UN's Gaza Report Favors EU Cases on Geneva Conventions, Sri Lanka Raised, Pascoe Waits

By Matthew Russell Lee
www.innercitypress.com/gaza1goldstone091509.html

UNITED NATIONS, September 15 -- The UN's report on the Gaza conflict, released on Tuesday, notes that the UN "Mission supports the reliance on universal jurisdiction as an avenue for States to investigate violations of grave breach provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1949." It refers to Gaza related cases against Israel pending in the Netherlands and Norway, where an arrest warrant against Ehud Olmert is being sought. Report here, see pages 514-15.

At the news conference announcing the report, Inner City Press asked the Mission's leader, Justice Richard Goldstone of South Africa, what he thinks of indicting Olmert, and if his investigation identified war crimes by any nationals of a state which is a member of the International Criminal Court, which would give the ICC jurisdiction even absent a referral from the UN Security Council. Video here, from Minute 59:59.

Goldstone answered that for "grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions," all countries have jurisdiction and even a duty to investigate and apprehend those responsible. He said that all member states of the UN are parties to the Geneva Conventions. While he said that grave breaches of the Conventions are just a "narrow ambit of the matters we reported," one wonders why for example this theory could not be applied to the Sri Lanka conflict which continued to escalate after the "hot" conflict in Gaza ended in January 2009.

On September 14, the head of the UN's Department of Political Affairs Lynn Pascoe was asked if the UN Secretariat would support Goldstone's report when it was released. Let's wait and see, Pascoe said. Some concluded that the UN Secretariat would have its finger in the wind, and wait and see whether to support the report based on reactions to it. Now, let's wait and see.

Footnote: Goldstone's press conference was moderated by the UN's Ahmad Fawzi, who took over from the Spokesperson's Office during the conflict between Israel and Lebanon in 2006, and who traveled with Ban Ki-moon to Gaza after the conflict. His presence marked how important the UN Secretariat thought this press conference would be. While it was surely difficult to try to get all questions in, two minutes from the end of the briefing Fawzi loudly claimed he wasn't sure if Inner Press wanted to ask a question. Video here, from Minute 58:46.

Only after another correspondent ceded his question was the question above permitted to be asked. Meanwhile, Fawzi called on two separate members of the same news organization. Whether this was due to being out of practice in or touch with Room 226 is not known, but may become clear during the upcoming General Assembly and its parade of heads of state. Watch this site.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/gaza1goldstone091509.html

UN Bans Propaganda, Then Refuses to Take Questions, Crackdown in Gaza's Wake?

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/ban1propaganda012709.html

UNITED NATIONS, January 27 -- Accused during the Gaza conflict of being ineffective, the UN's media operation has sought to crack down on and cut off the Press. Last week UN Spokesperson Michele Montas declaimed that briefings are "not for propaganda." This week, Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe read out a series of press releases and then refused to take questions even about them during the briefing, despite having made an on-camera commitment to do so.

On January 21, members of the Press asked Ms. Montas to explain Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's backing away from a call for an independent investigation of the bombing of UN facilities in Gaza. While one correspondent hearkened back to destruction in Lebanon on 1996, Inner City Press asked Montas to explain how Ban could commit to Israel's Ehud Olmert that Hamas' rockets would be part of any investigation. Video here, from Minute 18:56.

Of course it would include that, Montas answered. But if as she'd said, Ban doesn't control where the investigation is done, how can he know its scope?

The next day, Ms. Montas began the briefing by reading out a statement that among other things the briefing room is not to be used for propaganda. Video here. She said that Inner City Press had been there when this statement was adopted, between the UN Department of Public Information and the UN Correspondents' Association. Video here, from Minute 24:10.

Inner City Press asked if, as written, this applies not only to the media, but to propaganda from the briefing room podium. Ms. Montas said, "We usually try to avoid to have people on the podium who give propaganda, in the case of UN briefers." Video here, from Minute 25:20.

On January 23, Montas made a point of telling the correspondent who asked about Lebanon on 1996 to keep his questions "short and to the point." Video here from Minute 41:58.

Ms. Montas' deputy Marie Okabe took over the briefings on January 26 and 27. On the first of those two days, she took but did not answer Inner City Press' questions about UN system contracting with Satyam, the so-called Indian Enron, and said that the widely-reported nomination of UN Assistant Secretary General Jane Holl Lute to be deputy head of US Homeland Security was not yet official, and so she wouldn't say if Lute will continue working at and for the UN even while nominated for a US government post.

The one answer Okabe did later provide was to say that a complaint Algeria filed with the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs on January 14 against a non-governmental organization would not be released, click here for that.

On January 27, things hit a new low. Because the UN decided to have the head of the UN Population Fund Thoraya Obaid come to the noon briefing to speak about President Barack Obama renewing funding to her agency, Ms. Okabe said that she would take questions after Ms. Obaid spoke. Okabe took three questions -- none from Inner City Press -- prior to Ms. Obaid's presentation. (Obaid did not answer about Satyam, just as she has declined to make even the minimal public financial disclosure urged by Ban Ki-moon, click here for her refusal.)

The moment Obaid had finished, Ms. Okabe stood up to go. The lights were turned off. In the half light Inner City Press asked, what about the Q&A? Go ahead and ask me now, Ms. Okabe said. Inner City Press asked four questions, ranging from an increased budget for the UN in Afghanistan and a "loss of confidence in the UN" by Congo and Rwanda, to the exclusion of the press from an ostensibly opening meeting on human rights at the UN in Geneva. "Ask Geneva," Ms. Okabe said. But this is UN central, this presumably is where the orders come from. Isn't it?

To her credit, Okabe called Inner City Press later on Tuesday to ask to be reminded of the Afghanistan question, and her Office sent a copy of a statement from Geneva. The theory of this case is that these orders to crack down on and exclude the press come from higher up. Someone on the 38th floor -- guess who? -- saw the rambunctious questions about Gaza on January 21, and told Montas to crack down, the theory goes. And things have progressed, or regressed, from there. The purpose of this piece is to provide a snapshot. We will continue to follow the process.

Footnotes: while on Ban's Middle East trip, not only the Korean media Yonhap but also Seoul Broadcasting were given privileged access. When it appeared that only three reporters could go with Ban to Gaza, provisions were made for Korean involvement. Others pointed out, Korean is not one of the six working languages of the UN. But the goal of such coverage does not appear to be UN promotion. So some media are increasingly excluded, while others are beckoned in.

Heard at the stakeout: in the run-up to Susan Rice's stakeout on January 26, it was suggested that the UN Correspondents' Association get the first question. The US Mission to the US worked with this, asking even what the question would be. Other reporters rebelled, saying there was no precedent for this. The level of control at the UN continues to grow. Take for example this leaked document that Inner City Press has obtained scripting Ban Ki-moon ostensibly informal and wide-open January 5, 2009 Town Hall meeting with staff which listed, in advance, the staff members who would be permitted to ask questions. How long before UN press conferences, and even the questions to be asked, are exposed to be like this?

And see, www.innercitypress.com/ban1propaganda012709.html

As Olmert Brags of UN's Rocket Focus, Ban Loses Voice

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/gaza1muteban012109.html

UNITED NATIONS, January 21 -- As Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert brags that he got a commitment from the UN's Ban Ki-moon that "any UN investigation of the damage resulting from the war in Gaza includes the damage Palestinian-fired rockets caused in Israel's south," Ban's spokesperson Michele Montas on Wednesday said the first investigation Ban is asking for is by Israel itself. The steps after that aren't clear, Ms. Montas said. Mr. Ban couldn't speak for himself. He has cancelled a press availability, and will reportedly only appear at the Security Council, but not speak. "Cat got your tongue, Ban Ki-Mute?" one wag snarked. Laryngitis, a more serious source told Inner City Press.

Inner City Press asked Ms. Montas to confirm a Ha'aretz report that Ban had agreed to Olmert's request. She nodded and confirmed, but upon follow-up questions acknowledged that Ban does not control what investigations are done. Questioned repeatedly about negative comments in the region about Ban, Ms. Montas said that a person who cannot be accused of not having the interest of Gazans at heart has praised Ban's performance.

It emerged that Ms. Montas was referring to the UN system's own John Ging, Gaza chief of the UN Relief and Works Agency. While Ging did on January 20 offer effusive praise of Ban as articulate and inspiring, it must be noted that Ging is part of the UN.

On the other hand Robert Fisk, a journalist long covering the region, has written that " Ban said it would not be up to him to launch a war crimes tribunal. It was pathetic."

Near the end of Wednesday's noon briefing, Ms. Montas explicitly denied that Ban has been conveying Israel's conditions to Hamas. Time did not allow Inner City Press this follow-up: since Tony Blair has said that the Quartet, of which the UN is a part, has said the Quartet will only deal or even speak with Hamas if it recognizes Israel, does Blair speak for Ban? Does Ban speak with Blair? Today, at least, Ban can't speak.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/gaza1muteban012109.html