Showing posts with label al aqsa mosque. Show all posts
Showing posts with label al aqsa mosque. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

At UN, Australian Briefing on Chlorine in Syria, Palestine Letters; Burkina Faso and South Sudan Statements


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, November 5 -- The day after Australian Ambassador and UN Security Council president for November Gary Quinlan got his program of work agreed to, the Council  met behind closed doors on the afternoon of November 5 about Syria chemical weapons, and Palestine.

   Inner City Press reported on Palestinian Observer Riyad Mansour's letter and Q&A stakeout, here; additional letters about Jerusalem and the Al Aqsa Mosque were submitted to Quinlan by Jordan and by Israel.

  Quinlan told the press all three letters have been circulated and that, if requested by Council members, a meeting would be possible on November 6 despite there also being International Court of Justice elections in the Council and General Assembly.
 On Syria chemical weapons, after Quinlan summarized the briefing that was given behind closed doors by Sigrid Kaag by video from Beirut, he was asked by the correspondent from Al Mayadeen - who walked out of Quinlan's November 4 briefing - about his use of the term "Syrian regime."
  Was Quinlan speaking in his national capacity -- for the "Australian regime," as the Al Mayadeen correspondent put it -- or for the Council? Quinlan nodded and said, "Syrian government."

  Inner City Press asked Quinlan about Palestine, yielding the answer about the letters being circulated, and about reports of ISIS using chlorine in Iraq, and possibly having helicopters like other vehicles seized in Mosul.

  Quinlan said that "one member" had brought that up in the consultations. After he left, Syrian Permanent Representative Bashar Ja'afari spoke of ISIS using choline in Iraq and that ISIS might have helicopters. Off-camera Ja'afari told Inner City Press his government had destroyed the three planes ISIS claimed to have, and that none of the three could fly.
  Inner City Press also asked Ja'afari if UN Peacekeeping has contacted his government about getting UNDOF peacekeepers back on the Syrian side, taken over by Jabhat al Nusra. Ja'afari replied, no, that perhaps UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous is asleep or in winter lethargy.
  Inner City Press notes that Ladsous is certainly not reporting on deaths and attacks in Central African Republic, click here for that.
  Kaag is said to be seeking, or waiting for, another post in the UN system (Inner City Press asked her about it in a briefing, without direct response). Some wonder for how much longer these monthly briefing will continue. We'll see.
  The previously afternoon, on November 4, the Security Council met on Libya, South Sudan and, at Quinlan's request, Burkina Faso.
  The Burkina Faso briefing, which Inner City Press first reported on Tuesday morning, was to have been by UN envoy to West Africa Mohammed ibn Chambas. But first a source told Inner City Press that "the connection was too weak;" later, Quinlan mentioned the curfew there as well.
  The Security Council agreed to "Elements to the Press" on Libya; on South Sudan and Burkina Faso, for now there were summaries by Quinlan. 
  Twenty four hours later, there was still no Press Statement by the Security Council on Burkina Faso. But then one was issued, but not read out by Quinlan, on South Sudan, then the same on Burkina Faso. We'll have more on this.

 
  

Palestine Wants UNSC Action on Al Aqsa Now, This Month on Draft Resolution to Set Timetable to End Occupation


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, November 5 -- With questions mounting about when Palestine's resolution setting a time frame to end Israel's occupation will actually be put to a vote in the Security Council, on November 5 Inner City Press put the question to the State of Palestine's Observer Riyad Mansour, on UNTV.
  Mansour said that Palestine wants a vote on the resolution this month. He said that the Security Council has supported a two state solution, and this is only possible with an end to the Occupation.
  The UNTV stakeout was late to go online. Earlier on November 5 the Free UN Coalition for Access was first to report that Mansour would meet with the Security Council's president for November Gary Quinlan of Australia then do a stakeout at 2:30 pm. 
 The UN belated announced it - then left the stakeout camera invisible on UN Webcast. This delayed Mansour's presentation, about his letter about the Al Aqsa Mosque, asking for the Security Council to "shoulder its responsibilities." Watch this site.
   Off camera on November 4, Mansour had told the Press of the resolution, "this exercise, we're going to be done with this month. This month. If there are parties which have a veto power and they select otherwise... we have options."
  Mansour said, "we are cooking it under slow fire, but I think after today we will increase the fire a bit."
   As to the five new members coming onto the Council on January 1, Mansour said then Palestine may put forward an application for full UN membership. "The first thing we are considering for them is to submit our application for membership. If somebody casts a veto, I will still be a few steps ahead of Israel."
  Even if it's vetoed, Mansour said, as long as Palestine reaches the "threshold" that requires a veto, he will have done better than Israel and will be like Italy and Ireland, Finland and Jordan, which were subject to vetoes and had to wait.
  Back on October 21 as the Palestine debate of the UN Security Council went on in the Council chamber, Inner City Press conferred with a range of Council sources about the pending draft resolution to set a time frame to end Israel's occupation.
Negotiations were held on the draft last week but only at the “expert” level, not of Permanent Representatives of the Council's 15 members. Supporters of the current draft, according to Inner City Press' sources, include China and Russia, Argentina and Chile, Chad and it was assumed Nigeria, although sources say Nigeria in consultations said they didn't yet have instructions.
France was described as more excited by the draft than either the US or the UK, as not have a problem with a time frame to end the Occupation but wanting unstated changes to the draft. France did not put forth amendments, a source told Inner City Press, guessing that France didn't want to “embarrass” the US Administration before the November mid-term elections.
The UK was described as less enthusiastic, but as somehow “softened” by the recent vote in Parliament favoring recognizing Palestine as a state.
Talk turned to the new members of the Security Council coming in on January 1, with Malaysia instead of South Korea seen as a shift in favor of Palestine as a state. (This reporter's Security Council elections coverage is collected here.) Angola and Venezuela are seen as supportive and “even Spain,” as one source put it to Inner City Press. But what about New Zealand? We'll have more on this. Watch this site.