| As Coastal
Bank Bancshares Tries to
Expand in Texas Disparate
Loans More Secret Fed
Questions
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack FEDERAL COURT, June 24 รข Coastal Bend Bancshares proposes to expand in Texas by buying First National Bank in Port Lavaca. Fair
Finance Watch, after the
Federal Reserve refused to act
to ensure public access to
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act
data, has commented to
the Fed on the 2024 HMDA data: This is
early opposition to the
application of Coastal Bend
Bancshares, Inc., Corpus
Christi, Texas to acquire
First National Bank in Port
Lavaca, Port Lavaca,
Texas. First
National Bank of Port Lavaca
in 2024 made 35 loans to
whites - and NONE to African
Americans. While
there are three HMDA-reporters
in Texas with the name First
Community Bank, Coastal
Bank's, LEI
549300L4Z4LTG4TJTM66, in 2024
in Texas made 126 loans to
whites, and NONE to African
Americans.
Evidentiary hearings are
needed on this application.
There are consumer complaints,
but the FRB has declared that
even CFPB database complaints,
no matter the volume, are not
"substantive." We
disagree - and ask for a
hearing on these issues as
well. On June 2, the
Fed asked Coastal Bend some
questions - but withheld two
of them. While less redacted
than on Enova, it is still
problematic. This while
Coastal Bend CEO W. Wes.
Hoskins wrote in that he takes
no position on Inner City
Press "purported Freedom of
Information Act ('FOIA')
request." Purported? On June 24 the
Fed asked more sealed
questions,
and Inner City Press FOIAed
again: "
This is an immediate FOIA
request for the FRS' withheld
June 24, 2026 Additional
Information questions posed to
Coastal Bend Bancshares to
acquire the First National
Bank in Port Lavaca, Texas.
The FRBD's AI letter
(attached) said "See
Confidential Exhibit, for
Questions 2-4." No
explanation of why they are
being withheld in full was
given. While not as extreme as
the FRS' withholding of ALL
questions posed to Enova in
the ongoing Grasshopper Bank
proceeding (which has given
rise to a FOIA lawsuit mailed
to the FRB on June 3, Lee v
FRB, 26-cv-4556 (SDNY) -
thought certificate of service
has been docketed, still not
even a notice of appearance by
the Fed - by that same logic
we are hereby challenging the
withholding in full of these
two questions, and ask for a
ruling as quickly as possible,
to allow if necessary appeal
(and FOIA litigation) before
any action other than denial
is taken on the application."
Watch this site.
Your
support means a lot. As
little as $5 a month helps
keep us going and grants you
access to exclusive bonus
material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback: Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com Mail:
Box 130222,
Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013 Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis. Copyright 2006-2025 Inner
City Press, Inc. To request reprint or
other permission, e-contact Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com |