Friday, April 10, 2026

Amid Live Nation Trial Inner City Press Requests Records from States Now Texas Demands $2500

SDNY COURTHOUSE, April 8 –  The United States versus Live Nation trial began on March 2 with jury selection, before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Arun Subramanian.   Then after a week of testimony it went on pause, and the DOJ and now several states settlement with Live Nation.

Late on March 19, Inner City Press published TicketMonster in Court, here

On March 27, amid massive sealing in the SDNY trial, Inner City Press files freedom of information / open records requests with US DOJ and states. 

On April 8, on the eve of the states' closing arguments and as other states and even DOJ processed the requests, Texas Assistant Attorney General Meredith Coffman despite repeated citation to the relevant Texas statute wrote that until Inner City Press pays over $2500 its request will be dismissed by April 23.

This is outrageous.  So too is the Office's run-around about how to appeal. Nevertheless Inner City Press has appealed:

"Texas Government Code § 552.267 provides:  "A governmental body shall waive or reduce charges for providing copies of public information if the governmental body determines that the requestor is a representative of the news media and the information is not requested for commercial purposes."  The word "shall" is mandatory. See Tex. Gov't Code § 311.016(2) ("'Shall' imposes a duty."). The statute admits of no discretion once the two conditions are met: news media status and non-commercial purpose.  The OAG's denial fails on two independent grounds.  The § 552.223 deflection is legally wrong. Section 552.223 requires governmental bodies to treat all requestors uniformly regardless of media status. It is an anti-discrimination provision — a floor. It does not limit, override, or repeal the separate affirmative obligation imposed by § 552.267. These provisions address entirely different situations. Invoking § 552.223 to defeat § 552.267 would render the fee waiver provision meaningless — a result courts disfavor under basic statutory construction principles. See Tex. Gov't Code § 311.021(2) (entire statute intended to be effective).  The "cost estimate required" exception does not exist. The cost estimate threshold under § 552.261 and § 552.2615 is a procedural mechanism — it triggers notice and payment requirements. It does not create an exception to the substantive fee waiver obligation under § 552.267."

Back on March 24-25, Live Nation filed two letters requesting sealing. Inner City Press filed opposition at 1:47 am, here. Midday on March 25 Judge Subramanian asked if anyone from Inner City Press was in the courtroom. Later, after live tweeting the jocular testimony of Mark Yovich of Ticketmaster, Inner City Press was ready to argue. Judge Subramanian said, Mr. Lee, I see you here, I have read your letter, we will address it." Watch this site.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

March 24 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

March 23 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

March 20 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here.

March 19 more on that on X for Subscriber here and Substack here

March 18 extra on "war room(s)" on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

On March 5, Judge Subramanian granted Inner City Press first motion to unseal, here

On March 6, Inner City Press was in the courtroom at 8:30 am, and spoke to push for further unsealing, including of demonstratives. See new book, "TicketMonster: US v Live Nation 1," ebook, audiobook and paperback here.

Back on March 4 Inner City Press did a vlog, after filing to unseal, full letter on DocumentCloud here

On March 5, granted. More March 2 details, and the names, on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

The case is United States of America et al v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. et al., 24-cv-3973 (Subramanian)