In Huawei Trial US Opposes Cross While Courtroom Closing Opposed by Inner City Pressby
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack EDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Sept 21 â
With the USA v. Huawei trial now underway in
Federal court in Brooklyn, presiding Judge Ann
Donnelly on September 8 instructed prospective
jurors: "China and the Communist Party ⦠are
not on trial." The same was said, or
claimed, in the Southern District of New York
in the UN corruption trials of CCP-member Ng
Lap Seng, and CCP-NGO boss Patrick Ho of the
China Energy Fund Committee. Both were
convicted. But is Huawei different? On September 9 Inner City Press
put out a 20 tweet thread of the opening
arguments, on X
and Bluesky. September 9 extra on X for
subscribers here
and Substack here On September 16-17 Inner
City Press published a book, Huawei on Trial
in Brooklyn, Surveillance from Iran to the UN,
here.
It contains information on how Huawei enables
surveillance by many UN states / the UN. In
the White House on September 18 there was talk
now minimizing spying. On the afternoon of September
18, this: "on the government's motion to close
the courtroom for three witnesses's testimony.
The government's motion and all supporting and
opposing briefing have been filed under seal.
(See ECF Nos. 789, 812, 815, 862, 863.) The
Court grants the government's motion. The
closure of the courtroom will be tailored by
providing access to redacted transcripts as
soon as possible after the witnesses's
testimony. Opinion setting forth the Courts
reasoning in detail to follow. Ordered by
Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 9/18/202." Inner City Press that
night emailed opposition to the closure, along
with a request that DOJ's motions for the
closure be unsealed, now docketed here.
On
September 22 Inner City Press was in the
courtroom before 9:30 am. It was nearly 9:50
am with Judge Donnelly took the bench and
announced not any unsealing but rather
significant time off the trial this week. Later
the US Attorney's Office filed to ask "that the Court preclude the
defense from cross-examining David Barker,
the former Chief Technology Officer of
Quintel USA Inc. (formerly Quintel
Technology Limited) (âQuintelâ), about
certain patent filings related to technology
stolen from Quintel by Huawei. Such
cross-examination would inject needlessâand
irrelevant and prejudicialâcomplications
pertaining to U.S. and European patent law,
and would likely draw the juryâs attention
to related civil litigation between Quintel
and Huawei that is an unnecessary detour
from this criminal prosecution. The
government expects to present evidence
showing that between 2009 and 2010,
FutureWei, at Huawei Techâs direction, stole
trade secrets from Quintel" - full filing on
Patreon here.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis. Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com |