Friday, May 15, 2026

As UN Corrupt in Nairobi for Wasteful $340 M Gigiri Site Guterres Set to Visit as USUN Closes Ears



As UN Corrupt in Nairobi for Wasteful $340 M Gigiri Site Guterres Set to Visit as USUN Closes Ears

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

UN GATE / Nairobi, May 8 – How corrupt is today's UN under Antonio Guterres? Consider the UN Office in Nairobi (UNON), on which UN spokespeople Stephane Dujarric and Melissa Fleming have refused all Press questions.

 Now while the US Mission to the UN pretends to a public that doesn't know (and mostly doesn't care) that it is reforming UN offices and missions with bureaucratic studies and changes in language, it has done nothing to stop the waste, and Guterres' ban on the Press which exposes it. Inner City Press exclusively published the below, and directly raised it to USUN, Mike Waltz and Jeff Bartos - nothing.

Actually, it's worse - after Inner City Press emailed the US Mission questions including about this Gigiri waste on May 5, on May 8 when it sent follow up questions the US Mission and its Press line blocked the email. Mike Waltz has gone entirely native at the UN, it seems....

Also since the publication below, it is reported that "Guterres is scheduled to visit Kenya on May 11, 2026, for a high-profile engagement expected to highlight Nairobi’s expanding role as a global diplomatic and multilateral hub. During the visit, Guterres will join President William Ruto in presiding over the groundbreaking and official launch of a major expansion project at the United Nations Office at Nairobi (UNON) in Gigiri." To get his cut?

Dear Matthew Russell Lee, 

Controversy has emerged around the leadership of Zainab Bangura, Director-General of the United Nations Office at Nairobi (UNON), in relation to the management of a $340 million construction program at the UN’s Gigiri complex.

The project, overseen during a period of financial strain within the United Nations, has been accompanied by serious internal concerns, raising broader questions about governance, accountability, and the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms. A misconduct investigation was initiated in mid-2025 by the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS). However, the investigation was ultimately closed, with OIOS concluding that the evidence did not substantiate the allegations.

This outcome has generated internal unease and skepticism, particularly given the nature and volume of concerns raised by staff and diplomats.  Among the most contentious issues were allegations of disproportionate allocation of office space to Zainab Bangura and her small team, including control over more than half a floor in a newly constructed building, while other senior officials such as Huang Xia were reportedly required to negotiate for reduced space.

Additional concerns included personalized modifications to office layouts, conversion of facilities for discretionary use, and installation of restricted-access features benefiting the Director-General alone.  Further allegations pointed to potential misuse of resources and privileges, including:  Engagement with the Saudi embassy to fund a private pilgrimage to Mecca without clear approval procedures; Repeated booking of high-end hotel accommodation at UN expense despite the availability of an official residence; Use of official vehicles for private purposes, including long-distance travel to a personal event not recorded in official reports.

These patterns have contributed to a perception of privilege, lack of accountability, and possible abuse of authority at senior levels. The decision by OIOS to close the investigation without further action has intensified concerns about the credibility and independence of internal oversight mechanisms, particularly in high-profile or politically sensitive cases.  The situation is further complicated by institutional dynamics, including Bangura’s connections within UN headquarters, her past role under Ban Ki-moon, and her perceived proximity to Deputy Secretary-General Amina J. Mohammed.

Meanwhile, the posture of António Guterres, including his decision not to engage directly with Nairobi-based leadership during his visit, has been interpreted by some as reflecting underlying institutional discomfort.  Taken together, this case illustrates a broader structural issue: serious allegations of misconduct and misuse of authority may not be subjected to sufficiently transparent or rigorous scrutiny, particularly when handled internally. The closure of the OIOS investigation, despite persistent concerns, reinforces perceptions that oversight mechanisms may lack independence or effectiveness, thereby weakening confidence in the UN’s commitment to accountability. 

This controversy underscores the urgent need for reform of OIOS, including stronger independence, enhanced transparency, and external review mechanisms, to ensure that allegations of corruption, abuse of authority, and misuse of resources are addressed with credibility and integrity across all duty stations. The urgent need for reform of Office of Internal Oversight Services(OIOS) as it reaches the final stage of institutional decay.

  What as USUN done? Nothing. Instead, as on the UNMISS resolution, Jeff Bartos unleashed a ten tweet series on the Committee on Information - without mentioning that Under Secretary General Melissa Fleming, which the Committee oversees, bans the Press and has refused even to answer two letters from two US law firms, pro bono, seeking a dialogue to end the ban on Inner City Press. USUN has gone native, putting style (of resolutions) over substance (ending waste, fraud and censorship).

 Back on November 6, 2025, in what seems like a pre-approved list shared by the UNMISS-SMG by mistake - and now given no answers published by Inner City Press on its DocumentCloud here - details some offices with specific names of International staff, to be considered for cuts. 

  It has happened at MINUSCA in Central African Republic too - and no answers from UN.

 Guterres, they say, should end censorship. Application was made on June 19, 2025, here. Still as of October 7 no answer at all from Melissa Fleming or Stephane Dujarric. Totally corrupt. Watch this site.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com