Friday, October 25, 2024

FTC Wins Preliminary Injunction to Stop Handbag Merger of Capri & Tapestry in SDNY


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack


SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 24 – At Day 7 of the hearing on the US Federal Trade Commission's bid to enjoin the merger of Tapestry and Capri started up before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jennifer L. Rochon, Inner City Press was there, from the thread here, more on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

OK - now in last day of FTC v Tapestry preliminary injunction hearing, Tapestry witness is trashing FTC expert Dr Smith's analysis, we're on it to Judge Rochon's decision and beyond

Now in last day of preliminary injunction hearing, Judge Rochan asks what an acquisition by Tapestry could do for Michael Kors brand that Capri has been unable to do

Defense testimony continues, about how attempts by Capri to have the Michael Kors brand recapture "brand heat" just haven't worked. Judge: How would acquisition by Tapestry do for Michael Kors what Capri can't? Witness: Great question.

Judge: I try.

On October 24, Judge Rochon granted the FTC's motion: "Antitrust has come into fashion...  the Court GRANTS the FTC’s motion to preliminarily enjoin the merger pending the completion of the FTC’s inhouse administrative proceeding." 169 page order on Patreon here.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

The case is Federal Trade Commission v. Tapestry, Inc. et al., 1:24-cv-3109 (Rochon)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Sean Combs Nov 4 Bail Appeal Canceled at his Request So Can Try with His New District Judge


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 24 – At 4:30 pm on September 16 Inner City Press was told by its SDNY source to expect "the big one" - Sean Combs - the next day in the courtroom here.

At 10:30 pm, from SDNY News, this: "USA Damian Williams: Earlier this evening, federal agents arrested Sean Combs, based on a sealed indictment filed by the SDNY.  We expect to move to unseal the indictment in the morning and will have more to say at that time."

At US Attorney Damian Williams' press conference Inner City Press asked if his office would be seeking detention - Yes, he said. Detention memo on Patreon here.

In the run-up to the 2:30 pm hearing Combs' counsel file a bail proposal, with $50 million bond - filing on Patreon here.

[Inner City Press published book / audio book Diddy Do It? on Sept 20 on Amazon here]

More on X for Subscribers here & Substack here

On September 30, Combs' lawyers filed a notice of appeal of detention to the 2d Circuit.

On October 11 the Second Circuit sent Combs' bail appeal to a three-judge panel but denied release pending their consideration - order on Patreon here.

On October 16, the Second Circuit set Combs' bail appeal for argument on November 4.

Then Combs asked for the appeal to be "held in abeyance," seeking to re-apply to Judge Subramanian for release. But on Saturday October 19 the US opposed. Full 7 page filing on Patreon here.

On October 21, Combs' lawyers wrote in that "It is remarkable that the government would oppose this straightforward, routine request for a stay." 5-page reply on Patreon here.

Then on October 23 a substantive 12 page reply, on Patreon here.

  On October 24, Combs' request to put the appeal in abeyance was granted, with updates due every two weeks. When will he apply to Judge Subramanian?


Extra/analysis on X for Subscribers here & Substack here

The case is USA v. Combs, 1:24-cr-542 (Subramanian)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

Questioning Capital One Discover Merger NY AG Asks for Subpoena Now More Astroturf


by Matthew R. Lee

SOUTH BRONX, Oct 23 – Capital One has applied to buy Discover, in an anticompetitive deal that should be rejected by regulators if they mean what they have been saying.

On September 4, Fair Finance Watch and Inner City Press submitted supplemental opposition to the regulators, including about a newly filed class action that "demonstrates Capital One's outrageous, illegal, and widespread practice of disclosing—without consent—the Nonpublic Personal Information1 and Personally Identifiable Financial Information2 (together, “Personal and Financial Information”) of Plaintiffs and the proposed Class Members to third parties, including Meta, Google, Microsoft,  DoubleClick, NewRelic, Adobe, Everest, Skai/Kenshoo, Snowplow, BioCatch, Tealium, and possibly others."

Meanwhile Capital One's "Astro-turfing" continues - for example in California, here.

On October 23, while the Federal Reserve calls submissions of these abuses untimely, NY Attorney General Letitia James asked an NYS Judge to a subpoena against Capital One:

"Discover agreed to provide a waiver... Capital One declined to provide such a waiver. Instead, its counsel stated that it had been told by the OCC that issuing a voluntary waiver of federal confidentiality protections would contravene OCC regulations that restrict the ability of State law enforcement agencies to exercise “visitorial powers” over national banks.

27. Attorneys in the Attorney General’s Antitrust Bureau later spoke with attorneys at the OCC, who confirmed the OCC’s position."

What regulators. The case has yet to be assigned an index number.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

ICC Sexual Abuse 2024 Echoes to Ocampo and UNSG Spox in Inner City Press Exclusive

 

Byline: Matthew Russell Lee [no longer] at the UN: Exclusive

UN GATE, Oct 24, 2024 (see back to August 2008] -- The new abuse charges against ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan, acknowledged belatedly today by the Registrar as the start of a cover-up, echo back to a prior ICC prosecutor whom Inner City Press exclusively reported on, before Antonio Guterres had it thrown out of the UN:

As the UN Security Council voted in the Spring of 2005 to refer the situation in Darfur to International Criminal Court prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo, he was in Cape Town, South Africa telling a female journalist she had to come to his hotel room and have sex with him in order to get her car keys back, according to a rejected complaint filed by then-close Ocampo aide Christian Palme.  Mr. Palme attached to his complaint transcripts of recordings surreptitiously made by him and, he claims, Ocampo's then-spokesman Yves Sorokobi, who is now with the Office of the Spokesperson for United Nations Secretary-General

   At a July 17 press conference at UN Headquarters, Ocampo was asked about the complaint, and a July 9 International Labor Organization ruling award back pay and "moral damages" to Palme, for the way he was fired. Ocampo called it a "human resources" matter and Sorokobi, who was moderating the press conference, told the questioner to desist and called on the next media organization in line, Inner City Press.

   Inner City Press exclusively obtained the complaint on July 18, and asked Sorokobi to respond to it. Sorokobi emphasizes that he did not collaborate with Palme.

  On that day, while the Security Council debated a resolution to refer to Ocampo the situation in Darfur for investigation, Ocampo himself was in Cape Town, South Africa.


Moreno-Ocampo and Ban Ki-moon, tape recorders, car keys and whistleblowers not shown

   In summary as the complaint relates events, Ocampo following an interview with a female reporter from a South African newspaper took the woman's

"car keys and proceed[ed] to go to his hotel suite... He refuses to return the keys unless she consents to have sexual intercourse with him.  In order to have her car keys returned to her, [NAME] consents to have sexual intercourse with Moreno-Ocampo... [NAME] leave the hotel suite and immediately calls Sorokobi.. She says 'something horrible happened.'"

   Attached to the complaint as Annex 3 is an email Sorokobi purportedly sent to Palme on March 29, 2005, that recounts "some disturbing (LMO behavior) stuff from [redacted] the [redacted] reporter who interviewed him yesterday. Darryl has been quite busy with lines on the possible Darfur referral."

  Contemporaneous notes taken and submitted by Palme recounts "working on the press release and the Q&A, as usual without any support from Luis. We are almost done with the Q&A, but Luis refuses to approve it even for circulation within the OTP. It seems he is trying to pretend as if nothing is going on and he doesn't understand that when the decision comes we will have numerous calls with questions from media and NGOs."

   Readers will make their own assessment of the credibility of different parts of the complaint, which Inner City Press is putting online here - and now?

For now, click here to view the "whistleblower" decision, which Inner City Press obtained and is putting online.

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for a Reuters AlertNet piece by this correspondent about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click here for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an undefined trust fund.  Video Analysis here

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

After SBF 25 Years Caroline Ellison Got 2 Years US Similarly Cite 5K1.1(a) on Nishad Singh


by Matthew Russell Lee

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 23 – On the US v Sam Bankman-Fried trial, hours after the guilty verdict, a book was published: "Crypto Criminal: The Conviction of Sam Bankman-Fried: As live tweeted and investigated from inside the SDNY courthouse by Matthew Russell Lee," audio/book here.

  On March 28, 2024, Inner City Press live tweeted his sentencing, to 25 years.

On September 9 cooperator Caroline Ellison's counsel filed a letter that "Ms. Ellison seeks leave to redact the names of certain people. Counsel for the government consents to this request." Document on Patreon here.

  Late on September 9 Inner City Press submitted opposition to sealing. Judge Kaplan docketed the filing on September 10. See here and, on DocumentCloud, here. If SBF's suretors were unsealed, how not these eigth supporters?

Just before midnight on September 10 Ellison's lawyers filed a 60+ page memo, with redactions, asking for... no jail time, time served. Filing on Patreon here.

On September 17, amid the Sean Combs detention hearing, the US Attorney's Office filed that "the Government intends to move at sentencing, pursuant to Section 5K1.1 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines(the “Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”), that the Court sentence Ellison in light of the factors set forth in Section 5K1.1(a) of the Guidelines." Letter on Patreon here.

On September 24 after praise from the AUSA and Judge, Ellison was sentenced to 24 months, minimum security.

On October 16, counsel for Nishad Singh wrote in saying he was else involved that Caroline Ellison and deserves a sentence of time served - no prison. "Another deeply personal act of kindness came when [REDACTED]

On October 23 the US Attorney's Office wrote in, as they did on Ellison, asking for sentencing light of 5K1.1(a). What will Judge Kaplan do?

Watch this site.

More on X for Subscribers here, Substack here

This case is US v. Bond, 24-cr-494 (Daniels)

We'll have more on this.

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

For IcomTech Crypto Ponzi US Asks 160 Months on Rodriguez Fatico Delay to Oct 28


by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 22 –  For a cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme called IcomTech, which held a promotional event in or near NYC's Times Square, David Carmona on December 21 pled guilty before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Inner City Press was there to cover it - and a related upcoming trial. But first, pleas.

On January 12, the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking for Ruiz Ochoa a sentence near the top of the 57 to 71 month range.

On January 19, Inner City Press attended the sentencing, to five years, thread

On March 11, the cooperator of the witness stand was asked by the prosecution about a lengthy Excel speadsheet, then cross examined about money laundering for drug dealers, and buying cars including BMWs and what he called a "Lambhor jee-nee."

On March 12, the government had on the stand a witness who had bought into IcomTech then made money bringing in others "down line" from her. On cross examination she repeatedly asked to provide longer explanations, but was told that would have to be on re-direct. But it may be fast: by day's end it was said that closings can be on May 13.

And they were, including Brend being described, or shown, to be demanding a $12 fee on top of $3300 he was taking from a victim. Next up: verdict.

In came late on March 14, not without drama, here:

OK - now in case of Brend / IcomTech, there's a verdict sent out by jury- along with a note expressing concern about juror anonymity and safety. Defense says this is serious, wants time to brief.

Defense counsel cites a case he says was about John Gotti and problems cause by juror fear. Judge: I will not grant a mistrial. I don't see any indication of outside influence. The note does not say there is fear, only concern about confidentiality

 Judge: This is very different than a juror being approached by mobsters. So I will take the verdict - any concerns can be raised in post-trial motions, depending on what the verdict is. I will direct the parties not to contact the jurors. Defense: We'd like to contact

 Jury entering! Judge: I have an envelope, I'll now open it. I'll ask my Deputy to hand the verdict form to the foreperson, please. On the sole count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, Brend? Guilty. Gustavo Rodriguez? Guilty. [Jurors are polled]

[There are now US Marshals in the back of the courtroom - will the prosecutors be asking for immediate remand to prison?] Judge: I thank you for your decision making. You are free of your obligation not to discuss the case. It's up to you

Jury leaves. Judge: Does the government have any applications? AUSA: Now post verdict, see 3143(a)(1), the burden is on the defendants. We think Mr. Rodriguez should be detained. Mr. Brend, we'd add home detention, GPS in Tampa where he lives.

AUSA: Mr. Rodriguez is not a US citizen. This is an aggravated felony; he is presumptively deportable. He faces a very significant sentence here. There's an enhancement for over $25 million. He was involved in other MLMs. He has family in South America: 11 trips

 Update: in the middle of the post-verdict remand arguments, a woman walking out of the court room collapsed, with her eyes closed. 9-1-1 was called. She was described as defendant Brend's mother in law, speaking only Portuguese. Now a break has been taken

 EMS arrived: court resumes. AUSA: Gustavo Rodriguez might just flee to Argentina. Defense: His 18 year old son is here, willing to testify, he would not leave him or his 16 year old. Judge: There is a guilty verdict, Mr Rodriguez will be detained

Rodriguez' lawyer: May my client speak with the son before he is remanded? To tell him how to get home? Judge: Marshals, can you wait a few minutes? Marshal: Yes.

On March 22, the US Attorney's Office argued that the ban on contacting jurors imposed after the verdict should continue, that they not be harassed by the defeated party (citing Moten, 582 F.2d at 664). The only exemption, they say, if if racial animus is expressed, not relevant here.

On June 18, counsel for David Carmona who pled wrote to the Probation Department objecting to the PSR, suggest a guideline of 41 to 51 months and noting that "as to paragraph 75, the matter for which Mr. Carmona was arrested in Las Vegas, Nevada was dismissed and sealed." But the PSR still picked it up...

On July 29 David Brend got a Fatico hearing on loss amounts, appearing for it by video. Inner City Press was in the courtroom, from the thread:

US describing "underestimated" loss amount...

Judge Rochon: What about conscious avoidance?

Assistant US Attorney: It doesn't reduce the loss amount... Brend sent WebEx invites as widely as possible

On September 20, counsel for Cardona wrote in asking for a two year sentence on October 4.

On September 27, the US asked for 188 months on Cardona.

On October 3, Gustavo Rodriguez's requests got shot down: "ENDORSED LETTER as to Gustavo Rodriguez addressed to Judge Ross from Attorney Jeffrey Cohn dated October 1, 2024 re: I write to request that the Court adjourn sentencing in the above-referenced case and set a date for a hearing on Mr. Rodriguez' pending motions pursuant to Rules 29 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It is Mr. Rodriguez' intention to testify at the proposed hearing. As regards the timing of this letter, shortly after undersigned counsel was retained, Mr. Rodriguez had proposed meeting with the government and it was only yesterday that the government informed me that it refused to meet with him. ENDORSEMENT: The request to adjourn sentencing is DENIED. Defendant was found guilty on March 14, 2024 and the sentencing date has already been repeatedly adjourned in this case. Therefore, it will not be moved. The Court will hear argument on Defendant's Rule 29 and Rule 33 motions on October 11, 2024 at 11:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. ( Motion Hearing set for 10/11/2024 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. ) (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 10/3/2024) "

On October 4, Cardona was sentenced to 121 months. From Inner City Press' thread:

AUSA: Mike Myersnow at sentencing of Carmona in Icomtech Ponzi case, he is already in detention. Prosecutor just quoted "Wayne's World." says, tell two friends, and they tell two friends. That's what happened here, a Ponzi. His loss amount is over $25 million.

Judge: That may be under reported. This scheme targeted vulnerable people, including those without legal immigration status

On October 10, counsel for Gustavo Rodriguez asked that he get time served on October 22.

On October 17 the US Attorney's Office wrote in asking for 160 months on Rodriguez - and on Brend.

On October 22 Inner City Press went to Rodriguez' sentencing. His new lawyer argued for a Fatico hearing, including a Mr. Cruz who had come to testify he designed websites just like Rodriguez. Judge Rochan got the day's CJA counsel to come up and advise Cruz; Rodriguez took the stand at 4 pm and began speaking about the farming region in Argentina he comes from.

The sentencing is now set for Monday October 28.

More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here

The case is US v. Carmona, et al., 22-cr-551 (Rochon)

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

sdny

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com