By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, May 20 -- Both the Egyptian persecutors of the journalists from Al Jazeera and other media and those Kyiv authorities who have more recently detained and abused reporters from LifeNews use the same logic.
Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council deputy Victoria Sumar said the detained journalists, Oleg Sidyakin and Marat Saichenko, are being investigated on the charges of "aiding the terrorist groups."
This has an echo in the UN, which unlike the OSCE has yet to contact anyone in Kyiv seeking the release of the journalists. Video of Inner City Press May 20 question, UN answer, here.
French Ambassador Gerard Araud, in the UN's Press Briefing Room on April 15, told a reporter who asked a critical question, "You are not a journalist, you are an agent." Video here.
The next day, April 16, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesperson Stephane Dujarric about it. Dujurric replied in part that UN accredited correspondents should be treated with respect. Video here.
Inner City Press, on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Access, noted that French foreign minister Laurent Fabius did the same thing last September, cutting off a question about Algeria by saying, let me call on a real journalist. An irony in Araud's "agent" talk is that on April 16 he called on France 24, his own government's media.
The old United Nations Correspondents Association, become the UN's Censorship Alliance, has dragged its feet on requests to address Araud's attack on a correspondents right in the briefing room. A Free UN Coalition for Accessflier raising the issue had been torn down on May 19 from the free speech bulletin board FUNCA advocated for and won, even as UNCA maintains a glassed-in, but content-less, bulletin board one floor below.
On April 16 Dujarric would not say if he would convey his stated UN position of respect for correspondents to the French Mission. Araud is slated to leave in July. Until then, he is more and more brazen -- on May 20 he refused to take any Press questions about Mali, even as he got sassy on the topic on Twitter.
But what about Araud's slated successor Jacques Audibert? Has Araud so programmed his spokesman Frederic Jung, who tries to micro-manage those operating what is supposed to be the UN's boom microphone, that this travesty might continue? We'll have more on this - and on whether and how Dujarric's statement that UN accredited correspondents should be treated with respect applies to UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, see this and April 7 video, here,compilation here.
During Araud's April 15 press conference, he began to receive many questions, here, about blocking human rights monitoring in Western Sahara.
It is a policy Araud is particularly associated with, since Javier Barden quoted him calling Morocco France's "mistress." Araud spoke of suing, but hasn't.
But when during the April 15 press conference, in which Inner City Press and the Free UN Coalition for Access were not called on, Araud was asked about France having killed people in Algeria, Araud on camera told the questioner, You are not a journalist, you are an agent. Video here.
The French run press conference gave the first question to Al Arabiya, for UNCA (now known as the UN's Censorship Alliance). An UNCA board member also wanly asked on April 16 - but this same individual not only did nothing whenHerve Ladsous, as head of UN Peacekeeping, said he wouldn't answer any of the Press' questions -- he supported UNCA board efforts to get Inner City Press to remove from the Internet its reporting about Sri Lanka, and also about Ladsous. So, no.
On April 15, Syria "Caesar" report panelist David Crane was asked who funded it and answered on camera merely that he was paid. (The photographs, Inner City Press noted and notes, are extremely troubling - all the more reason that taking Qatar's funding and denouncing the only critical question were unwise.)
Afterward, Inner City Press asked Crane to confirm the payment was from Qatar. He confirmed it. Inner City Press asked, did you seek any other, less compromised funding? The answer was no. In fact, Crane said he gave his recommendations to the Syrian National Council. Afterward Inner City Press asked him if he meant the Turkey based group headed by Ahmed Al Jarba, and Crane said yes, than added, "The resistance" writ large.
When Qatar sponsored an event at the UN in New York on March 21 featuring the Syrian Coalition headed by Ahmad al Jarba, a group calling its the Syrian Grassroots Movement held protests seeking to oust Jarba.
By March 22, the group stated that some 40,000 people in 58 cities inside Syria had participated in demonstrations to get Jarba out of his post, saying "it is time to put an end to political corruption."
Back in September 2013, France sponsored an event in the UN and called Jarba the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people. French Ambassador Gerard Araud was the first questioning at Qatar's March 21 Syrian Coalition event. What is France's position now? Who chooses the leaders?
Likewise, back in July 2013 and earlier this month, the Jarba-led Syrian Coalition held faux "UN" events in the clubhouse Ban Ki-moon's Secretariat gives to the largely Gulf and Western UN Correspondents Association. How does that now appear, in light of the anti-Jarba protests?
Qatar's March 21 event was not listed in the UN Journal nor in the UN Media Alert. It was not on the UN's publicly available webcast.
Select media outlets were there, when Inner City Press came in at the end to ask a question: Al Jazeera on the podium in Qatar's event, Al Arabiya like a Saudi diplomat -- not the Permanent Representative -- in the audience along with Al Hayat, even Al Hurra, on whose Broadcasting Board of Governors US Secretary of State John Kerry serves.
The new Free UN Coalition for Access is against faux UN events, in the clubhouse the Secretariat gives to what's become its UN Censorship Alliance or elsewhere.
On March 21 Inner City Press put these questions, also on behalf of the Free UN Coalition for Access, to the UN's top two spokespeople:
"there is an event in Conference Room 4 right now, sponsored by Qatar, which is no listed in today's UN Journal, nor is it on UN Webcast http://webtv.un.org/ but it appears to be being filmed. Please explain the legal status of this meeting, if there are any sponsored beyond Qatar, how it was publicized and if any request to have it webcast was made. Thanks, on deadline."
But no answer was provided. Inner City Press ran to the event and from the back of a three quarters empty Conference Room 4 asked why the event was so stealth: not in the UN Journal, not webcast.
The Permanent Representative of Qatar answered, saying it was a "special event" to which Qatar had invited (some) member states and groups, and (some) media. There is a UN Media Alert, but this event was not put in it.
Perhaps it was publicized by the Gulf & Western United Nations Correspondents Association, which has twice hosted faux "UN" events by the Syrian National Coalition or Syrian Coalition. (In both cases, the Free UN Coalition for Access suggested that the SNC hold its events in the UN briefing room, accessible to all journalists.)
Since French Ambassador Gerard Araud, the first questioner flanked by representatives of Saudi Arabia and of Turkey which earlier in the day banned Twitter, has spoken about "fakes" and others about accountability, Inner City Press asked if the groups Al Nusra and ISIS, and those who fund them such as private individuals in Qatar alluded to at the US State Department briefing earlier in the day, could or would be held accountable.
The SNC representative emphasized what he called links between the Assad regime and ISIS, saying it was too easy to blame the Gulf countries.
Here's from the March 21 US State Department briefing transcript:
Question: you have concerns about the withdrawal of the ambassadors. Do you also have concerns about the reasons that these countries said that they withdrew their ambassadors from Qatar? In other words, do you – if you have concerns about the withdrawal of the ambassadors, do you also have concerns about Qatar’s behavior, which – alleged behavior, let’s say – which led to these countries withdrawing their ambassadors?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I know one of the issues that has been mentioned is the issue of private donations to extremists – and that’s something that some have mentioned – operating in Syria and elsewhere. It remains an important priority in our high-level discussions, and one that we also certainly raise with all states in the region, including Qatar, including the Government of Kuwait, wherever we have concerns.
After Inner City Press asked about the sponsorship of the event, a one-page "Joint Statement by the Co-Organizers" was passed out, listing among the co-organizers France, the UK, US, Belgium, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. Inner City Press tweeted it.
Even 24 hours later, the UN's top two spokespeople had not answered the simple questions put to them, above. Watch this site.
