By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive Series
UNITED NATIONS, February 19 -- When self-styled Burundi facilitator William Mkapa drew up a list of participants, he allowed Pierre Nkunrunziza to in essence choose his interlocutors, making their participation contingent on Nkurunziza granting them provisional immunity.
This and Burundi's request to Tanzania to have opponents arrested should be raised in the February 23 UN Security Council meeting about Burundi. But it will be behind closed doors, and penholder France's constant quote when Inner City Press asks is the vague "we never give up."
In Burundi, government electricity and water authority (Regideso) employee Lydia Nibogora was murdered and dumped. Sources Inner city Press has come to trust say it is because she blew the whistle on corruption. There should be an investigation, but where is the UN? We'll have more on this.
Inner City Press on February 17 asked, video here, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: not only is the Government of Burundi not going, but there's a letter, at least that's online, from the embassy of Burundi in Tanzania asking the Government to arrest anyone that's been indicted by… by the Burundian Government. So, I wanted to know… I know that you'd said that the UN is trying various things, but now that an actual formal request has been made, what can the UN… does Mr. [Benjamin] Mkapa… does that… was that a commitment that he made on behalf of the Government of Tanzania not to arrest anyone? Or have, in fact, people been invited to a place where they can be arrested?
Deputy Spokesman: Well, I told you what our efforts were on that, and that it did not involve carrying out any of the arrest warrants. And beyond that, as I think I said yesterday, we do regret the decision by Burundi to decline attendance of the consultations that are being held in Arusha.
Inner City Press: But, I guess my question is that people are worried because they don't understand if Mr. Mkapa saying… does he have the ability to commit that people are not going to be arrested, given that they… he convened them there and now there's a request that they be arrested?
Deputy Spokesman: Well, I've already described what our approach is on this. I don't speak for President Mkapa, so you'd have to address that question to him.
Inner City Press: Right, but what would the UN say to opponents for future talks? Because, obviously, this is an attempt by the Burundian Government to make future talks impossible given the threat of arrest.
Deputy Spokesman: That's your interpretation. What I'm suggesting is that what we're trying to do is make sure that any talks are as inclusive as they possibly can be, and we'll continue to press for that.
Inner City Press: But, who would go to talks if they can be arrested? I guess I'm just saying… you're saying it's an interpretation, but it seems pretty self-defeating to go to be arrested.
Deputy Spokesman: Yes, which is why we are not… we're against that particular proposition, but we are continuing to push for, like I said, as inclusive a format for any talks as possible.
Deputy Spokesman: Well, I told you what our efforts were on that, and that it did not involve carrying out any of the arrest warrants. And beyond that, as I think I said yesterday, we do regret the decision by Burundi to decline attendance of the consultations that are being held in Arusha.
Inner City Press: But, I guess my question is that people are worried because they don't understand if Mr. Mkapa saying… does he have the ability to commit that people are not going to be arrested, given that they… he convened them there and now there's a request that they be arrested?
Deputy Spokesman: Well, I've already described what our approach is on this. I don't speak for President Mkapa, so you'd have to address that question to him.
Inner City Press: Right, but what would the UN say to opponents for future talks? Because, obviously, this is an attempt by the Burundian Government to make future talks impossible given the threat of arrest.
Deputy Spokesman: That's your interpretation. What I'm suggesting is that what we're trying to do is make sure that any talks are as inclusive as they possibly can be, and we'll continue to press for that.
Inner City Press: But, who would go to talks if they can be arrested? I guess I'm just saying… you're saying it's an interpretation, but it seems pretty self-defeating to go to be arrested.
Deputy Spokesman: Yes, which is why we are not… we're against that particular proposition, but we are continuing to push for, like I said, as inclusive a format for any talks as possible.
Inner City Press on February 16 asked, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: the Government itself has said it's not going to participate. So I wanted to know if you have any kind of update to what you said yesterday. And, also, a Burundian minister has visited refugees in Uganda. This has given rise to protests, because there's a sense that… that, by visiting people that fled the country in fear of their lives, there's essentially a threat to them to be repatriated or refouled back to Burundi. I wanted to know if the UN has a view on that. And, finally, I'd asked some weeks ago about a guy called Budigi, a Burundian military figure that was involved in the burning down of Radio Publique Africaine. And it's, again, reported by Radio Publique Africaine that this Nicolas Budigi is part of UN CAR, the UN Mission in Central African Republic. And so Stéphane had said he'd look into it. I wanted to know, have you found out that this… whether or not… can you confirm that the guy is there? And, if not, what does it say about the vetting that's being conducted by DPKO (Department of Peacekeeping Operations)?
Deputy Spokesman: Yes, our peacekeeping colleagues have been looking into this matter. I think they're trying to gather details on this now. Once we have that, we'll let you know. Regarding the participation by the parties in the Arusha talks, we do regret the decision by any invited participant to decline attendance of the consultations to be held in Arusha under the auspices of the East African Community (EAC) and facilitated by former Tanzanian President Benjamin Mkapa. We urge the parties to demonstrate the necessary flexibility to make a negotiated solution possible, and the UN will continue to support the process led by the EAC.
Deputy Spokesman: Yes, our peacekeeping colleagues have been looking into this matter. I think they're trying to gather details on this now. Once we have that, we'll let you know. Regarding the participation by the parties in the Arusha talks, we do regret the decision by any invited participant to decline attendance of the consultations to be held in Arusha under the auspices of the East African Community (EAC) and facilitated by former Tanzanian President Benjamin Mkapa. We urge the parties to demonstrate the necessary flexibility to make a negotiated solution possible, and the UN will continue to support the process led by the EAC.
On February 14, after Inner City Press asked a second time (and about the constitution, here), the UN sent Inner City Press this response, which we publish in full: "Special Adviser Benomar is in Arusha at the invitation of the Facilitator, former President Benjamin Mkapa, to support his efforts. The Facilitator has invited both the government and opposition and offered assurances to those members of the opposition who are on a Burundian Government arrest warrant list that they will not face arrest or extradition while in Tanzania."
Meanwhile, an Nkurunziza minister is "visiting" refugees who fled Nkurunziza into Uganda, giving rise to protests.
Inner City Press first asked the UN's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq on February 13 how the UN can support this. With the answer UNclear, and just before Haq called Inner City Press an obsessive a*hole, Inner City Press asked him, from the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: The other thing I wanted to ask about was on the Burundi talks is, you'd said yesterday that the UN is doing everything possible to make sure they're inclusive and that there shouldn't be preconditions. And I wanted to get your response now. The ruling party, CNDD-FDD, has said, quote, we are not going to sit with people who are under arrest warrants. So this means that the peop… that… that exactly what you were saying yesterday you're opposed to will take place in these talks. And I wanted to know, will Mr. [Jamal] Benomar nonetheless attend? Will there still be UN funds to support a process in which large parts of the opposition are not allowed to participate?
Deputy Spokesman: We'll check with Mr. Benomar what his intentions are on that.
Deputy Spokesman: We'll check with Mr. Benomar what his intentions are on that.
From the February 14 UN's transcript:
Inner City Press: In Burundi, the talks that are re-beginning, there's a list out of the participants, but it says at the bottom of the lists that the… the opposition's attendance is contingent on discussions with Pierre Nkurunziza to grant conditional immunity. Since the UN is supporting this process, is it really a process if one side gets to choose who from the other side can attend? What is the role of the UN in ensuring inclusivity of the talks?
Deputy Spokesman: We have stressed and will continue to stress the need for all talks to be inclusive. And we want, therefore, all people to be able to participate in a manner that is not conditional.
Inner City Press: But, what is… I mean, conditioned on immunity. This is a letter… this is a document from Mr. [Benjamin] Mkapa, and he seems to be accepting that Pierre Nkurunziza can choose who can attend.
Deputy Spokesman: We're in touch with the parties, and we're doing what we can to ensure that talks will be as inclusive as possible.
Deputy Spokesman: We have stressed and will continue to stress the need for all talks to be inclusive. And we want, therefore, all people to be able to participate in a manner that is not conditional.
Inner City Press: But, what is… I mean, conditioned on immunity. This is a letter… this is a document from Mr. [Benjamin] Mkapa, and he seems to be accepting that Pierre Nkurunziza can choose who can attend.
Deputy Spokesman: We're in touch with the parties, and we're doing what we can to ensure that talks will be as inclusive as possible.
So what is the UN doing?
On top of Mkapa's attempt to up his pay to $1500 a day, and inclusion in his team of a person named in a previous UN sanctions report for DR Congo, there are more and more questions about this facilitation. But the UN, which "supports" it, won't even disclose the delay and blocking of its visas.
Herve Ladsous, the fourth French national in a row to run UN Peacekeeping, overrode recommendations and continues to pay the Nkurunziza government for Burundian peacekeepers accused of 25 rapes in the Central African Republic. This is calling out for action and cuts, and a re-thinking of how and by whom UN Peacekeeping should be run. Watch this site.
While the UN claims, even now, that it vets the peacekeepers it deploys before it deploys them, it has already had to repatriate a number, from Burundi. On January 24 Inner City Press asked about another, but the UN in its transcript didn't even take down the name. Video here,UN transcript here and below.
At the confirmation hearing for Nikki Haley, nominee as US Ambassador to the UN, on January 18 Haley three times said that countries whose peacekeepers abuse should not keep getting paid.
Inner City Press asked the UN and UK about this, with the example of the UN having chosen to keep paying Burundi for 800 troops even after the UN's own inquiry charged 25 rapes by Burundian soldiers in the Central African Republic.
UK Ambassador Matthew Rycroft signaled agreement, that sexual abuse by peacekeepers should be met by repatriation. Tweeted video here. But simply to be replaced by troops from the same country, to get paid?
(During Rycroft's answer, there was a smirk at the mention of Burundi, from US state media that's had John Kerry on its Board - perhaps aflashback to Liberians, here. We may have more on this.)
UN deputy spokesman Farhan Haq called it a "case by case" decision, tweeted video here. But who decided it, and why? Look to Herve Ladsous, the fourth Frenchman in a row atop UN Peacekeeping.
UN deputy spokesman Farhan Haq called it a "case by case" decision, tweeted video here. But who decided it, and why? Look to Herve Ladsous, the fourth Frenchman in a row atop UN Peacekeeping.
From January 17: Video here; UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: You may have seen that Burundi has announced it's going to withdraw 5,400 troops from AMISOM [African Union Mission in Somalia]. They're saying they're not being paid. The European Union says that they, in fact… the soldiers are being paid, just the Government is not able to take a cut of it because they believe the Government is in violation of various human rights issues. What has the UN, which itself has peacekeepers… what does it think about the standoff? Does it believe that it's legitimate for a funder of a peacekeeping operation to say we'll pay the people directly so that the Government doesn't get a cut, particularly in the case of Burundi where the UN has decided not to use Burundian police officers in CAR [Central African Republic]?
Deputy Spokesman: Well, regarding the question of how these troops are to be paid, that's a matter that needs to be resolved ultimately with the European Union, which is responsible for the payment issue, and with the African Union. So, that's not really something which we would comment on. Of course, we believe that all troops performing such tasks need to be paid.
Inner City Press: But, you have… I guess my question is, in the Central African Republic, the UN is still paying the Pierre Nkurunziza Government for the use of these 800-some peacekeepers, and you have another major, you know, admittedly, not the UN, but the EU saying this is a Government that would, you know, predictably use this funding to commit human rights violations. Does the UN disagree?
Deputy Spokesman: We… if we were to receive reports of problems with payments getting to our peacekeeping troops, we would act upon that accordingly. Whenever we pay Governments, as a general policy, we do that on the assurance that those… that that money will go to the peacekeeping troops.
Inner City Press: Just one final question. What… what's the UN's understanding of the percentage that's kept by governments before they pass it through to… because it's not 100 per cent. I think you know that. So, what percentage of withholding is appropriate, according to the UN?
Deputy Spokesman: That not something that we calculate or advise on. That a decision made by different Governments.
Deputy Spokesman: Well, regarding the question of how these troops are to be paid, that's a matter that needs to be resolved ultimately with the European Union, which is responsible for the payment issue, and with the African Union. So, that's not really something which we would comment on. Of course, we believe that all troops performing such tasks need to be paid.
Inner City Press: But, you have… I guess my question is, in the Central African Republic, the UN is still paying the Pierre Nkurunziza Government for the use of these 800-some peacekeepers, and you have another major, you know, admittedly, not the UN, but the EU saying this is a Government that would, you know, predictably use this funding to commit human rights violations. Does the UN disagree?
Deputy Spokesman: We… if we were to receive reports of problems with payments getting to our peacekeeping troops, we would act upon that accordingly. Whenever we pay Governments, as a general policy, we do that on the assurance that those… that that money will go to the peacekeeping troops.
Inner City Press: Just one final question. What… what's the UN's understanding of the percentage that's kept by governments before they pass it through to… because it's not 100 per cent. I think you know that. So, what percentage of withholding is appropriate, according to the UN?
Deputy Spokesman: That not something that we calculate or advise on. That a decision made by different Governments.
So there are no limits at all? Except if a government takes 100% and the peacekeepers complain they got nothing? We'll have more on this.
As Burundi "facilitator" William Mkapa reconvened talks, the attendees list obtained by Inner City Press shows not only Ken Vitisia, of whom we're previously written, but also Francis Mnodolwa.
Inner City Press previously on December 29 asked the UN's holdover spokesman Stephane Dujarric to comment on the inclusion of an individual listed in the November 2009 DR Congo sanctions Group of Experts report, without answer. (Dujarric answered only two and a half of the 22 questions Inner City Press submitted: and those only to defend Ban Ki-moon and himself.)
Now, from Paragraph 74 of that report:
"The Group has been informed by several sources, including a source close to Mr. Ndagundi, that he has close links to the ruling Counseil national pour la défense de la démocratie-forces pour la défense de la démocratie (CNDD-FDD) party in
Burundi.. Mr. Ndagundi.s Burundian telephone records also show 27 communications from April to September 2009 between himself and the number used by Francis Ndoluwa, the ambassador of the United Republic of Tanzania to Burundi, a former general in the Tanzanian military. A source close to Mr. Ndagundi informed the Group that he works closely with the Ambassador."
Burundi.. Mr. Ndagundi.s Burundian telephone records also show 27 communications from April to September 2009 between himself and the number used by Francis Ndoluwa, the ambassador of the United Republic of Tanzania to Burundi, a former general in the Tanzanian military. A source close to Mr. Ndagundi informed the Group that he works closely with the Ambassador."
So there is yet another of Mkapa's team that is close to the CNDD-FDD.
On January 16, Inner City Press asked the UN's deputy spokesman Farhaq Haq, video here, UN Transcript here.
On January 11, long after the UN Security Council ostensibly mandated the deployment to Burundi of 228 UN Police, no progress had been made. Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: Has there been any progress in deploying the 226 police that the Security Council also mandated for Burundi to Burundi? Do you have any update on that?
Spokesman: No. None that I can report. Go ahead. Last one.
Spokesman: No. None that I can report. Go ahead. Last one.
While corpses are found in Burundi and the government blocks the deployment of both the UN Police and UN Conflict Prevention staff ostensibly called for by the UN Secretariat and Security Council, the government's supporters try to side with either UN censors like Under Secretary General Cristina Gallach, who evicted and restricts the Press which reports on Burundi, or more generally UN staff.
It is more than a little ironic. UN staff are being PNG-ed and having visas denied from Burundi.
While the UN says little and does nothing about this, they made a point of ordering Inner City Press to stop broadcasting on Periscope, with voice-over, a Town Hall meeting with new Secretary General Antonio Guterres, which was on the UN's public UN Webcast website. And the government supporters, saying Inner City Press entered the meeting (it didn't) and picking up on the anti-Press maze Cristina Gallach of Spain and DPI has created, piled on. The UN of Gallach has brought this on; this is how the UN is perceived and to this has it sunk.
There is also a strange announcement of a 500 Euros loan being arranged from a shadowy, seemingly dormant company “Biz Planners.” We'll have more on this.
Benjamin Mkapa as Burundi mediator has kept his mind on his money, and his money on his mind, even as amid assissination of minister, closing down of NGOs. Well placed sources exclusively teold Inner City Press that Mkapa demanded a raise -- up to $1500 a day -- and was rejected.
Mkapa then took his demand to the East African Community heads of state. Will he get the payday? By declaring Pierre Nkurunziza legitimate because Ambassadors still present their credential to him, Mkapa is working for the money. But $1500 a day?
There are other of his advisers gunning for up to $500 a day, including one who is said to have previously help arm CNDD-FDD related groups. Yes, we'll have more on this.
On January 4, Inner City Press asked about the Security Council's (lack of) Follow through on Burundi, to Ambassador Delattre of France, the "penholder" on Burundi. Tweeted video here.
Benjamin Mkapa as Burundi mediator has kept his mind on his money, and his money on his mind, even as amid assissination of minister, closing down of NGOs. Well placed sources exclusively teold Inner City Press that Mkapa demanded a raise -- up to $1500 a day -- and was rejected.
Mkapa then took his demand to the East African Community heads of state. Will he get the payday? By declaring Pierre Nkurunziza legitimate because Ambassadors still present their credential to him, Mkapa is working for the money. But $1500 a day?
There are other of his advisers gunning for up to $500 a day, including one who is said to have previously help arm CNDD-FDD related groups. Yes, we'll have more on this.
On January 4, Inner City Press asked about the Security Council's (lack of) Follow through on Burundi, to Ambassador Delattre of France, the "penholder" on Burundi. Tweeted video here.
