Showing posts with label durjarric. Show all posts
Showing posts with label durjarric. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

UN Won't Release Its Darfur Cover-Up Report, Under-Reports in Central African Republic


By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, November 5, more here -- A week after after the UN issued a statement on its internal investigation into charges it covered-up attacks in Darfur, Inner City Press on November 5 asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric if the full report will be released, at least to the Security Council, and about under-reporting of attacks in the Central African Republic. Video here.
  Dujarric said that even before the summary was given to the Security Council members -- so that is apparently all that has been given to them -- UN missions were told to be sure to report attacks. He said he reads out what the missions sent him.
  So has the UN mission in CAR, MINUSCA, simply not send in reports about killings in Bambari and elsewhere? 
  It is reported, somewhat naively, that France, the UK and US have all expressed dissatisfaction to the UN Secretariat about the lack of accountability. First, France controls UN Peacekeeping, through Herve Ladsous. Second, if the P3 complained they'd get action. So we'll see.

Despite a request from Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access the UN will not release the report. Back on October 29, Inner City Press asked, given that even the sanitized statement says information on attacks was withheld from the media and UN Headquarters - at its request? - who is responsible? What about Mohamed ibn Chambas, recently head of the Darfur mission UNAMID until he got a promotion? Video here.
  Back on September 12, eight days after Inner City Press exclusively reported that the head of the Darfur peacekeeping mission Mohamed ibn Chambas was being given the UN Office in West Africa post in Dakar, and asked about it, the UN confirmed the move.

  Inner City Press has asked on September 5, and did again on September 12, if this move didn't undercut or pre-judge the UN's investigation into charges that the Darfur mission under Chambas under-reported attacks on civilians. 
  On September 12, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric insisted he didn't want to "pre-judge" the inquiry.  But by giving the new post, this has already been done. Now this sanitized statement, with the report still withheld:
A review, initiated by the Secretary-General, was conducted into recent allegations that the African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) intentionally sought to cover up crimes against civilians and peacekeepers.

The Review Team examined all the material related to 16 incidents, which were the basis of these allegations. It also interviewed former and current staff in UNAMID and at UN Headquarters. The Review Team did not find any evidence to support these allegations. However, it did find a tendency to under-report unless absolutely certain of the facts. In five of the cases examined, the Mission did not provide UN Headquarters with full reports on the circumstances surrounding these incidents, which involved possible wrongdoing by Government or pro-Government forces. The Review Team also found that the Mission took an unduly conservative approach to the media, maintaining silence when it could have developed a press line, even in the absence of all the facts.

The Secretary-General is deeply troubled by these findings. He recognizes that UNAMID faces unique challenges owing to its complex mandate and operating environment. Nevertheless, keeping silent or under-reporting on incidents involving human rights violations and threats or attacks on UN peacekeepers cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

The Secretary-General will take all necessary steps to ensure full and accurate reporting by UNAMID. Every effort will be made to ensure that sensitive information is systematically brought to the attention of UN Headquarters and the Security Council in a timely fashion. UNAMID’s media policy will be re-examined to ensure greater openness and transparency. The Mission will be expected to follow up formally and report on Government investigations into incidents where peacekeepers have been killed or injured.

Ensuring that the UN speaks out consistently against abuses and identifies the perpetrators is a key goal of the Secretary-General’s Human Rights up Front initiative. The Secretary-General will ensure that all missions are provided with clear guidance on the fulfilment of their reporting obligations, particularly with regard to human rights and the protection of civilians. He looks forward to the upcoming review of UN peace operations as an opportunity to comprehensively address this issue, which is a core element of his Human Rights up Front initiative. 
   On August 22, Inner City Press asked:
Inner City Press: in Darfur, it seems that Mr. Mohamed ibn Chambas went to Kalma Camp and met with residents who expressed a variety of complaints, but he was quoted as saying there that UNAMID [African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur] cannot stop Government forces from entering camps for the displaced, and it has left many people confused whether, what is UNAMID’s role in terms of protection of civilians given these [inaudible] entrances in the camp and people lying on the ground?
Spokesman Dujarric:  I will… we will check with the Mission to verify the quotes and see what actually they have been doing.
  Two weeks, no answer. Now this. 
  UN Peacekeeping and its mission in Darfur continue take a selective and lax approach to protecting civilians.  
   This example concerns the UN's evolving statements on the Al-Salam camp. 
  After whistleblower Aicha Elbasri further exposed UN Peacekeeping under Herve Ladsous as covering up attacks in Darfur, on June 17 several Security Council members joined International Criminal Court prosecutor Fatou Bensouda in calling for an investigation.
  On August 7, Inner City Press asked the Joint Special Representative of the African Union-United Nations Mission in Darfur, Mohamed Ibn Chambas, about the status of the probe.
   Chambas told Inner City Press he had met earlier in the day with the commission, whose members will be on their say to Darfur.
 Inner City Press asked if the report will be public. Chambas only said his staff will cooperate. Apparently it will be up to Ban Ki-moon, or even Herve Ladsous, to decide to release or withhold the report.
 Back in Khartoum on August 11, Chambas said this:
"And on the attack on Alsalam camp, let me state that we have information about this. We have always stated that the responsibility for maintaining law and order in Sudan lays with the Government. This is a sovereign country, it has law enforcement obligations, it has its justice system and the AU, the UN is only here to facilitate and ensure that law and order and justice are maintained and are enforced according to due process of law. So, we want to say that we will continue to engage with the Government of Sudan in accordance with its own protection of civilian mandate and to ensure that the activities on law enforcement agencies are carried out without infringement of the rights of innocent civilians specially vulnerable communities in IDP camps. We hope that on the other hand residents of IDP camps can understand and do understand that possession of weapons, carrying of weapons is not allowed in IDP camps under international humanitarian law.

"It’s also imperative, and it’s a responsibility of the leaders of IDP camps to ensure that no one is using these camps to keep weapons or to hide weapons, because this is against international humanitarian law. These are the issues involved there and we as UNAMID we will continue to work with both sides, with IDP leaders to educate them what is permissible in these camps and what is not, and at the same time working  with Government to enforce legitimately law and order but to do that respecting the civic and human rights of the citizens and also respecting due process of law. Thank you."
  Since this seemed to defer to Sudan's Abu Tira, and even to blame the victims, Inner City Press on August 13 asked:
Inner City Press: I wanted to ask about Darfur, Missouri and Afghanistan.  On Darfur, photos have come out of the Sudanese uniformed Abu Tira forces going through a refugee camp or [internally displaced persons] camp in El Salam and making the residents lie on the ground.  And Mr. Chambas was asked about it and said that this was entirely up to the Sudanese and it just seems sort of strange. I mean, I know there is a Human Rights component to these peacekeeping missions.  Does the UN, does UNAMID [United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur] or does anyone in the Secretariat, are they aware of these photographs?

Spokesman Stephane Dujarric:  I will check.
  Twenty three hours later, Dujarric sent nothing to Inner City Press. But UNAMID issued a belated statement, which seems to contradict or attempt to rehabilitate Chambas' dismissive August 11 comments:
"Following a security raid conducted on Al Salam IDP camp on 5 August when individuals were arrested for alleged possession of illegal drugs, weapons and ammunition, UNAMID monitored the trials of those arrested during the operation; most of whom have since been released. UNAMID has been engaging relevant state authorities on the conditions of those still being detained.

"Other security raids have been conducted in Otash and Dereig camps and are part of a wider campaign by the South Darfur authorities to address the high level of criminality in the State, especially around Nyala.

"The security raids have generated alarm and anxiety amongst IDPs in Kalma camp, who are anticipating a similar operation at their camp and have expressed their concerns to UNAMID."
 We'll continue on this.
  Inner City Press asked UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq if an independent investigation of Ladsous' UN Peacekeeping will be done, and if not, why not? Video here.
  Haq claimed that UN Peacekeeping is already acting on Elbasri's complaints, and that it had been telling the press about it. Inner City Press asked, where have these updates been provided.
 
  Haq cited a read-out given in March, largely generic; then he said the requests made on June 17 would be studied.
 Now on July 2, Ban's spokesman Dujarric - in the midst of a controversy about a non-factual response on June 27, not corrected when asked June 30 and July 1, about Ladsous' mission in the DRC flying sanctioned FDLR leaders around, released this:
"The Secretary-General is concerned about the recent serious allegations against the African Union-United Nations Mission in Darfur (UNAMID). These allegations cover a wide range of issues, including inaccurate reporting of the facts on the ground in Darfur, specific instances of failure to protect civilians and accusations of mismanagement of UNAMID.

"UNAMID has undergone several investigations and reviews over the last two years, which have sought to address both strategic issues and specific incidents related to the Mission's performance. The Secretary-General’s Special Report of 25 February 2014 provides an overview of the strategic and managerial challenges faced by the Mission and the work being done at United Nations Headquarters and in UNAMID to address them.

"The Secretary-General remains committed to improving UNAMID's performance and is determined to take all necessary steps to correct any wrongdoing. He has instructed the Secretariat to review the reports of all investigations and inquiries undertaken since mid-2012 to ensure that their recommendations have been implemented and that any relevant issues have been fully addressed. This review, to be completed within one month, will enable the Secretary-General to determine what has already been done and, if recommendations are outstanding, what corrective action needs to be taken."
 On DRC, Dujarric said "you can pick up the phone" - after siting next to Ladsous while he refused to answer Press questions on DRC.
  As recently as May 29, Ladsous refused Press questions, video here,compilation here.
   Back on April 24 when Darfur as such was the topic of the UN Security Council, three major Darfur rebel groups wrote to the Council to investigate "all reports of the Peace Keeping Mission, including reports presented to the UNSC by [Under] Secretary General for Peace Keeping Mr. Ladous and the reliability of the sources he had relied on."
   But unlike his abortive stakeout on the evening of April 23 about South Sudan, video here, Ladsous did not come out to answer any questions. And at the April 24 UN noon briefing, when Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq for a response to the request for an investigation of Ladsous and his reports, there was none: not one modified or corrected report was cited.
  Instead, from the "holy seat" of the UN Correspondents Association a long time scribe followed up to say that it is not all Ladsous' fault, and to cast blame on the government. (This same dynamic was repeated at the June 17 noon briefing.) This reflexively shifting of blame from the UN to the government, whose new Permanent Representative spoke in the Council on April 24, is in this case particularly absurd: how can the government be responsible for the UN's own reports being inaccurate?
  Those requesting this investigation of DPKO and Ladsous are not the government of Omar al Bashir, which whom Ladsous met in July 2013 without any readout, but rebels Abdel Wahid Mohamed Ahmed Nur, Chairperson, Sudan Liberation Army/Movement (SLA/M-A/Wahid), Gibriel Ibrahim Mohamed, Chairperson of Justice & Equality Movement Sudan (JEM) and Minni Arko Minnawi, Chairperson Sudan Liberation Army/Movement (SLA/M-MM).
  Pending UN answers, again we ask: how can one write about the corruption of a UN Peacekeeping mission, at length, without naming the person in charge? Why would one airbrush that person, in this case Herve Ladsous the UN Under Secretary for Peacekeeping Operations, out?
   The former spokesperson of the UNAMID mission in Darfur quit, spoke out and finally leaked documents. Radio Dabanga as well as Foreign Policy began publishing them on April 7 (FP did not mentionDabanga, and called its back to back  Ladsous-less pieces an exclusive investigation). 
  The last piece focused on the US role, all to the good, but not only doesn't mention that the UN's Ladsous met with International Criminal Court indictee Omar al Bashir in July, without providing any read-out, but also omits France's hosting of Darfur rebels, for example.
 Back on March 25, 2013, Inner City Press asked the UN Spokespersonabout how the UN Peacekeeping in Darfur could have let a group of Internally Displaced People be kidnapped while they were ostensibly protected:
Inner City Press: there is this incident where IDPs were taken hostage or kidnapped by people that were in Government army uniforms, and somehow UNAMID is saying that they opposed it and they denounced the kidnapping, but some people are wondering how armed UN peacekeepers could have IDPs under their care and they could all be kidnapped. Can you clarify how it took place and how it is consistent with protection of civilians?
Spokesperson: Well, I have asked the Mission for more details on that, and I think if you were listening carefully you will have heard me read out precisely what you just said to me.
Inner City Press: But what I am asking about specifically about how it could take place?
Spokesperson: I heard what you said, and I’ve said that I’ll see if I can find out more, which is what I have already asked the Mission and Peacekeeping Operations.
  Now Radio Dabanga has published a memo by UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, from April 10, 2013, still saying he didn't know how it happened. 
  What is Ladsous doing? Then, and apparently now, he refuses Press questions about topics ranging from Sudan -- why did he meet with International Criminal Court indictee Omar al Bashir in July 2013? -- torapes in the DR Congo by UN Peacekeeping's partners in the Congolese Army.
  We'll be following this. Watch this site.

 
  

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

On Ukraine at UN, Of Svoboda & France's "Virtual Reality" on Eve of Geneva Talks


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, April 16 -- When the Ukraine report of UN human rights deputy Ivan Simonovic was discussed in the UN Security Council on April 16, Simonovic went beyond his report to mention a candidate for the election slated for May 25 who was beaten up for this political beliefs. 

  Just the day before, Inner City Press asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric about Oleg Tsarev, who beyond being beaten was subject to a call by the Svoboda Party to be taken off the ballot and have his citizenship stripped.

  Since Ban met the leader of the Svoboda Party while in Kyiv, Inner City Press asked Dujarric about the new threat, as well as the beat-up of a TV news executive which is one of only three mentions in Simonovic's report of the Svoboda Party. Video here.
   In the April 16 meeting, French Ambassador Gerard Araud said there was "no" foreign involvement in Maidan in Kyiv; to his prepared speech he added that sanctions are not the path "we" want. Well, yes: France is still selling Mistral warships to Russia.
   Churkin in reply mocked Araud's phrase, "virtual reality." Araud did not ask for a chance to reply. The day before, to the lone critical question allowed during Araud's human rights press conference, Araud said "You are not a journalist, you are an agent." Ah, respect for freedom of the press. Video here, including questions to Dujarric for the Free UN Coalition for Access.
  Churkin said Russia will not discuss Crimea in the Council anymore, at least not under the agenda item "Ukraine." Long time Ukrainian ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev said Crimea must continue to be discussed. But neither he or anyone else spoke at the UNTV stakeout afterward. 
  All eyes turned to the meeting in Geneva slated for April 17. Churkin said Russia proposed for the regions to attended, but it was rejected. The US delegation includes its envoy on Syria, Danial Rubinstein. Why? Watch this site.
   After the Ukraine meeting of the UN Security Council on April 13, Inner City Press asked Ukraine's long-time Ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev about the reported visit to Kyiv of US Central Intelligence Agency chief John Brennan.
   Sergeyev replied, "It happened only in some comments from Moscow." Video here.
  Well, not anymore. At the US State Department briefing on April 14, spokesperson Jen Psaki confirmed that CIA's Brennan was in "Kiev this weekend." She also said that Secretary of State John Kerry spoke with Ukraine's acting prime minister Yatsenyuk earlier in April 14 that there was not yet any read-out.
   Also on April 14 Oleksandr Turchynov, acting president of Ukraine, in a telephone call with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, suggested a joint "counter-terrorism" operation in Eastern Ukraine with UN peacekeepers.
  This and much reporting on it ignored that all UN peacekeeping operations require authorization from the Security Council, in which Russia (and China) have veto rights.
  Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric to confirm Turchynov's peacekeeping suggestion -- Dujarric declined -- and whether any deployment would require a UN Security Council vote. On the latter, Dujarric said yes, such a vote would be required.
  Turchynov's suggestion and most of the reporting on it also ignored how the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations has lost any semblance of impartiality under Herve Ladsous, the fourth Frenchman in a row to head DPKO.
  Counter-terrorism has an echo of Mali, where first the French Serval forces, then later a "re-hatted" UN Mission under Ladsous, MINUSMA, are un-transparently in northern Mali.
  In this context, the idea of a UN Peacekeeping mission in Eastern Ukraine is, well, laughable.
   When the UN Security Council met to exchange speeches late on April 13, it was two hours before a deadline by Ukraine's president to use force in Eastern cities.
   Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, who had requested the meeting, tweeted photo here, said he hoped his "Western colleagues" would get on the phone and try to get this "criminal degree" rescinded. 
   Several speakers cited the meeting slated for Geneva on April 17. But Churkin said if force is used, why would Russia sign off on that meeting? 
  US Ambassador Samantha Power among other things cited to funding, saying the $1 billion US loan guarantee goes into place on April 14 and the US wants the International Monetary Fund to move forward. She said, "On Monday, we will conclude the $1 billion loan guarantee for Ukraine... We strongly support concluding the agreement between Ukraine and the IMF so the international community can bolster Ukraine’s economy."
   After the meeting Inner City Press asked Churkin if Russia was aware of any "Western colleagues" behind the scenes asking for an extension of the deadline. Churkin's answer mentioned, skeptically, US Secretary of State John Kerry.
 
   When Ukraine's long-time Ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev came to the stakeout microphone as the second and last speaker there, Inner City Press first asked him about any extension - no, he said, this was the last deadline -- and about Crimea. Video here.
  On the latter Sergeyev pulled out a sheet of paper from the UN Refugee Agency UNHCR and cited 4000 displaced people, using the word genocide.  As the last question, Inner City Press asked about the CIA's John Brennan. "It happened only in some comments from Moscow," Sergeyev said. And then he was gone, less than two hours before the deadline.  Video here.Watch this site.
  Inner City Press had arrived at the Security Council at 7 pm and was reliably informed that there will be an open meeting, and a briefing by UN Assistant Secretary General Taranco (and not Under Secretary General Feltman, who traveled to Ukraine with Ban Ki-moon when he met the leader of the Svoboda Party, and stayed behind for days.
   Still, just before 7 pm there were only three cars parked in front of the UN, tweeted photo here, and no UNTV at the stakeout.
  It was only Friday April 11 when Sergeyev was slated to give a talk promoted by UN scribes  at Rutgers University in Newark entitled "Seeing Through the Spin: Sorting Fact from Fiction in Public Information." 
   UN deputy human rights official Ivan Simonovich's report on Ukraine is slated to be heard, also behind closed doors. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon spoke on another topic, Western Sahara, with Morocco's King on Saturday but the UN refused to give a read-out, click here for that. Watch this site.
  Back on March 30 it was midnight in Paris when US Secretary of State John Kerry came to take two questions from two media about his meeting with Russia's Sergey Lavrov. One of the two asked about Palestine, Israel and prisoners. That, Kerry declined to answer, saying only that he spoke with Benyamin Netanyahu fifteen minutes before.
   Kerry was asked what was said about the "Russian troops." He replied those troops are on Russian soil, so it's not about legality. To some, this implies that Crimea, or at least Russian presence there, is off the table.
   On Crimea, as if in a parallel universe the UN Security Council will hold an "Arria formula" meeting on March 31 featuring a Crimean Tatar and a journalist from Crimea, organized by Council member Lithuania, it was confirmed to Inner City Press.
   Tatar leader Mustafa Jemilev has been calling for another referendum in Crimea.  This meeting comes a day after US Secretary of Stat John Kerry and Russia's Sergey Lavrov meeting at the Russian Ambassador's residence in Paris. While the US talked Crimea, Russia moved on to Moldova.
   Russia's read-out of Putin's call to Obama raised the latter issue and was silent on the former. Much was made of this by talking heads on US Sunday morning shows.
   Perennial David Gergen mocked Kerry for turning his plane around to meet with Lavrov, asking rhetorically if this is the promised diplomatic isolation. A pair of Michaels, Hayden and Morell, mused about a commitment for Ukraine not to join NATO, or even the European Union. But what about the IMF deal?
  Soon to be former elected official Mike Rogers, headed to talk radio, went beyond dark talk of a land bridge to Moldova to speculate about Russia moving from South Ossetia to Armenia. He's running for the Republican Presidential nomination, it seems.
   On March 28 while at the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon took selective questions from the press about Ukraine (and Venezuela), the US White House issued a read-out of a call between President Barack Obama and Russia's Vladimir Putin, here.  Russia issued a different read-out, here. So how relevant is the UN?
   Later a Senior Administration Official explained,
We’re not going to get into the details, but they discussed the latest iteration of a working document that Secretary Kerry and Foreign Minister Lavrov have been working on to de-escalate the situation, which has been the guiding concept of our approach.
As you know, previously we discussed general elements of an off-ramp, including: international monitors, pull back of Russian forces, and direct Russia-Ukraine dialogue - supported by the international community - taking into account the Ukrainian government's openness to constitutional reform and upcoming Ukrainian elections. Throughout this process, we have been coordinating closely with the Ukrainians, including on this diplomatic proposal.
And later still:
The U.S. de-escalation proposal was fully coordinated with the Ukrainian government, and responded to points raised in a March 10 Russian paper.  We are awaiting a response from the Russians.
  Back at the UN, Ban Ki-moon mentioned the word "radical."
  It was inevitable: as Inner City Press first reported, while in Kyiv Ban met with the leader of the Svodoba Party, adjudged as both racist and anti-Semitic and most recently beating up a television executive then getting the footage censored from YouTube via a bogus Millennium Digital Copyright Actcomplaint.
  In fact, on March 27 at the UN General Assembly stakeout Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin told Inner City Press Ban's meeting was "disturbing" and that he looked forward to an explanation in the March 28 Security Council consultations. Video here. (We hope to have more on this.)
  At the March 28 noon briefing Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq if Ban had known in advance that Svoboda's leader would be present, and if he would address it at the stakeout. Video here.
  Haq declined to provide anything more than the list of parties Ban met with, which was provided after Inner City Press repeatedly asked over two days.
   But when Ban came to speak after briefing the Council, the questioners chosen were AP, CBS (or, the UN's Censorship Alliance), Bloomberg and Voice of America. While noting as an aside that Voice of America tried ot get the investigative Press thrown out of Ban's UN, in a request to Ban's now-spokesman,click here, big picture, all four questioners selected by / for Ban were Western -- all US-based, in fact. Ban was not asked about the Svoboda meeting.
   Moments later, Inner City Press asked outgoing Security Council president for March Sylvie Lucas of Luxembourg about Ban meeting Svoboda. She said, among other things, that You should have asked the Secretary General.
  But how? We'll have more on this.
   On March 27 when the UN General Assembly voted on a resolution rejecting the Crimea referendum, it was far from unanimous. There were 100 countries for, 11 against and fully 58 abstaining.
  Afterward, Inner City Press asked Russia Ambassador Vitaly Churkin about citation in the meeting of Kosovo as a precedent, and about UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon having met the leader of the Svoboda Party.
  Churkin took issue with a high US official claiming there was a referendum in Kosovo, and expressed concern about Ban meeting with a party deemed among other things racist and anti-Semitic.
   Inner City Press ran, before 12:10 pm, to the UN noon briefing in order to ask these and other questions. But Ban's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq had begun and ended the briefing before 12:09. 
   This contrasts to Ban's Spokesperson's Office having, for example in October 2013, delayed the noon briefing so thata(nother) country's speech could be covered, click here for that.
  When asked on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Accesswhat the Spokesperson's Office policy is, Haq said, "You want a policy where it's all about you." We'll have more on this.
  In the GA meeting beyond Kosovo, Nicaragua cited the Honduras coup as an analogy. St. Vincent's cited Grenada, saying the positions are reversed but abstaining because the Ukraine resolution is about the principals, not the principles.
  Uruguay cited Kosovo and also the referendum carried out in the Malvinas / Falkland Islands. UK Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant was in the room, and tweeted at; if there's a response we'll publish.
   Earlier it was 4:25 am in New York and Washington when theInternational Monetary Fund announced its preliminary agreement for a $14 - $18 billion loan program with Ukraine. 
 Inner City Press asked the IMF to confirm or comment on reports that the Ukrainian "increase the price of natural gas for household consumers by an average of 50%" is attributable to the IMF. 
  At the IMF's 9:30 am embargoed briefing, IMF deputy spokesperson William Murray read out the question then said that the program has five components, including energy sector reform.
  He said Ukraine will reduce subsidies to the energy sector, and that current prices in Ukraine are two to three times lower than in neighboring countries. He said, as it did to other questions, that responses were given in a press conference in Kyiv.
 In New York at the UN, a General Assembly meeting started at 10 am. Russia's Ambassador Vitaly Churkin recounted history and said radicals "called the shots" in the change of government. We've noted that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon met with the leader of the Svoboda party while in Kyiv.
  In Washington later on March 27 the US Congress is expected to act on a $1 billion loan guarantee to Ukraine, but not on the IMF changes the Obama administration requested. Obama Press Secretary Jay Carney issued a statement welcoming the IMF preliminary deal, concluding that "We also remain committed to providing the IMF with the resources it needs – in partnership with Congress – to provide strong support to countries like Ukraine as well as reinforcing the Fund’s governance to reflect the global economy."
  
  Two weeks ago on March 13, the day after several US Senators argued that International Monetary Fund quota reform would have to be approved by Congress to enable the IMF to meaningfully assist Ukraine, Inner City Press asked IMF spokesperson Gerry Rice if this is true. Video here, from Minute 12:05.
  Rice genially said several times that the question couldn't or wouldn't be answered while the IMF mission is “in the field” in Ukraine. He initially gave the same answer to Inner City Press' question that had nothing to do with Ukraine: is it true, as Russia reportedly argued at the most recent G-20 meeting, that quota reform could be accomplished without US approval, under some set of rule changes?
  Rice during the briefing repeated this could not be answered while the mission is in Ukraine. Later it was conveyed that the reform is not possible without US approval. The answer is appreciated: a benefit of asking in person. But Inner City Press (and the Free UN Coalition for Access) hope to make the online asking of questions work better from now on. 
 And on March 27, for example, IMF deputy spokesperson William Murray read out this question from Inner City Press:
"On Zimbabwe, please confirm IMF is re-opening its office and respond to Finance Minister Patrick Chinamasa saying part of the deal included cutting Zimbabwe's wage bill from 70 percent of the budget but this pledge will not be met, 'addressing it overnight would mean very drastic measures which I indicated to them (IMF) I am not prepared to take. That would mean retrenchment of civil servants.'"
  On March 27, Murray said he would not comment directly on what the Finance Minister said, but pointed to a press release we will add a link to.
  Back on March 13 in another non-Ukraine question, Inner City Press asked Rice about a book published earlier this week in Hungary, that the then-economy minister in 2011 told Goldman Sachs that the government would be going to the IMF for a program. Since much currency trading ensued, Inner City Press asked if the IMF has any rules limiting its government interlocutors from trading on or sharing insider information.Video here, from Minute 31:12.
  Rice said there are confidential provisions. But are those only for the contents of communication and not the existence of communications or negotiations? We'll see.
  

Friday, April 19, 2013

At UN, Ban Ki-moon Switches From Woman to German Man as Police Adviser to Ladsous, of Gender, Veto Power & WW2 Echoes



By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, April 19 -- When the UN announced on the afternoon of April 18 that it was replacing as Herve Ladsous' Police Adviser in the Department of Peacekeeping Operations the Swedish Marie Orler with a Germany man, Stefan Feller, there was little time to put the switch in context.
  But it is noteworthy that just as Ban Ki-moon replaced a female Deputy Secretary General, Asha Rose Migiro, with a Swedish man, Jan Eliasson, now he has replaced a woman, not by coincidence Swedish, with another man. 
   That Feller is German is not the main point -- but that he is European, like Ladsous the fourth Frenchman in a row to head UN Peacekeeping (and like Eliasson) is significant.
  Why has France been allowed to name the last four DPKO chiefs? Because it has a veto on the Security Council, including over selection and re-appointment of UN Secretaries General. And why does France have that veto power? Because it ostensibly was a victor in World War II.
  Now, over 70% of the UN's and DPKO's work is in Africa. What does it say that both the head of DPKO, Ladsous, and his top Police Adviser, Feller, are European?
  Inner City Press raised this issue when Secretary General Ban Ki-moon named out of work Italian politician Romano Prodi as his envoy to the Sahel in Africa. For that, there was push back from the UN Secretariat. 
  (And on March 18, the UN Department of Public Information conducted a non-consensual raid on Inner City Press' office, rifled through papers and took photographs, which were leaked on March 21 to BuzzFeed right after that publication contacted Ban's spokesman for comment on the raid.)
  Perhaps not surprisingly, on the evening on April 18, UN DPI official Stephane Dujarric contacted Inner City Press “urgently” about its tweet -- yes, a 140 character message -- about Feller's appointment. Durjarric has previously criticized Inner CIty Press' tweet about Ban himself. This time, Dujarric demanded an explanation of the tweet. Well here it is:
  It reflects UN decay that Ban Ki-moon's top Peacekeeper and top Police Adviser are both European men, given the percentage of their work that is in Africa. It smacks, yes, of colonialism. And of the UN being lost, in top appointments, in the legacy of World War 2. 
  And what of Ban's speeches about women in top positions in the UN? Here, an outgoing official, one of the UN's top women, is replaced by a man, just as Ban replaced Asha Rose Migiro with a man.
  (Orler, as Inner City Press reported, was at least responsive to questions, unlike Ladsous, who on camera refused questions about 126 rapes in Minova by the Congolese Army, his partners, on November 27December 7 andDecember 18
  On February 1, Orler's office sent answers to questions Inner City Press asked Orler in her final briefing. And how will Feller be? The UN, including DPI and Dujarric, done nothing publicly or substantively about Ladsous' outrageous refusal to answer question.)
  But where is Asha Rose Migiro now? Ban named her his envoy on HIV / AIDS in Africa. And?
  Back on December 27, 2012, Inner City Press asked Ban's top three spokespeople about the process to replace Orler (and whether France or another European country would get the post). They responded:
From: UN Spokesperson - Do Not Reply [at] un.org
Date: Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM
Subject: Question
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
On the Police Adviser: DPKO advises that the post of Police Adviser is a rotational post that is filled by active-duty officers on secondment from national service, normally for a limited period. The current Police Adviser has been in service since 2009 and a note verbale has been circulated to seek nominations from member states to the post. The selection process is in progress.
  Then it still took more than three and a half months, and then was announced not in a noon briefing but in an afternoon e-mail. But Dujarric was there, with his hawk-eye on even the tweets of the media he acccredits to enter the UN. Or is it ALL media, he watches? We'll have more on this. Watch this site.

Monday, April 15, 2013

UN Cut Off Rwanda Genocide Survivor's Story So Ban Ki-Moon Could Leave For Another Event






By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, April 15 -- At the UN's annual commemoration of the Rwanda genocide on Monday night at the UN, survivor Virginie Ingabire was telling the story of how most of her relatives were killed with machetes one night in Kitarama. She was left walking to Goma with the one month old baby her killed mother left behind.
  But right then, in the middle of her story, a UN functionary whispered to the master of ceremonies Stephane Dujarric, who went and whispered on the podium with Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Then the functionary crossed to where Ms. Ingabire was speaking and whispered in her ear.

Video here, at Minute 55:50.

  I've been told I have only one minute left, Ms. Ingabire stopped and said. I can't tell you, then, how I got to Goma, or what happened there. She rushed to a close.
  The moment she finished, Dujarric announced that Ban Ki-moon and President of the General Assembly Vuk Jeremic had another event to go to, to remain seated while they left.
  One wondered: couldn't Ban (and Jeremic, though he was not whispered to) have gotten up and left while Ms. Ingabire continued her stories? Was it somehow classier to have the genocide survivor's story cut short?
  Rwandan foreign minister Louise Mushikiwabo in her speech said that the then-Hutu government of Rwanda mis-used its seat on the Security Council in 1994 “with allies.” 
  That would be France -- click here to see a 1994 memo by then French Deputy Permanent Representative Representative to the UN Herve Ladsous, who shockingly (or tellingly) is now Ban's chief of UN Peacekeeping.
  Ladsous was not seen at Monday night's commemoration, but French Permanent Representative Gerard Araud was there, in the front row. Earlier in the day, he circulated a draft resolution authorizing France to use “all necessary means” in Mali. Watch this site.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

After Photographing UN Raid, Pamela Falk of CBS News & UNCA Sends Inner City Press a Legal Threat About a Question in a Story



By Matthew Russell Lee

UNdisclosed LocationMarch 23 -- After Pamela Falk of CBS took photographs during the non-consensual search of Inner City Press office by the UN on March 18, and photographs were published by BuzzFeed on March 22, Inner City Press posed a question.

   Why did Falk, who is also the president of the UN Correspondents Association which has tried to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN, “take and presumptively give to BuzzFeed photographs from Inner City Press' office?”

   Before the BuzzFeed story, which came out Friday afternoon and which noted that Falk declined to comment, Inner City Press had asked in writing and in the March 19 UN noon briefing why the president of UNCA, Falk, was allowed by the UN to be taking photographs of the raid.

   Falk never answered that question; nor to the UN, even when it was re-iterated to UN official Stephane Dujarric in writing.

   Now now on Saturday afternoon, Pam Falk who is a lawyer has sent not answer but a legal threat:

From: Falk, Pamela @cbsnews.com
Date: Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM
Subject: Inner City Press
To: Matthew.Lee [at] innercitypress.com
Cc: "Falk, Pamela" @cbsnews.com

Dear Mr. Lee:

On March 22, you published the following statement, referring to me:

Why did she take, and presumptively give to BuzzFeed, photographs from inside Inner City Press' office?”

I did not give photographs to BuzzFeed or to anyone else, and I did not take the photographs that BuzzFeed published.

Please cease and desist from publishing statements which are either inaccurate or cast my actions in a false light.

Pamela Falk

  There. We've run it in full, less than an hour after receipt. But in what light CAN we cast Falk's ghoulish photographing of the raid of Inner City Press' office on March 18? 

  Falk has had numerous opportunities to clarify or just explain why she took the photographs, but has not. If she appears in a negative light it is largely Falk's fault.

   She bears other responsibility -- presumptively, of course. The UN has denied, through Dujarric, giving the photographs to BuzzFeed. They were given by an anonymous “Concerned UN Reporter” who is then quoted defending UNCA.

   Falk is the president of UNCA. Just as with her UNCA Executive Committee members defacing flyers of the Free UN Coalition for Access, and setting up anonymous social media accounts to try to undermine FUNCA and Inner City Press, Falk bears some responsibility, that no tin horn cease and desist letter with the term of art “false light” can solve.

 Falk, as we've reported, claimed to Inner City Press on February 22 that she was advised by lawyers -- herself? -- that for Inner City Press to contact media organizations including hers to ask their policies "might constitute a crime."

  Why has UNCA under Falk gone even further into the gutter, with false social media accounts? Again, why DID Falk take photographs of the UN's raid on Inner City Press' office, and search of its papers, on March 18?

  And what steps has Falk as UNCA president taken to identify which UNCA “leader,” if as she says not herself, obtained the photographs taken during the raid and forwarded them, anonymously, to BuzzFeed? We will have more on this. UNCA's in the gutter - but CBS and CBS News are hitting new lows daily. Watch this site.