Thursday, January 12, 2017

On Burundi, ICP Asks UN of ITEKA Closed, Posts UNfunded, Nothing


By Matthew Russell Lee, Follow Up to Exclusives

UNITED NATIONS, January 3 -- Benjamin Mkapa as Burundi mediator has kept his mind on his money, and his money on his mind, even as amid assissination of minister, closing down of NGOs. Well placed sources exclusively teold Inner City Press that Mkapa demanded a raise -- up to $1500 a day -- and was rejected.

Mkapa then took his demand to the East African Community heads of state. Will he get the payday? By declaring Pierre Nkurunziza legitimate because Ambassadors still present their credential to him, Mkapa is working for the money. But $1500 a day?

   There are other of his advisers gunning for up to $500 a day, including one who is said to have previously help arm CNDD-FDD related groups. Yes, we'll have more on this.

On January 3, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric - set to hold over for a full six months - the Burundi questions he refused to answer between Christmas and New Year's. Video here.  From the UN transcript:

Inner City Press: on Burundi I wanted to ask or re-ask some of the things I’d asked you between Christmas and New Year’s.  One is, has… there was an order by the Government to severely crack down on any “foreign NGOs” (non-governmental organizations).  And then today there’s an order that a longstanding Burundian NGO, ITEKA, has been outlawed.  So I wanted to know if the UN has any comment on that.  Also the President [Pierre] Nkurunziza statement that he may run for President again in 2020.  And, finally, in the budget committee on 23 December, the posts that were proposed by Ban Ki-moon for the Special Adviser in Burundi were, in fact, not funded, nor the police, and I wanted to know, what was his comment on that?  And what will the new Secretary-General do to follow through?

Spokesman:  What I can tell you on Burundi that we, obviously, deeply regret the decision by the National Assembly of Burundi to adopt a law restricting activities of international non-governmental organizations, including the imposition of registration and reporting requirements, as well as limitations on the ability of such organizations to hire and pay staff.  We’re concerned that the enactment of this law could impede or even threaten the continued free operation of important organizations that are working to assist the Burundian people.  On the statements by President Nkurunziza, we have no specific state… comment at this time.

Inner City Press: it seems like you may be a couple of news cycles behind, because today this longstanding forum by a former leader of the country, a group called ITEKA, has itself been outlawed so…

Spokesman:  I think we… obviously, as you could tell from what I’ve just said, we are obviously extremely supportive of civil society and the need for a civil society and NGOs to operate freely.

Inner City Press:  What about the post…? [inaudible: this is how the UN transcribed about its failure to follow through on posts or positions, police, that it itself proposed. Total failure.]

Spokesman:  I don’t have anything on that.

  Meanwhile the day after the Washington Post story reviewing the UN deployments of Burundi human rights abusers to the Central African Republic, Inner City Press on the morning of December 27 asked three UN spokespeople in writing:

"Yesterday the Washington Post reported among other things:

“The U.N. human rights office “has raised serious concerns about alleged human rights violations committed by the officers during the violent demonstrations which started in Burundi since April 2015,” said a memo obtained by The Post dated Feb. 5, 2016, and issued by Lt. Gen. Maqsood Ahmed of the U.N. peacekeeping office in New York. The memo, which ordered the repatriation of Niyonzima and the two other men, was first disclosed by New York-based Inner City Press.”

Given your Office's response to Inner City Press at a noon briefing on August that Mayuyu has not on any roster, please explain who in the UN was responsible for providing this false information."

  A week later, there was no answer at all.

Amid human rights abuses in Burundi and the Central African Republic, on November 23 Inner City Press exclusively reported and documented that the United Nations has told the Burundian government of Pierre Nkurunziza it must replace, and cannot deploy to CAR, nine officers.

Inner City Press exclusively obtained and published the UN's confidential Note Verbale with the nine names, below.  It said the UN would closely review Burundi's cooperation. But is the UN doing that?

On December 21, Inner City Press witnessed PR Albert Shingiro's long talk with France's Alexis Lamek then was told to "be balanced."

In the UN budget process, Burundi not only fought to cut funding even for the small UN presence “mandated” by the UN Security Council -- police and Special Adviser's team -- but proposed over the top language. Inner City Press, Banned from access to the General Assembly by Under Secretary General Cristina Gallach's eviction order, still through sources got a copy of the draft and exclusively tweeted a photo here.

   Burundi proposed that the “residual activities” -- many of which have never begun -- be downgraded to the UNCT (UN Country Team) in September 2017 since, Burundi said, “the political agreement is planned for signature in June 2017.”  It wants a 50% vacancy rate, and “reminds” the UN to stay impartial, an echo of Shingiro's “be balanced.” It praises the EAC (headed by a Nkurunziza loyalist) and the “Inter-Burundian dialogue.”

   The UN Secretariat of Ban Ki-moon, as established, did nothing to fight this. For the US (non) role, and a Periscope video, see here. But it has not for now passed. Still, the budget remained the same as the year before, despite what was supposedly mandated by the Security Council. No follow through by France - nor by US (Samantha) Power. We'll have more on this.

On December 23 at the last noon briefing of Ban's era of ignoring genocide, from Sri Lanka to the current risks, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman, who apparently will stay as UN spokesman, UN transcript here:

Inner City Press: there are reports that in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the FARDC engaged with and fired on and killed some Burundian soldiers who had crossed in.  And I’m… since there’s a billion-dollar peacekeeping mission there, does the UN have any information…

Spokesman:  I’m aware that the peacekeeping mission and its cost.  I’ve just not received an update here from them.  It doesn’t mean that they’re not aware or just means I have not been given an update.

  And twenty hours later, no update either. We'll continue on this.



On Burundi 21 Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq, UN transcript here: 

Inner City Press: on Burundi.  There’s reports that in a place called Kagaragara, some 500 families were… were forcibly and without notice moved out of their homes.  The Government said it’s because there are rebels nearby.  So these people are in tents.  And I’m just wondering, one, is the UN coun… team there aware of that?  And what do they say about it?  And, two, in the Fifth Committee, which is a… you know, going to come to a vote, the Government of Burundi is arguing against any deployment of this Special Adviser’s team beyond the capital, and I’m wondering, is the Secretariat aware of it?  Are they… are they somehow making their views known?  Do they believe that these people should be deployed to places like Kagaragara?

Deputy Spokesman:  Certainly, the Secretary-General believes that the team should be able to go wherever they need to go in terms of carrying out their mandate.  If there are places where we have specific human rights concerns, they need to be able to carry out their responsibilities.  Of course, the Fifth Committee’s proceedings are its own business, and we leave the matter [to] the Member States.  But we are always prepared to clarify questions for Member States on their request. And you had also asked about the incident in Kagaragara.  We don’t have a reaction to it at this point, but certainly, the monitors and our team are able to follow up as needed.  If there’s anything further that they need to say, we’ll let you know on that.

On December 15 in the UN's Fifth (Budget) Committee meeting in basement Conference Room 3, Burundi's representative - once again, not its lead Ambassador Albert Shingiro - said Pierre Nkurunziza opposes any deployment of the UN Special Adviser mission outside of the capital.

While France in the Security Council on the second floor was drafting a resolution to demand deployment of UN observers in Aleppo, Syria, it has done nothing to even seek compliance with Security Council resolution 2303. Call it Upstairs, Downstairs.

  On December 16 while Inner City Press covered an almost-comically glitzy event honoring Ban Ki-moon on Wall Street, including commentary on Burundi, South Sudan, Aleppo and the expensive Italian sports car displayed outside the event, UN thugs grabbed, threw and smashed Inner City Press' Periscope-broadcasting camera phone, with which on December 15 it tweeted this photo of Burundi's representative.

As before, the UN's cynical abuse of Press freedom under Ban Ki-moon and his head of Communication Cristina Gallach emboldens others like the Nkurunziza government. We'll have more on this.

On December 9, Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq about criticism of the Mkapa “mediation,” Tweeted video here, UN transcript here and below.

Now after the UN made light of the denial, delay and downgrading of visas, Burundi has searched the homes of diplomats and, it's said, UN functionaries. Is this cooperation? It is due to Ban Ki-moon's weakness and/or inattention as he promotes himself in VanityMoon week and for his run for South Korea president.

Many more Burundians get searched this way. But Ban's failure to uphold even his own staff member's rights is a new low for the UN, and enables what is happening in Burundi.

  Ban is untransparent as well - his spokesman Dujarric refused to answer Inner City Press on who paid for Ban's vanity photographer Giles Clarke to travel to Burundi and take photos promoting Ban and Pierre Nkurunziza?

On December 15, Innr City Press asked Dujarric, tweeted video here,UN transcript here: 

Inner City Press: I want to ask you about Burundi.  It’s been… yesterday, you’d said that the… the… under that note verbale, the… the UN is watching the country.  There are reports overnight of search… searches of the homes of diplomats and, at least in one account, it says UN functionaries.  So I wanted to know, is the UN aware of these searches by the Government?  Also of a statement in the Fifth Committee this morning by Burundi that they are opposed to the deployment of any the Special Adviser’s team to any provinces beyond the capital.  Does that fall into the cracks…?

Spokesman:  I have not seen personally the reports that you mention out of Burundi.  I will ask our colleagues on the ground.  And as I said yesterday, we’re obviously monitoring the actions of Burundi, and we’ll… a decision will be taken accordingly.

ICP Question:  But so the flights that were listed on the memo that was leaked have already taken place, the actual…?

Spokesman:  I’m not aware of the memo that was leaked.  I’m just trying to answer your question.

ICP Question:  Okay.  The flights were… can you get an update on the actual…?

Spokesman:  I will try to get as much of an update as I can. 

 On December 14, with Ban still not having answered, Inner City Press asked Ban's lead spokesman Stephane Dujarric, tweeted video hereUN transcript here: 

Inner City Press: I wanted to ask you about Burundi.  On Friday, I'd asked you about the request by the opposition there to the Secretary-General to… that the current mediator should be recused and that the UN should become more involved.  I believe you have some kind of a statement.  I wish you'd released it.  But I also wanted to ask you about the status of the UN; in its note verbale to Burundi said that they would closely watch cooperation by the Burundians with the UN system to do this deployment to the Central African Republic.  And given that it's my understanding that Burundi is denying visas to… to the UN Mission there and putting people on… on one-month tourist visas in order to keep hold over them, are they cooperating?

Spokesman:  I think the letter, from what I understand, states it, that we will be watching the situation.  I don't have an assessment to share with you.  On Burundi, I can't speak to Mr. [Benjamin] Mkapa.  Obviously, from our end, Mr. [Jamal] Benomar is mandated by the Council to support this inclusive dialogue and he will continue to work on those issues.

Inner City Press Question:  But if the note verbale said that we're watching you to have you cooperate, and I guess I'm asking you factually, do you deny that Burundi has denied visas and given one-month visas…?

Spokesman:  I'm not denying it.  What I'm saying is that the situation continues to be assessed.

On December 12, Ban's spokesperson's office canceled its daily noon briefing, and has refused to answer written questions from Inner City Press, including about Burundi. But during a closed door UN Security Council session on The Gambia, which Inner City Press alone staked out, suddenly a half dozen US Mission picked media showed up (including one, US state media Voice of America, which previously “saw Liberians” in Burundi).

   Samantha Power came out, with spokesman and three US-paid bodyguards, and launched a speech about Gambia. Not on UNTV, which global taxpayers including Americans are paying for, but for the handpicked media. Inner City Press' Periscope went dead from covering the UN General Assembly, but it managed an audio recording. Audio here.

  Inner City Press asked Samantha Power, What about Burundi where the mediator now says Pierre Nkurunziza is legitimate? But Power did not answer: no follow through. The UN and even its Security Council have become a circus that you pay for. Drain Turtle Bay.

Inner City Press: I wanted to ask you, on Burundi, on Burundi, there's now an open statement by the CNARED or… you know, the main opposition group calling explicitly open… open letter for the replacement of Mr. Mkapa or for the UN to send its own mediator.  And they're tying it to Mr. Mkapa, saying at the Bujumbura Airport, that Pierre Nkurunziza is, of course, legitimate because Ambassadors that arrive in the country present him their credentials; therefore, he's legitimate.  So they say he can't be the mediator on the topic of opposition and legitimacy if he's made such statements.  I wanted to know, is the UN aware of this call by the main opposition group and… and… it's been made before in a letter but… and what's their response to it?  Can somebody be a mediator when they've already given their opinion on the underlying question?

Deputy Spokesman:  Yes, I believe we've received a letter in regards to this particular issue in… in the past week or so.  Regarding President Mkapa, of course, he's not a UN mediator.  He has a status outside of the UN process.  But if… if Jamal Benomar has any particular views on this issue, I'll let you know.

Inner City Press:  But isn't Jamal's office charged with… with providing technical assistance to that mediation?  And if now one of the parties has gone… said public… I think the letter was written before his more recent statements…

Deputy Spokesman:  Yeah.

Inner City Press:  …about the legitimacy of Pierre Nkurunziza.

Deputy Spokesman:  And I believe Mr. Benomar is evaluating the situation.  If he has a response, we'll certainly make you know… we'll make you aware of it.

But before that, on November 14 Inner City Press reported from UN sources that 25 Burundian troops were linked to rapes in Central African Republic; on November 16 it asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq about just this number: 25.

  On December 5, Ban's lead spokesman Stephane Dujarric read out a canned statement about 16 Gabonese and, yes, 25 Burundi troops identified by OIOS.

Inner City Press asked, how can it be that the UN, led by Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, decided to bring in 800 more Burundian troops AFTER the finding of the 25? Tweeted video here.

Dujarric replied, Due process. UNreal.

On December 6, Inner City Press asked more, UN transcript here: 

Inner City Press: the way to incentivise is to say no further deployments.  I remember there was a police conference, a UN police conference, that Burundi was disinvited from, that was told not to come.  They didn't come.  They were very upset about it.  A decision was made that, based on human rights issues in the country, they shouldn't come.  What would you say to those who say this… this sexual abuse… 25 cases that OIOS finds cause to believe were sexual abuse is pretty serious and yet the response is less so than was…?

Spokesman:  I think no one here is debating the seriousness of the issue.  There is due process.  That process is being followed.  We're doing all we can to keep you updated in the most transparent way possible.  OIOS has done its investigation in the presence of Gabonese and Burundian national investigative officers.  We await with great interest the report, reporting back from those countries to see what measures have been taken.  There… I think it's important for the process to play out.  There are all sorts of different options.  We, as we've done in the past, repatriate the whole contingent.  We can also… as the resolution says, we can also block all countries from deploying again.  We can bar commanding officers from being deployed if they don't apply the right command responsibilities.  What is important is that the process plays itself out along established lines.

ICP Question:  I just say because it's kind of ironic… there are actually flights that have already been scheduled by Ethiopia Airlines to fly 800 more peacekeepers in right at this time, so I just…

Spokesman:  Well, I think you may see the irony in it.  I don't.

Inner City Press:  Is there a deadline?

Spokesman:  We've asked that they be completed within six months.

From the December 5 UN transcript:

 Inner City Press:  I want to ask you about the… the announcement you made of the sexual abuse in the CAR.  My question is about the Burundian contingent.  In around mid-November, I'd asked, I guess… looked back at it; it was Farhan [Haq] that day, about specifically that number, 25 Burundians charged, because people inside the building knew that that was the number: 25.  They said that there is strong evidence against them.  So I'm wondering, now can you explain how after that date DPKO (Department of Peacekeeping Operations) wrote a letter to Burundi saying we're going to take 800 more peacekeepers; we're watching you closely.  How is it consistent to be watching you closely… if 25 Burundian peacekeepers committed rape, isn't that grounds to not…

Spokesman:  First of all, I think we're looking at accusations., right?  I think… so that's… everyone deserves due process.  We're talking about individuals, right, who may have committed horrible crimes, and if they did, they should face… they should clearly face justice.  Following consultations with relevant offices within the system, the Secretariat has decided to continue with the deployment of Burundian troop battalion in the Central African Republic.  The deployment of the Burundian troops will remain under close review based on the evolving situation in Burundi and cooperation with the UN.  The conduct of Burundian troops in the Central African Republic will also be closely monitored.  Just to give you an example, we reviewed the names of the new incoming Burundian troops.  Nine individuals, for various reasons, were excluded at our request from the rotation.  If you look back at Security Council Resolution 2272 on sexual abuse, it gives the UN the authority to bar troops wholesale from a country.  We will… we've… we're in the middle of a process here.  We… the UN has concluded what it is responsible for.  We've concluded our investigations, and I would stress that, during those investigations, the national investigative officers from Burundi and Gabon were also present.  Once we get the information back from those two countries to see what they have done, the sort of investigations they've done, the accountability they've done for each of these alleged crimes, we'll then consider whether the various provisions of 2272 apply.  And at this point, we can't exclude any option, but we do need to let the process play itself out.

ICP Question:  But I have two… thanks.  I have two follow-ups.  One is that… is that the UN… various parts of the UN system have… has… have been critical of the judiciary process in Burundi.  For example, there are journalists missing.  There are cases… and also, over the weekend, basically, a new… It seems that the… the Arusha Accord and the constitution are being overridden in terms of the makeup between Hutu and Tutsi in the army.  This has been… I was going to ask you that separately from this.  But, given the things that are going on, it seems… I understand due process, but from my understanding, the… I guess what I'm saying is this same number, 25, is what I'd heard three weeks ago.  And so it seems like people in the system… and from what I was told, there's, in some instances, video evidence, cell phone video evidence.  So due process or not, it seems like, how desperate is the UN for peacekeepers in CAR to continue to work with this battalion that has problems at home…

Spokesman:  Whoa, whoa.  We're not… Matthew, all the people that were accused, right, have been rotated out.  They're gone, right?  We're talking… the Burundian troops that are coming in are different units; they're different people.  We've excluded people based on a review.  It's clear that no one who is accused while the process is ongoing would be allowed back.  And we expect the Burundian military to do an investigation and to bring the perpetrators to justice.

ICP Question:  But they can go to AMISOM (African Union Mission in Somalia), right?  Just one last question.  For example… that's why I've asked you before, about whether the UN is part of its financial support to AMISOM.  Has any human rights review [inaudible]…?

Spokesman:  The UN does not provide; the European Union does.

We'll have more on this - because the UN including its US/UN official Jane Holl Lute claims “zero tolerance,” that's not what this is.

   And even these 25 could redeploy to AMISOM in Somalia tomorrow. This is a joke. Zero credibility. It's impunity day everyday in Ban Ki-moon's UN.

Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokespeople questions about the note verbale in writing on November 25: no answer. On November 28, Ban's lead spokesman Stephane Dujarric told Inner City Press he would “take a look at it.” On November 29, he had nothing - but the paperwork for more deployments by and payment to the Nkurunziza government emerged.

On December 1, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric, Twitter video here, UN transcript here:

Inner City Press: in Burundi, there's an attack on the presidential adviser, Willy Nyamitwe.  And it's unclear sort of who did it.  They accused Rwanda.  There are pictures circulating today saying this was an intra-government thing by General Bunyoni's forces.  Is the UN itself looking into who attacked him?

Spokesman:  We have no way of knowing who may have committed the attack, but, obviously, regardless of who may have committed it, is something we condemn, as we condemn all forms of violence, especially political violence.

ICP Question:   I'd asked, I guess, two days ago, there's a widely, at least in Burundi, reported letter by the opposition to the Secretary-General saying that… that the Mkapa/Museveni process has not worked at all.  Today, [Benjamin] Mkapa put out another statement.  I just wanted to make sure that the Secretariat has, in fact, received a request that that process be superseded.  Is that…

Spokesman:  I will check

 And again, six hours later and counting, nothing.

On November 30, Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq, YouTube video here,  UN transcript here: 

Inner City Press: I wanted to ask you on Burundi, on Burundi, you gave the readout of Prince Zeid's statement in Geneva about the pos… the problems in Burundi.  And both… I… he and the panel of experts seem to both… to believe that the UN peacekeeping should… should stop using Burundian peacekeepers given the human rights issues both in CAR [Central African Republic] and in Burundi.

So given that I've now seen a deployment order for flights beginning on 10 December to… to, in fact, send more Burundian troops to CAR than are currently there, up to 800, and it's dated 28 November, I'm wondering, either from this podium or sometime today, can you… can the UN explain why the Secretariat and DPKO are… are… are rejecting this human rights recommendation to not take the peacekeepers and how that's consistent with Rights Up Front and consistency of the system?

Deputy Spokesman:  Well, regarding that, following consultations with all relevant offices within the UN system, the Secretariat has decided to continue with the deployment of the Burundian battalion in the Central African Republic.

The deployment of the Burundian troops will remain under close review based on the evolving situation in Burundi and cooperation with the UN.  The conduct of the Burundian troops in the Central African Republic will also be closely monitored.

And regarding what, what you've been asking about people's individual records, one thing I can say is that, following a review of the CVs of the proposed incoming battalion, nine individuals were excluded from the rotation.

ICP Question:  And I… just one follow-up, because I've seen that letter on the nine and published it.  But I wanted to ask you, I've also… since you've gone this far, since the letter, the note verbally, says it's based on cooperation by the Government of Burundi with the UN system, given this week… this past weekend's demonstration against the UN, and allegation by the ruling party that the UN is distributing weapons, and a memo that's come out showing that government employees were required to protest the UN, is that cooperation?  And who… who's reviewing it under what time frame, given that they're going to fly 2 December?

Deputy Spokesman:  We will evaluate all these developments, but regarding the weekend events, of course, you're aware of what my colleague Stéphane said at the start of this week. 

   In front of the UN Security Council on November 29 Inner City Press asked French Ambassador Francois Delattre about the protests. midtown Manhattan.  He replied that Burundi was one of the topics discussed by new Secretary General Antonio Guterres when he was in Paris. Video here. From the French Mission's transcript, this time included by them:

Inner City Press Q: What about the Burundi protests against the UN? Do you intend to do anything on Burundi, there were major protests against the UN. They said that the UN is trafficking weapons in the country, pretty much ignored the call...

Amb Delattre: We remain completely mobilized on Burundi. This was one of the topics of discussion when Antonio Guterres and then Ban Ki-moon went to Paris a few days ago. Thank you for mentioning it, this remains for us a key priority. And as we speak we work on the implementation of resolution 2303.

  We'll see.

This is an attempt by outgoing UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous to protect the Nkurunziza government and his CAR mission accused of sexual abuse from Human Rights recommendations that no more Burundian peacekeepers by used and paid by the UN.

But as even Ladsous' terms -- "full cooperation" with the UN - was immediately rejected by the Nkurunziza goverment with a mandated protest of the UN scheduled for November 26 - Ban Ki-moon's UN stayed silent.

On November 28, after Ban's spokespeople left entirely unanswered the Burundi questions Inner City Press submitted to them on the morning of November 25, a day on which they got paid, Inner City Press at the (next) noon briefing asked Ban's lead spokesman Stephane Dujarric, UN transcript here:

Inner City Press:   I have some questions on Burundi, many of which I sent to your office on Friday and were not answered.  One has to do with this note verbale between the UN and the Government of Burundi, where it says that nine officials are not to be deployed, but says that the rest of the things can be deployed but will be subject to the full cooperation of the Government of Burundi with the UN system.  And, as you know, on Saturday, there was a protest in Burundi at which it was mandatory to attend the protest if you're a Government official, and the UN has been accused by the chairman of the ruling party of having distributed weapons in connection with what they say is a plot against them.  So I wanted to know couple of things.  Also… finally, I just want to get your answer to this.  There's a French company called OMP Solutions, which is online saying it sold uniforms and provided services for pay in connection with the Burundian deployment.  So I wanted to know how many UN Missions this French compay, they're promoting it, and many in Burundi now allege that the fact that the head of peacekeeping is from France and that this company is openly selling services only to Francophone Africa deployments creates a conflict of interest.  So those were the questions.

Spokesman:  I don't know about the company.  We can try to find out.  You can look on the procurement website to see if they do any business with the UN.  As far as any link between… conflict of interests between the fact that the head of peacekeeping may be… is French and that the company may be French, I think, is completely out of the question.

Inner City Press:  My question is…

Spokesman:  (cutting in) Mr. [Hervé] Ladsous is an international civil servant.  There are a lot of the companies that do business with the UN where its nationals are also there.  To me that's a non-issue.  On the… we've seen these reports of accusing the UN of participating in weapons trafficking.  I can tell you that we, obviously, categorically deny any allegations of weapons trafficking in Burundi, which are untrue, without basis, and extremely dangerous.  The UN has been working to support the Burundian people, with extensive humanitarian development efforts, and has also been supporting efforts to find a political solution to the crisis in Burundi.

Inner City Press:  One follow-up on that.  The reason for the follow-up is… is this, is that the letter… this note verbale, which was never announced from your platform, but we… Inner City Press obtained it and published it on Wednesday, said… it goes against what the Panel of Experts propose, which was to not use Burundian peacekeepers anymore be… due to the human rights issues.  And so, clearly, somebody… and I'd like… I think you should be able to announce… to say this.  Who overrode the human rights, given Rights Up Front and other things, who made the decision to continue the deployment?

Spokesman:  Let me take a look. I haven't seen the note verbale.  Let me take a look at it.
   By the time Ban's spokesperson's office closed hours later, nothing.

  On November 25, a day on which the UN was open and Ban Ki-moon's Spokesperson's office had many people in and getting paid, Inner City Press in the morning submitted this question:

“In Burundi tomorrow Nov 26 there is scheduled to be a demonstration against the UN Panel of Experts, in which government employees are required to participate. (Photo attached). Please before the event provide the UN Secretariat's / Ban Ki-moon's comment - and, separately, how it will be acted on under the Note Verbale about Burundian troops in MINUSCA which Inner City Press obtained and published on November 23.”

   Neither that day, nor in the two days since, has Ban Ki-moon's spokesperson's office provide any response. This as UN staff members in Burundi call in, scared of the targeting. Ban Ki-moon, Ladsous and others including UN “Communications” / censorship chief Cristina Gallach, have failed, and are responsible. #BanGenocide.

Even the UN's “Note Verbale” to the Burundian government which Inner City Press exclusively obtained and published said that “the deployment of Burundian troops to MINUSCA will remain under close review, based on the evaluation of the situation in Burundi, the full cooperation of the Government of Burundi with the entire United Nations system” -- click here for exclusive photo.

   Not only has the Pierre Nkurunziza government since the Note Verbale openly rejected the three members of the UN Panel of Experts replacing the three it previously declared Persona Non Grata -- now mandatory protests of the UN Panel have been decreed for Saturday, November 26. Letter here.

This is the opposite of the “full cooperation” Ladsous and Ban Ki-moon said is required to continue paying Burundi. So will the UN payments and deployment immediately end?

Neither Ladsous nor Ban Ki-moon have lived up to “Rights Up Front” to date. So incoming Secretary General Antonio Guterres, who should fire and replace Ladsous and Under Secretary General Cristina Gallach who has censored Inner City Press as it reports on human rights, has been written to, by the RDB to demand a new UN mediator. We'll have more on this.

There's more. Inner City Press then reported on the "100% French" firm, OMP Solutions, which makes money selling equipment, uniforms and services to Troop Contributing Countries in UN Peacekeeping operations run by Ladsous.

  Now OMP Solutions has responded to Inner City Press with this paragraph, which raises more questions than it answers:

"In 2014, Burundi was selected by the UN to take part in the “Minusca” peacekeeping operation in the Central African Republic. Burundi chose the OMP Solutions group to supply its personnel for the operation carried out on behalf of the UN. The 5-year contract between the Government of the Republic of Burundi and the OMP Solutions group involved the supply of equipment and maintenance in operational condition of this equipment, along with accompaniment for the deployment of one battalion (750 troops) and 2 Police forces (140 men per FPU). This contract covered the equipment with which the troops would be supplied (mobile kitchen, solid toilets, generators, tents, uniforms, logistical vehicles, etc.); under no circumstances were any weapons to be supplied. In July 2016, the UN decided not to relieve the Burundi Police forces present in the CAR. This meant repatriating the equipment and men to Burundi following the UN’s decision. The Buderrundi battalion should be relieved in December 2016. 95% of the equipment specified in the contract was delivered by OMP Solutions to the port of Douala in Cameroon. These goods were then transported to the theatre of operations by the UN (Sibut, Bangui) Each year, the UN dedicates nearly $7.5 billion to Peacekeeping Operations around the world. The States who want to take part in these operations submit their applications to the UN, which then examines the intervention conditions and declares whether or not the States are eligible."

  We'll have more on this. The company's website says:

"Through a global and integrated commercial offer, OMP SOLUTIONS has been implemented for African countries seeking to match all requirements set by the United Nations regarding eligibility and reimbursement for Peacekeeping Operations. OMP Solutions is a 100% French Joint-Venture bringing together the “Groupe Marck” and Ineo Support Global, a subsidiary of ENGIE, heightening the associate’s International visibility."

What safeguards are in place to ensure that Ladsous, the fourth French official in a row to head UN Peacekeeping, does not abuse the total discretion he has asserts to keep the Burundians in MINUSCA in CAR, to benefit French business? We'll have more on this.

  The UN's own Panel of Experts recommended no further UN use of Burundian peacekeepers; the Nkurunziza government declared the three panel members Persona Non Grata. When three new panel members were named this week, the UN's Dorian Lacombe, a former spokesman to Ladsous, sent it to numerous UN correspondents who do not even cover Burundi, but not to Inner City Press which does.

   This is the UN of Ban Ki-moon and his Communications chief Cristina Gallach: try to exclude, even evict and restrict, the Press which reports on human rights, and whose exclusives have been credited, for example earlier this month, by the Associated Press. This retaliation must change, and the officials responsible for it should leave.

   Here are nine Burundian officials that, “on the basis of a review of the personal history profiles” of which the UN has told Burundi's government to exclude and name replacements for by December 1:

Maj. Ferdinand NIYONGABO
Capt. Deogratias AHISHAKIYE
Capt. Epitace NDUWAMAHORO
Capt. Medico NZITUNGA
Capt. Diomede SINZUMUNSI
Capt. Jean-Marie NINDAGARITSE
Capt. Richard GATERETSE
Capt. Dieudonne NTUKAMAZIMA
Lt. Prosper NIWRUNZIZA

   Separately, Burundian who Ladsous has used in the CAR mission stand accused of sexual abuse and exploitation, as Inner City Press has also exclusively reported, here. We'll have more on this.


The UN of Ban Ki-moon can't even handle attacks on Ban's own envoys correctly, or keep its story straight. Nor will it stand by its own humanitarian staff's finding of famine.

Inner City Press was leaked an email by UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs that specifically cited famine in Kirundo and other prefectures.

But in a UN Peacekeeping Configuration meeting on November 18, OCHA's representative made a point of saying, just before Burundi's Ambassador Albert Shingiro spoke, that there is no famine in Burundi, unlike the Press has reported. The UN presentations, including by UN “resident coordinator” Paolo Lembo, ignored all the things that the UN's own Panel of Experts said make out a risk of genocide.

 So much for Ban Ki-moon's supposed “Rights Up Front” -- even Ban's son in law Siddarth Chatterjee, who Ban promoted to resident coordinator in Kenya without recusing himself, doesn't even pretend to follow “Rights Up Front” as South Sudanese are targeted and raided.