By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, October 24-- How low has the UN fallen, in terms of corruption, not stopping rapes, and retaliating against the Press that asks the questions? April 16 eviction here and here. May 14 New York Times here; petition here, today's story here.
On October 24, “UN Day” as it happened, the UN was protested in Bangui for its rapes and impunity. Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric had a canned statement about protests, without any mention of what the protests were about; he cited injuries but only to UN peacekeepers. It was another version of the UN's smearing even of child rape victims under Ban Ki-moon.
A memo by the UN's Mercedes Gervilla, excerpted from uncritically by Reuters, smears those claiming rape by peacekeepers in the Central African Republic. Were this done, in this way, about others alleging rape, there would be an outcry.
Reuters doesn't report, but Inner City Press has, that Ban Ki-moon has allowed the conflict of interest in which Mercedes Gervilla's cover-up mandate overlaps with that of her hsuband, Michael Dudley of the Office of Internal Oversight Service, which participated in Ban Ki-moon's retaliation against CAR whistleblower Anders Kompass.
(In Ban's UN it's all in the family: Ban promoted his own son in law Siddharth Chatterjee to the top UN job in Kenya, without recusal.)
While rape victims are being smears, and UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous this week refused to answer Inner City Press' question if there have been any convictions at all, here was Ladsous linking the rapes to "R&R," more than a year ago. Ban Ki-moon kept Ladsous in place and is responsible.
On October 13 Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric about the smearing and conflict of interest, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: As I'm sure you know, as to the sexual abuse allegations in the Central African Republic, there's been a published report using and quoting a 24 August memo from Mercedes Gervilla of the UN peacekeeping, basically saying that the accusers may be lying, that their testimony was coordinated. It's the kind of thing that, at least here in the United States, this is viewed as kind of explosive. This is kind of smearing alleged victims of rape. So I wanted to know, what's your comment on UN peacekeeping writing such a memo? And since it says that she was citing the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), it's widely said among staff and some others that her spouse, Michael Dudley, is working for OIOS. What safeguards do you have in place to make sure that these two units don't conspire to smear victims?
Spokesman: I think… There's no… there is no conspiracy. The head of the conduct… of the conduct and discipline unit is a dedicated staff member, and I think we all appreciate her work. The document that was reported on at Reuters, I can't comment on the veracity of things that are leaked, whether it's true, whether it's not true. What is true and what is going on is that OIOS is finishing up its investigation into what happened in Kemo prefecture, and we hope to have that soon. Thank you.
ICP Question: And will the supposed repetitive nature of child victims of sexual abuse be held against them?
Spokesman: I think the… I don’t think… nothing is being held against anyone. What is happening is that there is a thorough investigation that took place of the incidents that may have taken place in Kemo. I'll be right back.
Inner City Press quoted from the report - fell apart under probing - but Dujarric left the podium and room, a trend in the late Ban era. Beyond the Vine video here.
On June 7, when Ban Ki-moon was criticized for not fully and publicly addressing the rapes, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman, UN transcript here and below.
On July 1, Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric said he would be providing the nationalities of peacekeepers newly accused of sexual abuse or exploitation later that afternoon.
He did not, nor in the days that followed. Before noon on July 5, with Dujarric present in the building but declining to hold a noon briefing in the room from which he ordered Inner City Press to leave, used as a pretext to evict it, Inner City Press asked him:
"1) On July 1 Spokesman Dujarric declined to provide the nationality of the peacekeepers involved in the sexual abuse / exploitation cases disclosed that day at the noon briefing 'because the concerned Member States will be notified shortly, hopefully later today. Once they've been notified, we should be able to share with you that information.' I inquired on the afternoon of July 1, but nothing. Please now state the nationality/nationalities, explain the dealy and state when the UN informed the nation(s) and how."
Three hours later, with Dujarric in a baseball cap outside the UN "focus booth" it must now use to return phone calls - some about Ban Ki-moon and corruption - there was STILL no answer or explanation. This is today's UN.
On June 22 UN staff unions issued their own statement, including on the retaliation under Ban, see below. On June 24, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesperson Farhan Haq about it, video here, UN transcript here.
We'll have more on this. Back on June 7:
Inner City Press: these are questions about Central African Republic but also sexual abuse. Down in Conference Room 3 this morning, in one of the side events of the HIV event, Stephen Lewis said that the Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, has yet to react publicly and fully to the December 2015 CAR review panel report and that they're basically putting their faith in next SG. Do you… where has he responded publicly and fully, and will he take a question on this at his stakeout later this week?
Spokesman: He will take whatever question is thrown at him.
Inner City Press: Really?
Spokesman: The Secretary-General has, through the appointment of Jane Holl Lute, through the actions that have been taken by DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations] and DFS [Department of Field Support], I think, reacted very strongly to the report. There's more transparency. There are more updates. Contingents are being removed. Contingents are not being… are not being replaced. All sorts of measures are put in place. Trust Funds were established. So, I think the facts of what we have done since then, I think, speak for themselves with all due respect for Mr. Lewis.
Inner City Press: I guess then I'd like to ask about another mister, Mr. Kompass. Mr. Kompass has now resigned from the UN system and has said it's because he has found virtually total impunity in the wake of the charges that he forwarded to the authorities. Do you have any comment? Have you seen what Mr. Kompass has said about the UN system, and what's your response to that?
Spokesman: No, I mean I… we wish Mr. Kompass well.
Inner City Press: And I have another CAR, just non-sexual abuse.
Spokesman: Quickly.
Question: Sure. This has to do with there's a report in the French media of prosecution of French soldiers in the… in the… got to say this right because it is in French… in the “Régiment d’infanterie de marine”, and I don't want to get this wrong, “violemment agressé des civils” in 2014 they're being prosecuted. And I wanted to know, is this something the UN… now that the French authorities have… they didn't make it public at the time, but it's now been reported. Is this something the UN's either human rights people knew about or the mission, and what do you say about this…
Spokesman: I don't know about this particular case, but obviously, we welcome the prosecution of anyone accused of sexual abuse.
Spokesman: He will take whatever question is thrown at him.
Inner City Press: Really?
Spokesman: The Secretary-General has, through the appointment of Jane Holl Lute, through the actions that have been taken by DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations] and DFS [Department of Field Support], I think, reacted very strongly to the report. There's more transparency. There are more updates. Contingents are being removed. Contingents are not being… are not being replaced. All sorts of measures are put in place. Trust Funds were established. So, I think the facts of what we have done since then, I think, speak for themselves with all due respect for Mr. Lewis.
Inner City Press: I guess then I'd like to ask about another mister, Mr. Kompass. Mr. Kompass has now resigned from the UN system and has said it's because he has found virtually total impunity in the wake of the charges that he forwarded to the authorities. Do you have any comment? Have you seen what Mr. Kompass has said about the UN system, and what's your response to that?
Spokesman: No, I mean I… we wish Mr. Kompass well.
Inner City Press: And I have another CAR, just non-sexual abuse.
Spokesman: Quickly.
Question: Sure. This has to do with there's a report in the French media of prosecution of French soldiers in the… in the… got to say this right because it is in French… in the “Régiment d’infanterie de marine”, and I don't want to get this wrong, “violemment agressé des civils” in 2014 they're being prosecuted. And I wanted to know, is this something the UN… now that the French authorities have… they didn't make it public at the time, but it's now been reported. Is this something the UN's either human rights people knew about or the mission, and what do you say about this…
Spokesman: I don't know about this particular case, but obviously, we welcome the prosecution of anyone accused of sexual abuse.
Back on June 2, when Ban Ki-moon did not even mention peacekeepers' rapes in the French organized Security Council debate on sexual violence in conflict, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric, video here, UN transcript here.
On May 26 amid UN Peacekeeping scandals ranging from rapes and sexual exploitation to the “protection of civilians” crisis exemplified by the failure at Malakal in South Sudan, DPKO chief Herve Ladsous and DFS' Atule Khare held a press conference.
While Ladsous has engaged in censorship for some time, refusing to answer Press questions, Khare on May 25 indicated he would take a question. But apparently the DPKO-DFS partnership or "brotherhood" is not equal: Ladsous' predilections won out.
Khare spoke of recycling in Darfur, and of the Tanzanian battalion agreeing to paternity tests. When Inner City Press asked, quite audible, for Ladsous to clarify his September 11, 2015 linking of rapes to "R&R," he declined. Nothing on Malakal, either. This is Ban Ki-moon's UN.
After Ladsous refused these audible questions, Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq about Malakal and, again, about the UNIFIL food re-sale scandal exposed by El Pais. Haq said the investigations are ongoing. This too is Ban's UN.
This too: on May 18 the annual meeting between the UN Security Council and DPKO Force Commanders which has always before been open - has gone behind closed doors.
This was particularly inappropriate given the Force Commanders present: rape-central MINUSCA commander Lieutenant General Balla Keïta; Lieutenant General Derick Mbuyiselo Mgwebi (South Africa) of the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), Lieutenant General Yohannes Gebremeskel Tesfamariam (Ethiopia) of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), and Major General Michael Lollesgaard (Denmark) of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA).
Why is this meeting closed? Why is UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, who linked rapes to R&R, not scheduled for a Q&A Press conference? Even to stakeout the closed meeting, Inner City Press is this year required by DPI's Cristina Gallach and ultimately Ban Ki-moon required to have a UN “minder” as it seeks to speak on background with sources. This is censorship and UN decay.
Still, it seems that at least one member state not on the UNSC this year was asked to leave; others wondered why the meeting was closed, or at least some part of it not left open. Inner City Press said to French Permanent Representative Francois Delattre, apparently NOT on the Security Council's mission to Somalia, "ca doit etre ouvert." He replied, politely, that he wasn't sure.
On May 17, Ban's Spokesman Stephane Dujarric announced the availability of the UN's own count of sexual abuse and exploitation allegations in 2016, 44. Of this, 29 MINUSCA, 7 MONUSCO, 2 MINUSTAH, one each in UNMISS, UNOCI, MINUSMA, UNISFA, UNSCO and UNSMIL (Libya). Is it credible? When is the UN Peacekeeping Q&A?
After a bill on UN peacekeepers' sexual abuse and exploitation passed the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Inner City Press on April 29 asked the spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon what he thought of the bill, video here, UN transcript here.
On April 20, Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric about rapes inside the UN's "protection" camps, UN transcript here.
On April 12 Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq about an April 13 hearing in the US House of Representatives about impunity for UN rapes. Just as the UN skipped court hearings on bringing cholera to Haiti, Haq's answer did not say that the UN would attend the hearing. Video here.
Inner City Press live-tweeted the House hearing on April 13, in which Aicha Elbasri described Herve Ladsous' cover up in Darfur, and former OIOS auditor Peter Gallo described how top UN officials just USE the OIOS (as they have to de-link Ban Ki-moon from the Ng Lap Seng scandal). Brett Schaefer said there is a need for US training of other countries' peacekeepers. There's truth in that, but one of the DRC Army units implicated in the mass rapes in Minova was US trained.
Chairman Chris Smith cited the UN's "zero tolerance, zero compliance culture;" in the Senate there were strong argument for reducing the UN's funding.
On April 14, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric, video here, UN transcript here.
