Friday, January 2, 2026

For Luigi Mangione SDNY Questions For Jan 9 Hearing As US Zeroes In on False Name


by Matthew Russell Lee, Substack Book Patreon

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 31 – Luigi Mangione was presented in Federal court on December 19 on four charges, one of them death penalty eligible, for the killing of UnitedHealth CEO Brian Thompson. Inner City Press was there, covering the case toward a book.

On April 1 DOJ announced it will seek the death penalty against Mangione.

  In the interim, after some push back, Inner City Press published a book Luigi Mangione Lone Wolf here, now Amazon here

On December 31 U.S District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Margaret G. Garnett posed questions: "ORDER as to Luigi Nicholas Mangione: In advance of the conference scheduled for January 9, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., the Court requests that both parties be prepared for oral argument and to answer the Court's questions regarding the Defendant's motion to dismiss Counts Three and Four. The Court will allot 30 minutes each to the Government and the Defense for this argument. As of the date of this Order, given the extensive and excellent briefing by both sides on the other pending motions and the issues presented by those motions, the Court does not believe oral argument on the remaining motions is necessary or would be helpful to the Court. Second, the Court hereby ORDERS the Defendant to submit a letter by no later than Tuesday, January 6, 2026, indicating whether, in light of the Government's representation that it is only seeking to admit the Defendant's statement giving his name as Mark and Mark Rosario, he is still seeking to suppress those statements. Because the Defendant did not address this issue in his reply brief, the Court is unclear whether that suppression argument has been abandoned in light of the Government's representation. Third, the Court hereby ORDERS both the Government and the Defendant to submit a letter by no later than Tuesday, January 6, 2026, indicating whether they believe an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve the Government's inventory search or inevitable discovery arguments (or any other aspect of the Defendant's suppression motion regarding searches of his backpack), and, if so, what specific facts are either disputed or unknown but necessary to resolving the question. If the parties are in agreement, a joint letter will suffice. Finally, the Government may, if it wishes, submit a sur-reply of no more than five pages on the Defendant's argument regarding Ms. Bondi's relationship to Ballard Partners, made for the first time in reply. Any such sur-reply must be filed by no later than Wednesday, January 7, 2026. (Signed by Judge Margaret M. Garnett on 12/31/2025)."

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

In the NY case late on December 2 Inner City Press emailed, then on December 3 faxed and hand-delivered, a letter asking to be heard and for unsealing, here.


  After handing in the letter and getting it stamped at 10 am, Inner City Press stayed in and covered Justice Carro's courtroom past 5 pm. Then:

Justice Carro said, "Mr. Lee? Come up to the rail." I did. He said, I've read your letter. I intend tomorrow to decide what part of what is being presented came be made public to the Press. And on December 4 he said it would happened. And some did.

On December 18, both sides rested and Justice Carro said briefs due January 29 and March 5 with his decision due May 18.

On unsealing bid, more / extra on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Melania Trump Moves to Remove Wolff Defamation Case from NYS to SDNY


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 29 –    Journalist Michael Wolff filed a defamation lawsuit against Melania Trump in New York State court on October 21, 2025. 

 On December 29, Melania Trump through counsel filed a Notice of Removal to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which Inner City Press closely covers and where it found it. The notice says that she is a resident of Florida and therefore diversity jurisdiction applies. 

  Her lawyers also wrote that "plaintiff falsely and maliciously asserted that Mrs. Trump was somehow 'involved' in the 'scandal' relating to Jeffrey Epstein [and] initiated this action in an improper effort to preempt a potential defamation lawsuit against him by Mrs. Trump." 

The SDNY case is Wolff v. Trump, 1:25-cv-10752 (Unassigned)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

On SafeMoon Karony US Wants 12 Years After Found Guilty As Inner City Press Bid to Unseal


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

EDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 29 – On November 2, 2023 SafeMoon's trio were indicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Inner City Press covered it.

 Prosecutors charged Braden John Karony, Kyle Nagy, and Thomas Smith with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering conspiracy for their roles in defrauding investors in a decentralized finance digital asset called “SafeMoon”  Earlier today, Karony was arrested in Provo, Utah...

 On November 3, Smith was arraigned, bond document on Patreon here ....

On November 13, Inner City Press live tweeted the bail appeal in which Karony was ordered detained and to be brought to EDNY, thread

On November 22, Karony's lawyers filed - Letter on Patreon here.

On November 27, the prosecutors replied that transport will take the time it takes, and there is no basis for release. Letter on Patreon here.

In February, Karony was given a new free lawyer and a $3 million bond package - but the co-signers are confidential, unlike what Inner City Press unsealed as to SBF in SDNY.

Inner City Press on February 17 filed a letter to unseal the co-signers - on February 22 Judge Komitee to his credit had it docketed. But nothing happened (?)

Jump cut to April 29, 2025 when Magistrate Judge Cho held a conference on the jury selection he will run on May 5 (same time as US v. Sean Combs in SDNY), thread.

On May 21, "a federal jury convicted
Braden John Karony on all counts of a three-count indictment charging him with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. The charges arose from the defendant’s and his co-conspirators’ roles in defrauding investors in a decentralized finance digital asset called “SafeMoon,” issued by their company SafeMoon LLC."

On December 29, the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking for a 12 year sentencing on Karony, 22 page sentencing memo on Patreon here

Inner City Press is following the case(s)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Imran Ahmed Christmas Eve Order to Show Cause on Sanctions Extended to Jan 5


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 29 – At 7 pm on Christmas Eve, lawyers for Imran Ahmed filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which Inner City Press closely covers, even on holidays. 

  The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the US from expelling or sanctioning Imran Ahmed for his work at the Center for Countering Digital Hate. 

  As of December 26 it has yet to be assigned to a District Judge. But Judge Vernon S. Broderick, the Part 1 Judge for the week, reported signed the Temporary Restraining Order early on Christmas Day and set a hearing for sometime on Monday, December 29.  

As of noon on December 26, Judge Broderick's Order was not public in PACER. Apparently, Imran Ahmed's lawyers distributed the order to some media (it is not on the law firm's website).

On December 29 Inner City Press went to the courtroom of Judge Broderick and heard him say that the day's 4:30 conference was off, though it had nothing to with him, he joked. Later it was docketed: the "conference scheduled for today at 4:30 PM is adjourned. The parties shall appear for a conference on January 5, 2026, prepared to address venue, this Court's jurisdiction to hear this case, including how long Plaintiff intends to be in New York, and what steps Defendants have taken to impose visa restrictions and initiate removal proceedings against Plaintiff and others pursuant to the same or similar State Department sanctions. The parties should also be prepared to discuss the schedule for briefing during the conference. The Temporary Restraining Order previously granted by this Court remains in effect."

  The case is Ahmed v. Rubio, et al., 1:25-cv-10705 (Preska)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Lazzarini No Answers in SDNY or from UN Spox on Corruption as Feted in Empty UNHQ


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

UN GATE, Dec 29 – With Phillippe Lazzarini being celebrated in the empty and increasingly irrelevant UN - while he is being sued in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and asserting immunity rather than offering any substantive defense or explanation - below are some questions left unanswered for two years by UN spokesperson including Stephane Dujarric.

(Note that on December 28 Dujarric received a very specific question / staff allegation from Inner City Press and has not answered, even to deny. That story is coming).

On Lazzarini, Inner City Press received and asked:

Dear Matthew Russell Lee / Inner City Press:

  Lazzarini, upon his arrival, assigned an official UNRWA vehicle for more than a year to be used by his wife.  The car gets hit by his wife and repaired at the expense of the Agency when the accident was reported as official.

We are a group of UNRWA staff who are witnessing daily violations and abuses and are unable to do anything about it due to bullying and fear of retaliation by the senior management.   We have several documented cases of abuse and fraud by senior directors who are protected by the commissioner general.    We saw your reporting and we are asking if you are interested to write about such cases in order for us to disseminate wider once these issues are reported.  

Examples:    1- A Senior Director was recruited at D1 level when he failed the P5 interview 10 months earlier.  This was a direct intervention of Christian Saunders when he was acting USG of the Agency.  

 2- That same Senior Director who is a former colleague and a friend of the director of HR bullies staff.  When staff report those actions to the ethics office and to the internal audit department, the complaints are ignored.  

3- That same Director announces a vacancy in his department and interviews candidates.  He selects his preferred candidate and makes her an offer.   When she refuses the fees, he decides to cancel the vacancy and lies to the HR department saying, no candidate was found suitable.  

 45 days later, he announces the same vacancy at 300% increase of the initial salary.  When HR asks him to interview candidates, he says, no because he had selected a candidate from previous interviews.   Head of HR because of his close friendship with the director (formerly colleagues at UNICEF), he agrees.  WE have copies of the two contracts with same ToRs but different amounts of fees.

  4- Tribunal judgment calls for accountability with two persons (Director of HR and deputy director of Syria field office) because they knowingly offered a contract to an unqualified candidate who is proven to have false information on her PhP/CV.   Nothing happens. 

 5- A staff member seeks protection against retaliation from the ethics office.  That request is ignored for months.  When the staff members provide additional concrete solid evidence of harassment, he is granted protection.   The evidence is very strong and qualifies for a dismissal.  The case is forwarded for investigation without putting the staff on any preventive action.  Harassment and bullying continues knowing that the investigation will lead to nothing. 

  6- Report of two independent consultants show how senior management is bullying staff with a strong report.  The report is hidden and nothing happens.   

 On the morning of February 6, 2023 Inner City Press sent the above for comment to dozens of UN officials, and Malta's Mission to the UN under Vanessa Frazier, as UNSC president for February. No answer at all. And now Frazier has been given a UN job, a clear conflict of interest right after her (non) oversight position on the UN Security Council. We'll have more on this.

 More on Lazzarini's tenure: management assessment report prepared by two individual independent consultants showed several serious violations and mismanagement.  The report was requested and paid by the German government via GIZ.

 After several attempts by Lazzarini to intervene with the findings, the report was hidden.  Instead of handling the serious issues, he decided to call for a team building exercise which included cooking class for his Snr Directors.  Directors who do not agree with him and his deputy are marginalized and eventually pushed out.  Those who maintain bad relations with the communities and staff are promoted.  An example of this promotion is the most recent appointment of Dorothe Kalaus (Germany) to the director of Lebanon field. 

  Briefly before the arrival of Lazzarini, Christian Saunders was appointed by his friend the Secretary General as acting Commissioner-General for UNRWA.  During his acting period, he added more than $100 million annually as unjustified additional costs.  This is all in the middle of a serious funding crisis which was threatening the existence of the Agency.   In addition, Saunders intervened in appointments of several of his friends.

  Brian Baker, a national of the UK and a former UNICEF staff member, was moved out of Gaza a few years back for his problems with the community.  He was interviewed in Jan 2019 for a P5 position of chief security.  The Panel found him unsuitable and opted for another candidate of an Egyptian nationality. 

Less than a year later, Brian was appointed as a Director of Security and Risk management with a fraud process orchestrated by the Director of Human Resources Antonino Brusa who is a friend and a former colleague of Brian Baker.    The process was a fraud.  The head of the Panel was a UNICEF staff and the then direct supervisor of Brian Baker.  He was invited  by Brusa to chair a panel.   There was never in the history of the Agency such an action.  Panel members disagreed with the chair (Brian's supervisor at UNICEF) and did not select Brian.  Antonino Brusa informed the panel members that lets send the case to the acting commissioner-general for his decision.  Saunders overruled the panel members' views and approved the appointment of Brian Baker at D1 level.

  That same person did not qualify for a P5 with the same agency a few months earlier.    Baker within months of his appointment, fired the Egyptian P5 person who competed against him.  With fabricated accusations and in close coordination with friend Antonino Brusa, the investigation took a couple of weeks for a final decision to be approved with dismissal. 

This way, Baker got rid of his first target.  A few months later, Brian Baker seeks a recruitment of a local consultant and he publishes an announcement for that position.  He selected his preferred candidate and offered her a contract valued at approximately usd 1300 monthly.  She turned down the contract.  Brian writes to HR and informs them that he intends to cancel the vacancy instead of proceeding with the second selected candidate.  A couple of weeks later, he replaced the vacancy with an international consultancy with a monthly fee of USD 5000.  After he announces the vacancy, HR asks him to shortlist candidates.

 Brian strongly refuses to do so and gets the approval of the Director of HR to proceed with the recruitment of the same selected candidate of the local consultant.  Two contracts are attached.  Same candidate, same ToRs, different value with more than 300% increase.    The Director of HR intentionally ignores those violations and approves whatever his friend wants.    Baker continues with his actions without any questioning by any of the Snr. Management people.  He then brings another friend from UNICEF Yara Dababneh on another consultancy contract.

 Less than a year later Yara receives a P4 contract with external relations with the help of Brian.   The Director of HR brings in another UNICEF former colleague in a fabricated pre-planned process.  Julliette Touma who holds a fake Palestinian nationality ( in reality she holds an Israeli citizenship but she was able to receive a Palestinian travel document and not a nationality).  She records her nationality with UNRWA as Palestinian and she was appointed at D1 level. 

Ms.Touma was originally assisted by her friend from OCHA ( David Shearer who was DSRSG for UNAMI Iraq) to become an international staff of the UN at P2 level in yet another fake process. He wanted her to move from GS6 position directly to P4 but then agreed to a P2 due to her lack of experience.   After serving UNICEF regional office in Jordan, she was asked to seek another opportunity outside of UNICEF.  Her friend Brusa immediately picked her up to become the spokesperson and the director of communications for UNRWA.    In Syria field office, UNRWA tribunal issued a judgment related to violation and abuse of power.

 A Selection of a senior staff was found incorrect by the Advisory Committee of HR.  While digging into the qualifications, they discovered that the selected staff provided false information on her CV.  The director of HR, Brusa lets the case rest for a couple of months and then agreed with the deputy director of Syria office to offer that same candidate a contract.  One of the non selected staff appealed the decision to the tribunal and won her case.  The judgment calls for accountability for those who violated the process.

  Lazzarini does nothing to this date and the selected staff remained at her new job in Syria.  

 The whistleblowers updated Inner City Press and, they hoped, the member states:

"Dear Matthew,   We thank you for your help and your efforts to present the truth about corruptions within the UN.  WE appreciate your help.  Noone else seems to care and not even the official channels of the UN.  Corruption seems to become a norm.  We are seeking your help to get this information and the previous ones to parliaments of donor countries.  They must investigate the spending of their taxpayer money.  It is not reaching the beneficiaries.  This is incredible and cannot continue.    Following your article, Yara quit her post.  Clearly she and Brian know well that her recruitment was fraud.  However, Brian and Yara are now on "official' travel to Lebanon together before her departure at the end of March.    The case of corruption of Brian which relates to offering two different contracts with two values to the same person is still pending with the investigation department.  It is clear they want to hide it and not investigate it.  This is because a person called Niel is back to UNRWA as an investigator and he is friends with Brian Baker.  Baker continues to act as a thug with full protection of the director of Human Resources Antonino Brusa.   A new investigation of possible retaliation with Brian Baker was triggered but all indications show a prefabricated outcome to protect him.  

  On the lady who lied about her nationality.  She managed to fire or push out another lady who served UNRWA for more than 10 years and was responsible to get  a lot of funding to the Agency.  Julliet Touma discovered that one of her team members is married to her ex-boyfriends.  Touma bullied that staff member until she quit under duress.      The main question is When will donors act and demand investigations?"  When, indeed.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Last UNSG Election Was Stolen by Guterres With Promises to Tyrants and Vows to Ban Press


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

UN GATE, Dec 25 – As inside the increasingly marginal United Nations a process begins to select a successor to Antonio Guterres who stole the post from female candidates in 2016 and drove the UN into the ground including through censorship, it is time to review the history. 

   Inner City Press, which Guterres banned from the UN as it reported on his links with briber CEFC China Energy and to sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, both convicted in the SDNY Federal court, closely covered Guterres' dubious selection, and after.  A book is forthcoming, soon - but here's from Chapter One, in which Guterres steals the election for UNSG from female candidates, by making promises to tyrants.

     Amid much talk of the UN finally having a female Secretary General, and with a half dozen female candidates putting their names forward, Antonio Guterres in April 2016 came to UN Headquarters in New York to try to steal the post. 

  While pontificating about the need for the UN to improve its communications, he had no Twitter account. His lead spokesperson / propagandist, Melissa Fleming, would go on to brag how she could get UN critics taken off the Big Tech companies' platforms.

 (Inner City Press did in fact later have all of its books including about Ghislaine Maxwell and Antonio Guterres' UN (Maximum Maxwell), about Guterres' Deputy Aminda J. Mohammed (Identity Thieves) and about Guterres and China (Belt & Roadkill) taken down.) 

    But Inner City Press didn't know that yet. It had asked Guterres questions on-camera at the UN Security Council stakeout when he was head of UNHCR, on February 26, 2015, about the treatment of middle income countries like Lebanon and Tunisia at the International Monetary Fund, where Inner City Press was and still is a registered correspondent invited to ask questions including remotely by WebEx, as it is denied by Guterres' Fleming.  

 In the first straw polls in the Security Council, Guterres had no fewer than three "discourage" votes against him. However, after secret meetings with P5 members China and Russia, the discouraging votes disappeared.    

Candidates like Helen Clark, and Kristalina Georgina who would go on to head the IMF and answer Press questions, were passed over. The UN was about to be Gutted.

More on X for Subscribers here and on Substack here

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Blocks Inner City Press Questions to Somalia Ambassador Osman on Prog...

VLOG 1/2 Luigi Mangione SDNY Qs 1/9. Mamdani v Pinnacle- & Flagstar? Som...

Friday, December 26, 2025

Imran Ahmed Christmas Eve Order to Show Cause on Sanctions Reportedly Signed in SDNY


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 26 – At 7 pm on Christmas Eve, lawyers for Imran Ahmed filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which Inner City Press closely covers, even on holidays. 

  The lawsuit seeks to enjoin the US from expelling or sanctioning Imran Ahmed for his work at the Center for Countering Digital Hate. 

  As of December 26 it has yet to be assigned to a District Judge. But Judge Vernon S. Broderick, the Part 1 Judge for the week, reported signed the Temporary Restraining Order early on Christmas Day and set a hearing for sometime on Monday, December 29.  

As of noon on December 26, Judge Broderick's Order was not public in PACER. Apparently, Imran Ahmed's lawyers distributed the order to some media (it is not on the law firm's website). We aim to have more on this.

  The case is Ahmed v. Rubio, et al., 1:25-cv-10705 (Unassigned)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

PayPal Hid Small Community Reinvestment Act Plan for Utah Bank Until Fair Finance FOIA


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

FEDERAL COURT, Dec 26 – PayPal wants to open a bank - but tried to keep secret its Community Reinvestment Act plan.

  On December 16 Fair Finance Watch commented against PalPal's proposal, to the FDIC (which is moving to cut out the public) and to the Utah Department of Financial Institution.

 While the FDIC had not responded, two days later, the Utah agency sent the "public" portion of the application. But the CRA Plan was called "confidential." Inner City Press immediately sought it under FOIA / GRAMA:


On behalf of Fair Finance Watch and in my personal capacity, this is a request under the Utah Government Records Access and Management Act, §63-2-101 et seq., for a copy of PayPal Bank's Community Reinvestment Act plan. FFW is a timely commenter on the application, but just learned that the part it most wants to see, the CRA plan, is for some reason being withheld. What is PayPal ashamed of?

On December 26, after the GRAMA request, the Utah agency sent Fair Finance Watch PayPal's draft CRA Plan, and we see why they tried to hide it. It proposes a very small assessment area for business as large as PayPal, and that a program of $85,000 by it should get it an "Outstanding" rating. No.

PayPay's draft CRA plan, with Inner City Press' DocumentCloud not working for it, is for now on Patreon here We'll have more on this.

Tellingly, still no response from the FDIC.

Before that, this comment (also to the FDIC) -

 On behalf of Fair Finance Watch, this is a timely comment in opposition to the application to charter the proposed PayPal Bank Industrial Bank:  Consider both the complaints about PayPal, and about the difficulty of complaining about or even to PayPal: "It was extremely difficult to close my Paypal account and Paypal Credit account even after I experienced fraud. Someone was charging the credit card connected to the Paypal account. Even though Paypal notified me of fraudulent activities, I got the run around when I requested to close both accounts. ... Paypal customer service? Customer Service does not exist except to make things even more complicated. So I am screwed, my friend is screwed and Paypal is richer by 750$…nice BTW, I am a 76 yr old disabled veteran living on social security…needed this $$ badly to survive…I guess Paypal needed it more. F%#* Paypal…
 And, from the closing-down CFPB: "My PayPal account suffered account take over. Unfortunately the app or website doesnt allow to change tel numbers, information, removed stores cards etc. I submitted a claim onto PayPal, as I noticed an erroneous telephone number, I could not change that and/nor have heard back from PayPal. Since I suffered an account take cover and I reported this to PayPall, this should have been remediated immediately. Hasnt happened yet!" No public response https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/consumer-complaints/search/detail/8234624    This is not a company that should be given a bank or ILC charter with no public benefit, no real CRA plan.    Fair Finance Watch is hereby timely requesting public hearings, and that we be emailed a complete copy of the application. 

 On the current record, PayPal's proposal could not legitimately be approved.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Volker Turk Collaborated in Press Ban Staff Pan His Mediation Room amid Guterres Layoffs


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack


UN GATE, Dec 24 –  How corrupt and decrepit has the UN system become under Antonio Guterres, in this case due to Guterres? Today's example is again from the Office of the High Commission for Human Rights, to which Guterres appointed his unqualified crony Volker Turk more than two years ago.


 From OHCHR staff: "Dear Matthew Russell Lee - Help us to expose how bad the situation has become on OHCHR under Guterres’ crony Volker Turk. 350 fired this year and more lined up for 2016. “Small moments of clarity can be enough to transform stress into perspective” writes Volker Turk in X as he gets his meditation room in UN Geneva. Those are his priorities. Meditation as he sinks OHCHR confirm Volker Turk lacks touch with reality. His words are a ridiculous and cruel slap in the face to more than 350 junior (and mainly female P2 and P3 including soc and pregnant ones) fired in 2025. Meditation will be no consolation for them or for their families.


Perspective is useful to review his performance as High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2025: deficit doubled from 45 to 97 million dollars in one year, all cash reserves were spent in expensive units like his “Analític Hub” (the fact that it was established in the most expensive duty station, Geneva, same as with his questioned “Investigations Branch”, is testament of how money has been wasted), most field presences have lost capacity to pay for expenses in Geneva and in Colombia all field offices closed and 70% of the staff fired, globally OHCHR is irrelevant as the High Commissioner models after his master SG Guterres who has made the UN invisible.


Stress is what 350 young colleagues fired face. Perspective is, against the Controller’s instructions, not one single ASG, D2, D1 or P5 have been part of the mass dismissal in OHCHR.  Stress is what 120 staff and their families face as they have been threatened  “relocate or will be fired”.  Perspective is the Cleptocracy headed by Volker Turk and his cronies including Nada al Nashif, Kim Taylor, Maarit Kohonen, Peggy Hicks, Mahamane Cisse Gouro, Michael Camilleri, Matthias Behnke, Francesco Motta, Dimiter Chalev, Abdul Aziz Thioye, Juliette de Rivero, Scott Campbell, Beatrix Balbin, Veronica Birga and those who run OHCHR like a family affair. 


Earmarked money is routinely deviated to cover financial holes. Reprisals against whistleblowers are tolerated routinely. Do not forget, Volker Turk’s term ends in September 2026, watch out Master Guterres does not extend him as his farewell present. The UN needs a new High Commissioner for Human Rights before Volker Turk and his gang destroy the Office and deplete all the accounts."


Inner City Press re-applied to re-enter the UN on June 19, 2025 - no answer at all from Melissa Fleming, Tel Mekel, Stephane Dujarric. Today's UN is corrupt.





***


Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.


sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com