Showing posts with label dungu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dungu. Show all posts

Saturday, March 24, 2012

On #KONY2012 Bandwagon, UN Ignores Darfur, Airbrushes Americans in Dungu

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, March 23 -- When the #KONY2012 video went viral and quickly garnered tens of millions of views worldwide, the UN at the highest level was caught off-guard.

Inner City Press asked the spokespeople for Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for reaction and to state what they had been doing about Kony's Lord's Resistance Army.

At first there was no reaction. Then the spokesman sent Inner City Press the link to a report from Ban, from November 2011.

Finally on Friday the UN provided a video linked briefing by Ban's Special Representative for Central Africa Abou Moussa, the Deputy Force Commander of the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) Major-General Adrian Foster along with the Special Envoy of the African Union for the LRA issue, Francisco Madeira.

They described operations in four countries, without mentioning Sudan or the 100 military advisers the Obama administration has sent. Inner City Press then asked about both, and more generally about the impact of #KONY2012 and of illegal exploitation of natural resources, including by militaries in the region. Video here.

Abou Moussa acknowledged there is controversy about the film -- he did not mention the public masturbation charge against its lead creator -- but said two points remain, that the LRA maims people and that its leaders should be arrested.

Inner City Press asked about reports that the LRA had entered Darfur in Sudan, and asked why this military operation dealt at least on paper only with DRC, Uganda, Central African Republic and South Sudan. The answer was that even the "neighboring states" should be involved and if Kony enters their territory, should arrest him, under the International Criminal Court warrant.

But Sudan's Defense Minister, its President Omar al Bashir and governor Ahmed Harun have themselves been indicted by the ICC and not arrested. In fact, UN Peacekeeping offered free helicopter flights to Ahmed Harun, and Ban's Darfur envoy Ibrahim Gambari most recently partied with Bashir.

Could this undermine the UN's credibility in tracking down ICC indictee Joseph Kony?

Inner City Press asked twice about the 100 American military advisers and was finally told that two of them are in Dungu in the DRC. Where are the other 98 and what have they been doing?

The war in the DRC, described as Africa's World War, was fueled by militaries including from Uganda looting minerals in Eastern Congo. Inner City Press asked what safeguards were in place. First it was said, despite UN Sanctions reports to the contrary, that such looting of minerals is just a "perception."

Then Major-General Adrian Foster described a meeting in Kinshasa on March 15 between the defense chiefs of staff of DRC and Uganda, saying that the "atmospherics" were good.

This was also meant to answer a question Inner City Press asked, including previously to Ban Ki-moon's spokesman, about the Ugandan army saying it has been blocked from DRC, apparently since just before the conduct of the deeply flawed (but scarcely UN commented on) Congolese elections.

It emerged Friday that the Uganda army, the UPDF, still for now cannot or will not enter the DRC.

There is a credible theory that Uganda's government and military have used the Kony issue for years, as a boogie-man and as a way to raise funds. With 5000 troops and 100 American military advisers, will Kony and a band of 200 to 700 fighters be caught? We'll see.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

UN Accused of Inaction As LRA Kills in Congo, Denies But Without Specifics, No Bosco

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
www.innercitypress.com/drc1msf020409.html

UNITED NATIONS, February 4 -- Following the deaths of hundreds of people in Northern Congo, and a report by Doctors without Borders (MSF) blaming the UN for failing to protect civilians there, the UN on Wednesday denounced the MSF report as "totally unfounded." UN Peacekeeping officials have admitted to Inner City Press that they pulled forces out of Northern Congo to focus on another part of the Congo, the Kivus. So Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Marie Okabe if her categorical denial of the MSF report meant that the UN takes issue with MSF's report that UN peacekeepers stayed inside their base near Dungu during the attack by Lord's Resistance Army on November 1, 2008. Video here, at Minute 13:58.

"I don't have anything specific on that," said Ms. Okabe, who had just denied the whole MSF report as "totally unfounded."

Since the UN has used a figure near 600 for the civilians killed in the area, Inner City Press asked if the UN disagrees with MSF's figure of 900. "I don't have the number killed," Ms. Okabe said. As part of her scripted denial, she had said that UN Peacekeepers support the Congolese army by providing "casualty evacuation." Video here, from Minute 12.

MSF specifically faults the UN for not taking injured civilians out of the area, as the UN does even in Sri Lanka. Inner City Press asked Okabe about this. She replied that her statement had said that "casualty evacuation" is part of the UN Mission's mandate. But are civilians being taken out? MSF says no.

The UN's main news on Congo for Wednesday was to brag about Hutu rebels it is repatriating from the Kivus, including the surprising news that Mai Mai fighters, some of the most vicious and disorganized, are being integrated into the Congolese Army, which the UN has chosen to support. Not mentioned by the UN was that Bosco Ntaganda, indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, appears also to be on the verge of integration into the Congolese Army. We'll have more on this.

News analysis: since the UN knows it should be doing more to protect civilians in Northern Congo, why do its spokespeople call a report to that effect by a respected humanitarian group "totally unfounded"? Why not admit that more could be done, and put at least some of the ball and blame back in the court of the Security Council? But like the worst of corporate Public Relations, the UN mechanically defends even the indefensible.

And see, www.innercitypress.com/drc1msf020409.html