Friday, March 20, 2026

Disputed Flight from Virginia to Honduras Referred by 2d Circuit to SDNY Judge Furman as Special Master

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 16 –    A panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, faced with a factual dispute about whether an appellant before them had or had not been flown from Alexandria, Virginia to Honduras and back in January, referred the matter to a special master.   Selected was U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jesse M. Furman. He held a conference on March 18 which Inner City Press live tweeted:

Judge Furman: I have received the parties joint letter [It is not in the docket, at least not as of 2:31 pm] I propose the bifurcate the issue. There is a filing in the Court of Appeals by a government contractor that DOJ says moots this. I disagree

Judge Furman: He did take a bus to and from the staging area on that day. The dispute is what happened in between. So we need a list of contractors who handled egress - and flights between Alexandria and Honduras.

Petitioner's lawyer Perry McAninch of Legal Aid: We'd like a list of everyone else on the removal flight. Judge Furman: I think there should be a protective order

DOJ's Christopher Pryby: He has a version that is contradicted by the record. Judge: Can I interrupt you? I've already ruled on that. I'm not going to resolve it on the existing record. DOJ's Pryby: The Court of Appeals wants to know if he was on the plane.

DOJ's Pryby: If you want names of the contractors, and who was on the plane, and who spoke with the petitioner - there are privacy concerns. We are disinclined to disclose who has been removed, to protect the privacy of the people removed. Judge: Protective order

DOJ's Pryby: We'll meet and confer then inform

[in the docket?]  

 There should be a protective order by Friday - and a letter about bringing the petition back to New York, or an order granting that - and discovery demands by Monday. The US got three weeks to respond.  The appeal proceeds in the Second Circuit, with the merits brief due on May 11.

The SDNY case is R.R.M.C. v. Brondi, 26-mc-114 (Furman)


More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here