| In Crypto Case Against NBA
Citation to FTX and Shaq Now
Discovery Stayed Motion Coming
by
Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book
Substack SDNY
COURTHOUSE,
Oct 5 รข In a proposed class
action over the collapse of
crypto exchanges that
sponsored professional sports,
here the National Basketball
Association, Inner City Press
live tweeted a proceeding on
October 5 before U.S. District
Court for the Southern
District of New York Judge
Gregory H. Woods, here
and below. The
plaintiffs, including Dominik
Karnas, Edwin Garrison, Rahil
Sayed, William Ayer, Anthony
Dorn and Todd Webb, sued the
NBA and the law firm McCarter
& English. They also sued
the PR firm Ketchum Inc. and
several celebrity promoters:
Matthew Barkley, Marshall
Faulk, Scott Melker, Tracy
McGrady and Stephen Piscotty.
Their original Florida
complaint alleges the NBA
approved and encouraged crypto
sponsorship deals, including
the Miami Heat arena's naming
deal with FTX, which let
exchanges later hit by
bankruptcy market themselves
to the public. It alleges the
NBA bears responsibility to
the proposed class for about
$4.2 billion in damages. On October
5: Plaintiffs'
lawyer: the NFL decided not to
do crypto, but Adam Silver
did. We settled a case against
Shaquille O'Neal... They want
us to not amend, to dismiss it
without prejudice. But I don't
think they will consist these
were unregistered securities.
We are ready to brief
it. Plaintiffs'
lawyer: I am Joey Kaye... This
was during out FTX case. The
11th Circuit cited mass
marketing on the
Internet.. NBA's lawyer Alex
Drylewski of Skadden: In the
FTX case, they sued
influencers and promoters,
Judge Moore found agreements
with FTX. Here, no Voyager
deal with NBA Judge: I'll give
you four weeks, given the
Thanksgiving holiday. Motion
due by Nov 2, any opposition
four weeks later, reply two
weeks later. NBA's lawyer from
Skadden: We want to stay
discovery. Plaintiffs'
lawyer: The Voyager customers
have lost $2 billion, more
than a billion has yet be be
paid. So I'm sure the NBA has
indexed documents. Producing
them would not be burden Judge: I will
stay discovery. I look forward
to reviewing the motion [to
dismiss] I Adjourned The case is Karnas et al. v. National Basketball Association, Inc., et al., 1:26-cv-06612 (Woods)
*** Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station,
NY NY 10013 Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis. Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com |