Saturday, October 10, 2026

In Federal Trial of Man Found Not Guilty in Bronx Court of 2 Murders Now Deliberations



In Federal Trial of Man Found Not Guilty in Bronx Court of 2 Murders Now Deliberations

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 22 - A man who was charged in The Bronx with two 2021 murder and then found not guilty in a less than two week trial there now faces a Federal trial for the same murders, starting on September 14.  

On April 28 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Senior Judge Colleen McMahon held a conference. Inner City Press was there. 

  The US Attorney's Office on April 21 wrote in that the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, directed that the death penalty not be sought. Still, there is learned counsel on the case.  

The AUSA, who has said he is on two other death-eligible cases in SDNY, asked that the 3500 material be attorneys-eyes-only until a week before trial. He said the witnesses live where the defendant does - or did. He is now in detention, awaiting trial. 

On May 8 the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking Judge McMahon to reconsider her order they produce 3500 material by August 21, arguing politely that she does not have the authority, and that "the Government's witnesses did not testify at the state trial," that safety is implicated.

On May 22 defense counsel filed a letter motion seeking to suppress everything found in the NYPD search of 1243 Findlay Avenue, saying the warrant omitted "materially different clothing."

On July 31 the US Attorney's Office wrote in opposing the defense motions in limine to preclude ID testimony from NYPD Detective Faton Alickaj and sever the felon in possession charge.

On August 3 the defendant's lawyer wrote in that "the government apparently objects to... a fair and impartial jury and opposes his request that prospective jurors be shown the Western District of Washington's unconscious bias video."

On August 11 the US Attorney's Office docketed its proposed Examination of Jurors, about the killings of Terrence Smith and Sergio Santana and December 26 2021 by 168th Street and Morris Avenue, then a very general bias question.

On August 20 the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking for reconsideration of a rule on "Individual-1," attaching an NYPD lab test that said "establishes that the firearm recovered from Individual-1 was NOT the firearm used in the murders."

On August 21 the US Attorney's Office filed a motion in limine seeking to allow introduction at trial of evidence of two earlier arrests of the defendant with crack cocaine on his person, as relevant.

On September 15, Inner City Press went to the trial. A doctor testified about a bright bullet in the soft flesh of the neck. Ms. Arzu testified about the father of her daughter, the victim.

  After 2 pm, after Judge McMahon held an unrelated status conference - considering a Deferred Prosecution Agreement - in the Pildes / SantCon case - it was announced that two jurors had approached the approachable court room deputy and said they are afraid for their personal safety. Judge McMahon had the lawyer back into the robing room to speak with the two jurors who, it appeared, remained.
 
  Then a video was shown of a man ironically named Lucky bleeding on the sidewalk while another, called Banks, said I ought to kick you in the head. The jurors watched.

On September 16 on the stand was a doctor who used many acronyms, from LIMS (Lab Info) to JCMS, and analyzed crack cocaine in containers.

On September 18 Judge McMahon docketed her letter to counsel about the jury charge, noting she'd tried to address "the [Justice] Barrett 'no two convictions' problem of 924(j) and 924(c)" and concluding "We will start at 10 AM on Monday. The jurors are coming in at 1 PM." Monday (Yom Kippur), two trials in EDNY will be off: Huawei and an Arrow key assault case before EDNY Judge Vitaliano...

On the afternoon of Monday, September 21, the closing argument, live tweeted here - including the defense identifying another suspect, saying the gun is linked to him. The prosecution dismissed this and Judge McMahon began her instructions.

 On September 22 in the late afternoon, deliberation after notes continued, with lawyers and woman and children milling around in the large courtroom. Inner City Press will report the verdict.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

Watch this site.

 The case is USA v. Savage, 1:25-cr-472 (McMahon)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com