After DR Congo Calls UN's Ladsous Inaccurate, Inner City Press Asks UN's Haq, Who Merely Echoes MONUSCO

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, February 3 -- On January 5, after yet more alleged rapes by UN Peacekeepers were reported in the Central African Republic, Ban's head of Peacekeeping Herve Ladsous pointedly refused an Inner City Press question about the rapes (Vine here), which by contrast the Ambassadors of New Zealand and Uruguay answered.

Now there's more #LadousFail - with an assist from the UN Spokesperson.

While Ladsous has not held a press availability at the UN in New York since the September 11, 2015 where he linked rapes to “R&R,” he granted a seemingly-controlled interview to RFI while in Addis Ababa for the African Union Summit.

(RFI had nothing on the rapes; DW did a piece ignoring Ladsous linked the rapes to R&R, here.)

This has resulted in DR Congo calling Ladsous inaccurate, and the MONUSCO mission having to put out a press release, which Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq about, transcript here:

Inner City Press: on the DRC, Under-Secretary-General Hervé Ladsous, I guess in Addis, gave an interview to RFI.  And he said that one of the two generals, Sikabwe Fall or Bruno Mandevu, had been redeployed at the request, I guess… as the UN had been requesting.  And since then, the DRC Government has said that that is inaccurate and false.  And so I wanted to know… they said they remain in place in their positions in North Kivu.  Given that this has been… was the reason given for not collaborating in the fight against FDLR (Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda), what is the status?  Did Mr. Ladsous say that?  If he said it, what's the UN's response to the Government saying that it's false?

Deputy Spokesman Haq:  Well, regarding the operations, you're aware of what our concerns have been regarding how and when we would cooperate with the Congolese Armed Forces.  It's clear that the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo has sovereign and primary responsibility for the protection of its citizens.  At the same time, our Mission on the ground, MONUSCO, stands ready to support the Government in line with its mandate to protect civilians.  In this regard, MONUSCO has welcomed the Government's acceptance of the Mission's proposal to resume coordinated offensive operations, which resulted in agreed arrangement for military cooperation on 28 January of this [year].  The UN Mission, MONUSCO, has put out a press release on this, and I would refer you to that for further details.

Inner City Press:  Yes, but my question… I've seen the press release, and it doesn't answer the simple question, which is, did Mr. Ladsous say that one of the generals was moved out of North Kivu?  And if he did, which it's on audio, what did he say to the DRC saying nobody moved, and how is that consistent with the UN-stated human rights due diligence?  It doesn't… the press release doesn't answer that.

Deputy Spokesman:  We are continuing to do our due diligence on pressing the Government on the question of the two generals, that is to say, General Sikabwe and General Mandevu.

Inner City Press:  Did Mr. Ladsous believe that they had moved?  Did he say it and does he now retract it?

Deputy Spokesman:  We continue to be in touch with the Government and we'll try to make sure that we have a clear position on what the status of these generals are.

  What was the purpose of the MONUSCO press release, which Haq merely re-read, other than to try to obfuscate another Ladsous mess? Meanwhile the UN correspondents of AFP and Reuters, cutting into questions on February 3, did not ask a single question about Ladsous.Vine here, story here.

  We said a “seemingly-controlled” interview with RFI because none of the 12 questions even mentioned the rape scandals swirling around Ladsous' DPKO, which less his linking of rapes to R&R.

   In fairness to RFI, those few times Ladsous grants interviews to handpicked scribes in New York, conditions are imposed, for example what cannot be asked about.

(Some media are so lame they wouldn't even try to ask. AFP at the UN, for example, airbrushes French Ladsous from the stories it has to publish about the peacekeeper rape scandals - while making bogus attempts on those who actually cover Ladsous, for example in 2011 and even now, today, here, in Vine here.)

   But even this RFI interview has caused trouble: the DR Congo says that Ladsous was “inaccurate” in claiming that Generals Sikabwe Fall and Bruno Mandevu had been moved to other assignments. So even in such a controlled session, Ladsous has these problems. How can UN Peacekeeping be reformed this way?

 Here's what the US State Department put out on Feb 3:

"The United States welcomes the recent announcement that the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO) have signed an agreement to permit resumed cooperation against illegal armed groups.  This agreement follows nearly a year during which such cooperation had ceased.

We urge both MONUSCO and the Government of the DRC to take action quickly against illegal armed groups, which continue to commit atrocities against Congolese citizens and communities.  We note the particular importance of ending the presence of foreign armed groups in eastern DRC – including the Allied Democratic Forces and Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) – which pose a threat to broader regional peace and security.

This agreement provides an important opportunity for MONUSCO and the DRC’s armed forces (FARDC) to deal the FDLR a decisive blow.  Strong cooperation between MONUSCO and the DRC Government is particularly important during the current electoral period.  As the largest financial contributor to MONUSCO and a provider of security assistance to professionalize the DRC armed forces, the United States will continue to support combined efforts by MONUSCO and the DRC Government in civilian protection and the consolidation of peace throughout the DRC. "

  On January 18, the UN confirmed to Inner City Press that the whistleblower of the CAR rapes, Anders Kompass, has been cleared, without reference however to any reforms. Inner City Press on January 18 asked:

Inner City Press: Anders Kompass, the whistleblower in the CAR [Central African Republic] rape inquiry, has said that he received a letter from OIOS [Office of Internal Oversight Services] saying that he's been exonerated and cleared.  And he also said… this is what I wanted to ask you about… is… you know, that he doesn't understand… he said he's saddened, and it's a mystery why most of the UN leadership decided to do this to me when they know very well how badly the UN was handling these type of cases.  So, this seems to be… what do you… one, would you confirm the OIOS sent such a letter?  And, two, although he doesn't name names, he in the… in this process has named fairly high names.  What's your response to what he's saying?

Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq:  Well, regarding his case, yes, I can confirm that the Office of Internal Oversight Services has written to him, and they've confirmed that the cases against him are now closed.  And so that is where we stand on all the various cases concerning Mr. Kompass.  Regarding how we deal with these matters, as you're aware, the Secretary-General appointed a panel headed by Judge Marie Deschamps to deal exactly with that very question.  And she came out with a report, of which you are all, I think, fully informed.  You've heard what she had to say.  You've seen the report, which we have made available in its entirety, and it is now being studied for follow-up action.  So, we continue to see what we can learn from this and how we can do better.

Inner City Press:  But, has anything been… I guess… one of the things that he talks about in his interview is to say that… that he wants to make sure that other UN staff are not dissuaded from blowing the whistle.  Although he's now been cleared, it obviously was quite a process.  There was an attempt to remove him from his job, which he was only restored by the internal justice system.  Are there any steps taken to actually encourage, rather than discourage, UN staff to come forward when they're aware of the rape of children?

Deputy Spokesman Haq:  Well, certainly, the Secretary-General believes that all staff should be encouraged to come forward.  This is the purpose of all of our various newer initiatives, including, for example, the Human Rights Up Front initiative.  But, beyond that, you, yourself, just pointed out that he was cleared by the internal justice system.  And that is a sign that we hope staff take to heart, that the internal justice system does, in fact, work.  And although it is… can be a tedious process and, for the people participating in it, it can be frustrating, we have tried to make sure that the internal justice system is strengthened enough that it will come to the right conclusions as you go through the process.

  Does this really encourage or discourage UN whistleblowers? We're still waiting for that answer. But even as Ban and his spokespeople refused to answer basic questions ranging from Sri Lanka to Burundi, corruption cases to rapes, his UN Correspondents Association now known as the UN Corruption Association, having charged $6000 for seats next to Ban, continues to promote him - without questions, literally. It seems Ban will appear at UNCA on January 29.

  UNCA head Giampaolo Pioli, who tried to get the investigative Press thrown out of the UN for accurately reporting that Pioli had accepted rent money from Palitha Kohona, Sri Lanka's ambassador, then gave a "UN screening" on a war crimes denial film in the Dag Hammarskjold Auditorium, has issued this, only to those who pay UNCA money, leaked by a disgusted UNCA member:

"Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon would like to meet with UNCA members and all UN correspondents for the New Year's visit this Wednesday, Jan 6th, 2016 from 10:35 to 10:50 am in the UNCA room. It will be an opportunity for him to say a few words to all of our colleagues and to exchange his best wishes. There will not be a Q&A session but as in every year it is a great occasion to be together. Please attend."

 Well, no. Providing a rah-rah session with no Q&A is pathetic. And, "all correspondents" will not enter the UN Corruption Association, which charges money for access to Ban. January 6 was canceled, but may be set for a repeat on January 29.

 And yet, Ban should be asked, and should answer, questions such as those raised by the new rape changees in CAR, particularly now that his head of Peacekeeping has again refused to answer. We'll have more on this.

The former President of the General Assembly John Ashe and four others have been indicted, Ashe for buying documents from Ban's UN Secretariat.

Ban's envoy to Libya Bernardino Leon was exposed by leaks as having taken instructions and then a job from the United Arab Emirates.

And Ban's head of UN Peacekeeping, Herve Ladsous, is listed in UN Dispute Tribunal documents as having tried to cover up child rapes in Central African Republic by peacekeepers from his native France.

  Inner City Press, which Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric did not call on despite calling two separate times on the same UN Correspondents Association scribe, asked audibly, “Do you have any update on the John Ashe indictment? Bernardino Leon? These were major developments this year.” Vine here.

  But Ban refused to answer the question. He walked out of the briefing room, shaking hands scribes. The press conference began with Dujarric setting aside the first question for the head of UNCA, who thanked Ban for attending an event on Wall Street for which UNCA charged $6,000 to sit with Ban. This is the UN Corruption Association.

  A question on or to cover up the sexual abuse scandal was arranged, with Agence France Presse congratulating Ban for this response to the sexual abuse scandal. (Senegalese Babacar Gaye was urged to resign, Ladsous who on camera linked the rapes to “R&R," video here, remains in place.)

Ban read out a wan answer on Burundi; his deputy spokeperson refused an Inner City Press question on Burundi at the previous day's noon briefing.  We'll have more on this.

Ban once promised monthly press conference but his last one was three months before, then nine months before that. On September 16 with the UN being less than successful in mediating in Yemen and Libya, Syria and South Sudan, accused of rapes in Central African Republic and killing 8,000 in Haiti with cholera (after 40,000 died in Sri Lanka with little response from the UN), Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was asked, What is your legacy?

  That question, nor none of the other 11 Ban's spokesman Stephane Dujarric selected, did not refer to the rape scandal, much less deadly cholera or the Sri Lanka report released earlier in the day in Geneva, after months of delay and supposed concern by Ban.

  Inner City Press asked, before the press conference ended and then again before Ban left the room, “Anything on Sri Lanka?” But there was nothing. Ban's spokesman Dujarric didn't even allow Inner City Press to put a question to UN Peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous, who covered up rapes in DR Congo, Darfur and now CAR.

  Most recently, Ladsous linked rapes to a lack of “R&R,” rest and relaxation, video here.

Dujarric himself cut off Inner City Press questions on what Ladsous said, and declined to answer on Reddit in an “Ask Me Anything.” (He didn't say he's ANSWER everything, one wag pointed out.)

  But even beyond the scandals, Ban did not in his opening statement mention Somalia, or CAR, or Darfur; none of the questions selected by Dujarric was about Africa. (One wire points out Africa was part of a UN-at-70 question; noted.)

    Inner City Press also tried to ask about Burundi -- nothing - and South Sudan, on which we are preparing a story.

  It was Voice of America with the “What is your legacy” question. Ban said he'd answer next year. Inner City Press might answer sooner. Watch this site.