Friday, June 12, 2026

After Live Nation Deal DOJ Withheld All Documents so FOIA Suit Now Complaints from WA State Request

SDNY COURTHOUSE, June 5 –  The United States versus Live Nation trial began on March 2 with jury selection, before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Arun Subramanian.   Then after a week of testimony it went on pause, and the DOJ and several states settled with Live Nation. 

   Inner City Press submitted a Freedom of Information Act requests to US DOJ on March 27, 2026, and also to states including Washington State (see below).

   DOJ granted expedited processing, then asked Inner City Press to narrow its request, which it did.

  But just after the jury verdict that Live Nation is a monopolist, DOJ denied the FOIA request in full. Inner City Press immediately appeal - and that was denied.

On May 27, Inner City Press filed a FOIA lawsuit in SDNY, complaint on CourtListener here.

  While awaiting action, Washington State among others has provided documents under state open records laws.

Public records obtained by Inner City Press through a Washington State public records request (PRR-2026-0279) reveal a stream of citizen letters to the Washington Attorney General demanding the state reject the federal deal and press for real accountability.  One Vashon Island resident, Richard Jones, wrote to AG Brown on March 10, 2026, calling the settlement "an obnoxious sweetheart deal with the oligarchy-happy Pam Bondi and others." Jones noted that the fine imposed on Live Nation "equals roughly four days of gross income" for the company and urged the AG to "work with any other like-minded AGs to torpedo this settlement and demand some real accountability." 

The same day, Euge Sosa Barboza — an employee of Sony Music Publishing — wrote directly to the Washington AG from a Sony company email address. "I want to reach out with my support for the continuing Live Nation lawsuit," she wrote. "Their illegal behavior has only begun to be exposed, and they need to be held accountable. The DOJ's settlement was weak, and I question what happened behind the scenes to cause it." Sosa Barboza added: "Both as a consumer and a member of the music industry, I stand against the Live Nation monopoly."  The records show that Washington's AG office was already engaged well before the settlement. In September 2024, an Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division responded to a citizen inquiry by confirming that "our office joined the Department of Justice and dozens of other states in filing a lawsuit against Live Nation on May 23, 2024."

The response also cited Washington's prior 2020 Live Nation Consent Decree — an earlier enforcement action that, critics noted, Live Nation violated in the years that followed.  The settlement — announced after trial began — has drawn criticism from state AGs and consumer advocates who argued the structural remedies fell short of the breakup the original complaint demanded.  Inner City Press, which covered every day of the Live Nation antitrust trial from the SDNY courthouse, obtained these Washington State records as part of its ongoing coverage of the case and the state-level enforcement records surrounding it.

Watch this site.    

March 18 extra on "war room(s)" on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

On March 6, Inner City Press was in the courtroom at 8:30 am, and spoke to push for further unsealing, including of demonstratives. See new book, "TicketMonster: US v Live Nation 1," ebook, audiobook and paperback here.

The case is United States of America et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al., 24-cv-3973 (Subramanian)