Tuesday, October 13, 2026

No Stay in Case Against Trump TV Ads with DHS Funds But Saturday Filing Amid PACER Interruption

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 9 – On the Administration's use of public funds for "propaganda ads" an emergency hearing was held on October 9 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Inner City Press was there, in the largely empty courtroom, and live tweeted here:

All rise!
Plaintiffs' lawyer: The Government is spending millions in public funds, putting its thumb on the scale. We need relief today.
Judge Rochon: There is a case in DDC, before Loren L. AliKhan. Is emergency relief sought there?
AUSA: Yes

Plaintiffs' lawyer: There is a big Alabama football game this weekend. The ad says, America would never be a socialist country - it hurts Mr. Hunter.
Judge Rochon: Why did you bring this motion last night, the day before you seek relief?
A: We worked fast

AUSA: I believe the contract ends October 11.
Judge Rochon: For ad creation? Or ad buys? Because the ads have already been created, allegedly inappropriately funded. Are you saying there is no need for a TRO?
AUSA: I am.
Judge Rochon: I'll need more information

Judge Rochon: Let me be clear, I will not be issuing any TRO in the next five hours. I need more time. That the ads may be played this weekend. I understand. But they started two weeks ago. They knew of DHS on September 29. Time has passed.

Judge Rochon: That said, let me understand the case a bit better. Are you seeking to enjoin the dissemination of the 13 ads created but not yet disseminated? Or future ads?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: Certainly the 13. And those substantially similar

Judge Rochon: Any case law, beyond the 1988 case you cite, on misappropriation?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: I don't have one handy.
Judge Rochon: How do they run afoul of the Appropriations Act, if Mr. Trump is not running for office and the Democrats are not mentioned?

Plaintiffs' lawyer: President Trump has said, Vote like I am on the ballot.
Judge Rochon: But that's not in the ads themselves.
Plaintiffs' lawyer: Hunter's opponent has tied himself to Trump. These ads started just before the midterms.

Plaintiffs' lawyer: Mr. Hunter is an avowed Democratic Socialist. The ads attack him.
Judge Rochon: What about deferring, after Chevron deference was overturned?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: You don't need to use the Office's interpretation. This is propaganda

Judge Rochon: How do you respond to the argument that the ads only celebrate America?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: The ads are purely partisan, celebrating President Trump and his allies. The money used for this was apportioned to DHS to honor fallen victims

Judge Rochon: AUSA, they cite to a meeting with Susie Wiles, with instructions given to Natalie Harp
AUSA: I have no idea
Judge Rochon: Was Russell Vought involved in finding the $20 million in funds, from H.R. 1 - will that be disputed?
AUSA: I don't know

AUSA: I can confirm there is a contract. That is all.
Judge Rochon: Plaintiffs say the ads cost $15.4 million - true?
AUSA: I don't know.
Judge Rochon: Will more money be spent over the weekend on these ad, before Sunday?
AUSA: I don't know

Judge Rochon: On Truth Social he said, "I will pay for them myself." Are appropriate funds still being used?
AUSA: I don't know. You take a good deposition..
Judge Rochon: After Mr. Trump posted that, Plaintiffs say the ads continued, even yesterday. MAGA Inc?
IDK

AUSA: I am not prepared to address the merits.
Judge Rochon: So I can't make a ruling right now, I need information from the Government. But I recognize the urgency. They only got the papers this morning. Can you agree on a schedule? Let's take a break.

Break

All rise!
AUSA: There is no agreement. We propose to respond on Wednesday.
Judge Rochon: That's too long.
Plaintiff's response: We propose Sunday morning for them, Sunday evening for our replyl.
Judge Rochon: Have a seat... I will impose this: US by Saturday night

Judge Rochon: Reply by Sunday at noon. But ECF will be down [!]

Inner City Press note: DOJ, and these plaintiffs, should put their full filings online if PACER is down - and has submitted a letter on that, watch this site.


More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

The case is Common Cause, et al., v. Department of Homeland Security, et al., 1:26-cv-8882 (Rochon)