Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/una1usajobs040209.html
UNITED NATIONS, April 2 -- How much is getting a job at the UN worth? The question is raised tonight by an event at the UN Association of New York, in which $10 admission is being charged to hear to UN officials speak. The flier says, "Are you intrigued by how to get a job at the United Nations... Join for a $25 introductory membership and attend for free." Otherwise, admission is $10.
Inner City Press has written to both the UN Association of New York and to the larger UN Association of the USA (UNA-USA) of which it is a part, asking on deadline how this does not violate General Assembly Resolution 92(I), which provides that
"Members of the United Nations should take such legislative or other appropriate measures as are necessary to prevent the use, without authorization by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and in particular for commercial purposes by means of trademarks or commercial labels, of the emblem, the official seal and the name of the United Nations, and of abbreviations of that name through the use of its initial letters"
To charge admission to hear UN officials tell how to get UN jobs clearly seems to a commercial purpose.
The two UN officials, Nelly Keita and John Ericson, are part of the Office of Human Resources Management, which in turn is part of the Department of Management, headed by Angela Kane. Ms. Kane has previously said that she does not have time to answer such questions, to ask them at the UN's noon briefing.
At a recent noon briefing, UN spokesperson Michele Montas was asked the basis for the use by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and his officials of a figure of $1.6 billion as how much the U.S. owes to the UN. Ms. Montas told the reporter that she had the information upstairs, then from there said to ask UNA-USA.
So Inner City Press, along with the request on deadline to explain the $10 (or $25) charge to hear UN officials, has asked for support for and details about the $1.6 billion figure. It was used as Ban called the U.S. the "biggest deadbeat" while reading from talking points prepared, Inner City Press has been told, by the UN Information Center in Washington.
When answers are provided, they will be published on this site.
And see, www.innercitypress.com/una1usajobs040209.html
Cash Demanded from UN Job Seekers by UNA-USA, UN Speaker Has No Comment
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS, April 3 -- “Never pay money to try to get a UN job,” the man from the UN told a ballroom of job seekers ten blocks from the UN on Thursday night.
To get in to hear the man from the UN Office of Human Resources Management speak, each attendee had to pay either $10 or, in a package deal, $25 to also join the UN Association - USA. It was apparent, then, that contrary to what the man from the UN said -- as well as in seeming violation of a UN General Assembly resolution -- money was being charged to hear how to try to get a UN job.
Earlier on Thursday, a person lured to the event by a flier from UNA-USA sent the flier to Inner City Press, calling the demand for money to hear from the UN “disgusting." While that seemed a bit strong to Inner City Press -- $10 is not a huge amount of money -- it seemed surprising that an organization as intertwined with the UN as USA-USA would use the UN in this way. The flier says, "Are you intrigued by how to get a job at the United Nations... Join for a $25 introductory membership and attend for free." Otherwise, admission was listed at $10.
Inner City Press sent a question on deadline to both UNA-USA and its New York branch, asking if the charge didn't violation a UNGA resolution, 92(I). Having received no answer even after deadline, Inner City Press walked ten block to check out the event, held in the basement ballroom of Hungary's mission to the UN.
The two people manning the door demanded ten dollars from Inner City Press. Another person going in paid $25, for entrance and a membership in UNA-USA. He paid cash, as did Inner City Press, to which no receipt was offered, and no contact information taken.
Inside, two UN speakers painted a rosy picture of four month maternity leave, four week paternity leave, extra pay for language posts and “automatic” promotion from the P-2 to P-3 grade. When the question and answer period arrive, Inner City Press sought to ask a question.
General Assembly Resolution 92(I) provides that
"Members of the United Nations should take such legislative or other appropriate measures as are necessary to prevent the use, without authorization by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, and in particular for commercial purposes by means of trademarks or commercial labels, of the emblem, the official seal and the name of the United Nations, and of abbreviations of that name through the use of its initial letters"
To charge admission to hear UN officials tell how to get UN jobs clearly seems to be a commercial purpose.
A representative of UNA-USA, which had not answered the written question earlier in the day about the appropriateness of charging money to those seeking UN jobs, sought not to hand the microphone to Inner City Press. But eventually it could not be avoided.
Inner City Press asked the UN speaker if it was appropriate that money had been charged to hear his presentation, and about those who work for the UN for eleven months and then face enforced lay-offs, so like at Wal-Mart they never attain full rights.
The UN speaker -- John Ericson -- said, “That's really a question for UNA-USA,” whose representative proceeded to take the microphone from Inner City Press and say, more to the crowd, that none of this money went to the UN. But that was not the point: UNA-USA was charging money to those wanting UN jobs, and the UN was speaking about jobs in an event people had to pay to attend.
In fact, another UN source tells Inner City Press that the two OHRM staffers did not know, prior to the event, that UNA-USA was charging money. Let us say, then, that the UN will agree that it was inappropriate. What next? UNA-USA should at a minimum offer refunds to those whom they inappropriately charged money. But how? Inner City Press bears witness that cash was accepted without receipts being given or contact information taken. Perhaps UNA-USA should publish a legal notice in a newspaper offering the refunds that should be required.
