Saturday, March 7, 2026

In Case Over 26 Fed Plaza 10 Floor Conditions Now 5 Floor Inspection Can Photos But Sealed



In Case Over 26 Fed Plaza 10 Floor Conditions Now 5 Floor Inspection Can Photos But Sealed

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, March 6 รข€“ A class action was filed on August 8 over immigration enforcement conditions in 26 Federal Plaza. (Inner City Press on that day covered the courtrooms on the 12th floor and the ICE activities just outside).  

 The case was assigned to US District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who held an oral argument on August 12. Transcript, on DocumentCloud here. Judge Kaplan mused about 50 square feet per person and increased and more private legal calls, with a TRO order to follow.

And at 4 pm the TRO issues, on square footage, legal calls and more, Order here

On September 8 plaintiff's counsel filed full 11 page memo of law on Patreon here

On September 16 Judge Kaplan issued a preliminary injunction.

On November 25 plaintiffs' counsel filed a motion for contempt and sanctions, saying the injunction has not been complied with. They seek a monitoring mechanism and attorneys' fees.

On February 9 Judge Kaplan held a conference in a largely empty courtroom. The Assistant US Attorney asked for more than 30 days; Judge Kaplan replied that ICE has billions of dollars.

The petitioners' lawyer said respondent Joyce disputes that the orders apply to detainees elsewhere in  26 Federal Plaza.

The AUSA said detainees are held for up to 12 hours on the 9th floor when the 10th floor hits the capacity of 22. Judge Kaplan said he'll leave asking for relief up to the petititioners, sanctions reply due February 27, discovery (and agreement on inspecting 26 Fed) with a deadline of March 16.

From Inner City Press' August 8 report:

  There are a dozen ICE officers with masks over their faces in front of Courtroom 1237 in 26 Federal Plaza. In the hall outside the media is allowed to stand, waiting. 

  On the morning of August 8, Inner City Press was there when a Latino family came out of the courtroom. A woman was crying, asking "porque?" as she was comforted and taken down a short hallway away from the click of the cameras.  

 "Did they grab somebody?" a journalist asked, without answer.  

 ICE officer told journalists and photographers to stand to the side as the family passed: a man pushing a stroller, a toddler in a blue Oxford cloth shirt, and the crying woman.  

  "Please get against the wall," one of the ICE agents told reporters.   

  There are no overflow courtrooms, allowing the Press to observe the cases, and little transparency.

 The judges in the courtrooms in 1237 appear to be named Sponzo, Harbeck, Sagesse and Nasser - no first names on the sign.

Instead, a sign says "A message to illegal aliens: A warning to self-deport." 

On March 6, "ORDER : This class action concerns the conditions of confinement of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") detainees at ICE's facilities at 26 Federal Plaza. Plaintiff is to carry out a Rule 34 inspection of those facilities on March 9, 2026. In some respects the parties have agreed on the parameters of that inspection. They disagree as to others. Plaintiff therefore moved late last night for an order to permit plaintiff to bring a camera and take photographs during the inspection, to permit plaintiff's expert to speak with staff and detained individuals during the inspection, and to permit plaintiff to visit and inspect the fifth floor of26 Federal Plaza in view of recent reports that families with children are detained there. The Court has considered written submissions from both sides and heard argument this morning. Accordingly, it resolves plaintiff's motion as follows: 1. Defendants shall permit plaintiff to bring a photographer to the inspection and to photograph the facilities. Unless otherwise ordered, all photographs taken shall be marked as confidential and attorneys' and experts' eyes only pursuant to the existing protective order. Plaintiff's counsel shall take possession of storage media containing all digital image files (or, in the highly unlikely event that analog rather than digital images are made, negatives or transparencies) created during the inspection, provide a copy of those files or analog media to defendants' counsel, and otherwise retain them pending further order of the Court. 2. Plaintiff's expert shall be permitted to speak with detained individuals provided that the persons spoken to first are advised that they have no obligation to answer any questions. 3. Plaintiffs expert shall not speak with members of ICE's staff except in the presence of and to the extent permitted by defendant's counsel. The Court does not contemplate substantive interviews of ICE staff, but anticipates that some questions about the facilities and related matters are likely to prove unobjectionable. In the event of material disputes that cannot be resolved by common sense and reason, the Court will endeavor to be available by telephone. 4. In all the circumstances, defendants shall permit the inspection of and photography on the fifth floor. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 3/6/2026)

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here  

  The case is Barco Mercado v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-6568 (Kaplan)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 130222, Chinatown Station, NY NY 10013

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540



Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2025 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com