Thursday, February 18, 2016
Exclusive: In South Sudan, As SPLA Shoots & Attacks IDPs in Malakal, UN Blames Ethnic Youth, Inner City Press Publishes UN Leaks
By Matthew Russell Lee, Exclusive series
UNITED NATIONS, February 18 -- In the UN's continued withholding of news and answers about South Sudan, the reports of the UN's own knowledge of abuses are now being withheld from its own impacted national staff. So Inner City Press has published below from inside UNMISS.
Now in Malakal, while the UN publicly blames violence on ethnic youth, internally it knows the SPLA is shooting and attacking IDPs, burning and looting in the UN Malakal camp.
On February 17, Inner City Press' sources told it of violence in the UN's Malakal "Protection of Civilians" site, and after inquiry @InnerCityPress tweeted, "On #SouthSudan, ICP asked UN of SPLA besieging PoC site in #Malakal, no comment. Now it's worse: silence, @VOAnews bogus Qs."
(The last was a reference to US-government Voice of America's questions to the UN; the same VOA "saw" Liberians in Burundi.)
But it's gotten worse, both on the ground in Malakal and within the UN. The UN belatedly put out a press release on five dead (and counting) in the PoC site, but did not mention the SLPA, instead
"The United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) strongly condemns the violence that erupted last night between Shilluk and Dinka youths in its Protection of Civilians site in Malakal... Violence involving the use of small arms, machetes and other weapons broke out between youths from both communities in the late evening on 17 February. According to preliminary reports, there have been 5 fatalities among the Internally Displaced Persons’ (IDP) community and approximately 30 injured."
But internally, as exclusilvely provided to Inner City Press by whistleblowers, the UN said to the UN Security Management Team (SMT) in Juba:
"Dear SMT Members,
SPLA troops numbering 50- 100 have entered the UNMISS POC Sector 1 and 2 in Malakal reportedly attacking IDPs, shooting sporadically, burning tents and looting properties. IDPs continue to flee into the former POC area and have now occupied and filled up former POCs 1, 2, 3, 4. Casualty figures are yet to be updated.
Sporadic shooting is continuing. Crisis Management Team is in session."
So the UN knows the SPLA is shooting and attacking IDPs, burning and looting - but blames it on ethnic youth.
On February 11, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Dujarric, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: On South Sudan, yesterday I'd asked you about Maridi, and today I want to ask you about Mundri. Seems like, basically, there are offences in at least these two places, maybe more, by the SPLA against the SPLA-IO. And I'm just wondering, were you able to get any… did you hear anything back?
Spokesman: Again, you should also take a look at the website from the Joint Verification Mechanism. They are responsible for monitoring the implementation of the ceasefire. So, their updates, I understand, are going up daily. As soon as we get updates from the field, we share them with you.
But this website is rarely updated. What IS the UN's job?
On February 10, Inner City Press asked UN Spokesman Dujarric about Maridi, still no answer. Nor, from a week ago, about chemical weapons:
UN Peacekeeping under Herve Ladsous hits new lows daily. On February 3 at a briefing in Juba largely triggered by leaks, UNMISS was asked about the use of chemical weapons in Mundri.
From the transcript:
"Answer: Please refer to the JMEC Monitoring and Verification Teams – I cannot comment."
But Inner City Press is told by South Sudan sources that "fighting started early am the other morning around Katigiri and proceeded WNW towards Mundri. Chemical agents were clearly within SPLA ammunition (mortar rounds, recoil-less rifles), the medics know the issue will be squashed."
So Inner City Press in New York asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq about the deference in Juba to JMEC. From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: in South Sudan, there are now people saying that chemical weapons were used in a place called Mundri. And I wanted to know, I know that UNMISS (United Nations Mission in South Sudan) has started holding briefings there. There's a question by a, quote, unidentified journalist about the chemical weapons, and the answer was, “Simply refer to the JMAC (Joint Mission Analysis Centre) monitoring and verification teams.” And I wanted to know, how is it that the UN has a near-billion-dollar peacekeeping mission there but can't speak about an issue as important as chemical weapons? And what is the state of the UN's knowledge on the reported use of chemical weapons by the Government side in Mundri?
Deputy Spokesman Haq: Well, I mean, the basic point is that, at this stage, we don't have a confirmation of the use of chemical weapons. If we do, we would report that. It's a matter of serious concern. We have a peacekeeping mission on the ground. If it can confirm these reports, it will.
Inner City Press: So the answer there given only to refer to JMAC actually meant the UN is trying to confirm it, and if it can, it will.
Deputy Spokesman: If we have any solid information to confirm this, of course, we would follow up on that.
So what the UN said in Juba is belatedly cleaned up by UNHQ. But they also refuse to answer basic questions in NY, here.
Previously, after Inner City Press published, the UN did a partial read-out at its noon briefing. But it left questions unanswered. Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: the Yambio readout. I have one just sort of factual question. In that… can you confirm that the NGO compound that people have fled to is the A-D-R-A, or ADRA, compound? And is it that the UN base in Yambio isn't large enough or set up to be the type of protection for civilians’ facility that's done elsewhere in the country?
Deputy Spokesman: I wouldn't speculate on why civilians choose to go to one place or another. The… remember, they are the ones who are estimated to have sought protection at the NGO compound. I don't have the identification of that particular compound there.
Inner City Press: And it may… and this maybe… may or may not… I don't know if it's related, but there's a report in Radio Tamazuj that, in the UN base in Melut County in Upper Nile State, people don't have food. Maybe your… your… that… that… since the beginning of the year, none has been delivered, and so there seems to be a… I know it's difficult to take care of this number of people, but is there some problem with… with actually… is there some snafu or breakdown in the delivery of needed supplies to these camps?
Deputy Spokesman: I'm not aware of any particular problems at any individual compound that the UN Mission in South Sudan has. We try to provide food and assistance for all of those who are seeking shelter in the UN compounds, and I'm not aware of whether any population is underserved at that point.
Well, here it is. And here's the UN narrative Inner City Press published:
"at around 1040 am heavy fighting broke out in Yambio Town, details are unclear at this moment; according to earlier reports the SPLA Commandos at around 0530 am launched an operation against the Arrow Boys arm under the SSLM located in the Birisi area of Yambio township, the group in turn entered Yambio town and launched attack against the SPLA causing citizens to flee in panic. Once the heavy shooting started a number of civilians around (40) forced their way into the UNMISS camp as vehicles were being processed at the main gate. They have since moved to the ADRA compound.
The Rwanbatt have now taken control of the main entrance and the citizens whom entered the compound have now moved to the adjoining ADRA compound. Alert status “WHITE” has been declared for Yambio town until further notice.
Point of note; the Arrow Boys under the SSLM are currently in peace negotiations with the government."
Then, this UNMISS update:
"After shooting occurred in the early hours of the morning around 0530 hours; at 0830 hours the SPLA Commandos lunched operations against the Arrow Boys located in the areas of Birisi, Gangura, Yambio stadium, and the general areas of the Power Station and surrounding communities north east of UNMISS compound. A number of locals have taken refuge in the ADRA compound."
For all the UN bragging it's ADRA doing the sheltering. From further inside UNMISS, from Inner City Press' sources:
"The Commandos attacked the arrow boys with whom they signed the peace agreement early this morning, and they engaged in battle at Uze river, the commandos have proceeded to Birisi, now the arrow boys have broken the bridge keeping the commando stranded in Birisi. There was some random shooting in town and heading towards Uze again. One prominent civil servant has been shot dead and his driver. All the youth and communities in Yambio have raised arms in any form to fight.
"The clashes began around 5 o’clock Thursday morning, according to a source. Gunfire has continued on and off until now, sources said. Casualties were reported though there are no concrete figures yet.
"Yambio market is reportedly empty with civilians seeking shelter in their homes or near the United Nations base in the town, a source said. That source said some people are afraid to reach the UN base because shooting has been heard in the area of the base. The fighting took place mainly on the southern side of the town near the prison, according to sources. That area is near a frontline between the government-controlled Yambio town and Gangura Payam which is held by the South Sudan National Liberation Movement.
"The SSNLM is a militia led by ex-SPLA commanders from Western Equatoria. The SSNLM signed a preliminary peace agreement with the government in November, but the deal has yet to be finalized. Time for war."
So the UN knows this - but what do they say? Inner City Press obtained and on January 21 published this:
"On 19 January 2016 at about 21:22hrs in Juba, an UNMISS integrated patrol team was conducting operations when they were stopped by an SPLA vehicle containing eleven (11) armed soldiers. The SPLA soldiers cordoned the convoy at gunpoint denying them permission to continue the patrol. After ten minutes of negotiation another three (3) SPLA vehicles arrived at the scene with about 30 armed soldiers. After 30 minutes the SPLA agreed to allow the UN patrol to return to UN House compound in convoy escorted by six (6) SPLA vehicles with about sixty (60) armed SPLA soldiers. During the negotiation SPLA soldiers reportedly advised that UNMISS should stop conducting night patrols without SPLA clearance otherwise there will be a consequences."
So one side in South Sudan's civil war - in this case, Paul Malong's - orders the UN to stop patrolling at night, so it can do what it will. And the UN says nothing -- even when asked.
At the January 20 noon briefing, Inner City Press asked UN Deputy Spokesperson Farhan Haq, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: On South Sudan, I wanted to ask you to confirm that UNMISS (United Nations Mission in South Sudan) — yesterday in Juba an UNMISS patrol was stopped by several dozen SPLA (Sudan People’s Liberation Army) military people and I've seen a UN document that says that the SPLA told UNMISS to stop conducting night patrols without SPLA clearance; otherwise, there will be consequences. Given the debate on the protection of civilians, will you confirm that this took place and what is the UN's response to the SPLA's request?
Deputy Spokesman: No, I don't have any confirmation of that. If we have any details from UNMISS down the line we will share that but, no, I don't.
Inner City Press said, quite audibly, It's an UNMISS documents, but the UN did not transcribe it.
Back on January 11, Inner City Press asked Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Stephane Dujarric about the withheld situation reports, video here, transcript here.
Even if that were true, what about civilians?
Inner City Press published an internal UN Situation Report.
Back on December 9, the day after the UN belatedly confirmed ceasefire violations in South Sudan, only after Inner City Press published proof of the UN's knowledge and asked about it, then the UN Peacekeeping mission in the country shifted to either intentionally mis-reporting government actions in Yambio, or showing ineptitude in its response.
Again receiving leaked UNMISS Situation Reports, Inner City Press found this paragraph:
"On 7 December 2015 around 20:00 hrs, heavy exchange of gunshots occurred in the area of Hai Kuba, Ikpiro in Yambio in Western Equatoria State. The shooting lasted approximately twenty to thirty minutes. Reportedly, the shooting started when the local authorities attempted to arrest three (3) local youths suspects."
But Inner City Press' sources said the arrests were political, of former Yambio Commissioner Angelo Bakote and 3 young men. So on December 9 Inner City Press asked, of protection, transcript here. Back on December 8 Inner City Press asked, video here, transcript here.
For weeks amid fighting in South Sudan, Inner City Press has asked the UN why it refuses to report even what it knows. Even as Inner City Press has obtained, asked about and published emails showing the UN's knowledge of fighting, the UN spokesperson has repeated, Ask UNMISS.
Inner City Press asked why UN Peacekeeping, led by Herve Ladsous, does not report on fighting of which it is aware, and how “no UN interest is involved” is consistent with the UN's protection of civilians mandate or claims.
Dujarric wouldn't even attempt an answer to this policy question (which Ladsous refuses, like other Press questions, to answer). Dujarric repeated, as if it were an answer, that he has not seen the email.
So Inner City Press published it, here:
"From: Enoch Penney Laryea @un.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:15 AM
To: SANTUR Abdulahi; Simon Agnew [WFP]; Christoffel Du Toit; Safari Djumapili [OCHA]; Ruiz, Domingo (FAOSS); Carlyne Romulus [at UNMAS] Sorin GIFEI [WFP], Shane Yates [UNCHR]; Abdikadir Tulicha; Sylvain Denairies; UNMISS-FHQ-J2; John McCue (IOM); Gatluak Gatluak [and others at UNICEF], IMF
Subject: FW: Fighting in Busere - Western Bahr El Ghazal State
"Info received indicate that on 01 Dec 2015 at about 05:00 hours (LT) fighting erupted between SPLA and SPLA/IO at FIRKA and BUSERE (20 km South of Wau town). The fighting subsided around 10:00 hours. Military pickups and ambulances were observed transporting casualties along the airport road at high speed towards the military barracks. SPLA soldiers in the town were seen to be on high alert and on stand by mode.
"Comments: Reportedly the SPLA/IO group attacked SPLA at the affected area. When SPLA soldiers were sent to reinforce their colleagues they were also ambushed by the rebels leading to further casualties on the part of SPLA.
"Fighting is still ongoing as of 02 Dec 2015.
"No UN interest is involved at this time."
Again, why doesn't Ladsous' DPKO report this, and how is this “no UN interest is involved at this time” consistent with the UN's protection of civilians mandate or claims? We'll have more on this.
Inner City Press obtained the UN Security Situation Report for November 29, and finds in this internal report, exclusively published here:
"On 28 November 2015 at around 22:45 hrs, in Yambio town near Tourist Hotel along the main road, a UN Agency national staff member was reportedly involved in a traffic accident. UN Security responded to the scene of the incident and found another civilian vehicle turned over with the driver apparently dead inside the vehicle whilst the UN agency staff member sustained visible injuries in his head. The local police on the spot attempted to arrest the UN staff member involved in the accident, however,
after negotiation UN Security transported him to UN clinic for the medical treatment."
Can you say, impunity?
From September 29, 2015: An internal UN document leaked to Inner City Press, which is exclusively publishing it today, shows the high degree of dysfunction in the country, and in the UN.
The full document we have put online here. A quote:
In March 2014, a labelling error was discovered whilst transporting containers loaded with duty equipment for the UN Ghanaian peacekeepers in Unity State which brought strained relations to even a lower point. The error was exploited to galvanise hostility towards the UN in favour of the government by falsely presenting the UN as supplying weaponry to the opposition. It took elaborate interventions, investigations
and communications to clear the false impression that this created.
[ICP note: the same type of "labeling" or "clerical" error occure this months with weapons headed to MONUSCO. This is what UN Peacekeeping has become under Herve Ladous, who linked peacekeepers' rapes to "R&R, here.]
We'll have more on this.
