Friday, August 7, 2026

Healthcare Exec Hit in Head by Bat at Yankees Guardians Game Use Saying Can No Longer Work

SDNY COURTHOUSE, August 1 – A woman hit by a baseball bat at a New York Yankees game on June 2 says she suffered a traumatic brain injury and filed a lawsuit against the Yankees on August 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where Inner City Press nearly immediately found it. 

 The Yankees were playing the Cleveland Guardians when a Guardians player lost control of his bat. It traveled "over the protective netting and struck Plaintiff Stephanie Duluc in the head in her season-ticket seats... The incident was captured on the YES Network broadcast of the game."  

She says the netting in her section was "materially lower that the netting protecting the adjacent sections behind home plate."     

   Duluc says she is or was a healthcare executive but "has been unable to return to her professional role." She wants "the full measure of damages the law allows."  

The case is Duluc v. New York Yankees Partnership, et al., 1:26-cv-6588 (Unassigned)  

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

Man Found Not Guilty in Bronx Court of 2 Murders Has SDNY Trial US Opposes Motions



Man Found Not Guilty in Bronx Court of 2 Murders Has SDNY Trial US Opposes Motions

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 31 - A man who was charged in The Bronx with two 2021 murder and then found not guilty in a less than two week trial there now faces a Federal trial for the same murders, starting on September 14.  

On April 28 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Senior Judge Colleen McMahon held a conference. Inner City Press was there. 

  The US Attorney's Office on April 21 wrote in that the Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, directed that the death penalty not be sought. Still, there is learned counsel on the case.  

The AUSA, who has said he is on two other death-eligible cases in SDNY, asked that the 3500 material be attorneys-eyes-only until a week before trial. He said the witnesses live where the defendant does - or did. He is now in detention, awaiting trial. 

On May 8 the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking Judge McMahon to reconsider her order they produce 3500 material by August 21, arguing politely that she does not have the authority, and that "the Government's witnesses did not testify at the state trial," that safety is implicated.

On May 22 defense counsel filed a letter motion seeking to suppress everything found in the NYPD search of 1243 Findlay Avenue, saying the warrant omitted "materially different clothing."

On July 31 the US Attorney's Office wrote in opposing the defense motions in limine to preclude ID testimony from NYPD Detective Faton Alickaj and sever the felon in possession charge.

 The case is USA v. Savage, 1:25-cr-472 (McMahon)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Children 13 and 9 Detained by Office of Refugee Resettlement 6 Months Files Habeas



Children 13 and 9 Detained by Office of Refugee Resettlement 6 Months Files Habeas

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 31 – Two children, 13 and 9, have been detained for six months without apparent progress toward their release by the Office of Refugee Resettlement.

In a habeas corpus petition replete with redactions, their next friend Lauren Louda has sued for their release in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where Inner City Press found the petition. 

  Their mother, in Rhode Island, had rented a larger apartment for their release, after a home study report "due to a household member's property and prior actions, both previously unknown" to the mother.

But they remain in "transitional foster care at Abbott House, an ORR subcontractor."

  The case has been assigned to Judge Arun Subramanian. He has ordered that they not be moved out of SDNY, EDNY or New Jersey absent the Court's prior approval. Response is due on August 7.

 It is Fouda v. Salazar, 1:26-cv-6559 (Subramanian)

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Youthful Offender from Ecuador Detained By ICE FIles Habeas Corpus Petition in SDNY



Youthful Offender from Ecuador Detained By ICE FIles Habeas Corpus Petition in SDNY

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, July 32 – An 18-year-old from Ecuador who was detained by ICE filed a habeas corpus petition in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where Inner City Press found it. 

  The petition says "after crosing the U.S. Mexico border in September 2023, he encounter immigration officials who subsequently released him on his own recognition."

 He says he followed all instructions but was detained at a check in on June 17 and remains detained in the Orange County Jail.

He has been adjudicated as a youthful offender of allegations of trespass "which arose out of an incident in which he was with a larger group but, upon realizing they were committing a crime, left without participating further."

The case is J.V.B. v. Genalo, et al., 1:26-cv-6573 (Unassigned)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2026 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

On UN Free PressGhana Responds to Inner City Press and Asks UN While Most of EU and USUN Have Not Managed Even That

UN GATE, August 3 –  Of the UN missions Inner City Press wrote to this week, including Security Council elected members, permanent members and UN Committee on Information members, asking each to raise a simple question with MALU and the Secretary-General's office about an eight-year-old, unexplained press ban, one has written back with an actual answer.

It is Ghana. 

"We have noted the concerns raised regarding your application for UN media accreditation and the questions concerning the applicable review procedures," Nuong Faalong, head of information and public affairs at the the Ghanaian Mission wrote. "The matter has been referred to the appropriate UN authorities for consideration. We will revert as appropriate should there be any further information to convey." 

That is not a grant of accreditation. It is not even a promise of one. But it is a government confirming it received the letter, read it, and did something with it, which puts Ghana, as of this week, ahead of a long list of missions that pride themselves, loudly and often, on defending press freedom and UN institutional credibility, and that have so far managed neither a form letter nor an acknowledgment.

Several of the Committee on Information's own European members, a body whose actual mandate is examining UN public information policy, have said nothing at all, eight days after being asked directly and given specific, current news pegs (the straw poll, the accreditation application, MALU's own auto-reply) to hang a response on. Committee membership, it turns out, is easier to hold than to use.  (Notably, UN Security Council member Liberia has also confirmed receipt; we hope to have more on their action - and on the inaction of Denmark, written to as UNSC President for August: nothing).

Then there is the inaction and worse of USUN and Mike Waltz. We'll have more on that - we will not cease.

Inner City Press take this as it comes: on to the next letter, the next straw poll, the next UNGA session. The coverage does not wait for an accreditation decision, and neither does the argument for restoring it — which remains what it always was. Not gratitude for a form letter. Immediate restoration, a written reason if there is one, and a functioning appeal if there is not. Ghana noticed. The rest of the building should too. Watch this site.


More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

For Luigi Mangione NYS Trial Still No Overflow Courtroom After Inner City Press Letter Even As DA Bragg Writes In

1oo CENTRE STREET, Aug 3– The New York State trial of Luigi Mangione still will not have an overflow courtroom for the press and public, unlike the Trump trial in the same building. Who made the decision, and why, has not been publicly explained.

  Inner City Press wrote to presiding Justice Gregory Carro on July 18, challenging the lack of an overflow courtroom. It has continued to push - and now on July 31 Mangione's lawyers have written to Justice Carro. They say they only learned of the restriction from Inner City Press. And they want a hearing on how it was and perhaps is chosen, which media and which journalists can enter and cover the trial

The argument for an overflow courtroom have become even stronger.

In the Federal SDNY courthouse, which always provides overflow rooms to view trial of wide interest, Luigi Mangione was presented on December 19, 2024 on four charges, one of them death penalty eligible, for the killing of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson. Inner City Press was there, covering the case toward a book.

On April 1, 2025 DOJ announced it would seek the death penalty against Mangione. But SDNY Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed the death eligible charges, and set an October 13 court date.

  After some push back, Inner City Press published a book Luigi Mangione Lone Wolf here, now Amazon here

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

  On February 6, 2025 NYS Justice Gregory Carro convened a hearing and, after a long whispered sidebar, announced that NY and he should go first, on June 8. Karen Friedman Agnifilo said that was too fast, and said she would raise double jeopardy.

Luigi Mangione while being led out said it's common sense, that's double jeopardy

February 6 extra on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

  Inner City Press pushed to get exhibits unsealed, waiting through one of Justice Carro's calendar days to hand up a letter. While that led to unsealing, afterward Justice Carro granted privileged access to some, but not others, in the press corps.

On February 9 Mangione's lawyers wrote to SDNY Judge Garnett, recounting what Justice Carro said and opposing it, promising another filing - this one on Patreon here

  Now after NYS Justice Carro did everything he could to have his trial go before the Fed, on July 17 it was announced "Hon. Gregory Carro presiding... Overflow Courtroom: There will be NO overflow room for this proceeding   Time Courtroom Opens: 9:30 am  Duration of Proceeding: Approximately six to eight weeks; weekdays excluding Wednesdays  Press Arrival Outside Courthouse: By 7:00-7:45 am." So, waiting two and a half hours, some days in the rain, to get in.

   Who this benefits, other than fee-charging line-sitting companies, is unclear. At a minimum, or really as a first step to getting this reversed, it must be disclosed who made this decision, and why.

On July 18 Inner City Press streamed this vlog on the topic; here is its letter to Justice Carro, on DocumentCloud since NYS has no PACER, here.
July 1
8 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here.

And on July 31, Mangione's lawyers Karen Friedman Agnifilo, Marc Agnifilo and Jacob Kaplan wrote in.

July 31 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here.

On August 3, the Office of Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg responded, saying they played no rule on OCA's July 17 "Access" plan - but notably NOT saying if they favor an overflow room as existed in their Trump prosecution.

August 3 more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here