Tuesday, October 13, 2026

On Sale of Early Access to Truth Social Posts SDNY Judge Listens Amid Local Press Access Tests

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Oct 7 –  A lawsuit against selling early access to posts on Truth Social was heard on October 7 by U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge J. Paul Oetken. Inner City Press, pushing for media access and freedom in SDNY, EDNY and the Second Circuit, live tweeted here:

All rise!
Judge Oekten: We are here on motion for a preliminary injunction.
Plaintiffs' counsel: The President is charging $1.2 million a year. Plaintiffs are prejudiced by getting info later than others-
Judge Oetken: Truth API is only 50 miliseconds faster, no?

Plaintiffs' lawyer: You could use Google News Alerts, it might take 10 to 15 minutes or an hour. You could rely on a web scraper.
Judge Oetken: If I'm on X I can get the Truth Social posts from one of these bots, right?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: The API pushes it out

Plaintiffs' lawyer: You can only get the push things if you register with Truth Social. When they issued this API, they said they are going to crack down on scraping and maintaining archives violates their terms of service. That has an adverse impact on reporters

Judge Oetken: In terms of standing, does it apply not only to the delay, but also to the archive?
Plaintiffs' lawyer: Both. He will post things and take them down, only the APIs will know.
Judge Oetken: Wouldn't a scraper catch that?

[Note: There are more than ten plaintiffs' lawyers here, some of whom have been asked to help on appealing a September 3 order maintaining total sealing of case(s) in EDNY: - so far, no cigar. Inner City Press filed its own Notice of Appeal.

Plaintiffs' speaking lawyer is David A. Schulz, Yale Law School, Media Freedom & Info Access Clinic
In the docket, there are nine others...]

Judge Oetken: You're asking me to enjoin the President from posting on Truth Social as long as it uses a API.
Plaintiffs' lawyer: We are asking the court to make him follow the law.

Defense: If the President gave an interview to the New York Times and to read it I had to buy it, I couldn't sue saying he made me support the Times. Here, the equities require denial of this motion. A story coming out a bit later is not irreparable harm

Yale's Schulz: There is state action. They keep saying, think about where we are going if this is enjoined. But think about this: the world is totally open to corruption. That can't be the world we live in.
Judge: I reserve decision. You'll hear through ECF

The case is The Intercept Media, Inc. et al v. Trump et al., 1:26-cv-6867 (Oetken)

  


More on X for Subscribers here and Substack here