by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack
SDNY / SOUTH BRONX, Dec 2 – JPMorgan Chase's apparent enabling of sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as its "debanking," have been formally raised by Fair Finance Watch on November 24 to the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, opposing JPMC's applications including to open eight branches while closing in low and moderate income communities.
As the US bank regulators including the OCC under Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould move to limit public notice and participation in review of banks' applications for approvals, and purport to take seriously debanking and even banks' enabling of sex trafficking, this was a test.
On and December 2, the test was failed. The OCC wrote: " Dear Mr. Lee: The OCC has decided not to extend the public comment period. Your request for a public hearing did not appropriately describe the nature of issues or facts to be presented in such a hearing. Therefore, your request for a public hearing was denied."
But the OCC loudly claims to take debanking seriously, and tells at least one Senator it is taking the Epstein files and JPM Chase seriously. Not so much - no hearing. How can there be details, for example, while the files are not yet unsealed in the SDNY?
To Comptroller Gould and To Whom it May Concern at the OCC:
On behalf of Fair Finance Watch and in my personal capacity there are timely comments opposing JPMorgan Chase NA's branch applications list below, all of which have comment periods running through today November 24 or later. These comments are timely.
FFW has reviewed the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data of JPMorgan Chase NA and finds that it is deteriorating. For now, here are JPMC's nationwide numbers..
Also for the record on these and all other JPM Chase applications before the OCC, now and until at least the end of the year: JPM Chase has been exposed as having enabled sex traffickers Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including a current Congressional inquiry into Suspicious Activity Reports it should have filed by didn't.
Also, on the issue of debanking which the OCC (and Comptroller) have said they take so seriously, for the record on these and all other JPM Chase applications, consider: "Strike CEO Jack Mallers said JPMorgan Chase closed his bank accounts without a proper explanation last month, prompting concerns of debanking of crypto CEOs. "Last month, J.P. Morgan Chase threw me out of the bank," Mallers wrote on social media platform X on Sunday. "It was bizarre. My dad has been a private client there for 30+ years." When Mallers inquired why his accounts were closed, he said JPMorgan’s only response was: "We aren’t allowed to tell you.'"
This is a debanking complaint to the OCC, on pending applications - please immediately confirm receipt, and take action. Public hearings are hereby timely requested
Meanwhile, JPM Chase NA is moving to CLOSE branches in low and moderate income areas. As only one example - and hereby raised, along with the request(s) for public hearings, FFW opposes this proposed closing by JPM Chase in a moderate income census tract, over 80% "minority" --
South Holland 370 EAST 162ND STREET SOUTH HOLLAND IL 60473 Cook 141494A
Note: the law REQUIRES a hearing or process on LMI closures. But the OCC is now violating that law, on TD Bank as well... Watch this site.
FFW notes in the FDIC's pending proposal RIN 3064-AG10, which is mirrored by other OCC proposal to move away from even having applications, and shortening review times, while purportedly taken issues like the debanking herein raised seriously: "the FDIC has received a limited number of public comments in response to subpart C applications.... Therefore, the FDIC is proposing to eliminate the public notice and related public comment period from subpart C and to make conforming changes to subpart A of 12 CFR part 303 of the FDIC Rules."
See, American Banker, BankThink: "The FDIC is taking the 'community' out of CRA enforcement," by Matthew R. Lee, here.
Again, the only enforcement mechanism of CRA is its consideration on applications for deposit facilities: branches. A hearing is requested, timely opposition made.
Thank you for your attention, /s/ Matthew Lee, Esq. Executive Director Fair Finance Watch
Watch this site.
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.
Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
