| Man Called Schizophrenic As
His Own Lawyer in SDNY Gets
Detained Looking at BRIDGE
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
July 24 รข A defendant who
has previously been called
schizophrenic, but who had his
New York State charges
dropped, was brought this week
on Violations of Supervised
Release into the Magistrates
court of the U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York. Inner
City Press was there and live
tweeted, both
times. The
defendant insisted both times
on representing himself. Inner City
Press has gone back to the
transcript of his previous May
7, 2024 appearance before the
District Judge on his case,
where he said "Sir, I'm sorry,
but I need to talk on my case,
sir." THE COURT: I told
you you don't have a right to
talk. You are represented by a
lawyer. Only he speaks for you
here. Now, if I hear another
word from you, I'm going to
hold you in criminal contempt
of court for disrupting these
proceedings and violating my
order, and I will impose a
jail sentence on you
immediately." This time,
he did speak for himself. But
every after the second day, he
was sent back to the MDC as
his mother cried in the
courtroom gallery. There was
talk of an outpatient mental
health program; from the
Government table came the
question, Don't you mean
inpatient? Neither
was implemented, and the
defendant will be in
MDC-Brooklyn at least until he
sees the District Judge again
- in September, more than a
month from now. In May 2026 SDNY
announced a "new mental health
court for federal criminal
defendants, BRIDGE Court.
BRIDGE stands for: Behavioral
Rehabilitation through
Intervention, Diversion,
Guidance, and Engagement.
BRIDGE Court is an intensive
judicially supervised pretrial
program focused on individuals
whose mental health diagnosis
is the predominant contributor
to their offense
conduct." Isn't
this an appropriate case for
such a court? But "[t]o be
considered for the program,
each individual is required to
complete a Statement of
Interest Form, which is
available at
https://nysd.uscourts.gov." It seem unlikely
this defendant will fill out
that form from inside the MDC.
And he has no lawyer. So Inner
City Press reports on it, in
detail, here. Watch this
site. The case is USA v. Clarke, 1:16-cr-212 (Kaplan / Tarnofsky)
*** Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis. Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com |