Thursday, May 29, 2014

Some Press and All Public Were Banned from UN Communications Group, But NYT & Gates Foundation Were There, FUNCA Objects


By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, May 29 -- A group of UN spokespeople which considers such issues as media accreditation met in New York May 20 to 22, and Inner City Press on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Access asked to observe or at least get a summary.

  On May 20, UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said no, it is internal, and declined to take a follow up question.  

  Now a summary of the meetings obtained by Inner City Press shows that to this "internal" UN meeting the Gates Foundation and the New York Times, among others, were invited:

UN Communications Group 13th Annual Session at Principal’s Level – 20-22 May 2014, UNHQ
The annual UNCG 13th Annual Session at Principal’s Level meeting, which was co-hosted by DPI and UNICEF, brought together directors and heads of communication from all UN entities. It allowed for a focused discussion and exchange of best practices in the field of advocacy and communication.
Working sessions were chaired by Peter Launsky-Tieffenthal, Under-Secretary-General, and featured interventions by Jan Eliasson, Deputy Secretary-General, and Yoka Brandt, Deputy Executive Director, UNICEF.
Presentations were made on the following topics: “Communicating as One” – by USG Launsky-Tieffenthal;
Breaking through the noise” - by Bruce Mau, Massive Change Network; Climate and post-2015 – a discussion moderated by USG Launsky-Tieffenthal; “Voice, reach and engagement” - UNICEF’s global communication strategy, by Paloma Escudero, Director of Communications, UNICEF; “Working with ad agencies to amplify UN messages” – David Ohana, Chief of Brand Building, UNICEF; Twiplomacy - social media in international organizations - by Adam Snyder, Director of Digital and Social Strategy, Burson-Marsteller; Journalism roundtable on the convergence of new and traditional media with panelists: Miriam Elder, Foreign Editor at Buzzfeed; Rebecca Howard, General Manager of Video Production at the New York Times; Jeremy Hillman, Director of External Communications, Gates Foundation, moderated by Deborah Seward, Director of Strategic Communications Division, DPI; “Storytelling, listening & communicating with data" - by Sebastian Majewski, Gates Foundation and Anoush Tatevossian, UN Global Pulse.
Other sessions focused on the high-impact of Partnerships; Social media, the Post-2015 agenda, and the 2015 EXPO Milan. Stephane Dujarric spoke about his work as the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.
   So can a meeting be called "internal" when at least two media organizations and outside foundations are invited? On what terms? Here was UNICEF's response to FUNCA's request:
The UN Communications Group meeting is co-hosted by UN DPI and UNICEF. It’s an internal meeting so isn’t open via webcast or otherwise.”
   Isn't open "otherwise"? To whom?
Background: Previous UNCG Annual Principals Meetings have come out with statements like that it is "important for the United Nations family to engage with all forms of new media, but that some, such as blogs, present particular challenges for accreditation."
   Even today, the UN lags behind the OSCE in raising concerns about the detention by Ukraine authorities of journalists like those of Life News, which put on YouTube video of “UN” marked helicopters in Ukraine. Inner City Press asked Dujarric about this on May 20 and was told that no one in the UN system has even raised the issue to Kyiv, unlike the OSCE. Video here.
   Inner City Press wrote to UNICEF to asked to attend or get access to a webcast of the UNCG meeting but was told: “The UN Communications Group meeting is co-hosted by UN DPI and UNICEF. It’s an internal meeting so isn’t open via webcast or otherwise.”
   But if it concerns topics like accreditation, shouldn't it be open or summarized? Watch this site.