by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack
SDNY COURTHOUSE, Nov 6 – Jane Doe 3 sued Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer Darren Indyke and accountant Richard Kahn for their role in Epstein's rape, sexual assault and sex trafficking.
On November 6, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Arun Subramanian held a public proceeding, and Inner City Press live tweeted it. From the thread:
Judge Subramanian: OK, we'll address the request to depose Doe's husband
Plaintiff's lawyer: Ms. Doe does not want her husband to know about this. So we are willing at trial to drop claims having to do with harm to the marriage. Jane Doe had not told anyone...
Judge: Defendants, what do you want to ask?
Defense counsel: He dated her before the Epstein time, before her return to [voluntarily redacted here - see Substack below the line here]. They got married in 2017, these alleged incidents took place in 2014.
Judge: Most litigation is public. You could stipulate to an adverse inference
Plaintiff's lawyer: You can imagine a victim so traumatized they don't tell their spouse. Here, the husband is not going to be told. We're trying. Defense lawyer: Their expert says she was vulnerable, just out of a relationship with her now husband, out of work
Defense lawyer: We got copies of her texts to her now-husband, he had moved to [voluntarily redacted here - see Substack below the line here]. Jane Doe 3 appeared to be having a fine time with Epstein, Broadway shows and the like.
Substack here
This case is Doe 3 v. Indyke, et al., 1:24-cv-1204 (Subramanian)
***
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.
Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
