Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/caac1myanmar051009.html
UNITED NATIONS, May 10, updated May 11 -- While Myanmar wants off the UN's children and armed conflict list and the UN strangely praises them, three non-governmental organizations last week said that big problems remain, and spoke of Thai and Myanmar pressure on UNICEF to stay off of their border. Inner City Press asked about this pressure, and passed on to UNICEF the quote. Video here, from Minute 25:35.
UNICEF's spokesman on May 6 said he would get an answer. The next day, he said that "both the Thai and Myanmar reps are en route from a meeting and so I have no answers yet but hope to by tomorrow. Just wanted you to know we have not forgotten your questions."
Five days later, there is nothing. Children are the future, but in terms of explaining how it deals with pressure from repressive governments like Myanmar's, UNICEF is no better than its UN brethren.
This is a problem or conundrum of the UN. Charged with defending children, it has to work with governments. So even the biggest recruiter of child soldiers in the world, Myanmar, gets treated with respect. The UN's expert on the problem praised the government last week. UNICEF promises a response, but provided none.
The NGOs were better. Watchlist had the courage to criticize UNICEF. Human Rights Watch, asked for its position on elections, promises to revert to Inner City Press with an answer and did, that the 2010 elections have no promise of effecting real democratic change inside Burma. This process is a clearly orchestrated process to ensure continued military rule with a civilian facade, the 2008 constitution ensures that. There is no possibility under present conditions that these elections can promise a more open Burma, or be in any measure a free expression of what people inside Burma want.
Still, and this is telling, neither group had an answer on the problem of Rohingya, the multiply oppressed Muslims of Myanmar. The UN's envoy Ibrahim Gambari had said it is beyond his mandate. Watch List said, we can get that (info) to you, but has not followed up. Video here, from Minute 30:28. A group that is ignored not only by the UN, but even NGOs, is suffering indeed. We will continue on this issue -- watch this site.
Update of May 11 -- after the publication of the article above, five days after the critique was made and question asked, the following arrived from UNICEF, which we publish in full:
Subj: Answer
From: UNICEF
To: Inner City Press
Sent: 5/11/2009
I have received a response from my colleagues in Myanmar, and they advise that UNICEF Myanmar Field Offices covers all parts of the country including the border area. Children from the border area included in the 1612 reporting as well as ILO mechanism to monitor forced labour which includes underage recruitment. The present UNICEF coverage in Myanmar is considered adequate and there is no immediate plan to beef up presence.
That's not what Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict and Human Rights Watch say...
Update of May 11, 6 p.m. -- while Watchlist answered the questions in real-time, it has provided the appreciated information below about the Rohingya, in response to the article above:
Subj: Follow up from Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict
From: watchlist.org
To: Inner City Press
Sent: 5/11/2009 5:13:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Thank you for covering the launch of our report and sorry for not getting back earlier to you on the question of the Rohingya... In general, as we clarify in our methodology (p. ii), our report mainly focuses on the impact of armed conflict on children in Myanmar following our core mandate. In contrast, the situation of the Rohingya is mainly one of discrimination and neglect as a result of exclusion and discrimination by the Myanmar authorities on the basis of their ethnicity and religion. The Rohingya live under appalling circumstances as the Myanmar authorities deny them citizenship in their own country.
To alert to the dire needs of the Rohingya, we also further elaborated on their situation in our chapter on Refugees (p. 21):
Refugees in Bangladesh
Ethnic discrimination and religious persecution has caused 250,000 Muslim Rohingya to flee to Bangladesh since the early 1990s. Since 1982, the ruling authorities in Myanmar have refused to accept the Rohingya as Burmese citizens, turning them into stateless people in their own country, according to RI, “Rohingya: Discrimination in Burma and Denial of Rights in Bangladesh,” July 21, 2006. [The 1982 Myanmar Citizenship Law has had the effect of rendering the Rohingya stateless. Their status as citizens had already been downgraded under the 1974 Constitution.] Many are denied basic rights to freely move, work or marry without an official permission. At the same time, SPDC officials have exploited refugees for forced labor during the day and forced sentry duty at night without any form of compensation, according to RI.
While most of the Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh have been forcibly repatriated to Myanmar, many returned to Bangladesh because the situation in Myanmar was not safe for them. Approximately 26,300 Rohingyas still live in two camps in the southern Cox’s Bazar area, according to the USCRI, World Refugee Survey 2008 – Bangladesh, June 19, 2008. An additional 100,000 to 200,000 live as unregistered refugees outside the camp areas, according to the same source. Since 2006, the Government of Bangladesh has allowed UNHCR to construct new shelters for refugees in both camps and allow other UN agencies and NGOs to run programs in the refugee camps. In addition, a very small number of Rohingya refugees have been able to resettle to a third country.
We will continue to follow these issues.And see, www.innercitypress.com/caac1myanmar051009.html
