Showing posts with label Tremseh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tremseh. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

At UN, Rice on Kofi & Sanctions, Syria Monitors in Hotels, Sudan Deadline



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 16 -- What does Kofi want? That was the question hanging over the UN Security Council meeting on Syria on Monday.

  US Ambassador Rice said it is clear from envoy Kofi Annan's letter on July 13 about the killings at Tremseh that he wants he "wants there to be consequences for non-compliance" with his six point plan. She cited Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's July 13 letter on Tremseh as well.


Inner City Press: Ban Ki-moon and Kofi Annan's letters about Tremseh, were they accurate at the time? Should they be updated?

Amb. Churkin: I don't think so. There is new, disturbing information. One reason for the monitoring mission to stay is that we need objective information about events. Of course, their resources are limited, but at least they are on the ground. We believe they can deter some things, and if horrible things do happen, they will be able to tell us what they believe has happened, because this is a situation where various horrors are taking place, unfortunately, and various provocations are happening, various people are interpreting what is happening in the wrong way.

  Rice said it would be "immoral" to keep the monitors in Syria, even in their hotel rooms, if the Security Council is unwilling to back them up with the threat of sanctions.

  Of sanctions, she said the "UK has tables a resolution which we strongly support" which would "make it clear that Geneva outcome now under Chapter Seven."

  Earlier, Churkin had emphasized that the use of Chapter Seven had NOT been agreed at the talks in Geneva.

  But another side, speaking off the record, said that nine of the 11 at Geneva had favored Chapter Seven, and even snarked that Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov had used as his reason for opposition in Geneva that it was up to the Security Council to invoke Chapter Seven -- but now, Russia uses Lavrov's refusal to agree in Geneva as the reason to not agree in the Security Council. Head spinning.

  As the last P5 Ambassador out of the Council, France's Gerard Araud stopped and told the press, "our draft is negotiable" but must have Chapter 7 in. He said dismissively, "no one is raising the Russian draft." And so it goes.

Footnotes: Inner City Press asked, and Ambassador Rice stopped and answer, not only Syria but Sudan: will Juba and Khartoum be able to meet the August 2 deadline? Ambassador Rice said that is a "lot to get done in a short period of time... they ought to."


  Finally, the US Mission's and Ambassador Rice's new lead spokesperson Eric Pelton was present at Monday's meeting, although didn't yet take up the Press suggested "first scrum." As Inner City Press reported last week, Mark Kornblau is going from the frying pan of USUN to the fire of JPMorgan Chase, in the middle of the growing "London whale" unsupervised trading loss scandal. We'll have more on all this.

Friday, July 13, 2012

Stalled on Syria, UNSC Member Tells ICP "Less Than 2 Dozen" Killed at Tremseh, Why Houla Report Delayed?



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 13, updated -- During the Syria resolution meeting of UN Security Council member "experts" on the morning of Friday the 13th, the buzz among higher level diplomats was how many in reality were killed in Tremseh?

  A non-Western, non-Permanent Five member of the Security Council told Inner City Press that his country's intelligence service put the number killed at "less than two dozen." He hastened to say this is still "bad," and criticized the Assad government for using heavy weapons.

  But the disparity in casualty figures -- 200 to "less than two dozen" -- highlights the differences in the Security Council. It was Syrian Permanent Representative Bashar Ja'afari who said, on UN TV, that he and "many Syrians" do not believe Al Jazeera. He has added, Saudi-funded Al Arabiya. But who do you believe?

  More troubling, the UNSMIS report on the Houla massacre appears to have been buried, at least to some Council members. Inner City Press has asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesmen about it a number of times, and each time they have said that Ban distributed it to the UN's human rights experts to look at before giving to the Security Council. How long can this take?

  Some Security Council member accuse the French chief of UN Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous of "sitting on" the Houla report. Ladsous does not speak to the Press -- or media, other than in the most controlled settings -- so his role and even side of the story cannot yet be told. 

Update: as the experts level meeting broke up at noon on Friday, experts told Inner City Press that the previously scheduled (all 15) Perm Reps meeting for the afternoon has been changed to "Permanent Five only." Watch this site.