Pildes Indicted for SantaCon Con Proposes Deferred Prosecution Now US on Tax Returns

Pildes Indicted for SantaCon Con Proposes Deferred Prosecution Now US on Tax Returns by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 23 –  The head of New York's SantaCon, Stefan Pildes, has been indict for fraud. On April 28 he was before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Senior Judge Colleen McMahon. Inner City Press was there: Defense: Your Honor is obviously aware of the event Judge McMahon: Hard not to, being in New York. I stay home to avoid it. Defense: Some like it. We can come back once we get discovery- Judge McMahon: In September.  Defense: His wife and mother have signed the bond. But he is supposed to pledge his home in Passaic, New Jersey to secure the bond. We need a week. Judge McMahon: Take it. Assistant US Attorney: We are discussing a protective order.  Judge: What's to protect? Whose secrets are we protecting here? AUSA: The victims'. Judge: OK. September 15, 2 pm. See you then. And Inner City Press was there on Sept 15 and live tweeted, here:  All rise! Judge: What is the status? AUSA: 40,000 page of discovery, and now tax records - we need court approval. Judge: I'm happy to sign. AUSA: We have discussed a potential resolution. The defense has submitted a deferred prosecution agreement Judge: A DPA??  AUSA: I don't want to get ahead of ourselves. But if no DPA, we may supersede with tax charges. Oct 30 for defendant's motion. Judge: On what basis? Pildes' lawyer Biale: We explained in detail why this is not a Federal crime Pildes' lawyer: This activity was covered by the First Amendment. And they have not given up Brady material. If we are unable to resolve, we will file. AUSA: Much of that was false. Our final Rule 16 production will be Friday. Judge: 3 terrabyes for this case? Judge: If you cut the salami too thin... I've already thrown out one conviction on Brady grounds and I won't hesitate doing it again. AUSA: We are doing ongoing responsive review Judge: That's gobbly-gook. You've had six months AUSA: I appreciate that  AUSA: We get a subpoena return from Google and go over it. The review is ongoing. Judge: You know they can't possibly review the full three terabytes.  AUSA: They have plenty of resources. Judge: By next Friday, you'll have dumped it on them Pildes' lawyer: They say they have been investigating this for years. Why are they not finished producing discovery? AUSA: We go through a painstaking process, inducting information with external third parties. Then a privilege review. What he's saying is unfair Judge: Provide weekly updates. AUSA: If the court wants. Judge: The Court wants. The motion schedule is fine. I exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. Please conclude your discussions asap.  Adjourned On September 23 the US Attorney's Office wrote in that '[t]he Tax Documents consist of tax returns and return information, where available, for the defendant, his spouse, and various entities. The Tax Documents may also indicate any years for which there were no relevant tax filings. The Government believes that the Tax Documents would be used at any future trial to demonstrate the defendant’s involvement in the charged offense, including that the defendant made knowing misstatements about the use of the SantaCon proceeds. Accordingly, the Government seeks an order authorizing it to produce the Tax Documents in discovery The case is USA v. Pildes, 1:26-cr-142 (McMahon) *** Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron. Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.  Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com