Showing posts with label Jerome Bonnafont. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jerome Bonnafont. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Exclusive: Three French Names for UN Peackeeping, Bermann, Ripert or Lacroix, Dumping

By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive Series

UNITED NATIONS, February 8 – Who will run UN Peacekeeping, and why? Two days after Antonio Guterres assumed office, Inner City Press named among the (French-only) candidates Sylvie Bermann and Jean-Maurice Ripert, disclosing some history with the latter.

  We can now name a third name in the mix, according to Inner City Press sources: Jean Pierre Lacroix, who was previously France's Deputy Permanent Representative at the UN.

  Amid calls to reform UN Peacekeeping and the selection process, or at least make it more transparency, it appears that the same old game, in which France which has owned the Department four times in a row merely submits three names so that one can be selected is being stuck to.
  Back in 2012, Inner City Press exclusively reported that Jerome Bonnafont had been the choice over three time loser Herve Ladsous - until Bonnafont bragged in India, where he was posted, about getting the job. Ban Ki-moon didn't like flashy officials; France made him take Ladsous and the rest, decay in Peacekeeping, is history. (The UN let Ladsous refuse to take Inner City Press' questions, as is being accused and derided now in DC).
  As to Ripert, in fairness, we can now add to our recounting of what Pakistan's ambassador called his failure in that country the detail that Ripert told his then boss Lynn Pascoe, I don't do floods, as his reason for not going there. 
  What scandals await one of these three? Well, as Inner City Press has exclusively exposed, the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations in Central African Republic is dumping waste negligently leading to malaria. This is what a UN memo leaked to and exclusively published on February 3 by Inner City Press has shown.
 On February 7 Inner City Press put the question to the UN Ambassador of France, which has controlled UN Peacekeeping four times in a row not, and prospectively a fifth. See below.
  Ambassador Francois Delattre told Inner City Press "I will take a close look at it, it is a high priority for us." Video here.
  On February 6, in a classic UN noon briefing cover up, holdover spokesman Stephane Dujarric when Inner City Press asked about its February 3 exclusive said he wouldn't speak to the authenticity of the leaked memo but that the UN is looking at possibilities of moving or somehow improving the dump.
  Then the memo showed up as "removed" from Scribd -- NOT by Inner City Press - so we uploaded it to our own server, now via PDF here. 
(Likewise, eviction by Dujarric and the UN's current head of communications Cristina Gallach has hindered Inner City Press from putting up video of Dujarric's evasion. The high-speed cable in the office Gallach evicted Inner City Press from sits entirely unused by the Egyptian state media Akhbar al Yom she seeks to give it to.)
  For the UN to try to cast doubt on the leaked memo while seeking to dodge its contents with vague assurances of improvements is typical. 
  The UN has known about this dumping and malaria for months. Who will be help accountable?
  The memo states that "following complaints by the local population living in the vicinity of the dumpsite" a UN investigation found that the dumpsite sludge dams breed insects which result in sickness. Eighty-one percent of the UN's victims are children, the memo says.
  The report, under "Community Discontent," cites malaria. It notes that when concerns were raised, "police force was used to quell the dissent."
  Later on February 3, an "anonymous" UN Peacekeeping officials spuns wire services about DPKO's same-old claims to reform itself, which include Ladsous visiting the Haiti mission he has mis-managed. 
  But this CAR negligence will be a test of the commitment to reform expressed, among other places, in the US Senate confirmation hearings. How can Ladsous (or MINUSCA as constituted) remain in place? How can France keep this UN Department?
]  
   By the same token, how could corrupt censor Cristina Gallach remain in the UN system, in a post other than Public Information of which she had made a mockery? We'll have more on this.
  Inner City Press has long questioned Ladsous, for example about his linking of sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers to "R&R" or rest and recreation, here. Ladsous replies, "I don't answer your questions, Mister."
  Now under new UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, many are interested who will replace Ladsous. While other Under Secretary General posts like Cristina Gallach's atop the Department of Public Information are now subject to public vacancy notices, DPKO has not. Why not? Inner City Press asked, but UN holdeover spokesman Stephane Dujarric didn't answer.
  Sources will Inner City Press France is trying to hold onto DPKO for the fifth time in a row, albeit with a women, on information and belief Sylvie Bermann, since 2014 France's ambassador in London. Five times in a row? Given this kind of mismanagement, in a former French colony?


  This concerned the Kolongo dumpsite in Bangui. Related memos refer to the UN in Mali as well.
  Tellingly, this UN memo warns of litigation, "taking into account lessons learned in the Haiti case." But was did the UN learn?
  Ban Ki-moon, who after leaving the UN on January 1 has found his campaign for South Korea's Presidency implode amid corruption charges, dodged legal papers about Haiti for years. In his last month he promised millions but so far less than $2 million have been raised, more than half of it blood money from South Korea.
  In the Central African Republic, UN peacekeepers have been accused of sexual abuse, including of minors. The UN itself recently accused 25 Burundian peacekeepers of sexual exploitation and abuse, but UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, the fourth French national in a row to hold the position, determined to continue to pay the Pierre Nkurunziza government for 800 more troops.
  New UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres is considering who will replace Ladsous. He should consider and act on this as well.
  UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, while declining to explain Ladsous' reasoning, recent answered only two and a half of 22 questions Inner City Press posed in writing. UN Department of Public Information chief Cristina Gallach evicted Inner City Press from its UN office without due process, confining it still to minders to cover the General Assembly.
  The UN reflexively covers up its abuses. Even after killing 10,000 people with cholera in Haiti, these practices continue in the Central African Republic.

  Other memos have been leaked to Inner City Press. Meanwhile even the UN's Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, rather than dealing with the substance of a UN Ethics Office memo Inner City Press published, has Tweeted a press release saying it is all unsubstantiated. Really? The UN must be reformed.

Saturday, August 9, 2014

As UN Envoy to Libya, Mitri Replaced by Bernardino Leon Gross, UK Announces A Week After Inner City Press Reported on Their Moves: Powell Power?


By Matthew Russell Lee, Follow Up On Exclusive
UNITED NATIONS, August 9 -- To try to counter Libya's lawless power struggle, the UN has engaged in one of its own.
 Back on August 1, Inner City Press exclusively reported that UN envoy to Libya Tarek Mitri was being "pushed out" of the post, including by UK envoy to Libya Jonathan Powell, and cited his brother Lord Powell's extensive business in Libya through Magna Holdings.
  The UK mission, usually responsive, did not provide comment on written Press questions on this; at UN Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant's August 4 press conference Inner City Press asked about Powell's and Mitri's relationship, without direct answer, see here.
   Now the UK's Ambassador to Libya Michael Aron has announced, on Twitter no less,  that Mitri is out and Ban Ki-moon has installed a new UN envoy, former Zapatero diplomat Bernardino Leon Gross.
  The UN, at least at its August 8 noon briefing and in emails since, has not announce anything about replacing Mitri, much less by whom.
  Isn't it for Ban Ki-moon to make this announcement? In fact, in 2011 when France had already gotten its Jerome Bonnafont in place to replace its Alain Le Roy atop UN Peacekeeping, Bonnafont's bragging about it in India, where he was French Ambassador, led to Ban rescinding the "offer."

  France countered with three time loser Herve Ladsous, Inner City Press reported each step -- including Bonnafont in July 2011 being tapped for the post, and even congratulation cards to Bonnafont, here, and threats from AFP then the UN Correspondents Association -- and the rest is, well, a type of history (coverage in UK New Statesman, here).
  Ladsous refuses all Inner City Press questions, video compilation here; Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq on August 8, alluding to Ladsous and now UNDPsaid it is because of "people skills." Or reporting?
  So Ban has accepted or done nothing to stop this P3 power grab to oust Mitri. But can "his" successor be pre-announced and Ban accept that too? 
Footnote: Inner City Press is exclusively informed that UNSMIL deputy Ould Cheikh Ahmed also has business, literally: fisshing business. Ban and those in control of this play accept that too? Watch this site.
Background: Inner City Press on August 1 asked UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric what UN envoy Tarek Mitri is doing; Dujarric said he was not aware but would check.
  Inner City Press had reported that Mitri, unlike the other UN international staff who relocated to Tunis, went back to his native Lebanon. Sources in the region exclusively told Inner City Press that Mitri had been hoping for a government post in Lebanon, describing him as less than committed to remaining with the UN.
   Now we can report more. These knowledgeable sources say that Mitri is being "pushed out," mostly they say by the UK's envoy to Libya, former Tony Blair aide Jonathan Powell.
  "Mitri was expected to take on a mostly support function," one source told Inner City Press. "He stood up and said no, headquarters didn't back him up and now he's being pushed out." We'll have more on this.
  It was nine days after Libya's foreign minister Mohamed Abdel Aziz at the UN Security Council stakeout told the Press his country wanted international help to protect oil fields and ports, including airports, that the US announced it had relocated its Tripoli embassy staff out of the country to Tunisia.
  Inner City Press asked, where is UN envoy to Libya Tarek Mitri? He briefed the Security Council from Beirut -- sources tell Inner City Press he has been on vacation there, and this deputy, too, was out of the country.
  Back on July 17 when Libya's foreign minister Mohamed Abdel Aziz emerged from the UN Security Council to take questions from the media, Inner City Press asked him to be more specific about what type of “support” force he is asking for.
  Mohamed Abdel Aziz replied that the request is not for a “military” force -- but then went on to say say the force should protect oil fields and ports. If that's not military, what is it?
  Inner City Press also asked Mohamed Abdel Aziz for Libya's current position on the US arresting Abu Khatallah. Compared to the complaints of others, Mohamed Abdel Aziz said that even though under international law it is unacceptable, since Libya can't protect witnesses, maybe it is okay.
  Given the current state of affairs, what is “Libya's” position?
  Meanwhile on July 17 the UN's envoy to Libya Tarek Mitri told the Security Council -- by video from his native Lebanon, while other UN international staff are in Tunisia -- that the fighting has “cast a shadow over the election on 25 June of the 200 member Council of Representatives.” Ya don't say.
 Mitri said that barely forty percent of the 1.5 million registered Libyans went to the polls. He said 12 seats will remain vacant; 41 candidates were disqualified under the post-Gaddafi Law on Political and Administrative Isolation. Final results are supposed to be announced on July 20. Watch this site.

 
  

Friday, August 9, 2013

On Haiti Cholera, Ex-UN Guehenno Now Switches "Come Clean" to "Make Others Pay," UN's Way


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, August 9 -- When a hole opens in the UN's armor of immunity, there are fast moves to close it.
   On August 7, with the UN of Ban Ki-moon and Herve Ladsous still denying all claims that Ladsous' UN Peacekeeping brought cholera to Haiti and killed 8,000 people, after Inner City Press again asked Ban's spokesperson about it, Ladsous' predecessor Jean-Marie Guehenno tweeted this:
"Peacekeepers have done a lot for Haiti, but UN needs to come clean on cholera crisis."
  Inner City Press retweeted then wrote about it, noting that this is a former chief of UN Peacekeeping. So where is Herve Ladsous on this? He's out of headquarters, after refusing Press questions then spoon-feeding spin to a friendly scribeAugust 7 Q&A with's Ban's lead spokesperson Martin Nesirky, here.
  Thursday August 8 was a UN holiday. So in its August 7 story, Inner City Press asked: what will the UN say about its own former head of peacekeeping, a post now devolved to Herve Ladsous who was rejected in favor of Guehenno, then in favor of Alain Le Roy, then a third strike in favor of Jerome Bonnafont -- only to be put in the job by France after Bonnafont bragged about getting it?
The flaw was that Ladsous has a record, of arguing for the escape of the genocidaires from Rwanda into Eastern Congo. How can he lead an (all African) intervention brigade now in the Congo?
On August 9, Inner City Press asked Ban's associate spokesperson Farhan Haq about what Jean-Marie Guehenno said. Haq replied there would be no UN comment on what Guehenno said in his "private capacity." Video here, from Minute 2:07.
But lo and behold later on the afternoon of August 9, Guehenno who is now a professor at Columbia but still in the UN loop, having had at least one Under Secretary General job, and a posting on Ban's Senior Advisory Group of Peacekeeping Operations (with a Sri Lankan military leader depicted in the UN's own report as engaged in war crimes),"clarified" his August 7 tweet:
"UN can take responsibility by pushing harder on member states to fund health and sanitation in Haiti with substantial donations."

  Suddenly Guehenno's (re) definition of coming clean has nothing to do with taking responsibility, but rather "pushing" others to pay for the consequences of DPKO's ongoing negligence.
  Here's the question: how can the UN, and DPKO which Guehenno used to head, preach rule of law if it never takes responsibility? Blaming plaintiffs' attorneys is not enough: to merely push others to pay, and not accept responsibility, is lawless.
  Who "got to" Guehenno? Or is the promise or desire for future UN-world posts enough to bring about such a quick reversal? If even standing by his statement for two days, Guehenno hearkens back to a time before the spreading "Ladsousification" of Ban's UN. Watch this site. And this noon briefing video, before Guehenno's afternoon "clarification," from Minute 2:07:


 
  

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Ex-UN Official Guehenno Says Successor Ladsous Must "Come Clean" on Haiti Cholera, Inner City Press Asks


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, August 7 -- With the UN of Ban Ki-moon and Herve Ladsous still denying all claims that Ladsous' UN Peacekeeping brought cholera to Haiti and killed 8,000 people, on August 7 after Inner City Press again asked Ban's spokesperson about it, Ladsous' predecessor Jean-Marie Guehenno tweeted this:
"Peacekeepers have done a lot for Haiti, but UN needs to come clean on cholera crisis."
  This is a former chief of UN Peacekeeping. So where is Herve Ladsous on this? He's out of headquarters, after refusing Press questions then spoon-feeding spin to a friendly scribe. August 7 video here.
  On Haiti, here's Inner City Press' question from the August 7 UN noon briefing:
Inner City Press: on Haiti first. There is a report that I am sure that you have seen, it came out of the Law School and the Medical School at Yale yesterday regarding the cholera in Haiti, it’s a medical and legal analysis that there should have been the claims process and saying that the UN needs to rehabilitate --
Spokesperson Martin Nesirky: What’s the question?
Inner City Press: My question is: what’s your response to this study, and also, whether the new Head of the Office of Legal Affairs, whether there is any indication that, you know, like Nicolas Michel in the past, but unlike Ms. O’Brien, whether he will take questions on legal topics such as these? Why the claim was was dismissed and what the legal implications are?
Spokesperson: Well, on the second part of your questions, we just in the past few minutes announced this appointment, so I don’t think you would expect me to pass further judgement on what he may or may not wish to do with regard to speaking to the media, but we will certainly convey your wishes to him. With regard to the first part of your questions, I don’t have anything further to say beyond what we have said in the past. We are obviously aware of this latest report. [More here.]
  Thursday August 8 is a UN holiday. But what will the UN say about its own former head of peacekeeping, a post now devolved to Herve Ladsous who was rejected in favor of Guehenno, then in favor of Alain Le Roy, then a third strike in favor of Jerome Bonnafont -- only to be put in the job by France after Bonnafont bragged about getting it?
  The flaw was that Ladsous has a record, of arguing for the escape of the genocidaires from Rwanda into Eastern Congo. How can he lead an (all African) intervention brigade now in the Congo? Watch this site.

 
  

Friday, March 8, 2013

AFP's Witcher, Ladsous' Lapdog, Echoes on Minova, Reuters Re-Tweets



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 7 -- When Herve Ladsous, the fourth Frenchman in a row to sit atop UN Peacekeeping, wants to spoon-feed stories and get positive coverage,Agence France Presse and its UN reporter Tim Witcher cannot be far away.

  It began the very day Ladsous was dumped on the UN, as a replacement for candidate Jerome Bonnafont. Inner City Press had the scoop, first of Bonnafont then of Ladsous. 

  The result was a complaint from Witcher for anti-Press action by the UN Correspondents Association, now known as the UN's Censorship Alliance.

   Flash forward to March 7. For months, Inner City Press has been asking Ladsous about 126 rapes in Minova by his partners in the Congolese Army. 

  On November 27, Ladsous ran from the question and took Witcher, Louis Charbonneau of Reuters and Margaret Besheer of Voice of America in the hall. Video here.

   But none of Ladsous' three Mouseketeers wrote a word about the rapes. Or asked about them in the weeks after, including on December 18 when Ladsous directed his spokesman to seize the UNTV microphone to try to avoid another Inner City Press question about Minova. Video here.

   After Inner City Press put the question to Ban Ki-moon himself on March 5, on March 7 Ladsous' DPKO decided to spoon-feed a vague answer to friendly reporters.

   Reuters wrote about it first -- Michelle Nichols typing it up, rather than Louis “Kurtz” Charbonneau -- then Besheer tweeted it, as a break from her concern for British royals.

   But then Witcher chimed in with his spoon-fed write up. And lo and behold, Lou Charbonneau thanked him for re-tweeting Nichols typing job, and promoted Witcher's echo. This is how these particular wires work, or don't work, at the UN. 

  Witcher and Charbonneau continue in the UN's Censorship Alliance; Besheer has pulled back to an affiliate. They are using social media, and how! Watch this site.

Monday, December 24, 2012

UN Peacekeeping's Ladsous Fiddles As Copter Burns, Offers Photos Only to Western Wires, Hurts DPKO



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, December 23 -- The UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations is headed by a former spokesman for the French ministry of foreign affairs, but its professionalism, transparency and credibility have plummeted in the second half of 2012 under Herve Ladsous.

  Most recently on December 21, minutes after the Security Council issued a press statement condemning the shooting down of a DPKO helicopter by South Sudan, killing four Russian crew members, DPKO's spokesman Andre-Michel Essoungou e-mailed out "an interactive timeline to look back at the milestones of 2012. We’d be grateful if you could have a look."

  Three days earlier at the direction of Herve Ladsous, Essoungou seized the boom microphone at the UN Television stakeout, to prevent questions to Ladsous about mass rapes by DPKO's partners in the Congolese Army, and Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's supposed Human Rights Due Diligence Policy. Video here.

  This was called outrageous by many in the UN, including in the Security Council, but despite complaints the UN has yet to act.

  The problem is that no one dares tell Ladsous to do his job, since the post belongs to France and outgoing French president Nicolas Sarkozy dumped Ladsous into the job as a last minute replacement for Jerome Bonnafont, after Ladsous had been rejected by previous Secretary General Kofi Annan.

  Ladsous openly favors the French, including also giving advance notice and questions to Agence France-Presse, on one of the boards of which Ladsous used to serve. Under Ladsous, DPKO despite its use of South Asian peacekeepers and Russian pilots has become fixated on Western wire services.

  Consider this UNPeacekeeping tweet, of photographs of Wau in South Sudan:

RT "@UNPeacekeeping: Photos: Protecting civilians in #Wau #SouthSudan http://ow.ly/geR6i For use in publication @washingtonpost @afp @ap @reuters @bw"

  Even if this doesn't mean what to some it seemed like -- that Ladsous' DPKO was offering photos only to these five Western media including AFP -- the choice of these five shows the bias and non-UN thinking of Ladsous' DPKO. So did Ladsous taking two of the five listed above into the hallway on November 27, to avoid questions about the Congolese Army rapes in Minova, video here.

   Substantively, Ladsous' refusal to answer Press questions since late May, when he sought take advantage of anti-Press moves that has begun in September 2011 by AFP, ironically about coverage of Ladsous being the last minute replacement for Bonnafont, has hurt the Ban Ki-moon administration, for example leaving Ban's Human Rights Due Diligence Policy unexplained and not credible.

   But who would replace Bonnafont? The way the UN works, one thinks it could only be the French. Watch this site.