Showing posts with label madagascar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label madagascar. Show all posts

Thursday, July 23, 2015

IMF Board to Meet on Ukraine July 31, No Answers on Africa, Madagascar, FfD



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 23 -- When the International Monetary Fund held a belated media briefing on July 23, before taking its summer break, nearly all the questions were about Greece; at least two Africa questions (from Inner City Press) were not answered, including:
On Madagascar, the IMF's Patrick Imam has said “certain preconditions for the... Extended Credit Facility (ECF) are not yet fully met.” What are those conditions, and what are the IMF's next steps on Madagascar?
What is the IMF's view of the Financing for Development agreement reached in Addis Ababa this month, in particular the non-inclusion of a mechanism to deal with inconsistent global corporate taxation?
  While leaving these and a Press request for an update on Nepal unanswered, the IMF went around and around on Greece and then Ukraine. On the latter, there is a July 31 board meeting tentatively set - before the Board's summer recess. 
  On Greece, spokesperson Gerry Rice could not or would not confirm a Troika visit to Athens. He praise Delia Velculescu, being shifted by the IMF to Greece from Cyprus. In the capacity, she answered Inner City Press' questions a year ago, here
 Apparently answers depend on what (country) you're asking about. A country like Nepal might merit answers for a few briefings, but then no updates (or follow through). We'll have more on this.
  Since the Nepal earthquake, Inner City Press has been asking the International Monetary Fund if it would move to relieve the country's debt burden. Inner City Press resubmitted the question for the IMF's embargoed June 25 briefing, and during it, IMF spokesperson Gerry Rice read out the question and answered it. Transcript herevideo here from 47:50.
  Inner City Press' question: "On Nepal, in the run up to the June 25 International Conference of Nepal’s Reconstruction, and with the World Bank announcing $500 million, is the IMF intending to do anything beyond the $50 million (one year) and $124 million (overall) in its response in the last briefing? Through the IMF's Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust?"
  Rice said the IMF is represented at the conference in Katmandu -- contrary to some reports, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is NOT there -- and could be the request for the $50 M / $124 M to the Board in July. He emphasized this would be zero interest under the RCF but said Nepal is NOT eligible for the CCRT, GDP damage is not enough. 
  Inner City Press would ask, should that threshold be lowered?
  On Jordan, Inner City Press asked: "On Jordan, having seen the IMF's announcement about the end of July, has there been any movement on the criticism by the head of UNHCR and others that the IMF and World Bank in treating Jordan (and Lebanon, etc) as “middle income” can't or don't do enough to provide support given the volume of refugees they have received?"
  Rice said, in essence, that the IMF has been flexible and has given fiscal space to deal with the refugee issues (we'll add the transcript later).  
  Back on June 11 Rice said that Nepal had made a request to the IMF under the Rapid Credit Facility, and that the IMF will send a mission to the country coinciding with the donors' conference on June 25. He said Nepal could be eligible for $50 million annually, for a total of $124 million. We'll see.
   Rice also answer questions Inner City Press submitted on Ghana's Eurobond and about Jamaica. (He said these questions, “from the UN in New York,” remind of other things in the IMF briefing room other than Greece and Ukraine).
  On Ghana, Rice said that the Eurobond was “envisioned” in the recently agreed program. But what is the status of any talks about it? Inner City Press asked, “Ghana's Minister of Finance, Seth Terkper, says the government intends to issue a $1 billion 10-year Eurobond in 2015. What are the status of talks with the IMF in this regard?”
  On Jamaica, Inner City Press asked, “On Jamaica, please comment on criticism that the percentage of people in under the poverty line has grown alongside the IMF's program and that 'last year, Jamaica paid the IMF over $136 million more than it received.'”
   Rice acknowledged that in 2014-15 there was a negative flow out of the country to the IMF, of $163 million. But he said with the new program that has reversed, to in-flow into Jamaica of $127 million in 2015-16, projected to rise to $176 million in 2017-18. Rice acknowledge the rise in the poverty rate from 9.9% in 2007 to 20% in 2012, but said this had to do with the global financial crisis and is the reason for the IMF's program. We'll see.
   Inner City Press had also asked for updates if any on Yemen and Burundi -- apparently there are no updates -- and one on a quote from Romania's National Bank Governor Mugur Isarescu saying the IMF's “communication has sometimes been problematic.” Still, three answers are appreciated.
  On Greece, for the record, Rice said there are major difference between us, with little to no progress made in narrowin them. On Ukraine, he said the IMF can lend to a country that has arrears to private creditors provided other conditions are met. Ukraine certainly has Western political support.

 
 

Friday, October 17, 2014

On Madagascar, UN Rejected Views of Jailed Ravalomanana, Free Speech?


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, October 17 -- While today's UN says it believes in freedom of speech, including political speech, and non interference in the internal politics of states, its approach is selective.
 On October 16, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon "rejected remarks made by former President of Madagascar, Marc Ravalomanana, challenging the legitimacy of his country's democratic institutions."
 On October 17, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric if Ban was aware that Ravalomanana has been arrested, his family banned from traveling to the capital, while his statement has a colorable basis in fact and history. Video here and embedded below.
  Mightn't Andry "DJ" Rajoelina’s declaration of support for Hery Rajaonarimampianina in November 2013 and his campaigning for Rajaonarimampianina constitute a violation of the SADC Road-map?  Why from afar condemn the free speech questioning of the current government of Madagascar full legitimacy?
   Dujarric simply reiterated the statement, not responding on the arrest or travel ban, saying there might be a further answer. But by close of business there was none. This is today's UN.
   Back on May 13, 2013, amid growing controversy in and about Madagascar, at the UN noon briefing, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's then-spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner City Press: On the Madagascar question, is, is, there has been since I last asked this, the SADC (Southern African Development Community) has come out and said that three candidates, they are encouraged to withdraw their candidacies, saying they are not consistent with the road map. This is Mr. [Andry] Rajoelina, also Lalao Ravalomanana and another candidate. And so, one, I wanted to know if there is a UN response to that, but two, since Ms. Ravalomanana is being barred for having been out of the country, and this was a forced exile by the Government, I am wondering whether the UN has any view on forced exile, that being used as a basis to bar a candidate from running.
Spokesperson Nesirky: We can check for you on that, Matthew. I don’t have anything right now.
  But it was not until Wednesday, 47 hours after the question, that a response arrived. But the UN response did, deferring to SADC, take or adopt a position:
Subject: Your question on Madagascar
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:13 AM
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
In response to your questions at the noon briefing concerning Madagascar, the Spokesperson can say the following:
The United Nations is supporting the Southern African Development Community's (SADC's) mediation efforts to ensure a peaceful transition in Madagascar, and what SADC has urged is that President Rajoelina, the former first lady, Lalao Ravalomanana, and former President Didier Ratsiraka all consider withdrawing their candidatures to ensure the peaceful conduct of the elections and stability in Madagascar.
  With this answer, the UN takes a position if only indirectly on forced exile: it's fine, or at least can legitimately be used, in the UN's view, to encourage a candidate to withdrawn.
  Now on May 20, Ban Ki-moon has put out this statement:
Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on Madagascar
The Secretary General shares the concerns expressed by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the African Union over the latest developments in the electoral process in Madagascar. The presentation of candidate nomination papers by Transition President Andry Rajoelina, Mrs. Lalao Ravalomanana and former President Didier Ratsiraka, and the decision of the Special Electoral Court to endorse those candidatures, is in violation of the spirit of the SADC-mediated Road Map.
United Nations assistance to the electoral process is conditional upon strict adherence by all parties to the Road Map as the sole framework for a restoration of the full legitimacy of the Government of Madagascar.
The Secretary General calls on all stakeholders to comply with the SADC Organ Troika and the African Union Peace and Security Council decisions, so that elections can take place in accordance with the calendar prepared by the Independent National Electoral Commission for the Transition and endorsed by the United Nations.
New York, 20 May 2013
  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes the right to return to one’s country as a basic human right. So to maintain, as France and SADC -- and now the UN -- do, that Mrs. Ravalomanana’s candidacy is not legitimate is to condone forced exile as a means for preventing someone from taking part in the political life of their nation.
After the CES decided on May 3 that Lalao Ravalomanana is officially a candidate, France announced on May 6 its “deception” on learning that the CES accepted Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature.
  Inner City Press had asked, What is the UN’s position regarding Mrs. Ravalomanana’s forced exile in July 2012? Does the UN consider forced exile to be a legitimate reason for barring a person from being a candidate for election in his or her country? And that question has apparently been answered. Watch this site.

Monday, March 17, 2014

At UN, New Madagascar President Denies to Inner City Press That His Paris Trip Was Paid For by Companies, Explains 4x4s, IMF


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, March 17 -- When new Madagascar president Hery Rajaonarimampianina came to the UN on March 17, Inner City Press asked him not only about the International Monetary Fund but also about two transparency questions.
 Who paid for his vacation in Paris in late December, and what about the fleet of 4 by 4's in front of his presidential palace recently? Video here, from Minute 7:19; here in French.
  Rajaonarimampianina replied that "I can afford to pay my own holidays." But African Intelligence has reported in great detail that the French construction firm Eiffage and others paid for the trip:
"All their expenses (hotels, meals, river boat trip, armoured car, bodyguards and taxi-plane between Marseille and Paris to catch the home-bound flight on Air Madagascar) were covered by companies Michel Scarbonchi had contacted.... Socialist leader Jean Christophe Cambadélis whom Scarbonchi called on the telephone and then handed over to Hery. On the other hand, Hery received the heads of the companies sponsoring his vacation: the Africa head of the construction company Eiffage and representatives of SMBs, mainly in the agriculture sector."
  Now, Rajaonarimampianina has outright denied this, on camera. What next?
  On the 4 by 4s, Rajaonarimampianina told Inner City Press these were donated to another candidate who didn't make it to the second round, then given to him by the manufacturer. RFI has written about this, but didn't ask a business question until after that of Inner City Press and the new Free UN Coalition for Access, formed due to censorship by the old UN Correspondents Association, including a board member from Agence France Presse. AFP was present on March 17 but asked... nothing.
  (Nor at the UN is French Ambassador Gerard Araud asked about his country's continued sale of Mistral warships to Russia, despite his speeches condemning Russia on Crimea.)
  While Rajaonarimampianina dodged Inner City Press' IMF question, he later said the IMF is open to a program, and that he will meet with the IMF (and World Bank) in Washington. We hear he'll meet with Susan Rice as well. And Exxon? Watch this site.

 
  

Monday, December 2, 2013

UN Repeats Ladsous Stonewalling on Mali Army Shootings, Says Later for Madagascar


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 2 -- When civilians are shot and killed by an army that UN Peacekeeping is supporting, one expects the UN to be able to explain what happened. 

  But after just this happened in Mali last week, and UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous refused to answer the Press question, Inner City Press put it to Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson on Monday, and he said he had no more information [video here with raw transcript and embedded below]

Inner City Press: I wanted to ask about the incidents that took place in Kidal. There seem to have been two different incidents, but in one account, UN peacekeepers told protestors at the airport in Kidal to disperse and the protesters ended up being fired on. Then, there may have been some actual armed groups that also attacked the army, but have you been able to find out what the MINUSMA [United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali] peacekeepers, did they tell protesters to disperse? If so, were the protesters armed or was there some suspension of the normal right to engage in protest?
Spokesperson Nesirky : Well, I do understand that the Mission, MINUSMA, issued a statement on this. A nd I don’t have anything further on that at this point. And if that changes, I’ll certainly update you. But, at this point, I don’t have anything further on that, Matthew.
Inner City Press: I’m only asking because I think, I mean, because I have seen the statement, and I appreciated you sending it, but it doesn't really explain this, it doesn’t address this…
Spokesperson: Well, as I said, that’s what we have at the moment.
Ladsous meanwhile was in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, to celebrate the launch of drones he had pushed for in the UN since France installed him as their fourth had of UN Peacekeeping in a row in September 2011. There he will ostensibly do a press conference with UN envoy Martin Kobler -- Kobler did his on UN TV with questions by Twitter, will Ladsous?

After back and forth about security - not peacekeepers - in Libya and layoffs of security staff in the UN itself, Inner City Press asked about Madagascar:
Inner City Press: Can I ask you about Madagascar?
Spokesperson: Yes, you did mention…
Inner City Press: It has to do with Andry Rajoelina I know that it seems that the UN is providing some kind of electrical… electoral assistance running up to the election.
Spokesperson: Maybe electrical, as well. I don’t know.
Inner City Press: Yeah, it could be. But, it may get blacked out by this, because Mr. Rajoelina, under the SADC (Southern African Development Community) road map, was not supposed to either run or endorse candidates. And on 1 December, he appeared at a rally for a series of legislative candidates and they’re actually running under a ticket known as With President Andry Rajoelina. Either you have it or DPA (Department of Political Affairs) maybe could answer this. Does the UN believe that Mr. Rajoelina appearing at these rallies and running a… a ticket of his supporters is complying with the road map? And if not, is the UN electoral assistance, which was supposedly tied to complying with the road map, still in place for the 20 December election?
Spokesperson: Well, the road map is certainly the guiding principle here and I’ll check with the DPA to see whether they have any updates on both the UN’s involvement in helping with the election process and its views on these latest developments. But, I don’t have anything right now.
And so it goes at the UN. When the UN answers this, we'll have more to say. Watch this site.

 
  

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

On African Union Request to UN Security Council For ICC Deferral on Kenya, Ban Ki-moon's Africa Adviser Maged Made No Calls, of Trip of 5 and Signers


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, October 23 -- Before the African Union summit which gave rise to, as Inner City Presspublished in full yesterday, an AU request to the UN Security Council to defer the International Criminal Court's Kenya case, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and others made calls to AU heads of state.

  Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesperson Martin Nesirky about the calls on October 14. Nesirky replied, "I can tell you that a number of telephone calls were made, and not just by the Secretary-General."

  On October 23, the day after publishing the full text of the AU letter (here), Inner City Press asked Ban's Special Adviser on Africa Maged Abdelaziz (formerly Egypt's Ambassador to the UN) about the calls, and whether he made any of this.

  He said he had not made any of the calls, but that he was aware of them. He told Inner City Press that five AU heads of state will travel to The Hague and to New York. He said the AU is not "against" the ICC, but when there are failures to respond to AU requests, the issue of targeting arises.
  Now the request is filed, but Western media are quoting unnamed Western diplomats that the request will not be granted. At the US State Department briefing on October 23, deputy spokesperson Marie Harf was asked about the request and said it is being studied.
  Someone will have to go on the record. As to the AU letter, Inner City Press asked an African mission to the UN and was told that the lack of some signatures (Tunisia, Equatorial Guinea, Cape Verde and Cameroon) is "not an issue," and was reminded that there are only 49 signature lines because the follow countries are, for now, suspended: Guinea Bissau, Madagascar, Sao Tome & Principe, Central African Republic (see Araud, above) and Egypt (see Maged Abdelaziz, above).
  Forty five signatures, including ICC backers Cote d'Ivoire and Botswana, for example, are a lot. Now what is the Security Council's response? Watch this site.

 
  

Monday, June 3, 2013

Amid Crackdown in Turkey, Ban Ki-moon's UN Is Silent, No Response to Press: Reducing Access, Turkish Lounge Indeed


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, June 3 -- Amid the protests and crackdowns in Taksin Square, Istanbul and elsewhere in Turkey, what has the UN had to say? Nothing.
  It's not that they were not asked. Early on June 1, more than 45 hours before finally publishing this, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's three top spokespeople, "does the UN have any comment or guidance on the response to protests in Istanbul and elsewhere in Turkey?"
  Not only was there no response to or acknowledgment of question, which was accompanied by a request for Ban's response to 19 members of the US Congress writing about his dismissal of 5000 legal claims for the UN bringing cholera to Haiti, and on other issues -- the UN has put out no statement at all.
  Statements are what this UN has been reduced to. They churn them out at breathtaking speed, and those who cover Ban write them up, as it's calls, as fast as they come out. Ban is "deeply concerned" about this, "concerned about that," "calls for restraint," and so forth.
  In this case, it's not that Ban and his Office have not been cranking out statements: about malariaTanzaniapost-2015 development, Madagascar, the World Bank and, of course, Syria. But nothing on #OccupyGezi or Turkey -- one of the West's and Ban's allies on Syria. Could that be it?
  Meanwhile Ban's UN, having orchestrated an entirely unnecessary reduction in press access and media workspace in front of the relocating Security Council, has also gone silent. Knowing of a 10 am Monday deadline, unlike Ban's Office of the Spokesperson the responsible department did contact Inner City Press.
A request was made to hold off to allow the checking and consideration of information provided by the new Free UN Coalition for Access back on May 21, when the proposed rule (apparently supported by the old UN Correspondents Association and explicitly by Ban or at least his Office of the Spokesperson, video here). Inner City Press did turn closer to home and hold off, it's unclear for what.

Ironically, a cause or justification for the impending reduction in media access is... a new so-called Turkish Lounge. We'll have more on all this. Watch this site.

Monday, May 20, 2013

On Madagascar, UN's Ban Ki-moon Again Calls for Withdrawal of Rajoelina AND Lalao Ravalomanana: Her Forced Exile OK?



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 16 -- Amid growing controversy in and about Madagascar, at the UN noon briefing on May 13, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner City Press: On the Madagascar question, is, is, there has been since I last asked this, the SADC (Southern African Development Community) has come out and said that three candidates, they are encouraged to withdraw their candidacies, saying they are not consistent with the road map. This is Mr. [Andry] Rajoelina, also Lalao Ravalomanana and another candidate. And so, one, I wanted to know if there is a UN response to that, but two, since Ms. Ravalomanana is being barred for having been out of the country, and this was a forced exile by the Government, I am wondering whether the UN has any view on forced exile, that being used as a basis to bar a candidate from running.
Spokesperson Nesirky: We can check for you on that, Matthew. I don’t have anything right now.
  But it was not until Wednesday, 47 hours after the question, that a response arrived. But the UN response did, deferring to SADC, take or adopt a position:
Subject: Your question on Madagascar
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:13 AM
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
In response to your questions at the noon briefing concerning Madagascar, the Spokesperson can say the following:
The United Nations is supporting the Southern African Development Community's (SADC's) mediation efforts to ensure a peaceful transition in Madagascar, and what SADC has urged is that President Rajoelina, the former first lady, Lalao Ravalomanana, and former President Didier Ratsiraka all consider withdrawing their candidatures to ensure the peaceful conduct of the elections and stability in Madagascar.
  With this answer, the UN takes a position if only indirectly on forced exile: it's fine, or at least can legitimately be used, in the UN's view, to encourage a candidate to withdrawn.
  Now on May 20, Ban Ki-moon has put out this statement:
Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on Madagascar
The Secretary General shares the concerns expressed by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the African Union over the latest developments in the electoral process in Madagascar. The presentation of candidate nomination papers by Transition President Andry Rajoelina, Mrs. Lalao Ravalomanana and former President Didier Ratsiraka, and the decision of the Special Electoral Court to endorse those candidatures, is in violation of the spirit of the SADC-mediated Road Map.
United Nations assistance to the electoral process is conditional upon strict adherence by all parties to the Road Map as the sole framework for a restoration of the full legitimacy of the Government of Madagascar.
The Secretary General calls on all stakeholders to comply with the SADC Organ Troika and the African Union Peace and Security Council decisions, so that elections can take place in accordance with the calendar prepared by the Independent National Electoral Commission for the Transition and endorsed by the United Nations.
New York, 20 May 2013
  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes the right to return to one’s country as a basic human right. So to maintain, as France and SADC -- and now the UN -- do, that Mrs. Ravalomanana’s candidacy is not legitimate is to condone forced exile as a means for preventing someone from taking part in the political life of their nation.
After the CES decided on May 3 that Lalao Ravalomanana is officially a candidate, France announced on May 6 its“deception” on learning that the CES accepted Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature.
  Inner City Press had asked, What is the UN’s position regarding Mrs. Ravalomanana’s forced exile in July 2012? Does the UN consider forced exile to be a legitimate reason for barring a person from being a candidate for election in his or her country? And that question has apparently been answered. Watch this site.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

On Madagascar, UN Calls for Withdrawal of Rajoelina AND Lalao Ravalomanana: So, Forced Exile OK?



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 16 -- Amid growing controversy in and about Madagascar, at the UN noon briefing on May 13, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner City Press: On the Madagascar question, is, is, there has been since I last asked this, the SADC (Southern African Development Community) has come out and said that three candidates, they are encouraged to withdraw their candidacies, saying they are not consistent with the road map. This is Mr. [Andry] Rajoelina, also Lalao Ravalomanana and another candidate. And so, one, I wanted to know if there is a UN response to that, but two, since Ms. Ravalomanana is being barred for having been out of the country, and this was a forced exile by the Government, I am wondering whether the UN has any view on forced exile, that being used as a basis to bar a candidate from running.
Spokesperson Nesirky: We can check for you on that, Matthew. I don’t have anything right now.
  That exchange took place at Monday's noon briefing, and three hours later Inner City Press was again told that it was being looked into. But it was not until Wednesday, 47 hours after the question, that a response arrived. But the UN response did, deferring to SADC, take or adopt a position:
Subject: Your question on Madagascar
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:13 AM
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
In response to your questions at the noon briefing concerning Madagascar, the Spokesperson can say the following:
The United Nations is supporting the Southern African Development Community's (SADC's) mediation efforts to ensure a peaceful transition in Madagascar, and what SADC has urged is that President Rajoelina, the former first lady, Lalao Ravalomanana, and former President Didier Ratsiraka all consider withdrawing their candidatures to ensure the peaceful conduct of the elections and stability in Madagascar.
  With this answer, the UN takes a position if only indirectly on forced exile: it's fine, or at least can legitimately be used, in the UN's view, to encourage a candidate to withdrawn.
  The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes the right to return to one’s country as a basic human right. So to maintain, as France and SADC -- and now the UN -- do, that Mrs. Ravalomanana’s candidacy is not legitimate is to condone forced exile as a means for preventing someone from taking part in the political life of their nation.
After the CES decided on May 3 that Lalao Ravalomanana is officially a candidate, France announced on May 6 its“deception” on learning that the CES accepted Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature.
  Inner City Press had asked, What is the UN’s position regarding Mrs. Ravalomanana’s forced exile in July 2012? Does the UN consider forced exile to be a legitimate reason for barring a person from being a candidate for election in his or her country? And that question has apparently been answered. Watch this site.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Are Forced Exile, Madagascar & French Influence Not on UN Map?



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 14 -- There was a time that Madagascar was important to the UN, at least enough so to be included in the so-called horizon briefings by the UN Secretariat to the Security Council.
But these days, amid growing controversy in and about Madagascar, the UN has little to say, and says it late. At the noon briefing on May 13, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky:
Inner City Press: On the Madagascar question, is, is, there has been since I last asked this, the SADC (Southern African Development Community) has come out and said that three candidates, they are encouragedto withdraw their candidacies, saying they are not consistent with the road map. This is Mr. [Andry] Rajoelina, also Lalao Ravalomanana and another candidate. And so, one, I wanted to know if there is a UN response to that, but two, since Ms. Ravalomanana is being barred for having been out of the country, and this was a forced exile by the Government, I am wondering whether the UN has any view on forced exile, that being used as a basis to bar a candidate from running.
Spokesperson Nesirky: We can check for you on that, Matthew. I don’t have anything right now.
  This exchange took place at Monday's noon briefing (video here, from Minute 22:15), and three hours later Inner City Press was again told that it was being looked into. And perhaps there is already an answer. But none has yet been provided to Inner City Press, as of Tuesday morning.
  And so we'll report: the third candidate mentioned is Didier Ratsiraka. For Rajoelina, the criticism is that he filed his candidacy papers after the 28 April deadline but was nevertheless approved by the Special Electoral Court (CES). He also broke the pledge he made in January 2013 to not be a candidate.
  For Lalao Ravalomanana, who filed her candidacy papers on April 25, the UN told Inner City Press on April 29, “It is up to the Special Electoral Court, which is in charge of receiving electoral disputes and proclaiming the final results of the presidential and legislative elections, to decide on the validity and qualifications of all prospective candidates”. Similarly, SADC mediator Joaquim Chissano said on May 2 that Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature “is a matter to be seen by the Special Electoral Court."
  But after the CES decided on May 3 that Lalao Ravalomanana is officially a candidate, France announced on May 6 its “deception” on learning that the CES accepted Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature.
In its May 10 communiqué, SADC “expressed grave concern on the decision of the Special Electoral Court to endorse illegitimate candidatures for the forthcoming Presidential elections in violation of the Malagasy Constitution and the Electoral Law.”
  The CES defended its decision to accept the legitimacy of Lalao Ravalomanana’s candidature by saying that her absence from Madagascar resulted from circumstances and events independent of her will that prevented her from enjoying her right to return to her country, despite repeated expression of her desire to return.
  In fact, Lalao Ravalomanana returned to her country on July 27, 2012, but was promptly kicked out of the country by armed security forces.
  The SADC roadmap requires that all political exiles be allowed “to return to the country unconditionally”. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes the right to return to one’s country as a basic human right. So to maintain, as France and SADC do, that Mrs. Ravalomanana’s candidacy is not legitimate is to condone forced exile as a means for preventing someone from taking part in the political life of their nation.
And so, again: What is the UN’s position regarding Mrs. Ravalomanana’s forced exile in July 2012? Does the UN consider forced exile to be a legitimate reason for barring a person from being a candidate for election in his or her country?
Watch this site.