Sunday, May 27, 2012

UN's Mood Says Lead-Up to Houla Unclear, UK Admits, Germany Says No, Russia on 3rd Force



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 27 -- After the UN Security Council issued its Press Statement on the killings in Houla, Syria, late Sunday afternoon, Inner City Press put questions about it to the Ambassadors of the UK, Syria, Germany, Russia and France - for the latter two, the Deputies.

  First, a BRICS representative told Inner City Press that General Robert Mood has said that the circumstances leading to the killings in Houla were unclear or murky, and had mentioned killings by close-range shooting and "extreme physical abuse" - a shorthand for beheading.

  Even before the statement was read out by the Azerbaijani presidency of the Council for May, Syrian Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari told Inner City Press exclusively that his government viewed Houla as analogous to "Algeria in the 1990s" -- brutal beheadings meant spark a civil war.

  Ja'afari also said a goal of those behind the beheadings included increasing the size of the UNSMIS mission, militarizing them and internationalizing investigations and accountability, mentioning "Ocampo" of the International Criminal Court (soon to be replaced by Ms. Bensouda).

  When the formal stakeouts started, Inner City Press asked French Deputy Permanent Representative Martin Briens to respond to the analogy to Algeria in the 1990s. 

  He said no further comment is necessary, it is the responsibility of the government to protect civilians. But it's said Houla was not in government control.

  Inner City Press asked German Permanent Representative Peter Wittig to confirm that Mood said that the circumstances leading to the killings in Houla were unclear. Wittig replied that in its view things were not murky.

  But UK Permanent Representative Mark Lyall Grant, when Inner City Press asked him the same question about Mood's statement that the lead-up was unclear, to his credit acknowledged that was said. 

  He went on to say that in a sense it didn't matter, Syria should not have used tanks, these should have already been back in the barracks.

Russian Deputy Permanent Representative Pankin said that Russia called for the briefing. Inner City Press asked him about the analogy to Algeria in the 1990s. 

  He replied that there is the presence of a third force, or external forces, who want to bring about military intervention or victory. He said that an investigation is much needed. But who will do a credible investigation?

  As the last speaker, Syrian Permanent Representative Ja'afari called the statements of Wittig and Lyall Grant a "tsunami of lies," which different from what General Mood had said. "What about Ban Ki-moon," Inner City Press asked: was he and his letter more akin to Mood or to the German and UK Ambassadors' presentation? He replied, closer to the UK and Germany, of course. Of course!

  Finally, Inner City Press asked Ja'afari if this might lead to an increase in the size of UNSMIS. Yes, Ja'afari said. So, in a cynical view: a jobs program? The investigation is important.

Footnote: During the afternoon's closed consultations, representatives of several countries not (yet) on the Security Council came to monitor proceedings. Inner City Press tweeted that Sudan and Norway were there, then that Liechtenstein and Finland had been first. 

  At the end, Australia let it be known that they had been present too, and give a written statement by Foreign Minister Bob Carr. Duly noted. But where was Luxembourg, which is running against Finland and Australia in October for two seats on the Security Council in 2013-14? Watch this site.

Absent from Press Q&A on Syria, UNCA Officials Conceal Complaint Information, Kafka-esque



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 27 -- Amid a series of press stakeouts on Syria on Sunday at the UN, in the parallel world of the UN Correspondents Association's top officials, the "urgent" move to expel Inner City Press persisted without disclosure.


  UNCA President Giampaulo Pioli, who on May 25 issued a notice of a May 29 session to appoint a "Board of Examination" to try to expel Inner City Press, did not come to the UN to cover the Security Council session on the killings in Houla.

  His Vice President Lou Charbonneau of Reuters, who on May 21 was bylined on a Reuters story stealing without credit an Inner City Press exclusive of March 28 that US official Jeffrey Feltman would come to work for the UNdid come to the UN and even sat at the multiple stakeouts. 

  But he did not ask any questions, preferring to use the information gleaned by the questions of others.

   Foreign Policy's The Cable, for example, credited Inner City Press, but Reuters did not. At the stakeout on Sunday, a Russian UN correspondent thanked Inner City Press for another exclusive report which he said he'd used and credited.
  Charbonneau has said that he has a POLICY of not crediting Inner City Press exclusives, a statement that Reuters has yet to respond to.


  Nor did Pioli respond to Inner City Press' sixth request that he provide the names of the five UNCA Executive Committee members he said had in writing requested the Board of Examination to try to expel Inner City Press.

  Since under UNCA's rules this Board must be "impartial," it seems clear that none of the five complainants, nor in context any correspondent which has used an Inner City Press exclusive without credit, can be on the Board of Examination.

  It is also clear that Inner City Press, as defendant, must have a role in selecting the Board, including making nominations and striking nominees if necessary for cause.
None of this is possible without known who are the complainants, and the supposed victims. But despite Inner City Press explaining just this in its request to Pioli, no names have been provided.

   Presumably Charbonneau, who also filed a stealth complaint with the UN Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit which controls media access to the UN, is one of the five complainants. Why not just give the names, then? Under his behind the scenes control of the UNCA Executive Committee, UNCA has become positively Kafka-esque. Watch this site.

At UN, Ban's Al Qaeda in Syria Quote Was Not Planned, Houla Fallout, Ban's Gaffes Covered Up, Witchhunt Against Watchdogs



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 27 -- Amid the focus on and use the Syria issue of statements by the UN and its Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, mostly unreported is just how slap-dash and un-thought out many of Ban's statements are.

  Ban's famous or infamous May recent statement that "a few days ago there was a huge, serious, massive terrorist attack. I believe that there must be al Qaeda behind it" was made in response to a student's question at a Model UN event in the General Assembly Hall.

  But in the same session, as Inner City Press reported, Ban also referred to the Syrian city of Hamas as "Hamas," a glitch which the UN edited out of its transcript of Ban's remarks without even noting it was brackets. See Inner City Press' May 17 story, here.

  Subsequent reporting by Inner City Press had found that people close to Ban were embarrassed by these and other Ban's statements, and that the "Al Qaeda" reference was not in any prepared speech, remarks or talking points. "He just said it," a source close to Ban told Inner City Press.

  And now that Ban gaffe is impacting and delaying Security Council response to, for example, the deaths on Houla.

  But most of the wire services covering the UN do not report on Ban's many glitches. They seem to want to take him seriously, because it makes their jobs seem more serious. They also do not cover Ban speeches like that at his May 24 "Town Hall" event with staff.

  Staff expressed outrage to Inner City Press that, for example, Ban's first answer was about AIDS to a question about the UN not recognized the domestic partnerships of homosexual staff members if their home countries do not.

  Others were offended when Ban's response to being questioned about his lack of follow up with the government of Afghanistan to the killing of UN Security Officer Louis Maxwell by Afghan National forces was to say he has asked "Hollywood" to make a movie about Maxwell.

Inner City Press reported on this, then at the May 25 UN noon briefing put a series of questions to Ban's lead spokesman Martin Nesirky, about Ban's answers on Maxwell (and Hollywood), gay rights (and AIDS), on and, perhaps relatedly, about media rights.

  Nesirky responded on each that "I am not going to go into the details of what was discussed at a staff meeting" and "there are complications, because of national legislation in some cases.."

  Then Inner City Press asked about " a complaint was filed with the Media and Accreditation… Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit (MALU) by" Louis Charbonneau, the UN bureau chief of Reuters which used without any credit Inner City Press' exclusive story that US official Jeffrey Feltman will come work by Ban. (Foreign Policy's The Cable did credit Inner City Press, here.)

  Nesirky said of Charbonneau's complaint to MALU that "correspondence between individuals is between individuals, first thing."

  Inner City Press asked as a matter of due press "whether journalists at the UN have a right to see whatever files or complaints are maintained about them."

  Nesirky said, "I think what we have here is something that I am fully aware involves you, and I think that it would be better to be discussed offline, not on camera in the briefing."

  Inner City Press followed up "to know what the procedures are, because I have very little confidence in the off-camera due process."

  Nesirky ended the questioning and the briefing by saying"we’ll deal with it separately. Thanks very much, and have a good weekend." 

  Then he went just outside the Dag Hammarskjold Auditorium and conferred to Charbonneau, who used to be his colleague at Reuters. Four hours later Inner City Pressreceived written notice of May 29 session seeking to name a "board of examination" to expel it.

In this case, the Emperor has no clothes -- and those including in the media who insist that he does will apparently do anything to keep the nakedness under wraps. Watch this site.

At UN, Charges Against Investigative Press Undisclosed, Stolen Scoop Unexplained by Reuters



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 26 -- It seems that at the UN the publication of articles critical of powerful officials, countries or media organization can be construed as "harassment" and used as the basis to seek to expel the offending journalist.

  This takes place in the context of an Inner City Press investigative scoop, that US official Jeffrey Feltman will come work at the UN being stolen without credit by Reuters (unlike Foreign Policy's The Cable which did give credit), and a stealth complaint of harassment filed by the bylined Reuters correspondent Louis Charbonneau, using his position as Vice President of the UN Correspondents Association.


  After being informed in writing Friday afternoon that five UNCA Executive Committee members had referred "charges of harassment" against Inner City Press seeking to form a "board of examination" to "expel or impeach" Inner City Press, UNCA's President Giampaulo Pioli has three times refused to disclose who complained, what definition of harassment will be used, and what beyond written articles and the single verbal word "disgust" Inner City Press is charged with.

  Already some other reporters, readers and also diplomats have expressed surprise that a purported correspondents' association would try to censor a member journalist or define critical articles as harassment. 

  By this definition, Inner City Press "harasses" Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and for example his head of Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous every day: it's called investigative journalism.

   One UN Correspondent, who will for now be nameless to avoid retaliation or UNCA charges against him, said

'No excuse to steal an exclusive... I think UNCA should have a 'law that "expulsion" is "outlawed". There is not "expulsion" in journalism, we are not Stalin's CPSU...I find great help in reading your blog when I'm not at the UN. Especially I think our job is not "policing" other journalists but watching the UN, especially when they are not doing their job. Something that I think you are doing better than anybody else in all the press corps. I just reported two days ago your questions, crediting that you / innercitypress.com is a must read for all the UN permanent missions.'

  This correspondent, like others, credits Inner City Press when using its exclusives. But Reuters' Lou Charbonneau says he has a POLICY of not crediting Inner City Press. It is unclear how this could be consistent with a Reuters-wide policy. 

  But despite five days of requests, in the United States and then its headquarters in London, Reuters has yet to provide its policy on crediting -- or on its reporters using their positions in correspondents' associations to seek to have competitors dis-accredited.

  Inner City Press wrote to UNCA President Pioli:

This is a formal request to be informed who are the five people requesting to urgently "examine" me. I am also asking to to be informed immediately of the definition you are using of "harassment" and of any and all alleged acts of "harassment" I am charged with, particularly since the last UNCA meeting on this topic in April, other than material that I have written and published as is my right under freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

  After Pioli reiterated by voice mail his position that the empaneling of a "board of examination" -- which is supposed to be impartial -- will proceed the next day the UN is open, May 29, Inner City Press asked again:

Hi, at least for now I'm just requesting (and believe I have a right to) the names of those who have referred these charges of harassment against me... For your information, the complaint Lou filed with MALU and Dujarric I found outrageous; it was baseless, should not have been filed, and I should have been informed. While he says I am somehow making it hard for him and unnamed others to do their work, he was in essence trying to STOP me from doing my work, as well in my view stealing my work without credit. Please provide the requested information, thanks.

  Pioli this time did reply in writing, but without providing any of the information or charges. And so a third request:

Hi. I am asking that you send me the information -- names of accusers, definitions and description of charges -- in writing by email, in part because Lou's complaint to MALU and Dujarric, cc-ed to you, appears entirely based on something I said to him. You should understand I don't want to subject myself to any more such charges, however spurious. So I ask again: send it to me in writing the names of accusers, definitions and description of charges. Past deadline.

   Still, even after two subsequent phone calls by Inner City Press to Pioli's cell phone and land line, the identities of those UNCA Executive Committee filing changes to expel Inner City Press have not been disclosed.  Here's the online list of Executive Committee members. Watch this site.

Friday, May 25, 2012

Witchhunt among UN Correspondents, As Reuters Steals Scoop, Kafka on May 29?



By Matthew Russell Lee, Media critique

UNITED NATIONS, May 25 -- With Yemen on the agenda of the UN Security Council for Tuesday May 29, in a parallel universe the UN Correspondents Association's board has another issue in mind: barring Inner City Press, and perhaps all investigative bloggers, from its ranks.

   On May 23, after Reuters stole without credit Inner City Press' March 28 exclusive story that US official Jeffrey Feltman would replace Lynn Pascoe as the head of the UN Department of Political Affairs, the UNCA Executive Committee was asked for the third time to adopt a simple statement encouraging UNCA members "to seek to give credit when using a report that was exclusively reported by another media."

  The members were shown for example that Foreign Policy's The Cable ran a follow-up story giving credit to Inner City Press, unlike Reuters. Shouldn't "colleagues" in the UN press corps show each other as much respect as strangers?

   But the proposed statement was flatly rejected, including by Louis Charbonneau of Reuters who said he has a POLICY of not crediting Inner City Press exclusives.

   Since it was and is unclear if this is a Reuters or only Charbonneau policy, implemented throughout the wire service as to UN stories since he is their correspondent here, Inner City Press asked the other two reporters and editors listed on the pilfered story. But there has been no response.

   Instead, Inner City Press learned that Charbonneau sought to have Inner City Press ejected from the UN, by filing a complaint with the head of the UN's Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit, and with her supervisor the former spokesman of Kofi Annan, claiming that Inner City Press' reporter is "making it very hard for me and others in the UN press to do our jobs." Reuters' Charbonneau's e-mail has in this context been put online here.

   At the May 25 UN noon briefing, Inner City Press asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky about due process rights of UN correspondents with respect to complaints filed against them by competitors. Nesirky replied that this should be "dealt with off camera."

  Inner City Press followed up asking if journalists at the UN have the right to see such complaints or files maintained about them by Ban's Media Accreditation and Liason Unit.

  Nesirky responded that there are "rules and procedures," but wouldn't say what these rules are. For the record, Nesirky proudly lists that he used to work for Reuters. He said he was "fully aware" of the situation and that "we'll deal with it separately." Four hours later, Inner City Press received an UNCA notice of a "board of examination," seemingly, a Franz Kafka-like kangaroo court, see below.

  Charbonneau sent copies of his e-mail to, among others,Tim Witcher of Agence France Presse. who is on the UNCA Executive Board but is not an officer. Why Witcher was cc-ed may be unclear. Witcher, at the behest of the French Mission to the UN, had earlier sought to have Inner City Press disciplined for revealing that the French Mission was so out of touch with Paris that it didn't know that then-President Nicolas Sarkozy would switch Herve "The Drone" Ladsous for Jerome Bonnafont as the French head of the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations. 

   Charbonneau can be viewed as a proxy for Witcher and thus behind him for the French mission. It is an abuse of power, and one that Inner City Press does not accept it cannot report on. So:

On May 25 Inner City Press receive the following "notice" from UNCA President Giampaolo Pioli:

"I received a request from 5 members of UNCA executive committee to urgently appoint a to look into a list of complaints . The Unca Executive committee will meet Tuesday may 29 at 4pm or at 5pm in the Unca club."

   Inner City Press was not informed of the identities of the "five members of the UNCA executive committee" who view as so urgent the right to steal exclusives and to silence those who complain - but here's the online list of Executive Committee members.

   Back on April 10, a warning shot was issued when Charbonneau e-mailed some UNCA Executive Board members but not Inner City Press, seeking to hold a meeting to throw Inner City Press off the Board. He said they had six issues, mostly about the Missions to the UN of France and Sri Lanka. (The "right" to steal exclusives would come later.)

  Three times since last September the UNCA Executive Board has pushed Inner City Press to censor its articles. These articles involved as noted exposing the French mission as not even knowing which French official would get the top Peacekeeping job, and reporting that UNCA President Pioli, took money from the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka before agreeing, without consulting with other board members such as Inner City Press, to screen in the UN the Sri Lankan government's rebuttal to the genocide film Killing Fields, which was NOT screened in the UN. 

 (Pioli argues that the payment of rent was long in the past; we add that here in fairness.)

  After Inner City Press reported on that, Pioli screamed over the phone that he would have Inner City Press thrown out of the UN. And now the attempt is on, with expulsion from UNCA as the first step, according to another UNCA board member.

  Since Pioli's hands may be viewed as dirty -- quite literally in light of the second Killing Fields film -- or tired, the lead has been taken by his deputy, Reuters' Lou Charbonneau. While increasingly rarely seen at the Security Council stakeout since he is handed stories and drafts on a platter by the UK, French and sometimes US missions, Charbonneau has as one wag put it become the power behind the flaccid UNCA throne.

  But he seems to have lost any free press sensibility. At a recent UNCA meeting to which Inner City Press was summoned, when another member who like Pioli was sent a copy of Charbonneau's complaint to MALU admonished Inner City Press to "write more positive stories about the UN" or apparently face expulsion, Charbonneau said nothing.

  From this and Pioli's open giving of gifts not only to departing UN officials but also those entering, one might surmise that UNCA is actually working for Ban Ki-moon. 
  But most of its Executive Committee members' motive are more mundane: to ensure for their media organizations the larger and more private office spaces, and otherwise serve themselves. Now, to be able to steal exclusive then try to silence the robbed media which complains.

   Charbonneau, for example, recently sent a written complaint demanding more access for Reuters, AP and other wires, ostensibly in the name of UNCA but without even checking with Executive Committee members.

   Many in these wires sit in their offices monitoring other journalists' questions, then taking the answers as their own, even regarding stories on which the others have exclusives. 

 These are routinely stolen without credit, as for example Inner City Press' exclusive report that 14 kilograms of cocaine were found in the UN mail room and covered up.
 
  After writing the story, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky about it at the next noon briefing. He had no answer, but later in the day organized a 6 pm stakeout by UN Security chief Gregory Starr to "rebut" the charges.

The UN correspondents of Reuters, Bloomberg (changing 14 kilos to "35 pounds")AFP (changing to "35.5 pounds")Agence France Presse (whose Tim Witcher as noted above was previously used to harass Inner City Press by the French Mission to the UN, after Inner City Press published an expose on France's use of the UN in Cote d'Ivoire, and the last minute switch from Jerome Bonnafont to Herve "The Drone" Ladsous for DPKO), Mexican media and others showed up, many complaining, then wrote stories which other than the Mexican media gave no credit to Inner City Press' underlying exclusive.


  The defense has been that once a press availability is scheduled, even if clear in response to anther media's exclusive, no credit need be given. Is this journalism? Or a club of corporate insiders who will stoop so low as to try to get Ban Ki-moon's UN to eject a reporter who "makes it hard" for them to do their jobs?

   Charbonneau adopted another tactic, or pretext: Inner City Press' publication of a publicly available, online photograph of the French Mission's Permanent Representative Gerard Araud with another tuxedoed man somehow created a "hostile environment" for another UN correspondents and UNCA executive committee member.

  Inner City Press countered that this was censorship, but agreed to take down the photo. "Don't post any explanation why," Pioli said. And seeking to ensure no more hostility, Inner City Press dropped from its Tweets the ostensibly offended party -- only to later be told this was another offense.

  A week later, after the UN's own Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit cited UNCA in support of the proposition that the Press could not cover the meeting of Ban Ki-moon's Senior Advisory Group on Peacekeeping to see if alleged war criminal Shavendra Silva remained in attendance after Ban Ki-moon was silent, Inner City Press included its rebuttal of this position, and UNCA, in an April 6 story.

    And so leading up to his complaint to MALU, on April Charbonneau sent e-mails to other UNCA executive board members, but not Inner City Press and another vibrant supportive -- but now resigned -- member, suggesting that Inner City Press should be ousted from the board. In the UNCA Constitution, there is only a provision for ouster from UNCA, after among other things a General Membership meeting.

The first step is a "board of examination," now set for May 29.

It was suggested to Inner City Press, at the meeting on the photo, again on April 13 and then by an intermediary, that it simply resign from the UNCA board. But why? The organization is supposed to fight for the rights of UN correspondents, for more rather than less access to the news, and for freedom of the press. And many on the current group are not engaged in their fight -- quite the opposite.

  The intermediary acknowledged that the complaint about the photo had come from the French Mission to the UN, which has been seeking to silence Inner City Press since at least a year ago, when along with its expose of France's misuse of UN Peacekeeping in Cote d'Ivoire Inner City Press also published an investigative piece about a French diplomat, Romain Serman, who was arrested for attempted purchase of cocaine and resisting arrest. Serman and the French Mission invoked diplomatic immunity and Serman was allowed to leave the country rather than face prosecution. But then he quietly re-entered the US, where is in the French consul in San Francisco.

   The French spokesman at the time, Stephane Crouzat, accompanied and since succeeded by Brieuc Pont, demanded that Inner City Press take down the story, much as UNCA has since demanded that Inner City Press take down the photograph, not write about French Mission briefings or about the UNCA president having taken money from the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka then agreed to show in the UN, without consulting other Executive Committee members at least not Inner City Press, the Sri Lankan government's rebuttal of a film accusing it of genocide. 

  When a supposed journalists association veers into censorship, the time has come to fight.

The basis of the fight is as follows: rather than defend or promote the ability to report on the UN, these individuals have sought to undermine it, often at the request of or even after the payment by particular countries' mission to the UN. Now some seek to use it as a club to steal stories. So it will be fought. Watch this site.