Friday, June 26, 2026

3d Misuse of DMCA Causes Censorship for Story on Centra Tech Crypto Fraud UN Echo



3d Misuse of DMCA Causes Censorship for Story on Centra Tech Crypto Fraud UN Echo

By Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, June 22 – Back in April 2022 Inner City Press published the story below, about a crypto fraud called Centra Tech.

Three years and nine months later, someone hired a firm to (false) claim copyright to the story and photograph, which were written and take by this reporting. Google wrote:

To the owner of Inner City Press, Google has been notified that your site allegedly infringes upon the copyrights of others, and violates applicable copyright laws in your region. We are in the process of removing the reported content from Google Search results for users globally.  The notice is on Lumen

  There we found a complaint about this article. We replied that this was an attempt to censor by misusing the DMCA, following the shameful example of Louis Charbonneau of Reuters now Human Rights Watch at the UN, who misused DMCA to get Google to remove from Search a leaked copy of his email to the UN MALU's Stephane Dujarric trying to get Inner City Press thrown out of the UN (the UN did it).

While that block remains, this time Google wrote back: "we determined that the request was invalid, so we have restored access globally to the content at the URLs listed below"

But on January 19, using a different firm - a "reputation management firm" apparently in New York, "Net-Legal.com" filed another bogus DMCA complaint against the same article. We again wrote to Google. But who in the below is behind this? And what will happen to them?

Now on June 22, 2026, four more complaints about the series of articles. Inner City Press has immediately written to Google:

This is a repeated request to try to censor the same content. I am a journalist who covers the Federal SDNY court. I wrote about a case, and earlier this year Google wrote back to me on a similar complaint finding the complaint without basis. See below. So how can the same complaint, about the same series of articles, be filed again and again and I have to waste my time "appealing"?  Tonight I received from Google four notice, all about the same series of articles as the one Google wrote to me about in January:

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <removals@google.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [8-7219000040771] Your Request to Google
To: <innercitypress@gmail.com>


Hello,

Thanks for reaching out to us.

We have reviewed your request to reinstate content that we removed in response to a copyright removal request. The law requires us to act expeditiously on removal requests. Upon review, however, we determined that the request was invalid, so we have restored access globally to the content at the URLs listed below:

https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny30gschofieldfarkasicp040522.html

Regards,

The Google Team

For more information about our content removal process, see g.co/legal.

Tonight the complaints are about

Here are the affected URL(s):
https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny30dschofieldfarkasicp092021.html

Here are the affected URL(s):
https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny30aschofieldfarkasicp011921.html

Here are the affected URL(s):
https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny30fschofieldfarkasicp0827021.html


Here are the affected URL(s):
https://www.innercitypress.com/sdNY30aschofieldfarkasicp011921.html

that's how the URL was sent to me - the NY should be ny, that is

https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny30aschofieldfarkasicp011921.html

The articles are entire written by me, a journalist who covers the court. The repeat complainant is presumptive in the criminal case and is abusing this process.

I would also like Google to stop blocking a document I receive a leak of and published, the author claims that his email to the UN was copyrighted, entirely frivolous. The block remains in place. The complaint was

3/10/16 it's: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/1457339#
"The copyrighted material is a private email I wrote in April 2012 and for which I never gave permission to be published. It has been published on a blog and appears in on the first page of search results for my name and the firm I work for, Reuters. It can be seen here: http://www.innercitypress.com/reutersLC3unmalu.pdf"

On that, and on these new repeated abusive (censoring) complaints, please respond forthwith. Thank you.

 Note: each time spurious censorship is attempted, we will reiterate, resurface and built on the reporting.

The story, again: Robert Farkas was up for sentencing on December 15, on fraud charges related to crypto-currency. Inner City Press covered it.  And now, on August 20, 2021, the re-arrest of Sohrab Sharma:

"Re: United States v. Sohrab Sharma, S3 18 Cr. 340 (LGS) Dear Judge Schofield: The Government writes to provide the Court with a brief update regarding the execution of the Court’s August 17, 2021 bench warrant authorizing federal law enforcement agents to arrest defendant Sohrab Sharma for violating the Court-ordered conditions of his release on bail in this case. Law enforcement agents with the United States Marshals Service arrested Sharma on August 18, 2021 in the Southern District of Florida when he appeared for a scheduled urinalysis exam at the Probation Office. Later the same day, Sharma was presented, in the Southern District of Florida, before United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra. During the presentment, the Government requested that Sharma be detained and ordered removed to this District for further bail violation proceedings before this Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3148. Sharma, through his counsel, conveyed that he would be seeking release on bail conditions, and requested several days to prepare for a hearing on his bail application. Accordingly, Judge Becerra scheduled a bail hearing for Monday, August 23, 2021 at 10 a.m. before United States Magistrate Judge John J. O’Sullivan, and remanded Sharma pending the August 23 bail hearing. At the hearing, the Government intends to continue to seek Sharma’s detention and removal to this District for further bail violation proceedings before this Court."

But at that bail hearing, Sharma was again ordered released "with the additional requirement of a $1,000,000 personal surety bond signed by Mr. Sharma's fiance Brielle Farkas and Mr. Sharma's mother, Fourazan Looladi and to surrender at FCI Coleman... within 24 hours." He wants Judge Schofield to sign off.

Now on August 27, the AUSA has written that "the Government has confirmed with staff from F.C.I. Coleman that Sharma is in the custody." Watch this site.

  U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lorna G. Schofield held the sentencing.

Farkas' lawyer emphasized that his client grew up in rural New Jersey and was not really a tech guy.

He said Farkas had served 55 days at the beginning of the case, in maximum security Federal facilities in Miami, then Atlanta, then Oklahoma and finally the MCC. 

 Judge Schofield asked if there were any victims on the line, and some beeping and loss of reception began.

On January 19, victims filed a claim for some of the $33 million (100,000 ETH) they say now DOJ is trying to keep for its Assets Forfeiture Fund.

Rensel, Yun Hi, Hao Poon, Fung Poon, Jae J. Lee, Rodney Warren and Mateusz Ganczarek requested a hearing to adjudicated their interest in a portion of the Victim Fund and for restitution instead of forfeiture.

On March 4, Sohrab Sharma got eight years. Inner City Press live tweeted it here and below.

Now in July, co-defendant Trapani gets permission to travel: "MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Raymond Trapani (2) granting [512] LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Joseph A. Bondy dated July 12, 2021 re: Request for Modification of Pre-Trial Release, to Allow Travel to Boston, MA, from July 20-23, 2021. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the letter motion at docket number 512. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield).

In April 2022, Trapani got time served: "Raymond Trapani (2). THE DEFENDANT: pleaded guilty to counts 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, and 10s. Counts 1,2,3, and 4 are dismissed on the motion of the United States. IMPRISONMENT: TIME SERVED on all counts. SUPERVISED RELEASE: 3 Years on to run concurrently on all counts."

On restitution - Assistant US Attorney argued that the claimants will not be able to show that the Ether / "Ethereum" in Sharma's wallets belong to them. But Judge Schofield seems ready to allow an amended petition.

Judge Schofield says new petition seeking the Ether in Sharma's wallet is due March 15, Government opposition by March 22 (and then a reply). She'll issue a written decision on the forfeiture decision.

Judge Schofield: OK, let's proceed to the sentencing of Mr. Sharma. I acknowledge letters from two of his uncles, his girlfriend, his future sister in law and employees, and others

 Judge Schofield: Sharma wants a downward variance, saying this his prior crimes were about substance abuse, not violence. If I accept that, the bottom of the guidelines range would move to 12 years and 7 months - still substantial.

 Assistant US Attorney: This defendant received $36 million from his crimes. He diverted money for personal expenses, high end retail purchases.

 And here it is: Sharma has been sentenced to eight years, followed by three years of supervised release and a fine of $20,000.  He was ordered to forfeit $36,088,960 - that's the ongoing fight.

Watch this site.

 The US Attorney's Office announced: Farkas "was sentenced on December 15 to one year and one day in prison, in connection with his participation in a scheme to induce victims to invest more than $25 million dollars’ worth of digital funds in Centra Tech, Inc. (“Centra Tech”), a Miami-based company he co-founded and that purported to offer cryptocurrency-related financial products.

FARKAS previously pled guilty to conspiring to commit securities fraud and wire fraud in connection with his and his co-conspirators’ use of material misrepresentations and omissions to solicit investors to purchase securities, in the form of digital tokens issued by Centra Tech, through an initial coin offering beginning in approximately July 2017."  Meanwhile, more delay in the OneCoin case...

This case is USA v. Sharma, et al., 1:18-cr-340 (Schofield)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222 NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com