Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at UN
www.innercitypress.com/oios1lockheed011008.html
UNITED NATIONS, January 10 -- The UN's $250 million no-bid contract with Lockheed Martin will be reviewed, including by still-to-be-hired auditors in Darfur, it was announced Thursday. But there is no deadline for the review, and its outcome will quite possibly never be made public. The head of the UN's Office of Internal Oversight Services, Inga-Britt Ahlenius, in her first press briefing in six months, said she could not speak about particular cases. Despite two questions from Inner City Press, for example, about OIOS' delayed investigation in the allegations that UN peacekeepers in the Congo traded guns back to rebels for gold, there was no clear response. Video here, from Minute 56:43.
The head of the UN's Procurement Task Force, Robert Appleton, referred to the due process rights of corporations and acknowledged that the PTF's reports often "never see the light of day." Nevertheless, he sought to explain how difficult it is to estimate losses due to fraud and corruption. Ms. Ahlenius referred to incalculable "reputational loss," which threats now to flow from the UN's stonewalling about the no-bid Lockheed contract. The spokesman for the official who pushed for this contract since April 2007, Jane Holl Lute, has taken to trying to reign in reporting about the contract and about the controversy, rather than making his client available for questions.
Ms. Ahlenius at the end of Thursday press conference took a question about an e-mail she wrote in September 2007, presenting for consideration as a procurement official at a UN department she audits the resume of a person she knew. Inner City Press, which first reported on the story, asked how this was appropriate. "I know every Under Secretary General," Ms. Ahlenius said. "They are my colleagues. That does not prevent me from auditing" their departments. But can't an e-mail from your auditor, forwarding a candidate's resume, raise questions of conflict and coercion? Ms. Ahlenius doesn't think so. Video here, from Minute 56:43. One reporter opined afterwards, if she doesn't see that as raising issues, maybe she isn't the right auditor.
But Ms. Ahlenius to her credit called again for greater transparency, making much of the fact that her audits, once completed, become available to member states. This can be contrasted with the new more limited policy of the UN Development Program, announced on December 18, 2007, that while member states may look at some UNDP reports, they may not make copies, and have to "maintain confidentiality with respect to issues that might affect staff, third parties or a country government/administration" -- that is, always. The policy is online here; see especially paragraphs 73-75. We will have more in short order on a particular OIOS audit -- watch this site.
