By Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS, June 9 -- How low has the UN fallen, in terms of corruption, not stopping rapes, and retaliating against the Press that asks the questions? April 16 eviction here and here. May 14 New York Times here.
On June 7, when Ban Ki-moon was criticized for not fully and publicly addressing the rapes, Inner City Press asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman about the resignation of whistleblower Anders Kompass citing impunity, video here, UN transcript here and below.
All Ban's spokesman would say of Kompass was, "We wish him well." When Inner City Press asked if Ban would address the issue at his June 9 stakeout, Dujarric said Ban would answer any question thrown at him.
Well, Inner City Press politely threw the question at Ban, about Kompass and retaliation, on June 9 but Ban did not answer. Ban used his rare Q&A in New York to spin his capitulation to Saudi Arabia, removing them from the Children and Armed Conflict blacklist for killing children in Yemen. Click here for that.
Inner City Press has been encouraged, beyond the UN rape scandal, to ask Ban about his ambitions in South Korea. That question was taken, from KBS; Ban said his Spokesman Dujarric has been answering it (that is, to Inner City Press) and that the question is "undue," seeming to mean "unfair." Vine here. Really? Just release the transcript of Ban's session with the South Korean political journalists in the Kwanhoon Club.
Dujarric chose the questions, then shepherded Ban away. All questions throw? Dujarric won't even any on what the UN told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, quoting him, to try to justify the retaliatory eviction of Inner City Press. We'll have more on this.
Later on June 7, Inner City Press asked Ban's former chief of staff Susana Malcorra who is seeking to succeed him about Kompass' resignation. Video here.
She argued that Kompass, by "moving forward" with a file she acknowledged had gotten lost in Geneva, had put children at risk. More than the rapists?
Down in Washington, Senator Bob Corker has issued a statement:
U.S. Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, today released the following statement after top United Nations (U.N.) whistleblower Anders Kompass resigned in protest over the U.N.’s failure to hold senior officials accountable for allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA) by peacekeeping forces and efforts to silence those who revealed them.
“This resignation appears to be a damning indictment of the leadership at the United Nations that has failed to end the horrific sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers and protect those who report wrongdoing,” Corker said. “The so-called 'zero-tolerance' policy has provided cover for a culture of impunity where allegations are swept under the rug and whistleblowers are intimidated to stop them from revealing the truth. The U.S. must use its influence as the largest contributor to peacekeeping to restore accountability and oversight of missions that are supposed to be about protecting vulnerable populations and restoring stability during conflict.”
Kompass’s former deputy, Miranda Brown, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at a hearing on April 13 in which Corker expressed disgust over continued reports ofSEA and the failure of the U.N. to provide accountability.
“If I heard right now that a U.N. peacekeeping mission was going to North Chattanooga today, which is where my wife is, I would be on the first plane out of here to go home and protect her,” Corker said at the April 13 hearing. “I am disgusted by the actions of U.N. peacekeepers that American taxpayers are paying for, and I hope that somehow we’ll figure out a way to reel this in.”
At an earlier hearing on December 9, 2015, Corker questioned U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power about the U.N. strategy to effectively address and prevent SEA. The 2017 State Department authorization bill passed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in April included provisions to encourage U.S. leadership at the U.N. to end SEA and protect whistleblowers.
It was to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the UN sent this "Aide Memoire" purportedly justifying the UN's ouster and eviction of Inner City Press.
This Aide Memoire says there was nothing in writing that the underlying meeting Inner City Press sought to cover as part of the UN bribery scandal was "closed."
The Security Handbook it cites is not on the Internet, not on the UN's iSeek Internet and the UN Media Accreditation and Liaison Unit has no copy. Inner City Press asked for that - and has asked to have its Resident Correspondent accreditation and long time shared office restored.
No response from the UN, except to refer everything back to Under Secretary General Cristina Gallach, who threw Inner City Press out in the first place, without once speaking to it, other than to referring Inner City Press' questions about her role in the Ng Lap Seng bribery scandal to Ban's spokesman. This is today's UN: coming to a head.
On UN Eviction of ICP, UN Aide Memoire to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Admits No Written Record, Oral... by Matthew Russell Lee
From the UN's June 7 transcript:
Inner City Press: these are questions about Central African Republic but also sexual abuse. Down in Conference Room 3 this morning, in one of the side events of the HIV event, Stephen Lewis said that the Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, has yet to react publicly and fully to the December 2015 CAR review panel report and that they're basically putting their faith in next SG. Do you… where has he responded publicly and fully, and will he take a question on this at his stakeout later this week?
Spokesman: He will take whatever question is thrown at him.
Inner City Press: Really?
Spokesman: The Secretary-General has, through the appointment of Jane Holl Lute, through the actions that have been taken by DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations] and DFS [Department of Field Support], I think, reacted very strongly to the report. There's more transparency. There are more updates. Contingents are being removed. Contingents are not being… are not being replaced. All sorts of measures are put in place. Trust Funds were established. So, I think the facts of what we have done since then, I think, speak for themselves with all due respect for Mr. Lewis.
Inner City Press: I guess then I'd like to ask about another mister, Mr. Kompass. Mr. Kompass has now resigned from the UN system and has said it's because he has found virtually total impunity in the wake of the charges that he forwarded to the authorities. Do you have any comment? Have you seen what Mr. Kompass has said about the UN system, and what's your response to that?
Spokesman: No, I mean I… we wish Mr. Kompass well.
Inner City Press: And I have another CAR, just non-sexual abuse.
Spokesman: Quickly.
Question: Sure. This has to do with there's a report in the French media of prosecution of French soldiers in the… in the… got to say this right because it is in French… in the “Régiment d’infanterie de marine”, and I don't want to get this wrong, “violemment agressé des civils” in 2014 they're being prosecuted. And I wanted to know, is this something the UN… now that the French authorities have… they didn't make it public at the time, but it's now been reported. Is this something the UN's either human rights people knew about or the mission, and what do you say about this…
Spokesman: I don't know about this particular case, but obviously, we welcome the prosecution of anyone accused of sexual abuse.
Spokesman: He will take whatever question is thrown at him.
Inner City Press: Really?
Spokesman: The Secretary-General has, through the appointment of Jane Holl Lute, through the actions that have been taken by DPKO [Department of Peacekeeping Operations] and DFS [Department of Field Support], I think, reacted very strongly to the report. There's more transparency. There are more updates. Contingents are being removed. Contingents are not being… are not being replaced. All sorts of measures are put in place. Trust Funds were established. So, I think the facts of what we have done since then, I think, speak for themselves with all due respect for Mr. Lewis.
Inner City Press: I guess then I'd like to ask about another mister, Mr. Kompass. Mr. Kompass has now resigned from the UN system and has said it's because he has found virtually total impunity in the wake of the charges that he forwarded to the authorities. Do you have any comment? Have you seen what Mr. Kompass has said about the UN system, and what's your response to that?
Spokesman: No, I mean I… we wish Mr. Kompass well.
Inner City Press: And I have another CAR, just non-sexual abuse.
Spokesman: Quickly.
Question: Sure. This has to do with there's a report in the French media of prosecution of French soldiers in the… in the… got to say this right because it is in French… in the “Régiment d’infanterie de marine”, and I don't want to get this wrong, “violemment agressé des civils” in 2014 they're being prosecuted. And I wanted to know, is this something the UN… now that the French authorities have… they didn't make it public at the time, but it's now been reported. Is this something the UN's either human rights people knew about or the mission, and what do you say about this…
Spokesman: I don't know about this particular case, but obviously, we welcome the prosecution of anyone accused of sexual abuse.
Back on June 2, when Ban Ki-moon did not even mention peacekeepers' rapes in the French organized Security Council debate on sexual violence in conflict, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric, video here, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I wanted to ask, listening to the Secretary-General's speech on this sexual violence and conflict, and I was sort of waiting for some reference to sexual abuse by peacekeepers themselves or by the Sangaris force. Is there something that I'm missing in kind of the scope of the meeting? Why was this important topic on which he actually had some… some, you know, responsibility and can do something, not mentioned in his speech…?
Spokesman: I think the Secretary-General has been clear in his outrage when violations are committed by peacekeepers or international forces. The focus of the meeting was on those terror groups and others who are deliberately using… using sexual violence as a tool of war, and I don't think in any way, shape or form that applies to peacekeeping.
Question: Well, I mean… no, I guess I'm referring to the Sangaris, the bestiality allegations at a minimum are not… don't seem to be of normal… they seem to be…
Spokesman: I think your… your… I don't agree with your logic. I think you're talking about, on one hand, groups and organisations that pointedly use sexual violence as a tool of war. And what I'm talking about are horrendous acts committed by an extreme minority… criminal acts committed by a minority of peacekeepers or international… international forces that doesn't… obviously, it doesn't reflect the intent of the missions.
Question: Sure. And I guess you may… I've been meaning to ask this for a few days. The Secretary-General's most recent report on children and armed conflict goes through a number of things, but it mentions the attack by the US on the Médecins Sans Frontières hospital in Kunduz, but the US is not listed in the annex. The Saudis are listed for similar attacks, I guess, which you might call unintentional, in Yemen. How is this determination made to list the… the…?
Spokesman: There will be… there is a process, and we go through it every year, and there will be a formal presentation of the report by the Special Representative. So I would ask you to save your questions for that.
On May 26 amid UN Peacekeeping scandals ranging from rapes and sexual exploitation to the “protection of civilians” crisis exemplified by the failure at Malakal in South Sudan, DPKO chief Herve Ladsous and DFS' Atule Khare held a press conference.
Spokesman: I think the Secretary-General has been clear in his outrage when violations are committed by peacekeepers or international forces. The focus of the meeting was on those terror groups and others who are deliberately using… using sexual violence as a tool of war, and I don't think in any way, shape or form that applies to peacekeeping.
Question: Well, I mean… no, I guess I'm referring to the Sangaris, the bestiality allegations at a minimum are not… don't seem to be of normal… they seem to be…
Spokesman: I think your… your… I don't agree with your logic. I think you're talking about, on one hand, groups and organisations that pointedly use sexual violence as a tool of war. And what I'm talking about are horrendous acts committed by an extreme minority… criminal acts committed by a minority of peacekeepers or international… international forces that doesn't… obviously, it doesn't reflect the intent of the missions.
Question: Sure. And I guess you may… I've been meaning to ask this for a few days. The Secretary-General's most recent report on children and armed conflict goes through a number of things, but it mentions the attack by the US on the Médecins Sans Frontières hospital in Kunduz, but the US is not listed in the annex. The Saudis are listed for similar attacks, I guess, which you might call unintentional, in Yemen. How is this determination made to list the… the…?
Spokesman: There will be… there is a process, and we go through it every year, and there will be a formal presentation of the report by the Special Representative. So I would ask you to save your questions for that.
On May 26 amid UN Peacekeeping scandals ranging from rapes and sexual exploitation to the “protection of civilians” crisis exemplified by the failure at Malakal in South Sudan, DPKO chief Herve Ladsous and DFS' Atule Khare held a press conference.
While Ladsous has engaged in censorship for some time, refusing to answer Press questions, Khare on May 25 indicated he would take a question. But apparently the DPKO-DFS partnership or "brotherhood" is not equal: Ladsous' predilections won out.
Khare spoke of recycling in Darfur, and of the Tanzanian battalion agreeing to paternity tests. When Inner City Press asked, quite audible, for Ladsous to clarify his September 11, 2015 linking of rapes to "R&R," he declined. Nothing on Malakal, either. This is Ban Ki-moon's UN.
After Ladsous refused these audible questions, Inner City Press asked Ban's deputy spokesman Farhan Haq about Malakal and, again, about the UNIFIL food re-sale scandal exposed by El Pais. Haq said the investigations are ongoing. This too is Ban's UN.
This too: on May 18 the annual meeting between the UN Security Council and DPKO Force Commanders which has always before been open - has gone behind closed doors.
This was particularly inappropriate given the Force Commanders present: rape-central MINUSCA commander Lieutenant General Balla Keïta; Lieutenant General Derick Mbuyiselo Mgwebi (South Africa) of the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO), Lieutenant General Yohannes Gebremeskel Tesfamariam (Ethiopia) of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), and Major General Michael Lollesgaard (Denmark) of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA).
Why is this meeting closed? Why is UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, who linked rapes to R&R, not scheduled for a Q&A Press conference? Even to stakeout the closed meeting, Inner City Press is this year required by DPI's Cristina Gallach and ultimately Ban Ki-moon required to have a UN “minder” as it seeks to speak on background with sources. This is censorship and UN decay.
Still, it seems that at least one member state not on the UNSC this year was asked to leave; others wondered why the meeting was closed, or at least some part of it not left open. Inner City Press said to French Permanent Representative Francois Delattre, apparently NOT on the Security Council's mission to Somalia, "ca doit etre ouvert." He replied, politely, that he wasn't sure.
On May 17, Ban's Spokesman Stephane Dujarric announced the availability of the UN's own count of sexual abuse and exploitation allegations in 2016, 44. Of this, 29 MINUSCA, 7 MONUSCO, 2 MINUSTAH, one each in UNMISS, UNOCI, MINUSMA, UNISFA, UNSCO and UNSMIL (Libya). Is it credible? When is the UN Peacekeeping Q&A?
After a bill on UN peacekeepers' sexual abuse and exploitation passed the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Inner City Press on April 29 asked the spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon what he thought of the bill, video here, UN transcript here.
On April 20, Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric about rapes inside the UN's "protection" camps, UN transcript here.
On April 12 Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq about an April 13 hearing in the US House of Representatives about impunity for UN rapes. Just as the UN skipped court hearings on bringing cholera to Haiti, Haq's answer did not say that the UN would attend the hearing. Video here.
Inner City Press live-tweeted the House hearing on April 13, in which Aicha Elbasri described Herve Ladsous' cover up in Darfur, and former OIOS auditor Peter Gallo described how top UN officials just USE the OIOS (as they have to de-link Ban Ki-moon from the Ng Lap Seng scandal). Brett Schaefer said there is a need for US training of other countries' peacekeepers. There's truth in that, but one of the DRC Army units implicated in the mass rapes in Minova was US trained.
Chairman Chris Smith cited the UN's "zero tolerance, zero compliance culture;" in the Senate there were strong argument for reducing the UN's funding.
On April 14, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Stephane Dujarric,video here, UN transcript here.
