Showing posts with label ankara. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ankara. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2016

On Syria, UN's Staffan de Mistura Lays Out Time Line, Condoles Turkey, Silent on Kurds



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 14 -- When UN envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura took four questions in Geneva on March 14, before ten days of talks beginning with the Assad government, he started with condolences for Turkey on the Ankara attack.

  Spokesman Ahmad Fawzi gave the first question to “our Turkish colleague” -- who asked about the timing of elections in Syria. The next picked questioner identified himself “with the Geneva press corps;” then Al Jazeera Arabic asked if there is any deadline for a deal to be reached.

  To this, de Mistura said this first round would run from March 14 to 24 -- during which no exclusive interviews, he said -- then a recess of a week or ten days. This will be folllowed by a second round of two weeks, then another recess, length undefined.

  Fawzi's final question went to ACANU, representing Geneva correspondents accredited by the UN, hopefully (much) better than the decaying and corrupt UN Correspondents Association the UN uses in New York. This question was to say when meetings begin and end. And then it was over.

One couldn't help wonder if there were anywhere near this focus on the slaughter in Yemen - and where is de Mistura's counterpart Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed?

 On Syria, will the Ankara attack impact mounting demands that the Kurds be given a role in this round of talks? We'll have more on this.

Previously, when the UN pulled the plug on the Intra-Syrian Talks, or as envoy Staffan de Mistura said merely pushed them back, de Mistura said that the UN "is not prepared to hold talks for the sake of talks."

  Then de Mistura was scheduled after delay to brief the Security Council on Friday, February 26 at 3 pm, in connection with a vote on a US - Russian draft Inner City Press had seen.

 After a delay described below, de Mistura briefed by video, saying he intends to re-convene Intra-Syrian talks on March 7.

  The Council approved the resolution 15-0, Russia's Gatilov spoke of strict implementation, and the need for "immediate" talks.

 At 2:40 pm, UK Ambassador Matthew Rycroft was in the hall outside the Council, talking heatedly into his cell phone. Another Council diplomat, on background, said there would be a delay of at least 30 minutes or an hour - someone didn't agree.

 Inner City Press was told by sources it was to renegotiate the annex of groups.

Now Inner City Press has been informed of more. In the public session, UK Matthew Rycroft said "The HNC represents a broad sweep of the opposition forces fighting in Syria against the tyranny of Asad. They deserve our whole-hearted support, which regrettably was not reflected in this resolution."

  Other changes were to the Cairo and Moscow platforms. But, the sources tell Inner City Press, the country which occasioned the delay was.... France.

  France was miffed to have been left on the sidelines by the Russian - US bilateral negotiations. Similarly miffed to have been left on the sidelines of the US - China negotiations on North Korea? Strange how when elected members complain, for example about their exclusion from the so-called "Group of Friends on Western Sahara," France is unconcerned or happy. Now, they feel excluded...  We'll have more on this.

 On February 19, Russia convened a UN Security Council meeting and proposed a draft resolution on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria. Western powers, as they're called, were dismissive the draft.

  Here's some of what Turkey's Permanent Representative said, as fast transcribed by InnerCityPro.com:

"The fighting, it’s not only bombing militarily, hospitals, schools, medical facilities, are being bombed, after the Russian Federation’s intervention in the war, the majority of the civilian casualties are caused by this intervention. So it is, the resolution is there, so why do we need another resolution in that regard? When I see the text I found it... silent on the humanitarian issue.

 "For us, any terrorist organization is a terrorist organization, full stop. For PYD they seem to try to get legitimacy by seeming fighting with Daesh. Actually this is not the case... For us, fighting against another terrorist organization does not give legitimacy to any terrorist organization."

 Inner City Press -- in the middle of being thrown out of the UN for seeking to covering meetings in the building, click here for that -- talked its way through a UN Security block at the Council stakeout and asked Turkey's Permanent Representative Cevic if his country would send in ground troops. He said only if part of a multinational force.

  Also at the stakeout - with a UN Security "minder" still trailing Inner City Press, like one of Ban Ki-moon's thought police as one wag put it -- Inner City Press asked the President of the Council for February, Venezuela's Rafael Ramirez, if he would convene and emergency meeting if Turkey or Saudi Arabia were to send in ground troops. He said yes, he would convene such a meeting.

  But as things stands, even with Ban Ki-moon's censor Cristina Gallach receiving calls to delay and reverse her decision, Inner City Press could not cover such an emergency Security Council meeting.

  We'll have more on all this.

 On February 16, Inner City Press asked Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari about de Mistura's and Ban Ki-moon's explanations of why those talks ended - and about the UN saying Ban was misquoted in or misinterpreted by the Financial Times.

  Ja'afari said that the UN would rather blame itself than the opposition, because then the UN would get push-back from “Westerners.” Ja'afari said that de Mistura's deputy only provided him with a partial list of the opposition delegations as the talks were ending. Ja'afari called them badly organized.

  Before Ja'afari spoke, the Security Council's president for February Rafael Ramirez of Venezuela told reporters that the Council's members agreed to tell Turkey to comply with international law. Associated Press - click here for AP's UN rape reporting on Feb 15 - asked if that meant all members.  All to different degrees, was the answer.

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Somaliland Rejects Mogadishu's Dutch Coastguard Deal, No UN Word on Burned Ethiopian Arms Plane


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, August 11 -- The government in Mogadishu has signed a contract with a European firm to set up a Somalia coast guard: Atlantic Marine and Offshore Group of the Netherlands.
  Somaliland has responded by "reiterating that it does not recognize, and rejects outright, any attempt by the Federal Government of Somalia to control, regulate or seek to exercise Jurisdiction in the waters adjacent to the territory to Somaliland."
  Where is the UN, its Mission and envoy Nicholas Kay in all this? It echoes the UN system's ham-handed attempt to give Somaliland's airspace back to Mogadishu, a move that led to the suspension of UN flight and was in essence reversed at the Somalia - Somaliland meetings in Turkey
  Somaliland's new foreign minister Mohammed Bihi Yonis, formerly the UN's deputy enovy in Sudan, where Kay was the UK's ambassador, has said "the Government of the Republic of Somaliland looks forward to continuing the Dialogue on the basis laid out in the Ankara Communiqué."
Meanwhile it's worth noting that the UN's own Somalia Eritrea Monitoring Group most recent report, at page 328, cited
"training in Turkey of Somali cadets at military colleges, schools and academies, training for Gendarmerie and Coast Guard personnel, specialization courses (like “underwater attack”), and participation in joint exercises.. in the absence of notification from the supplying State, and in accordance with resolution 2093 (2013), the Monitoring Group expects in the future that the Federal Government of Somalia will notify the Committee, at least five days in advance, of any support and assistance supplied by the Government of Turkey to its security forces."
  Of the Ethiopian plane full of weapons that burned in Mogadishu, Inner City Press on August 9 asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's associate spokesperson Farhan Haq if the UN's Somalia Eritrea Monitoring Group would be looking into it. Haq had no comment.
  So far Nicholas Kay has offered condolence to Ethiopia and called it a "cargo plane." Then he and the Mission UNSOM moved on to promoting a video of his Eid greeting. What about Puntland, Jubaland, Somaliland? 
  What is the UN doing? In New York, UN Peacekeeping boss Herve Ladsous refused to answer Inner City Press' June 24 question about UN Mine Action Service cowboy in Mogadishu David Bax sharing genetic information with the US - then had spokesperson Kieran Dwyer spoon-feed it to another. The Free UN Coalition for Access will be working on this, amid anonymous pro-spoonfeeding trolls. Kay said it was a "question for New York." Indeed. Watch this site.