Saturday, September 23, 2023

For Insider Trading Ex-Rep Buyer 22 Months in Prison to Start Nov 28 as He Vows Appeal


By Matthew Russell Lee, Light ReadPatreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Sept 19 -- On July 25, 2022 the SDNY prosecutors unsealed an indictment of ex Rep Stephen Buyer for illegal trading on two mergers.

On July 27, 2022 Buyer accompanied by his wife was in Courtroom 17B of 500 Pearl Street to be arraigned. Inner City Press live tweeted it here.

On March 10, 2023 again with Inner City Press in the courtroom as it was throughout the trial, Buyer was convicted on all counts. His sentencing was set for July 11. Afterward, he shook his head as if in disbelief. But it was a trial of trades and timing.  More on Substack here.

  Jump cut to July 31, when sentencing was to occur. Within any letter yet being in the docket, the sentencing was put off, due to last-minute allegations of conflict of interest in counsel.

On August 7, the US filed the bills of individual lawyers who worked for T-Mobile, Alex Janghorbani and Matthew Solomon - but redacted their hours and billing rates, information that is routinely made public in civil cases. Why not in this criminal case?

More on Substack here

On September 19, 2023, Buyer was sentenced to 22 months in prison. Inner City Press live tweeted it, thread here:

Judge Berman: So do you commit to not appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel? Buyer: Based on the facts as I know them today. My lawyers don't even know what the other lawyers from Orrick were doing for T-Mobile. [Still no sentencing - bogged down]

Judge Berman: I said at the outset this [pre-sentencing Curcio hearing] could take a while. And it's going to take more. That's OK. This is what I get paid to do....

 Judge Berman: I have calculated the sentencing guideline as, under the incoming rule, 31 to 41 months. The defense wants a non-guideline sentence...

Judge Berman (still going, before the parties' arguments start) - Mr. Buyer was a Congressman who represented Indiana's 5th district from 1993 to 2003, and 4th district from 2003 to 2011. Then he started a consulting firm, to T-Mobile, Guidehouse and others...

 Judge Berman is reading from letter of support submitted for Buyer, notes "some of the letters do not accept the guilty verdict. Robert Komahrens wrote that 'Something does not sound right. Steve is a prominent Republican, so it's Manhattan politics

 Judge Berman: Mr. Buyer can claim innocence, that is his right, but his conduct screams "Guilty," as it did at trial. Imprisonment is needed, for deterrence, especially general deterrence.

Judge Berman: You may wish to consider the US v. Wahi Coinbase case [Inner City Press has covered that too, here.

 Now Buyer's lawyer: We wanted the grand jury transcript to see if Agent Raz impeached the trial testimony of Mr. Russo, that would have been Brady or Giglio material... That's what we were looking for. If it reflects that, then I could allege gov't misconduct

 Buyer's lawyer: Mr Buyer has spent his whole life helping others, many many military veterans, his core values. If that is not worth a departure in your view, I hope it is worth a variance, from the 33 to 41 months.

Buyer's lawyer: He has lost his health, and he has been shamed nationwide. He has lost businesses, millions of dollars. We are asking for home confinement. That is all I have to say to you, Judge. Mr. Buyer?

Buyer: Does the government go next? Judge Berman: You do

 Buyer: All I've ever done is good acts. I invite you to Indiana. We leave sweet corn out to be bought, three hundred dollars just sitting there. My appellate team is here. So I will not give a statement. But to my family and friends, I want to thank you

 Buyer: Reading my letters of support, it was like reading my obituary. I will rely on my letter. AUSA: This is a serious breach of trust. It is not a one-off. He did it in 2018, and again in 2019. He knew it was wrong.

 AUSA: He perjured himself. General deterrence is needed. He undermined the integrity of US financial markets. We still ask for 36 months.

Buyer's lawyer: If the court is going to order prison time, we ask for the Morgantown, West Virginia camp, it is well under capacity, no COVID issues for now. Also we'd like drug and alcohol treatment, RDAP

Judge Berman: I intend to impose on Mr. Buyer a prison sentence of 22 months, then 3 years supervised release.

Judge Berman: Probation recommended a fine of $15,000. I'm going to impose a fine of $10,000.  Buyer's letter: I'm going to apply for release pending appeal. Judge Berman: I'm not suggesting remand at this time. Buyer's letter: We want release during the appeal

Judge Berman: I am going to give you a surrender date. You can write me and say whatever you want to say, then the government can respond. Forfeiture $304,000 with credit for any funds repaid by others in whose accounts the defendant traded.

 Judge Berman: The surrender date is November 28 at 2. Please stand, Mr. Buyer. You are hereby committed to the custody of BOP for 22 months.

Back on June 14, 2023 Buyer through his potentially conflicted counsel filed his sentencing memo, seeking home confinement and delayed restitution, emphasizing the penalties he's already faced including his son at Charles Schwab getting interviewed.

On June 21, 2023, the US filed its memo, noting that while the guideline is 41 to 51 months, the Office, "the Court should sentence the defendant to a below-Guidelines sentence of 36 months in this case," calling it a "brazen, deceptive scheme."

Judge Berman asked for information about forfeiture and restitution. The US Attorney's Office responded that beyond forfeiture of $349,000, it understands that Guidehouse will seek $261,000 and T-Mobile will seek $1.1 million in restitution. Judge Berman (counter) endorsed: "The Govt submission is insufficient to give the defense adequate time to respond in writing in relation to the sentencing date. It is preferable to resolve all issues, including forfeiture + restitution, before sentencing, even if this entails having to adjourn the sentencing date. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 6/29/2023)."

On July 2, 2023, the US - jointly with Buyer - asked for a postponement: "The Government respectfully submits this joint letter to request (1) the Court adjourn the sentencing in the above-referenced matter set for July 11, 2023 and (2) allow the parties additional time to propose a schedule for any additional written submissions and a new date for sentencing. The Government presently expects to receive materials related to restitution from counsel for T-Mobile and Guidehouse by on or about July 10, 2023, and the Government understands defense counsel would like time to review those materials and request any additional materials before proposing a schedule for any written submissions related to forfeiture and restitution. Accordingly, the parties jointly respectfully request the Court adjourn the July 11, 2023 sentencing date, and permit the parties to advise the Court on the status of their discussions and propose a schedule for any additional written submissions by on or about July 21, 2023."

On July 6, Judge Berman ordered: "ORDER as to Stephen Buyer: The Government shall ensure that the Probation Department provides its position with authorities regarding forfeiture and restitution (in writing) to the Court by July 13, 2023, at noon. As noted by Defense counsel in its July 6, 2023 letter to the Court, "[w]here restitution is permissible under the law, "the probation officer must conduct an investigation and submit a report that contains sufficient information for the court to order restitution." Fed. R. Crim. P.32(c)(1)(B); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3664(a) (requiring the court to order the probation officer to obtain and include in its presentence report or a separate report "information sufficient for the court to exercise its discretion in fashioning a restitution order," including "a complete accounting of the losses to each victim")." Defense shall submit its forfeiture and restitution position with authorities to the Court by July 20, 2023 at noon. The sentencing is adjourned to July 31, 2023 at 9:30 am. (Sentencing set for 7/31/2023 at 09:30 AM before Judge Richard M. Berman) (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 7/6/2023)." Watch this site.

On March 1, 2023, the trial began with opening arguments. Inner City Press live tweeted here.

On March 2, T-Mobile executive (and plus 2 hadicap amateur golfer, he pointed out) Anthony Russo was on the stand. On direct examination he said Buyer trading stock would have been inappropriate under T-Mobile's insider trading rules.

With the jury out of the room, Buyer's lawyer asked for a mistrial. Judge Berman asked for briefing, saying he didn't want to prejudge. He pointed out at the indictment does speak of stock sales, and not only purchases. Buyer's lawyer insisted on the dates of crime listed in the indictment. Inner City Press will cover the filings - for now, thread here

On the morning of March 6, the prosecution called witnesses including Matthew Levine of Virtu Financial, who said along with servers in New Jersey they traded through Manhattan offices (for venue), and Karen Hensel, a journalist in Indiana, Boston and now Florida.

  She said after a friendship then intimate relationship with Buyer he opened a Charles Schwab account in her name and traded Sprint and Navigant stock in it, for her.

On cross examination, the fourth of Buyer's five lawyer asked her to confirm that Steve helps his friends. She did.

More on Substack here.

On March 7, Buyer's lawyers put on the witness stand a series of character witnesses. One had flown in from Indiana the night before; another had traveled to Bosnia with Buyer. Each was asked, since a Congressmember gets to use the prefix "Honorable," if they thought Steve Buyer was - and said yes.

  Former Buffalo Congressman Jack Quinn was allowed to testify by video from Florida (he said he has Parkinsons Disease). With a ceiling fan behind him, he too agreed Buyer is honorable. Will it be enough?

On March 8, Buyer was on the stand, and Inner City Press was there. Thread here:

OK- now in insider trading trial of ex-Rep from Indiana Stephen Buyer - defendant is on the stand

Buyer: When Tony Russo told me about a dark project, I thought he meant NSA and CIA, Sprint had those contracts...

Alonso: Did you tell Tony Russo you'd bought Sprint stock? Buyer: No. I regret it because now I suffer innuendo

Buyer: Tony told me I was to tell VP Pence two hours before the merger. He's from Indiana too.  [Henry Waxman also on list for #TMobile lobbyists meeting]

 Buyer: I traveled to Augusta to consider joining a golf club, Champions Retreat. My cousin wanted to play Augusta National. [Cousin Cal's text about 9 1-putts shown; Buyer replied "I bought Sprint"]

 Exhibits show T-Mobile telling John Sununu, and Manus Cooney for antitrust. They met at DLA Piper.  [Jurors are taking a lot of notes]

More on Substack here.

On March 9, cross and closings, culminating in the rebuttal summation, thread here:

AUSA: Tony Rosso canceled the golf at Doral to be on merger calls. Does it make any sense he would not tell Steve Buyer why he canceled? No. 

[Buyer is shaking his head]

AUSA: Here is Steve Buyer's stock watch list

[Roku, Zendesk, Square- but no Sprint or Navigant].

The notes on the Zacks print-out is him papering the trades. He's smart but you're smarter.

 AUSA: On venue, the NYSE is in SDNY. Game over.

[Buyer shakes his head, whispers to his lawyer.]

AUSA: Ms Hensel is relevant because Mr Buyer called 8 character witnesses. But he lies. He committed thos crime. Thank you.

More on Substack here.

  Inner City Press will continue to cover the trial. More with analysis on Substack here

  Early on March 3, the US filed opposition to Buyer's motion for a mistrial, arguing among other things that "the defendant’s suggestion that the Government “purposefully elicited testimony about a crime Mr. Buyer has not been charged with” (Dkt. 85 at 2) should be dismissed out of hand. As reflected in the transcript, the date range on the Government’s question was added, in the moment, at the request of the defendant. (Tr. 346:12-13). There was certainly no targeted effort to “convict Mr. Buyer on the basis of conduct that falls outside the grand jury’s indictment.” (Dkt. 85 at 2)." Full letter on Patreon here.

In court on March 3, an interview of Buyer was recounted, second-hand through notes. Alonso objected, calling it hearsay. Judge Berman overruled the objection. And so it went into evidence that Buyer said he had joint trading accounts with his wife Joannie and another with his son. Past recollection recorded... The trial will continue on March 6, and Inner City Press will be there.

 As to T-Mobile, the two week trial against the proposed T-Mobile / Sprint merger ended on December 20, 2019 before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Victor Marrero. There were papers due January 8, and a final four hour argument on January 15. Inner City Press began what will be a trial-long live-tweet, here. Day 7 Patreon here.

Back on August 31, Judge Richard M. Berman held a US v. Buyer proceeding, ranging from the so-called filter team to trial dates, most likely in February 2023. Inner City Press live tweeted here

On November 23, Judge Berman ruled on a discovery dispute and concluded, "Cut it out" - "Counsel for both sides should be aware that the Court is not fond of "tit for tat"litigation. Cut it out. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 11/23/2022)."

On November 30 Judge Berman to his credit set the December 7 oral argument to be virtual, since the defendant - whose right it is - did not object: "ORDER as to Stephen Buyer. The oral argument scheduled for Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 11:00 AM - in the absence of defense objection - is being held by video."

Opinion (than and now): More judges should do this, as they do in civil cases.

But it was converted to in-person, on December 14. Inner City Press there, thread

On February 12, 2023, Buyer's counsel wrote to seek to exclude another other things text messages: "  The exhibits at issue are GX 402, a series of text messages between Mr. Buyer and Individual-1 from August 18, 2016 through October 23, 2017 (before the events in the indictment); GX 401, which contains a series of texts between the two from 2021 (long after the events in the indictment); and GX 306, an email in which Mr. Buyer sent photos of Individual-1’s daughter’s wedding in 2019 and wrote “you are beautiful.” Other topics discussed are hot-button political topics like abortion (Individual-1 stridently expressed that she is pro-life and was very negative about pro-choice women) and political debates including admiration for former Vice President Mike Pence (GX 402), discussions of getting together and phrases like “miss you” (GX 401). Notably, GX 402, which the government told us it intends to offer, is 383 pages long. Adding to the prejudice is that within the text strings and in his phone, Individual-1 is referred to by what the government says is a code name, “Leo.” This code name also shows up in a series of documents (GX 413-15) that the government also seeks to introduce, which contain nothing but Mr. Buyer’s passwords from his iPhone, many of which contain the string “leo.” There is no reason to offer any of this other than to tar Mr. Buyer with the stink of infidelity and conservative political beliefs."

Next, there was a February 15 conference, which Inner City Press live tweeted here:

OK - now a conference in US v ex-Rep Steve Buyer. Judge Berman says, "This rolling process is not acceptable. No more motions in limine?"

Buyer's counsel from Orrick replies that he just wants to make sure he can object to evidence at trial.

Judge Berman: Are you seriously asking that? A: I just, uh... Judge: I assume you know. Now the trial is moved back a week to Feb 28

Buyer's counsel: Can we store defense stuff in the courtroom or nearby? Judge Berman: You may have to take care of that yourself. No printers or copiers in the courtroom. But we'll talk about it.

Buyer's counsel: We get it. We can deal with the new trial date.

Judge Berman asks why the defense needs to bring seven laptops in, and then it's over. For now.

This case is US v. Buyer, 22-cr-397 (Berman)

Watch @InnerCityPress.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com