Friday, April 17, 2026

After Bob Menendez Got 11 Years Sentence Nadine Not in Jail Asks To Remain Free



After Bob Menendez Got 11 Years Sentence Nadine Not in Jail Asks To Remain Free

by Matthew Russell Lee

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 14 – Amid reports of investigation against Sen. Robert Menendez for taking gold bars, Inner City Press' sources on September 21 it to expect on Friday, September 22 an appearance in Federal court in Manhattan by Menendez and his wife Nadine Arslanian, now facing trial alone. This scoop was true.

Later a superseder was unveiled, including charges of bribes to act for Qatar.

On January 10 Menendez filed a motion to dismiss, on Patreon here

On February 1, Judge Stein granted some unsealing - including of some of the material in the vault which Inner City Press requested. Order here.

Jump cut: Menendez et al were convicted; Inner City Press published a book, here.

On Nadine Menendez, on March 31 there was ex USDA official Ted McKinney (thread) then an FBI Agent with Gurbir Grewal and then Jose Uribe on deck.

Jump cut to February 10, 2026: after Nadine Menendez was convicted and sentenced, her lawyer wrote in asking for more travel, filing on Patreon here

On April 14, 2026 Nadine Menendez asked to put off any prison time or forfeiture pending appeals, arguing ", despite forcing Mr. Schertler off of the case, subpoenaing Mr. Schertler himself for trial testimony, and marking trial exhibits for admission that necessarily required Mr. Schertler’s testimony, the Government, shockingly, never called Mr. Schertler at trial. Indeed, the Government offered no evidence whatsoever regarding the August 2023 Proffer. In violation of its duty of candor, the Government never informed Mrs. Menendez or the Court directly of its change of heart, Mrs. Menendez was not allocuted further on the issue (as she easily could have and should have been), and Mrs. Menendez was forced to proceed to trial without her highly experienced and well regarded chosen counsel. The Government’s reckless course of action raises a substantial question of constitutional dimension that mandates Mrs. Menendez’s release under 18 U.S.C. § 3143. This issue alone is enough for the Court to find a question warranting release, but Mrs. Menendez’s appeal raises several additional substantial, material questions that require vacatur or reversal. In tandem with Mrs. Menendez’s demonstrated good behavior on release to date, the issues on appeal justify release pending their resolution" - 17 page filing on Patreon here

Thread extra on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222 NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com