Council expressed condemnation at the renewed and ongoing large-scale violence in Unity State caused by the recent Government of South Sudan offensive and resulting in the displacement of more than 100,000 civilians and the suspension of nearly all activity and delivery of aid to populations in the affected areas, over 300,000 civilians, by humanitarian agencies and organizations.  The members of the Security Council further expressed their condemnation of the large-scale attack initiated on 15 May by the SPLM/A (in Opposition) on the town of Malakal, in Upper Nile State. 

The members of the Security Council underlined their grave concern that as a result of violence and increased insecurity since the beginning of the conflict, more than 50,000 internally displaced persons have sought shelter and assistance at the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) camp in Bentiu, and an additional nearly 25,000 at the UNMISS camp in Malakal, only further magnifying a dire humanitarian crisis.

The members of the Security Council condemned in the strongest terms the repeated violations of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement accepted and signed by the Republic of South Sudan and the SPLM/A (in Opposition) on 23 January 2014, and underscored that there is no military solution to this conflict that has now lasted more than 17 months.  

The members of the Security Council called upon all parties to engage meaningfully in the peace process so as to bring about a political solution to the crisis and an end to the conflict.  They acknowledged the IGAD-led peace process and urged renewed regional and international efforts to swiftly implement a common plan and to table a reasonable and comprehensive solution to end the crisis in South Sudan.  In this context, they reiterated their willingness to impose sanctions against those who threaten the peace, security, or stability of South Sudan as established in resolution 2206 (2015), and noted the 24 March 2015 African Union Peace and Security Council Communiqué on South Sudan and the 12 May 2015 African Union Commission Chairperson’s Statement on South Sudan in this regard.

The members of the Security Council reiterated their full support for UNMISS peacekeepers and for the vital mandate they are performing under very difficult conditions, including to protect civilians in South Sudan.  They demanded that all parties end intimidation and harassment against UNMISS and humanitarian personnel, cease ongoing restrictions on freedom of movement, and allow UNMISS to fully implement its mandate.  They further demanded full adherence to the Status of Forces Agreement and permission for the deployment of essential assets and enablers currently being blocked by the Government of South Sudan.  The members of the Security Council underscored the importance of close cooperation and communication between UNMISS and the Government in addressing these issues.

The members of the Security Council condemned, and reiterated their demand for an immediate end to, all human rights violations and abuses and violations of international humanitarian law.  They reiterated that those responsible for violations of international humanitarian law and violations and abuses of human rights must be held accountable and that the Government of South Sudan bears the primary responsibility to protect civilians within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction, including from potential crimes against humanity and war crimes.

The Security Council renewed its calls for the parties to the conflict to allow and facilitate the full, safe and unhindered access of humanitarian personnel, equipment and supplies to all those in need and timely delivery of humanitarian assistance in accordance with relevant provisions of international law and United Nations guiding principles of humanitarian assistance.

 Loj said that as a former diplomat she did not favor any blanket lifting of immunity. She said she has taken sexual abuse seriously, then said she is strict about curfew. One was left wondering how the UN will reform itself, if it ever will.  Let's see how you write this up, Loj genially said. Well here it is.

May 14 Video here.

 Loosely transcribed by Inner City Press (video here), Loj replied on May 14
"Let me say what UNMIS has undertaken in collaboration with IOM [the International Organization for Migration]. Primarily the project is primarily financed by the Dutch government. It’s actually a new site for the camp, on higher ground and with better drainage, because the Bentiu camp was totally flooded during the last rainy season. That work is being undertaken as of this week. We are hoping to get it finished…

As far as the fence, the problem with the fence is not that UNMIS is not putting up the fence. It’s that even if the fence were there, the problem with the fence is that the IDPs themselves cross the fence  in order to sneak out...

Yes, we have had troubles with the SPLA,  right outside the gates, and we have tried to solve it...We are doing our utmost to ensure that nobody enters the camp with weapons. We are doing regular searches in all camps … for alcohol and illegal substances…"
  She then said that UNMISS installed lights, but people break them. There was more to ask, including from great reporters on the bround. Inner City Press asked for another question but was told no, to ask on May 15. Watch this site.
After the May 14 stakeout, Loj told a story about UN staff in Liberia telling her all about Inner City Press, which after time she associated with her time on the UN Security Council. She has seen the UN from that position and now two countries.

 
  

Monday, March 9, 2015

For UN OCHA, Partially Transparent UN Process Banned Cameron Crony Lansley, Now UN Peacekeeping and Ladsous Need Scrutiny


By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive Series
UNITED NATIONS, March 9 -- While with Stephen O'Brien being named today to replace Valerie Amos atop OCHA the UK keeps that post for the third time in a row, at least there was some public process, which resulted in the rejection of a worse UK candidate, Andrew Lansley.
  By contrast, when France in 2011 kept UN Peacekeeping for the fourth time in row with Herve Ladsous, there was NO public process at all, nonote verbale to other countries inviting nominees, and very little review of Ladsous himself, who had been rejected for the post when, for example, Jean Marie Guehenno left.
  In light for example of the exposed sale of UN posts in Ladsous' UN Peacekeeping -- and the post seller still remaining in the UN -- and the cover up of rapes in Tabit in Darfur and Minova in the DR Congo before that, it's time for at least as much public process on UN Peacekeeping as on UN OCHA.
  In this OCHA case, when Langley's name emerged and questions were raised -- as they would have been on Ladsous had his name similarly become public -- the UK was forced to put forward two more candidates, Stephen O'Brien and Caroline Spelman.
  After Inner City Press reported on UK Prime Minister David Cameron's angry or "rude" call to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, and more than a month after Inner City Press exclusively reported on Cameron's second and third nominees to replace Valerie Amos,including Stephen O'Brien, Inner City Press on February 26 exclusively reported that Cameron's replacement candidate Stephen O'Brien was slated to be interviewed Tuesday, March 3, by Ban Ki-moon himself.
Now on March 9 UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric at noon announced that O'Brien will take over UNOCHA. Inner City Press immediately asked Dujarric if this means that the UK owns OCHA like France owns UN Peacekeeping (four times in a row) and the Political Affairs (twice in a row and counting).
 Dujarric said to look at the list of OCHA chiefs since 1992. But three in a row, under Ban Ki-moon, it is not a coincidence.
   Inner City Press asked Dujarric to at least describe WHO chose O'Brien, and if there was a woman on the final short list. Even this, Dujarric would not do.  Video here.

 In fairness to O'Brien, Inner City Press has been told he's done work for example on malaria; we'll see. Still, the UN is UNtransparent and dominated in these posts by the Permanent Three (or Four) members of the Security Council. We'll have more on this.
  On March 3 UNOCHA announced that "Valerie Amos was to pass the baton as #UN Humanitarian Chief at the end of March. She will stay 2 more months, til end of May."
  Sources also told Inner City Press there was a "second Brit" in the final round, Caroline Spelman, the submissions of whose name was first reported by Inner City Press. But neither that, nor the UAE's female candidate, Dujarric would confirm.
  Back on February 12 Inner City Press learned more about the selection process, reported it that day and asked the UN about it on February 19.
  Beyond Deputy Secretary General Jan Eliasson, who as on many similar issues Ban Ki-moon has put in charge of this process, Inner City Press is informed that the interview panel consists of two senior UN officials and two outside officials, including "the Swiss chief of the International Committee of the Red Cross."

   That would be Peter Maurer, formerly Switzerland's Ambassador to the UN. As one source put it, this puts the UK with its "weak" candidates "even further behind the eight ball."
 On February 19 Inner City Press asked UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric:
Inner City Press: on this OCHA recruitment process, I know that earlier in the process, Farhan, I think it was, had said there's been a petition asking for outside participation in the review and he'd said, no, this is something that can be done in-house.  So I wanted to ask you not who's on the short list, but as a general matter, can you confirm that the UN has in fact accepted at least two outside people on the review panel, some of whom have been named in writing, but just the general principles…

Spokesman Dujarric:  No, I understand.  I think if you look — we can share with you — there's quite an extensive detailed report on how this recruitment process is done, which went to the General Assembly, I think, last year, and outlines the possibility for the Secretary-General to reach out to outside parties.  But I will not confirm the details of this recruitment process.  When it's over, we'll announce it.

Question:  And will you say whether you had an outside participation…

Spokesman:  When it's over, we'll announce it.
   Talk about (a lack of) transparency...
    Non-UK candidates, as Inner City Press has already first reported, include Germany's Martin Kobler, the United Arab Emirates' Lubna Khalid Al Qasimi -- for whom Ban was heavily lobbied when he was in the UAE recently -- and, Inner City Press now hears, "a South African candidate." We'll have more on this.
  Citing Inner City Press' exclusive reporting on  Caroline Spelman and Stephen O'Brien, the UK's second round of candidates after opposition to Andrew Lansley, C4's Lindsey Hilsum says Germany's candidate Martin Kobler led in a poll of 200 UN staff by Avaaz.
  Whatever the other merits, there is now another unaddressed scandal at the UN Mission in the DR Congo, MONUSCO, which Kobler is in charge of. As exclusively uncovered by Inner City Press, UN Police posts in Kobler's mission were for sale, by the Deputy Permanent Representative of Cote d'Ivoire to the UN. Click here for that.
  Inner City Press 24 hours before this report sought comment and explanation -- particularly for the UN having sat on this report since April of 2014 -- from Kobler and MONUSCO, but so far, nothing.
  Shouldn't Kobler have to answer? Watch this site.
   Back on January 14, Inner City Press was informed by sources of a minister from the United Arab Emirates, Lubna Khalid Al Qasimi, a member of the ruling family of Sharjah, put forward as a candidate by the UAE. The UAE has, it was noted,, the "Humanitarian City." And the UAE did give $1 million to OCHA's CERF last month.
  But the UAE sought, and has been unable to obtained, UN Asia Pacific Group consensus support for their candidate. This is a set-back. 
The UK's second duo of candidates, after opposition to Andrew Lansley: Caroline Spelman and Stephen O'Brien. Are those who oppose and opposed Lansley being lobbied?
  Germany's candidate Martin Kobler, a close observer emphasizes to Inner City Press that Kobler was for a time the UN's first choice to be UN Special Coordinator on the Middle East, before after opposition by a Permanent Five Security Council member the position went to Robert Serry.
  Now Serry is to be replaced by Nickolay Mladenov, currently UN envoy in Iraq. The UK -- seeming to reflect a lack of confidence it will retain OCHA -- sought to name one of its national to replace Mladenov, but was shot down by Iraq. That process is now in its final stages.
  While Inner City Press exclusively published the Mladenov to Serry switch before midnight in New York on January 30, eleven hours later one of the board members of the UN Censorship Alliance put it out without any credit at all. That's UNCA - Inner City Press quit and co-founded the new Free UN Coalition for Access, after attempts at censorship and refusal of UNCA's board to issue even guidance about not stealing exclusives. Call it sleaze.
  Back on November 26, minutes after the UN announced the departure of Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs chief Baroness Valerie Amos, Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq if the vacancy would be advertised for candidates from all countries, or if it is set aside for Amos' United Kingdom.
  On January 30 Inner City Press was reliable informed that UK Prime Minister David Cameron telephoned Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and said -- "rudely," according to denizens of the UN's 38th floor -- that despite the UK's submission of two additional names, below, Ban "must" pick Andrew Lansley.
  These sources say that Ban, as if to prove independence, will NOT choose Lansley but will keep the post UK, choosing on a progressive basis the female candidate, Caroline Spelman. Are those opposed to Lansley being lobbied for her?
  We'll have more on this.


 
  

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Chile's UN Security Council Month Had 7 Stakeouts, Haiti Trip Without Cholera Accountability, No Palestine Resolution


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, January 29 -- When Chile's Ambassador Cristián Barros Melet held a January 5 press conference on the month's Program of Work of the UN Security Council, Inner City Press asked him about a next Palestine resolution, about rapes and expulsions in Sudan and, on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Access to hold as many question and answer stakeouts as possible.

  Twenty four days later, when Chile held its End of Presidency reception just north of the UN at the River Club, there was still no Palestine resolution -- no fault of Chile, whose Foreign Minister Heraldo Munoz mid-month explained the country's support of, and embassy in, Palestine.

  The mass rapes in Tabit in Darfur had yet to be followed up on by the Department of Peacekeeping Operations, whose chief Herve Ladsous refused Press questions, here, unlike Barros.

 On the rapes, the Ambassadors of the UK and Lithuania replied to Inner City Press that they are raising the issue to DPKO, in consultations. Will this bear fruit in February?
  Barros himself held six stakeouts, each time agreeing to take questions even if slightly off camera; Heraldo Munoz held another on January 15, for a Chilean total of seven.
 There were two meetings on Ukraine, and one on Lebanon which a full day later had yet to produce even a press statement. One Ambassador at the end of presidency reception complained to Inner City Press that the killing of peacekeepers should always result in such a Statement, "no matter who is responsible."
 Because we have reviewed other End of Presidency reception, we'll review this one, complete with ceviche on plantains, sliders and one of Ladsous' predecessors, Jean-Marie Guehenno. He was once quoted urging the UN to do more about cholera in Haiti - the failure to raise this issue during the Council's visit to Port au Prince and Cap Haitien is still to be explained.
 There are not enough media questions like this; the head of the old UN Correspondents Association, unquestioning receptor, was seen hailing a taxi for the less than ten block trip to the River Club. What's next, an UNCA faux UN briefing on climate change? But that's another story. For now, hats off to Chile, from which we hope to hear more throughout this year.

 
  

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

On South Sudan, Ban Ki-moon Hasn't Spoken with Riek Machar, Ladsous Speaks Only to Norway, No Rights Up Front


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 18 -- Amid the crisis in South Sudan, UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous spoke behind closed doors to the UN Security Council on Tuesday, but refused to speak on the record with the media as had been announced.

  This led on Wednesday to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon doing an on-camera stakeout about South Sudan, as which it was said he would take no questions.  His spokesperson called on Al Jazeera (will the UN send more peacekeepers? apparently no) then Inner City Press asked if the UN had spoken with former vice president Riek Machar.

From the UN transcript:

Inner City Press: The former Vice President [Riek Machar], has anyone reached out to him?
SG: No, no, I didn’t. Thank you very much.

  Then Ban Ki-moon left. 

   Despite his refusal to speak to the UN press corp at the stakeout, as his predecessors Alain Le Roy and Jean-Marie Guehenno before him did, Ladsous appeared on Wednesday on a television station from Norway, the country of UN envoy to South Sudan Hilde Johnson.  Why?

  This matters because while various wire services on Tuesday quoted an unnamed UN official that 400 to 500 people had been killed, no named UN person stood behind the number.
   Some French publications linked Ladsous to the number. It was unclear if this partial or targeted approach was authorized. But at Tuesday by the Security Council, Ladsous simply walked out without speaking. This is a pattern: UK coverage here.
 Again, here's a question: if the UN means its post Sri Lanka "Rights Up Front" action plan, why would it only give its estimate of deaths anonymously? It seems clear there will be no "Rights Up Front" for UN Peacekeeping as long asLadsous is at the helm.
  Ladsous' spokesperson Dwyer remained as Gerard Araud, the Ambassador of Ladsous' native France and December's Security Council president, took questions on South Sudan, Syria and Mali.
  Araud's spokesperson Frederic Jung tried to control the proceeding, telling the UN Television (actually, outside contractor Team People) microphone operator to go to Reuters, then to Agence France Presse.
  Inner City Press asked, what about clashes outside of Juba, in Pibor and Bor?
  Araud acknowledged there had been fighting in Pibor; he did not mention Bor where it is reported at least three people have been killed.
  Inner City Press asked if Ladsous had briefed on how this split, between Salva Kiir and former vice president Riek Machar, might impact fights with the David Yau Yau rebels. Araud said that hadn't been considered yet, and that he'd told another Council members it couldn't yet be known.
  Then after a typical AFP question -- from the scribe who once asked breathlessly what time a head of state's plane would land in New York -- Araud called on Reuters to ask a question about Syria.
  Predictably, it was about Assad leaving power, at least executive power. It was not the type of question a President of the Security Council would answer, but Araud used the stakeout and microphone to state France's position and brag that France's "side event" with Saudi sponsored rebel Ahmad al Jarba was the best attended side event. (As noted, the UN Censorship Alliance a/k/a UNCA also hosted Jarba for a faux "UN briefing.")
  Then Inner City Press asked a question about Mali, which Araud refused to answer. It was the type of question the president of the Security Council should answer: have the peacekeepers that the Council has sent into Mali become combatants and therefore targets?
  Araud gave a lecture about three levels of decision making, calling himself "the political" and saying "it's not to me to care" what happens on the ground with the MINUSMA mission. Inner City Press YouTube video here
  Then Araud walked away from the stakeout. The AFP scribe snickered and Ladsous' spokesperson Kieran O'Dwyer stood feeding the scribes for some time. The feeding is set to continue. Watch this site.